Mini 1579: The Great Flavor Caper (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
That's a bit hasty.In post 5, evilpacman18 wrote:yay I can town read Slandaar for once
Either Mirhawk and Jake B are no fun town or scum looking for any reason to portray someone else as scum. Voting Bacde for "strongarming" the town is dumb.
Never mind I like this guy ^^ (and his vote)In post 23, Mirhawk wrote:And Chaoslord segways into manipulation in post two.
Unvote
Vote: Chaoslord
@Bacde - You mistake my intent. Whats really important here is that everyone understands they should listen to me instead of you.
But Josh B seems like no fun town, but still town nonetheless.Really? Nothing else you want to comment on?
In post 41, chaoslord54 wrote:
It was not my intent to manipulate. I just feel that he makes a good argument on why we should vote Slandeer but would like a little more evidence before I chose to vote on his side. If I came off manipulative then that was not was I intended at allAnd Chaoslord segways into manipulation in post two.
These posts are too apologetic which seems like newbscum to me. I think newbtown would be a little more adamant about his own position.In post 42, chaoslord54 wrote:
I probably am. Sorry this is my first game so I may have taken it a little too seriously as you mentionedLol i think you are taking page one a little too seriously
And as Bacde says below, it wasn't a good argument. And Bacde then provided the link, so if you thought it was a good argument, why aren't you voting for Slandaar?:In post 43, Bacde wrote:Lol good argument?
It was a weak argument at best, and imho it was a nonargument
Its silly anyone even cared about the link, because as i expected, it did not affect anything in this game
I think I agree with this post.In post 48, TheYankeeReaper wrote:
I find it curious that you've taken Bacde's D1 vote on Slandarr so seriously.In post 47, Josh_B wrote:
No. I pressured you for the existence of the link, not necessarily the content of the link. But the content of the link suggests that you are still a little sour about that game, and possibly trying to use it to invent scuminess when there isn't much to go on. Until, I feel like there's more likelyhood that what you say is true, or I feel like there isn't anything else to go on, I'll be looking else where and consider you on the block if he flips town.In post 45, Bacde wrote:
So basically, you pressured me for a link for no reason?In post 40, Josh_B wrote:I'll keep it in mind, but it wasn't his RVS that gave him away. There are some other patterns there too that are interesting.
UNVOTE: UNVOTE
It was apparent to me that he was fishing for reactions and the initial argument on Slandarr wouldn't make it past 2-3 pages. Your last sentence also bothers me "...and consider you on the block if he flips town." It seems to me you're giving yourself convenient options for a vote down the line if a Slandarr lynch were to occur.
Then why would you bring it up?In post 54, Josh_B wrote:
How would i be sour about that game? It was over a year ago and town wonIn post 51, Bacde wrote:]
VOTE: bacde[/quote]
Why would this make Bacde scum?
Yikes!In post 62, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:RVS a serious thing, seriously...
vote JoshB-add on TYR's outstanding post and this is no brainer.
This gives me bad vibes and it seems like you are just trying to rush a lynch. I don't think there's such a thing as a "no brainer" on page 3 unless it's a scumclaim.
Really like you.In post 65, Mirhawk wrote:@Knife
What about Yankees post makes "outstanding"? It's a good point but I'm not seeing as how anything in it is indicative of anything other then JB not thinking before he posts.
You're obviously getting a hard scum vibe from it, mind explaining why YOU think JB's scum or are you just trying to float with the current town attitude.
Not sure if JB is scum or bad town. Will need to see more but I would not be upset with a lynch on him at this point, but obviously we need more time in the day to allow other players (including myself) to post more.
Right now I'll vote for chaoslord because my scumread on him stands alone. I am leaning scum on knife too but my read will be influenced by JB's flip so I'd rather lynch JB over knife.
VOTE: chaoslord
P-edit:
@reinoe
Instead of getting pissy at bacde for calling you out on sidelining, would like to comment on Josh B or knife?- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
You do realize your bacde vote is terrible, right? Are you going to pretend to stubborn and pretend to believe in it or are you going to remove it?In post 72, reinoe wrote:
It's not sidelining if people are discussing the merits of RVS and the analysis thereof.In post 71, Elyse wrote:
P-edit:
@reinoe
Instead of getting pissy at bacde for calling you out on sidelining, would like to comment on Josh B or knife?
Josh B? His posts aren't great and it looks like sloppy scumhunting. At least he's making an effort.
Sharpest? His vote is only the third on josh so it's no big deal.
Unrelated: I like Mirhawks thought process so we're on the same page there. It considers several possibilities instead of just of just locking into conclusions. With that being said.
Also, if Josh B's posts aren't great and it looks like sloppy scumhunting, then why would you assume he is town? (This is in reference to saying newbscum would go after him)
Furthermore, if you think newbscum would go after Josh, then why isn't knife's vote on him troubling?
Ok...In post 73, chaoslord54 wrote:@Elyse
I think that me being apologetic is not being scummy. It's just that since this is my first game I feel a little guilty because I feel like I was being influenced a little too quickly at the beginning of the game and posting too quick before thinking out my posts and I just don't want to annoy people so I'm trying to think it out a little more before I comment. That's why I also mentioned that for now I want to hear more comments before I take a vote.
So why didn't you vote for Slandaar if you thought Bacde presented a strong argument and then later substantiated it?
If you can answer this question to my satisfaction I will switch my vote to reinoe, so make it good.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
I actually don't know what his response will be.In post 87, Mirhawk wrote:Chaoslord is cautious, that pretty much sums the whole thing up. Also, we both know what Chaoslords response will be and you'll have to unvote him afterwards anyways so why drag it out?
Haven't liked anything he's posted.In post 87, Mirhawk wrote: I agree that Reinoe's vote on bacade is weak, but why is he your back up vote?
@MirhawkIn post 88, chaoslord54 wrote:@Elyse
I first thought that Bacde had a strong argument only because his was the first in the game and since this is my first game I thought about it and realized that it sounded good but before I had a chance to vote I saw how many people starting commenting how it wasn't a strong argument and Bacde himself said that his argument was a weak one at best in post 43 and he also pointed out that I was taking the first page a little too serious so I decided that I shouldn't vote for Slandaar yet because people had already pointed out he was not actually being scum. That's why I'm taking my time before I vote now and why I did not choose to vote for Slandaar.
If you were expecting this answer ^^ from chaos then good job I guess but I wasn't expecting something like this. I didn't know what to expect. His answer is ehhh I don't see it as completely town like Bacde but I'll probably move my vote anyway.
UNVOTE:
Say what? My vote on chaoslord isn't a "red herring" and even if it was that doesn't make your vote good. The strength of your vote is shown when you change it in this very post.In post 92, reinoe wrote: 1. Your vote is on chaoslord and it's a red-herring vote, so you're the last person to talk about "bad votes".
I said you assumed he was town when you said newbscum would go after him. Unless you are insinuating newbscum would go after their own partner?In post 92, reinoe wrote: 2. How do you know I'm assuming he's town? You see the part where several people are waiting on responses? That's the proper thing to do. I don't think Josh's post are so bad that he deserves to be at L-3: which I personally feel is a tipping point on a d-1 lynch. You do see the part where I said "at least he's trying" right? That doesn't mean I think he's town or scum it just means he's putting in effort.
"Presumptious" (presumptuous) and pushy aren't scum behaviors and what kind of assumptions am I making? The only one I can think of is that you are townreading Josh because newbscum would go after him. I'm only assuming that because it doesn't make sense if you think he's scum.In post 92, reinoe wrote: 3. I didn't like bacde's response. You do realize people have differing opinions on things right? You're being really presumptious and pushy too. You're making all kinds of assumptions about other players.
This is just silly. An arbitrary tipping point and specific behaviors you decided do not make someone scummy or not scummy.In post 92, reinoe wrote: 4. Newbscum would put Josh at L-3, that previously mentioned tipping point. The fact that chaoslord wanted to wait before putting down a vote suggests that he's not newbscum.
So if someone put the fourth vote on him, you would care? Is that because it's past this "tipping point" you've created?In post 92, reinoe wrote: 5. And I don't care that Josh had three votes because he's "earned" those three votes. His posting isn't great but I don't think he deserves to have a developing wagon: at least not before he clarifies a few things.
VOTE: reinoe
Reinoe you never responded to this properly. This is why I am assuming you are townreading Josh. Your reluctance to state your read on him looks like you keeping your options open to vote him.In post 96, Bacde wrote:Because chaoslord not voting josh being a town move only makes sense if josh is town. If josh was scum, and chaos was scum, wouldnt not voting josh actually be more of a scum move?
I think I took a solid position when I said I would be voting reinoe.In post 111, Mirhawk wrote: The tone of Elyse's posts suggests a soft attack on you without taking a solid position. Her vote on chaoslord was ridiculous, especially seeing as how she told him exactly how to remove it. If feels to me like she was looking for a place to temporarily place her vote so she wouldn't have to commit to one of the serious wagons.
I never told chaoslord how to make him remove my vote and what are the "serious wagons"? Josh? Is that it?
I'm entirely uninterested with Slandaar v Titus and would be ok with lynching Josh or reinoe.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
I'm not going to respond to reinoe's entire wall because it boils down to this:
To say newbscum would go after JoshB and newbtown wouldn't is ok, but you have to take into consideration JoshB's alignment. If JoshB is scum, then what you are saying doesn't make sense. So you assumed JoshB was town in your statement, and that is scummy because it looks like you already know he is town.
I didn't give instructions on how chaoslord can get me to remove my vote on him. His response didn't make me remove my vote - your scumminess did. I'm not going to keep my vote on someone who I don't have as big a scumread on.
@Titus
People are certainly unintentionally manipulative. Bacde is my strongest townread because we are seeing a lot of the same things and he is literally obvtown to me. His motivations are protown and all of his reads make sense and have reasons behind them. I know you have a crush on reinoe but he's scum.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Saying "WE HAVE SYNERGY!!!1111!" isn't going to convince anyone of anything.
You can manipulate unintentionally. I'm not going to continue to argue this point because it's not really relevant.
Bacde's logic is sound. Please show me his invalid logic. Weak players can be scum, and pacman isn't typically a lurker AFAIK so I don't see the problem there either.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Saying that newbscum would vote josh insinuates josh is town. It doesn't matter if chaos is or isn't, but saying that in the first place insinuates it.In post 325, reinoe wrote: How do I assume josh B is town? Let me break it down in a rudimentary chart...
Chaoslord newbtown=doesn't vote josh at the time because he wants clarification
this has no bearing on whether josh is town or scum.
chaoslord newbscum=does vote josh at the time because it's opportunistic
this would make josh town.
I really don't know how to say it any other way. You're the only person who's insinuating anyone knows anyone's alignment.
Maybe because you would look opportunistic? Maybe because scum don't push every mislynch possible? Maybe because it contradicts your other posts?In post 325, reinoe wrote: p: edit. If I know josh is town, and I'm scum why aren't I now pushing for his mislynch!!! josh's responses have certainly been shaky enough for more votes. Good god, why don't you point those powers of perception at yourself. I'm not sure on josh and I'm certainly not going to put a vote on someone I'm not sure on.
I'm not sure josh is scum??? Never said that.In post 325, reinoe wrote: Oh wait, if you're sure both me and josh are scum why aren't you voting for josh. OMG OBSCUM TEAM IN SLANDAAR/ELYSE.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
I don't need to verify anything. I've played with town Pacman and he was a lot more active than this. Want a link?In post 340, Titus wrote:So you're assuming Bacde's logic, assuming that lurking is scummy by pacman because meta without verifying...you know that's sound...bullshit.
I said I understand you thinking he's town but it won't make me share your view.In post 340, Titus wrote: Yet you cannot accept me thinking Reinoe is town because of the fact I have a town pm and she's reacting like me therefore obvtown. Sounds like you have a built in bias towards accepting whatever Bacde says, or daychat but you realized Bacde posted no logic when I asked that question.
No I don't share daychat with bacde. What were you expecting me to say?In post 340, Titus wrote: I also take note that you side stepped the daychat question.
I would hope you show me rather than waving it around in my face.In post 346, Titus wrote:
And if I had evidence of lurker town Pacman?In post 337, Elyse wrote:After pacman was prodded, Bacde said the slot might be scum. In my experience, pacman doesn't lurk so I assumed he was calling him scum for that.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
@Titus
Here is a game where town pacman was very active:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=32269
Is it SOOO bizarre that I would agree that lurker pacman might be scum???? You are too stubborn to think that maybe, just maybe, people might have different opinions on players and they can be valid too!!!
Care to expound upon the daychat thing you were going on about? You said you needed my answer before you could elaborate, and I find that asinine since I would never reveal that as scum or mason or whatever has daychat.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Josh B
He lurked away pressure and came back barely responding to what was directed at him. It seems like he's trying to make people forget he was scummy rather than explain himself and I don't like it.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
You're not obvtown at all.In post 453, Titus wrote:
I've totally read. So has Reinoe and anyone else voting you.In post 452, Slandaar wrote:Whatever I can't be bothered arguing people clearly don't read, vig, all votes to Titus.
Of course you want me dead. It's an easy place to vote park since I'm not getting lynched cuz I'm obvtown. So you can just go throw yourself and you're team a pity party.
The only obvtown is Bacde.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Um no you were saying he might be a serial killer in the same exact post you unvoted him. I get you're not pushing a lynch anymore but you seemed to be holding out hope someone would continue to push him (hi Titus) and you could hop back on.In post 544, reinoe wrote:I have absolutely no intent to pressure a lynch on slandaar. As I said earlier my prolonged suspicion was due meta reasons.
Elyse is spreading paranoia and has lost all capacity to look at my posts objectively because she's confirmation biased to the max.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
When I said "explain yourself" I meant explaining the things people found you scummy for, not just answering questions.In post 555, Josh_B wrote:Did you ask me anything directly that I didn't answer, or were you going off of me not answering MirHawk and SKOT?- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
I quoted all of the posts I wanted to respond to and most were about JoshB, but now he's an un cc'd doc...oh well.
This post almost makes me reverse my read to a strong townread on chaoslord. His reasoning makes sense and is something I would expect from newbtown and I might be underestimating him, but using "we" when referring to the town seems like a townslip, kinda.In post 587, chaoslord54 wrote:Although I feel that Wake's actions are scummy as well, I really feel that Titus is the scummiest. She keeps aggresively pushing for Slandaar while seeming to completely ignore the legitimate reasons that everyone else is posting about why we shouldn't lynch him.
We do have a backbone we just don't see any logic in your arguments. Until you back off of Slandaar and start contributing in other ways I call scum.In post 578, Titus wrote:Shut up scum. If town has backbone, you'd be dead already.
Vote Titus
Yes I agree with this, but now that he's a doc it kindaaaa makes sense???In post 595, Titus wrote:In post 586, Josh_B wrote:Definitely? I think that Titus's play is town. I was in a game with him recently where he was scum, and his play is remarkably different,
But If anyone is definitely town, it's me. If anyone is definitely Scum it's Slandaar. If Titus is scum, you are definitely his scum partner.
This is why Pacman's reads are definitely crap.
I think I understand a few players, but TSO WTF? Sarcasm, I hope.
This can die now. Blantant survival vote. Voting a townread.In post 591, Josh_B wrote:Don't talk to me about alignment in question bacde, if I were scum, I would have pressed for your lynch, NOT try save your ass. Fuck it. You're the only one that I'd be uncomfortable lynching right now and SKOT, he is town.
VOTE: Titus
My apologies.
VOTE: JoshBYeah I wanted to kill SKOT if Josh flipped town because I still think they were bussing.
What is this? Is it a joke? Where did he admit to being not town aligned and why aren't you voting him?In post 619, Josh_B wrote:Slandaar is definetly scum. He admitted to not being town aligned. This read is crap.
Also saying "not town aligned" makes it seem like Josh thinks he's scum, but is scum himself, so he says "not town aligned" instead of just "scum".
I also hated that post where Josh felt the need to discredit every single one of pacman's reads.
I'm hesitant on buying it as well but I would hate myself if we lynched the doctor after he was cc'd.In post 636, T S O wrote:am I the only one not buying this?
Also, pacman, since when am I known to be wrong?
Bacde and TSO are my strongest townreads, followed by Slandaar. I have liked pacman's posts but I need more to feel comfortable. Titus is back and forth, because I don't think she's dumb enough to actually want to lynch Slandaar (meaning she's scum), but I also don't think she would advocate that as scum because she would obviously take heat for it if he flipped town.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Vigs are town.In post 645, Josh_B wrote:Elyse, slandaar is vig, That makes him Third Party in my book. Whether or not he can be leashed is still to be determined by his judgment. The fact that he said Vig and not Serial Killer, makes me feel like he can be leashed. Pacman calling him town is a leap of faith at best, and scummy.
@Titus
It's not actually a townslip, but it seemed town to me especially coming from a newer player. I dunno. He seemed put off and almost offended by saying the town has no backbone, and he wouldn't feel that way if he was scum.
And yeah I'm fencesitting on you because I don't know how to read you. Would you rather me make up a reason or flip a coin?- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
I will respond to what reinoe said later when I'm off my phone.
Titus, can you articulate why you're voting for me? You have been saying I am scum for quite a while now and have never voted me despite being possibly your longest scumread. I feel like you don't actually have legitimate reasons and that's why you've held off I'm voting for me. So I'd like you to put your money where your mouth is.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Please quote that. I said it's not good to convince anyone else. I accepted it as valid though.In post 800, Titus wrote:Yeah you pretty much did. We had a whole argument that you said that being in sync with someone logically is not a good reason to townread them.
You don't have an "everything else".In post 800, Titus wrote: The second reason, alone, would not suffice. However, toss it in with everything else and it is part of the reason why I scumread you.
You said gut, not meta. If you would like to bring up specific examples, go ahead.In post 800, Titus wrote: It's not a copout to say that meta seems consistent.
No, I went into this exposing you for not having the reasons you say you do.In post 800, Titus wrote: You went into this trying to "explain away" the reasons why I scumread you.
The only valid reason you have is gut. And your gut is wrong.In post 800, Titus wrote:The problem is my reasons are valid.
Untrue. Please show how I've been doing this. I've questioned your townread on reinoe, said continuing to lynch Slandaar is dumb, and questioned your scumread on me. You have had some posts I agree with, but I'm not the type of person that says "Good post Titus! I agree completely!" all the time, especially if I'm not townreading you.In post 800, Titus wrote:You've been trying to discredit everything that's come out of my mouth since I started townreading Reinoe.
You've given three reasons as to why I'm scum.In post 800, Titus wrote:Now that the noose is getting closer, you feel the need to attack me directly and pretty much state no reason is good.
One isn't true.
One isn't scummy.
One is gut.
It's not my fault you have nothing to back up what you're saying.
VOTE: Titus
I know you're going to call this OMGUS but I don't care. I've shown you are bullshitting your read on me and your primary lynch targets are either universally townread (Bacde) or a claimed PR (Slandaar) so you settle for me when you're not even scumreading me hard. That's not town Titus.
P-edit:
Slandaar, I agree that his tone has been off. I actually am enjoying him this game, but usually he's more aggressive. His whole issue with SKOT seemed almost tame and forced compared to his usual self.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Please tell me this isn't a real vote.In post 807, Mirhawk wrote: I could go for Elise, I've had my eye on her since that chaoslord thing at the beginning of the game. I don't think any of her subsequent behavior is particularly scummy, but I don't think she's looking for scum very hard either. That business between her and reinoe had the smell of trying to look busy while avoiding the other wagons.
Vote: Elyse
You haven't done much to interest me aside from your claim. I think your frustration makes you lean town but I don't have much else to say.In post 813, Wake1 wrote:
I've paid little attention to it. Elyse seems to be ignoring my presence, while my gut somewhat feels Titus is Scum. On the latter, I'll have to see more how she shifts to and fro in the wind.In post 812, Mirhawk wrote: Whats your take on the Elyse - Titus throwdown?- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Regardless of your opinion of me, Mirhawk's vote was shitty beyond belief. Get your tunnel vision glasses off and wake the fuck up.In post 819, reinoe wrote:Oh noees, Princess Elyse, who hasn't done shit all game, is faced with the reality that you can't sit in the corner and criticize other people all goddamn damn.
This is just plain false. I don't have much of a read on Wake because nothing he is posting gives me a read. That's what I mean by interests me. And if half of my posts are about Titus' townread on you (a gross misrep), then two thirds of yours are about me.In post 819, reinoe wrote:
Town try to understand players and get reads on them. Once again we have Elyse sitting on the sidelines trying not to draw attention. The only time she does anything to understand players is sort post 71. Then she spends nearly half her posts trying to challenge Titus on her town read on me. Which isn't actually scumhunting.In post 817, Elyse wrote: You haven't done much to interest me aside from your claim.
Hm?In post 819, reinoe wrote:
And yet when I have to get drunk just to address your posts you label me as scum. OBVIOUS DOUBLE STANDARD IS OBVIOUS. LYNCH HER PLEASE.In post 817, Elyse wrote:I think your frustration makes you lean town but I don't have much else to say.
I agree that reinoe is probably town now because of the whole font color escapade. The post Josh B quoted from the mod is very interesting. Why didn't you bring that up sooner? It makes me weary of lynching a PR atm.
I know reinoe and Titus are pushing hard for my lynch, but there is literally no case on me. I'm just asking you to actually think about why I am being voted for before you consider joining.
Right now, I want to lynch Titus. She's buddying the hell out of reinoe and pushing a shit lynch on me. Town Titus would stick to her guns and continue to push for her number one lynch.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Titus I just have one convo with you that isn't riddled with jabs and insults? (I mean that from both ends)
Your "case" on me comes down to three things:
1. Not accepting your townread on reinoe.
I DID accept this, so it's irrelevant.
2. Disagreeing with you about almost everyone.
This isn't scummy.
3. Your gut/meta
I can't dispute that but when I get on my laptop I'll show you a town game that reminds of this game. I was playing poorly and AtE'd like hell and yeah...- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
@TitusIn post 324, Elyse wrote:Saying "WE HAVE SYNERGY!!!1111!" isn't going to convince anyone of anything.In post 411, Elyse wrote:
I said I understand you thinking he's town but it won't make me share your view.In post 340, Titus wrote: Yet you cannot accept me thinking Reinoe is town because of the fact I have a town pm and she's reacting like me therefore obvtown. Sounds like you have a built in bias towards accepting whatever Bacde says, or daychat but you realized Bacde posted no logic when I asked that question.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
As far as my meta, I rarely AtE as scum and don't do it as town much either. Titus' example showed me AtE'ing but it was because I fakeclaimed mason and had to pretend to be sorry for my actions when I was actually scum. So it's fake AtE and Titus using that as evidence shows how weak her case is. And Josh B stop confbiasing. I'm not scum and you're not cool for thinking I am.
I'm fine with showing you all of my meta. Just look at my topics and go through. Here is the game I feel is most like this one if anyone is interested:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=33249
@Mirhawk
I said reinoe was town for the font color thing.
@pacman
I thought that at first, but I think she's too dangerous for scum to keep alive if she's the real cop so it will solve itself eventually, which is why I'm starting to question if lynching her is the best move.
I originally had Mirhawk as a townread but it has since pretty much reversed itself. His vote on me is terrible. "I guess I could go for Elyse. After her initial thing with chaoslord she really hasn't done anything scummy." Wtf? He also accuses me of not trying to find scum and then says I should stop questioning reinoe. I don't get it. He's just fabricating reasons and is content with voting for a popular wagon he doesn't care about.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mirhawk- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Titus, no one gives town cases on anyone. Maybe it's the vibe they get (like your townread on reinoe!!) or something like that. No one can provide a town case for TYR, so should we lynch him? Your reasoning is flawed. I proved your point wrong about me not accepting your townread on reinoe and you just ignored me and now want to string me up because no one is give you a play-by-play as to why I'm town. Get over yourself. You're either wrong or scum. Prove to everyone you're just wrong.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
This is FUCKING BULLSHIT. When has that EVER been a reason to lynch someone? Can you just not accept that people have a townread on me? That you might be wrong? You keep looking for reasons as to why I'm town when you SHOULD be looking for ones as to why I'm scum since, you know, I'M BEING LYNCHED FOR NO REASON.In post 1174, Titus wrote:Mirhawk, that is generally what I have been seeing as well. We're getting a lot of lynch anyone but Elyse but no solid reasons why she's town.
What is this?Josh_B wrote:A quick recap of the game:
Beginning: A Lot of lurkers, and town bickering with one another.
Middle: Town agrees to lynch Elyse. Lurkers suddenly become active, and start tunneling on Titus.
Now: Tunneling on Titus continues.
Results: Elyse Lynch becomes a high information D1 lynch. Unfortunately, bickering continues. If you are town, get on this wagon and stop BSing.
Your recap is wrong but it would point to a TITUS lynch being most informative. Why are you so set on lynching me? You don't have a case on me or anything. Your insistence on my lynch is off-putting.
This is once again bullshit. There is enough support to run up Titus. I don't know if you've realized this, but MOST PEOPLE don't think I'm scum. It's not a forgone conclusion that I'll be lynched today, so stop trying to make it that way.Mirhawk wrote:There's a lot of hemming and hawing going on here when it should be fairly apparent whats actually going to happen.
There's not enough support to run Titus up today, so that's not happening. So unless we want to lynch a lurker, (which by the way will have to be yankee, which will give us no information) we more or less have to go for Elyse. Unless of course anyone thinks we should go for a claimed PR instead, which also isn't happening because of a lack of agreement on not only which of them is the scummiest, but whether or not it would better to wait to see if the PR situation resolves itself overnight anyways.
Also, I find TSO's continued insistence that we should pick someone else because we have "lots" of time scummy seeing as how he doesn't seem inclined to say why Elyse is a bad lynch or who we should lynch instead (aside from suggesting a lurker which is a frankly unhelpful statement).
Since a Mirhawk lynch isn't happening,
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Titus
Her insistence that Slandaar could be scum while simultaneously screaming for my lynch just reeks of chaining lynches, especially because Slandaar is right in that it would be dumb to claim vig as scum.
Josh and SKOT, I hope you can see that Titus is the better lynch. Mirhawk, there is enough support for a Titus lynch so hop on if you want.- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
- Elyse
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Elyse
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Do you think I'm scum with Slandaar/TSO/Wake/pacman? People disagreeing with you does not make them scum. There can't be 5 scum in this game and I don't think that if I was scum, both of my buddies would come to bat for me.In post 1220, Titus wrote:How many times do y'all gotta bullshit to save Elyse? It's all chainsaw to save her. I don't mind getting lynched if it is what I have to do, but it will be mutually assured destruction.
Boonskiies, can you tell me why the fuck you think Elyse is town?
What you are pushing is ridiculous and I'm happy the person who came in with fresh eyes sees it that way.
Lastly
What the fuck is thisTitus wrote:
Oh one more thing, lynch me and you'll die. (A) It will be obvious what liesIn post 1218, Wake1 wrote:I cannot in good faith vote Elyse today.
Twice now Titus has lied about what's up on my end, and that's twice too many.
I never defended Elyse, which Titus claimed, and Elyse never even hinted for my lynch, either. Throughout the game Elyse has been neutral about my alignment, while not pressing for my death—I know you know this.youhave told. - Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse
- Elyse