Micro 376: Chosen Mafia - Game Over = Perfect Town Win
Forum rules
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
If I were scum, I would be adamant about NOT Vetoing TSO and hope that he was "chosen". I like to bicker with him and I would want press for his lynch. If I were anyone else, I would also not Veto Josh B. He usually gets lynched regardless of alignment.
ZZZX is semi-lynchable D1 target, and possibly a D2 or D3 target. I would agree to veto him on the grounds that it guaranteed he was NKable just in case things weren't going well for me and my partner.
But ultimately I would suggest to Veto one of the hydras. Two heads are better than one, unless they're against me. Of the two hydra's I'd veto AngryPidgeon over Anti-hero and hope that anti-hero wasn't chosen. I've never played with either of them before(that I know of), but I've seen their names around the site enough to question myself about being able match wits with them.
Everyone else in the game is null.
A-West-F-ie.
This totally makes no sense. But for the hell of it, Who would you veto?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Guilty Gunsmith wrote:awestfie is so town I can't fathom leaving this vote here even a second longer.
Anyone who disagrees is wrong, flatly.
UNVOTE: ; VOTE: JOSH
Lame.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
That's possible. Only impossible, having been in two games together, where I was scum in both. I suppose neither my style nor interests have changed. Perhaps I'm better at being scummy in my town games, than I am at being scummy in my scum games.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
Flubbernugget. I like it that you seem to understand the point that I'm trying to make. TSO correctly read me as scum in two games. Of all the people who have first hand knowledge of my scum game, TSO probably has the most. So it's really a question to TSO. That I'll rephrase as such "So TSO, you correctly read me as scum in two previous games, are you going to correctly read me as town in this game?"- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ T S O wrote:In post 215, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
Whoa, what is going on here? Since when was I defending JB?
Since you came in and attacked me straight after I had began to attack him.
Clearly, if you felt JB was a good vote, you would not have done this. You don't have an opinion on JB, or on anyone, but you're still trying to tell me it was a bad vote. That's absolutely disgusting logic.
TSO, From my POV, I really thought you just blindly sheeped GG. BBT's post looks more like he was calling you out on that. You just latched on to those reads like they were gospel and voted. I thought this when you posted it, but I wanted to see BBT's reaction first before I posted my thoughts about it.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Townies: GG, Lying Cat, AntiHeart, Swifty
Scummies: TSO, Josh
Meh: ZZZX, Flubber, BBT.
This is awful. TSO is the only one with you who is still on my wagon. Get your shit together Hydra, while I go back and show your last reads list. And remind you that you initially wanted to policy lynch TSO.
What happened that turned Zzzx and Flubber and BBT to Meh?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Its not really that hard to figure out. EtL made 206 and I made 249. If you want to argue that hydra dissonance is scummy, be my guest, but you don't seem to be doing that. I'm not sure how you missed and/or didn't consider that these opinions are coming from 2 different people and are not likely to be 100% in line.
Hence the reason, in my last post that you half responded to, I said get your shit together. Being the case that you only half responded. I felt the need to point out specifically where I was having trouble with your group play.
If TSO flips chosen townie, I will continue to be glad that a toxic player is out of the game. Im going to know because Chosen townies flip as chosen townies .[/quote]
I reread the setup. OK. But, I see that you pinged other player's scumdar with your posts too. I also want to go back and consider A-WEST. Nearly everyone admits that a hydra is the most likely to get veto'd. But for her to say...
..to encourage everyone to vote a safe lynch, can possibly mean that one of the hydras could be chosen. As far as toxic players go, I'd like to see a-west nixed. What do you think about that?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ awestfie wrote:Yeah, you didn't read my posts; that's cool. I, even said, even if they are safer lynches doesn't mean we're just gonna go out of our way to lynch them; I said if we end up in situation where we think two people are scum and one is most likely to be veto'ed and one isn't; then we should lynch the one who's most likely to be veto'ed, that's all. If you honestly think this is a scum-tell, then why don't you think what ZZZX did is one too? He pretty much did the same thing as I, except that he asked everyone to out who they would've veto'ed.
I don't even know why I'm still explaining something like this when I've done it two or three times already. You've made no effort to read my later posts about this and I don't know why I'm even making any effort responding to this.
It can't be changed that you suggested it. I don't care how hard you try to explain it away. It's true ZZZX also asked for other players to say who they would veto. But he never made the suggestion to lynch from that poole, and he also gave his list first. Scum on the other hand would be more likely to wait for a consensus before actually saying who they would veto, and probably not give much detail about why. Do you see any players that have done that?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
And so it begins. Toxicity at it's worst.
TSO, if you are town, we are going to have to work together this game. How do you want to play that?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
YeahIdo. But I also don't think BBT addressed it justly. Even after the convo that you and he had, I'm still not satisfied with the outcome. Even after a re-read, 51 is still the scummiest post to happen all game.
Beyond that I'm really not seeing your defense on this. I'm challenging GG to identify what constitutes justification to nix a toxic player who he thinks is town to the point that he's considering him to be a chosen. You really aren't even involved in this.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
Well that's going to suck. Because I have your scum list as BBT, GG, Awest, zzzx, and Myself. Since it is impossible for all of us to be scum at the same time, I'm going to assume that we're all town and that you haven't bussed if you are scum. I'm going to take a mouthful of crow, and...
UNVOTE:
I would also like some explanation for this
What would make you chosen if Flubber is scum?
On the other hand, there does seem to be a lot of pressure on your slot, which is the reason I've been town reading you despite you being misguided.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:
Do I have to beg Josh for an explanation of his wagon? Do you think he's to stupid to realize if wants to be town read by me, he can try to clarify things for me?
A WAGON! What Wagon? Where?
I drew a picture of a wagon, no one one it, no one there to drive it, going nowhere. Lame and worthless.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:As of right now, lynch you,[/qutoe]
seems kind of random,
and let GG keep bickering with people one at a time.
seem kind of counter productive
Someone is gonna slip somewhere.
seems kind of hopeful
Lying Cat what do you think is the best plan?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:You also scum read awestfie for asking a question the same way you are asking one right now.
Not true. My problem with awest is the call to lynch people based on an arbitrary game mechanic on her first post. Meaning that she's thinking of the game in terms of lynching by WIFOM, and doesn't have the mind set of scum hunting. It's clever, because only the scum actually know who was vetoed and the scum have a clear shot at NKing whoever they vetoed. And town won't know who was actually vetoed until endgame.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 303, Josh_B wrote:
TSO, if you are town, we are going to have to work together this game. How do you want to play that?
In post 467, Josh_B wrote:
Flubbernugget, what do you think is our best course of action right now?
In post 473, Josh_B wrote:
Lying Cat what do you think is the best plan?
Why do you keep doing this?
Asking people questions? TSO and GG have done a pretty good job of making sure that I can't start any wagons. Which is fine, I'll just try to generate productive content.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:↑ Josh_B wrote:↑ Flubbernugget wrote:You also scum read awestfie for asking a question the same way you are asking one right now.
Not true. My problem with awest is the call to lynch people based on an arbitrary game mechanic on her first post. Meaning that she's thinking of the game in terms of lynching by WIFOM, and doesn't have the mind set of scum hunting. It's clever, because only the scum actually know who was vetoed and the scum have a clear shot at NKing whoever they vetoed. And town won't know who was actually vetoed until endgame.
Nope. That's not what happened. Awestfie already said this but I'm backing her up for what it's worth.
Her idea really assumes the town is going to be waffle-y, so nobody is really going after a full pursuit of it. But for an ice breaker it wasn't that big a deal. No need to dwell on it. Now I get what she was saying about you taking too long to address her answers.
I'll note your dissatisfaction, your assumption of assumptions, your attempt to ovrcome town wafflery, and your dismisiveness of scummy behaviours,
I'm also going to vote you.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
I went over the interactions between her and BBT. I still don't like it. Perhaps I'll come around in time, but until then...- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:The plan awestfie laid out will not work in any manner if the town has strong, confident reads, because at that point nobody would be too "iffy" toconsider the veto pool as part of a lynch.If a waffling read isn't the opposite of a confident read, my terminology was wrong. But I think I might be easier to see this way that I have made deductions and not assumptions.
This is the problem. It isn't considering scum as the possible lynch, it's considering the "veto pool" which is town. Saying you want to lynch someone just because they are likely to be vetoed as opposed to trying to lynch someone that might be scum, is scummy.
Considering it first, as opposed to a last resort is scummy.
An open door policy lynch before scum hunting is scummy.
He explanation was "When considering a town vs town lynch, it's better to lynch a person who was more likely to be vetoed"
and my problem with that is.. "this person considering a town v town lynch right out of the gate."- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
A) What do you mean by signs? This exact moment?
B) How is this relevant? Is it supposed to prove something?
C) NO. I got this role PM that says I may or may not be chosen, and that I have a weapon. I was hoping that it was nunchuku but it wasn't- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
I don't like this growing wagon on FN. Lynching the most inexperienced player; smells like scum looking for an easy lynch so they can get to their kill.
I don't. As of right now, including myself, 5 people are calling flubber scum. What's your read on Heartless? I think they are town.
It's more than asking people questions though isn't it. It looks like buddying, you're asking people for direction instead of trying to figure the game out for yourself. Three separate people as well, so it's not like you even care who it is, just so long as someone is helping you.[/quote]
I don't know. But you are right. Usually I'm very aggressive. I'm more unsure of people this game than I normally am. Maybe it's just the setup that's keeping me from being as whimiscal as I normally am.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Guilty Gunsmith wrote:
This is ..... really terrible? No one is stopping you from scumhunting, you just prefer to spend your time not being townie, probably because you aren't.
You're terrible. I am scum hunting anyways. I'm just getting off to a slow start. I usually prefer spending my time OMGUSing and Flashwagonging. Unfortunately, that's been anti-town too. So, until I figure what to do that's town, I'm going to keep doing whatever I feel like at the moment.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
some habits die hard. But seriously, Myvote like yours is on flubber, either you don't think he's scum and have your vote on him anyways, or you do think he's scum and that I'm scum with him.
Because I think that you are trying to say that my vote on flubber is flashwagoning.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Lying Cat wrote:ing over nothing, when in fact ETL and TSO had clearly suffered a miscommunication and then come to an understanding. AP is legendary for his waffles, so the abrupt 180 doesn't really bug me, but 'inane shit' is something I've seen AP regard as a towntell before and TSO was hardly obstructing discussion.
I haven't really decided where I fall on the TSO/GG line yet, but I like your evaluation. I am hard pressed to believe an apology could come from TSO !evar! Which is mostly why I'm not sure about that situation, possibly one or the other is scum. Not unlike awest to be so negative about this post.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ awestfie wrote:↑ awestfie wrote:There's two of you, you had three days to think all of this through and this is all that you guys had to say, really? Really not liking this post at all. Why are you guys playing so lazily? I wouldn't normally think that, being lazy is a scum-tell. What's bothering me is that there's two people posting on that account and it doesn't seem like it, at all. I understand that one of you was busy with "baby sitting," but why wasn't the other head posting during that time?
I've played in a hydra before and you don't just wait for the other head to give you their reads to post; you post when you want to post and keep your partner updated with your reads and they'll do the same. So, what's the problem here? I'm actually seeing this from GG/Antihero, but not from you two, so.
I forgot to paragraph break, so here's an "easier" version to read.
O I C. you think Sthar and Jingle aren't doing a good job at being a hydra. What do you think about the content of the post? Do you have anything to say about the content?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
This read is going to disappoint you. Which means there is at least one scum in your town pile. If you were able to know that I was for sure town, who would actually be scum?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Josh was a scum-read for his buddying and looking for direction in the game. I'm sure you already knew this though; but given it doesn't fit into your case, it can be disregarded right?
I have been waiting for you to say this for a while.
I'm going to take your hesitation as a town tell. And I'm going to take anti calling you out on it as a town tell too.
Mostly, I haven't been buddying- well I admit that I did go pretty hard on TSO. And I guess this post is probably buddying. But that's it.
Maybe I haven't been playing as hard as I should be.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
@Heartless, I'm actually fine with my vote. It's these two votes that I'm concerned about...
Lying Cat - [2] - Guilty Gunsmith, awestfie
BlueBloodedToffee - [2] - Heartless, T S O
Especialy considering that there are so many Vote Kangaroos.
Guilty Gunsmith, you are probably the chief. It took me a while to get it, but I think I'm going to jump off of any wagon that grows past two. At least for D1, and probably for D2. We can't no lynch, but I can un-voat.
I thought I got the game at first, but then I was like ok, I guess, I have to vote someone, and now I'm like, no I really don't. As long as the vote count stays low, I'm good. 3 votes are probably enough to lynch. Unless it's scum, and then they get a 2 vote boost on whoever they want. I probably won't be upvoting anyone past the highest number of votes, and I'm probably going to stay vote parked for the rest of the phase, unless it becomes more obvious that someone is scum.
@mod How will you decide plurality if two people have the same number of votes? If you send it to Random.org, Will players be included who have had the most total votes against them, the highest number of votes at thread closing, or the highest number of votes gained? [/bold]- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Heartless wrote:T S O wrote:tth who are you scumreading?
I'm currently scumreading Flubbernugget and Josh_B.
The major problem I'm encountering is ZZZX, because I'm also scumreading him. His ISO is pretty scant, but the fact that he manages to post to express intent to put someone at L-1 is very unsettling. It's not that he did it, it's the way he did it. He didn'tactuallyput Flubbernugget at L-1, he just said heplannedon doing it and then glibly left it at "discuss". I feel like it's a cheap maneuver to appear town.
We need to get more from ZZZX and I also need to talk to Anti about it. He probably has something to say.
-TTH
I'm not as concerned about ZZZX's intent post as I probably ought to be. But with the set up in mind, I find it more town than not. You and Guilty both jumped to other interests fairly quickly afterwords.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
No. Is this the same question as, Do you need to have a particular person lynched in order for you to win?
↑ Guilty Gunsmith wrote:oh boy.
yeah boi!- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Wickedestjr wrote:Heartless wrote:@mod How will you decide plurality if two people have the same number of votes? If you send it to Random.org, Will players be included who have had the most total votes against them, the highest number of votes at thread closing, or the highest number of votes gained? [/bold]
The outcome is solely based on number of votes at thread closing. In general, the player listed at the top of the vote count would be lynched when deadline hit. For example;
Current Vote Count wrote:Lying Cat - [2] - Guilty Gunsmith, awestfie
BlueBloodedToffee - [2] - Heartless, T S O
Flubbernugget - [1] - Josh_B
T S O - [1] - ZZZX
Guilty Gunsmith - [1] - Lying Cat
Heartless - [1] - BlueBloodedToffee
awestfie - [1] - Flubbernugget
So if deadline hit right now, then Lying Cat would be lynched. Lying Cat is listed higher on the vote count because they received two votes before BlueBloodedToffee received two votes.
There is one exception to this time tiebreaker. If I voted BlueBloodedTofee (I'm not a player in this game, but just an example) then BlueBloodedToffee would be listed highest because they would have more votes than anyone else. If I unvoted, then BlueBloodedToffee would still be listed at the top because he would still be tied for most number of votes and nobody else would have re-passed him. Even though Lying Cat received two votes first, I would still list BlueBloodedToffee as highest in that scenario.
That would be my thought process if there was a tie vote at deadline. I don't know of any other simpler method. Given that this town will always have an odd number of members during the day, hopefully this never becomes relevant.
Does this answer your question?
Yes, thankyou.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
There are two votes on it, I'd hardly call it a wagon. I particularly don't care for the repeated promises to catch up, then the aversion to catching up based on other people posting, then the immediate attack ad hom on the person she claimed to be waiting on, without addressing any of the points that were made followed by an "I'm done with this game" type statement.
However, if you are willing to defend her over that, I'm thinking that I may have sided on the wrong side of that argument.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
Active lurking, Attacking the Game, Attacking Players without considering content. These are legitimately scummy things.
So, you may ask me, why did I wait so long before casting a vote on her. And I'll answer:
It bothers me that she was called town so early in the game. Based on those claims, I'm not sure if she was being defended by scum partner or scum buddying. I've been very hesitant to decide which one. 31 pages into the game, this is where I've wanted my vote all along. With the further evidence presented, I'm comfortable being on this cart.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
Dubai is a really nice place. Don't waste your time playing this game if you're there. See the sites. We'll still be wasting our lives playing this game when you get back.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:Josh or Awestfie lynch right now.
It's like we're on the same page only we're not.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
.. had a chance to vote a scum read,
...called the wagon too fast.
.... still scum reading the said person.
My face...
Also using someone else's scum reads- sheeping and being lazy.
I could move my vote to BBT, but I'm so hung up on Awest. That attack on lying cat was super scummy. The hesitancy from others to call it scummy has got me twisted. The only town case I have for Awest, is scum defending town?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Ya BBT isn't the worst vote in the world, but I think Josh is just scum.
In this game or at life?- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
although I was on Awest's case yesterday, the Flubber flip give me a solid reason to think that she is town. I am going to vote Lying Cat. as my prefered lynch of the day. I may or may not consider others as a possibility.
VOTE: Lying Cat
anti- you have dirty socks and your breath stinks when you don't brush your teeth.- Josh_B
-
Josh_B Mafia Scum
- Josh_B
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: April 1, 2014
- Contact:
↑ BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Willing to lynch Josh or ZZZX today.
Your recent posts are awful ZZZX. Voting someone if they scum-read you and then retracting that vote if they town-read you...wtf?
Willing to lynch BBT or Lying Cat today.
BBT, that double soft hammer, has me thinking "bus". If you considered how much Flubber wanted to lynch me, I think you would reconsider your targets for today. And this...
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:BBT just end it ffs.
Lying Cat- I think I took the wrong side of the awest argument. Flubber flipping scum with his last vote on awest made me rethink why you didn't scum read her yourself for that crazy attack that she pulled on you. - Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B
- Josh_B