Mini 1602: Game Over
Forum rules
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
↑ phokdapolees wrote:↑ tman2nd wrote:↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.
No it wasn't lol- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
↑ phokdapolees wrote:
In any case, Tammy's reaction to it was very scummy, regardless of whether the vote was serious or not.↑ Flames682 wrote:↑ phokdapolees wrote:↑ tman2nd wrote:↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.
No it wasn't lol
How was it scummy? We were both still joking.
I love when people give serious votes but give no reasoning at all.- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
↑ phokdapolees wrote:Regardless of me being hilariously wrong about the srsness of flames' vote, my point still stands about Tammy trying to play it off.
It was obvious that she was still joking at that point, as was I. If you're seriously stubborn about a joke, you're probably scum trying to ML town.
VOTE: phokdapolees- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
↑ implosion wrote:
Yep.
From the opening post of the last game I played with Tammy (she was town):
Did anyone hear that sigh of relief earlier this afternoon? Yeah, that was me when I saw I was town. Empire's a terrible troll.
↑ implosion wrote:Anywho, the more in-depth explanation (note that this will inevitably sound like reaching, because it is): the post (37) sounds overdramatic, i.e. it sounds like it's trying to make active attempts to look a certain way. This is particularly notable since rack's posting style overall seems fairly concise. The "but... but......" and "so confused" both contribute nothing to the actual content of the post, while contributing to the tone.
I think he's just trying to be playful.- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
↑ phokdapolees wrote:Eh, still don't feel too good about Tammy, but rack's posting has been way worse. The "confusion" in the beginning then the vote and immediate unvote seems like scum.
VOTE: rack
Trying to vote someone else to try to get votes off of you huh?- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
↑ phokdapolees wrote:
You mean all 2 of them?↑ Flames682 wrote:↑ phokdapolees wrote:Eh, still don't feel too good about Tammy, but rack's posting has been way worse. The "confusion" in the beginning then the vote and immediate unvote seems like scum.
VOTE: rack
Trying to vote someone else to try to get votes off of you huh?
What? That made no sense- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
↑ AGar wrote:↑ Flames682 wrote:↑ phokdapolees wrote:Regardless of me being hilariously wrong about the srsness of flames' vote, my point still stands about Tammy trying to play it off.
It was obvious that she was still joking at that point, as was I. If you're seriously stubborn about a joke, you're probably scum trying to ML town.
VOTE: phokdapolees
Serious note: I don't like the projection at the end of this post. Some people don't have senses of humor, and get stubborn about jokes. Some people get super serious about games. Trying to project Phok as scum trying to very specifically "ML town" screams as really stretching to force that case to stick.
That's true, but I would assume that he would know it's a joke because it was obvious enough especially with the gif at the end. If you vote someone off of a vote, you're probably scum.
↑ Elias_the_thief wrote:Hey rack. Answer the question. Please and thank you with a cherry on top.
He just answered the question.
For rack, I think the primary purpose of saying that Tammy was scum was to get an actual reaction. If he says he's played with Tammy before, he probably has and he's a confirmed alt as well.- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
Okay, I was focused on phok, but now I see what people are saying about rack being scum. Last night I was tired so I wasn't really thinking. Today, looking at rack's ISO, it's not too impressive.
Still think that he was being playful here, but that's not the reason I think he's scum.
Seems like a good reason to vote Tammy at first, but then can't site it and gives shitty reasoning on why he can't cite it.
↑ rack wrote:Okay, time to come clean.
I have played with Tammy before (no, not telling you who I am).
I do know this is her towniness; I primarily wanted to gauge reactions from other players to my vague accusations. (And, in my mind, it worked. Pretty well, actually.)
implosion is town, I am pretty sure.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: malakittens
Backing off to seem town from the shitty reasoning in his last post.
This statement even worse than phok voting Tammy for a joke.
↑ rack wrote:↑ phokdapolees wrote:Eh, still don't feel too good about Tammy, but rack's posting has been way worse. The "confusion" in the beginning then the vote and immediate unvote seems like scum.
VOTE: rack
Oh, please.
VOTE: phokda
That's a nice OMGUS for legit reasoning.
Gives no reasons as to why he thinks implosion is town.
VOTE: Rack- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
↑ AGar wrote:↑ phokdapolees wrote:This is a good point, but why would he defend him against the lynch so early in the game? There would be plenty of time to defend him against the lynch to earn towncred later on, not to mention the fact that this rack wagon could dissolve at any point.
I literally said why in the very post you quoted.
Rack apparently has no intention of being of use here. That's dumb.
Aneninen seems up the same boat.
I don't like the Rack case primarily because he's an alt, and alts are generally an awkward account to interact with because they often don't want to give off any possible tells as to who their main is. The case to me reads as "Rack is acting generally strange and awkward," and not something like "Rack did something super scummy."
Remember how I speculated Flames was defending Rack to get towncred? Look at this 180. If that's a bus, that's the worst bus in the history of busses. Like "Holy shit my partner is getting lynched, I must vote now!"
So you say you don't like the case on rack, but then say that I'm bussing him?Stop using gut as a reason to state someone is scum. Now.
If you want my meta click my wiki for a list of all my games. Warning: my meta changes.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Flames682