Corpse Party Mafia [WRONG END]

[Taly]

Mod

, will our darkness level be stated at the end of a day phase?

Also, I do agree that we don't have RVS because it could just pointlessly hurt our life. But, are we going to do RQS? Or something else to get ideas on someone?

We should at least go off of some initiative here.

[Taly]

A quick game under these circumstances doesn't bother me. The more darkness everyone has the more it plays into scums wincon because more likely townies will die off, none of us knows how much scum can affect our darkness, or how many peoples darkness they could affect. So we're going to have to have a set timeline. I'd suggest 3 to 7 days so we won't be on a marker for us getting another darkness point... But 4 and 6 also seem like a reasonable time.

I like the idea of Pseudovoting, you're going to be the pseudovote counter in this department Ze lol...

32

Thor/Loki, why would you want to kill off notscience?

[Taly]

37

Omg, I see all of these kitties now. <3

[Taly]

Psuedovote: Taly
Why did you mention how many people scum could affect?

@Zel loving mafSilver. Why did you send me to mafTiger, shit is ugly.

...It was never specified on how scum parties can affect us at one night... They could affect one so much they die instantly, they could affect several of us very lightly. This isn't a normal game set-up where scum just kill someone at night...

It seemed like a valid idea to raise given on how we don't really know what can happen at night.

[Taly]

Actually i just realized in the description of the mechanic it says that they can raise the darkening of

one or more

people.
Why did you guys even need to bring that up?
Also you've guys spent 2 pages already discussing deadlines and pseudovotes rather than actually scumhunting, save a couple, why? (Mostly directed at Zelink and Taly)
~Sakura

Honestly, all I've said so far as that we need an initiative to find a way to get answers from people effectively without doing damage. Zel has pretty much came up with the pseuedovotes and deadline idea, and I commended him for it. I even suggested the idea that an entire week is a possible timeframe for convenience and avoiding the marker of 48 hours leading to people getting a darkness point right when the day ends.

The other thing I've said is that none of us know how the scum can affect us via darkness. Leading to my suggestion of the timeline.

I also questioned Thor/Loki to see why they would just want to quicklynch someone who hasn't done anything. Don't misrep what I've done as useless because I'm adding in what I think is necessary.

It's the way Taly did it. He repeated lots of stuff already said or pretty obvious, like he wanted to share the town spotlight with the rest of the "cool guys".

This sounds vaguely insulting. I

NEVER

did repeat anything, at least not particularly:

13

>>>

Me seeing how our darkness is calculated, and raising attention on how to go about something.
39

>>>

Me verifying a new possibility of timeframe between lynches, and introducting the thought that scum can harm us on varying levels. Thor/Loki said that scum could get us at 100% darkness at night in 26, and I thought I could add on to that idea so people will understand how differently we may be affected.

Note: I also questioned them why they wanted to just lynch notscience.

44

>>>

Somehow, Skold found my previous post to cause concern....? So I continued and told him that what I brought up was valid since scums affecting us weren't specified particularly.

You have only seen

3/4 of my posts

that actually provided something new to the conversation, and here you are - who has already RVSed someone, saying that I haven't been scum hunting and therefore I must be a harm to the town?

You already put your pseudovote on me ater your 1v1 with Zel, without seeing my response to your assumptions?

What have you provided?

Then tell me, what reads do YOU have, since you have done nothing in this game that remotely resembles scumhunting.
~Sakura

Sorry, but what are

YOUR

reads?
It is quite too early to give elaborate reads, but my

town reads

are stated:

Zel, Witness Protection, Thor and Loki

Everyone else is neutral so far except for you,

WN

.

For now:

Pseudovote: White Narcissus

>>>>

As for other things,

Thor/Loki

, 63 seems noncommittal. What are you reads thus far?

87 and 88

NAOMI? Naomi!

Is this Naomi-Chan!?

SeikoXNaomi

[Taly]

Spoiler: Game Context - Not Serious

<3 <3 <3

SEKIOxNAOMI

<3 <3 <3

[Taly]

Our reads were given in 61 and 65. I'm not liking your overreaction to some minor suspicion on you.

~Wis

Overreaction? I was responding to the assumptions you made about me. Explaining and showing my side.

[Taly]

@Taly: So you have a town read on someone you're questioning for having noncomittal posts?
Re-Bringing up how scum could affect us: So basically stating what the mod had mentioned in how the mechanic works is bringing something new?
And yet again, what in ANYTHING of those posts that you had made was there any scumhunting at all?

@notty: So you disagree with pseudovoting?
~Sakura

>

Thor/Loki's recent posts seem to be adding some of his thoughts into the game. I'm a bit unsure, but my gut tells him he is town for now. He hasn't done anything that has set off any alarms.

>

I was explaining what I was doing and why I was doing it. I wasn't entirely sure about the game mechanics, so it was partially a re-iteration for others, and for myself as well.

>

What are you doing to scum hunt? Also, I'm looking around at posts, I'm busy quite a bit right now - so I'll get back with some ISO researching and show what I've found out.

101

The only person so far detecting the tone in my post as over-defensive is you... You discredit what I've brought up to you by saying I'm sugar-coating what I've said, when I'm really telling you what the posts meant and why.

110

And now you're off-handedly implying that Zel doesn't have credit because he doesn't agree with you... You seem very confident for a townie so early in the game.

[Taly]

pedit-

SEIKO IS MINE

YOU DO NOT TAKE MY SSEIKO

But I'm Seiko. Sorry

Now if you'll excuse me, I'll shove some of that ass medicine up mah pooper and butter dat desert reaaaal good. Thanks!

VOTE: notscience

Now we're both equal.

[Taly]

Sigh, you will see that you will lynch Seiko first at this rate. Even though you guys have yet to take me seriously.

I'm busy right now, and since this is a fast pacing game, don't expect something elaborate from me until tomorrow

[Taly]

VOTE: notscience

Now we're both equal.

...

So the fact he voted you gives you the right to disregard the town strategy and vote?

~Wis

No, he went ahead and ignored the psuedovote idea that most is abiding by. So I was happy to oblige him and meet him there with a legitimate vote of my own.

And I said nothing elaborate is going to happen until later, for now - stop misrepping me.

P-Edit

: you're one to talk if it's tunneling you say....

[Taly]

You're also being awfully defensive.

~Wis

You also awfully love saying this phrase. Also, if you think everyone else is rendering your ability to scum hunt, then maybe you should stop reacting to everyone and throwing up half-formulated assumptions to give reasons to tunnel someone...

They're my thoughts and reads for the players in as much detail as I could bother with, please suggest how I can improve on that and I will oblige at my earliest convenience. Of course I will start proper interactions and questioning when I get a chance to. Your issue with me only partially agreeing with you is ridiculous, and you should feel bad for it. Disagreeing with part of a read and 'sheeping' the other part is called 'thinking for myself'.

I have bad news for you, you appear to be unable to distinguish between 'half-assed' and 'unsure because it's been less than a day of gameplay'. I am familiar with at least one case of your town games though so I know this is how you play so I'm not going to complain about it further.

I am not in the mood for this crap today, and I pretty much guarantee that I will become very unpleasant if I continue. I'll come back once I finish my report.

Who are your scum reads? You haven't given a direct read on me, Zel, notscience, or WN? I'm curious, what are your reads on us?

*Also, I don't completely understand the suspicion on Mika? Can someone elaborate on this if they aren't liking Mika's entrance? Same goes for Anka.*

JESUS CHIRST? This much overnight?
UNPsuedovote: I ALWAYS HATED YOU, HATED YOU FROM HELLO: Taly
Catching up soon.

Oh,

Skoldy-Poo

<3 <3 <3

[Taly]

Taly: What are you asking me to elaborate on?

Well, I wanted to see why people found you and/or Mika to be suspicious, since I didn't pick up anything major for concern.

Other than that, could you elaborate on some of our reads? You skimmed most of us as town, but I don't believe you specified who and why, exactly.

[Taly]

Seriously, my hands have been quite full unexpectedly the past day or 2. I'm very sorry, I will be more productive tomorrow. As for now:

UNVOTE: notscience >>> You haven't officially unvoted me, but your vote was entirely because I claimed Seiko, then I don't exactly understand why we're voting each other. Especially if it is formally, since it's not congruent to the towns mentality of how we are going about this.

I need to catch up, but so far I will say:

Zelink:

I still think he is town, I don't see scum putting themselves out there as he has.

White Narcissus:

Going to have to ISO: Neutral overall.

lufan:

We haven't seen much of each other, what do you want to know?

Also, why do you suspect ZZZX scum?

Haven't looked deeply at his posts much, but I haven't seen anything inherently bad - and he has been somewhat active.

Gaiden:

I think she is sticking to her meta for the most part. I'm gut town reading her for honesty if nothing else.

I'll pump more reads and opinions out later.

[Taly]

Just when I said I was going to catch-up and pump more reads...

This thread explodes. The second thread that has exploded today. Why. Priorities... where are you?

Also, in skimming the thread, I can already see a few Lufan slips... About his knowledge, being a noobie, and overall him sacrificing himself for a lynch... Which I'm not entirely understanding. If anything, I think a lufan PL soon my be beneficial for all of our darkness levels... And if

Lufans

PR is remotely truthful, then it may be likely a scum role.

Lufan

, can you at least explain your scum read on

ZZZX

?

By The Wrath of Taly: lufan131

P-Edit

...This may not have enough conviction since Pvotes are becoming extinct for this day.

By the Wrath of Seiko:

VOTE: lufan131

As for the reads part:

Shadowcat an ZZZX:

Have not looked at her/him that much, but I haven't found anything to raise alarms, their responses seem normal for a town perspective.

Slight Town Lean

Zymf:

Liked his breakdown in 608, hasn't said anything that seemed unreasonable for today. Even with the possible crumb.

Slight Town Read

Thor/Loki:

I've been a bit uncertain of him, I find his posts to be a bit genuine. Just in skimming, and how he has accessed things that have happened.

Slight Town Lean

Skold:

What are your opinions of Lufan? Who are your suspects?

I'll have some better formulated reads come D2, a lot is going around right now.

[Taly]

Also, in skimming the thread, I can already see a few Lufan slips... About his knowledge, being a noobie, and overall him sacrificing himself for a lynch... Which I'm not entirely understanding. If anything, I think a lufan PL soon my be beneficial for all of our darkness levels... And if Lufans PR is remotely truthful, then it may be likely a scum role.

What, i'm trying to understand what you're going with here, but i don't understand. Also what do you mean with the last part?
~Sakura

Basically:

>

I skimmed the thread and found Lufan slipping: Mostly about the idea of him being a noob and his overall knowledge, and also with him sacrificing himself for a lynch. Via, voting himself.

>

I said I didn't understand his motives, and with his PR claim not really sounding convincing...

>

I concluded that a Lufan lynch would be beneficial soon for the town, whether it is off people thinking he is scum, or whether he is worthy of being lynched on Policy terms. Either seems applicable depending on how you see the situation.

>

I also said that his PR claim, seemed to more likely be scum to me. It just didn't sound very realistic for town to be able to lower their darkness if they decided to lynch their own alignment person.

In all

, Lufan is a worthy candidate, and we are nearing the announced deadline as we put. This paragraph was just to sum up my thoughts on Lufan, in dignifying a vote onto him. I'm not fond of voting without disclosed reasoning, it just gives too much room for town to confuse motives, and hurts them in return.

[Taly]

Or wait.. maybe it's to late for that?

Lufan did hammer himself.

Now we'll see for sure how truthful his claim really holds.

[Taly]

I'm a bit salty I died so early. lol ;p

[Taly]

Scum were good

[Taly]

Arrogant town gets other town killed in my 2 months of mafia experience. lol