[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6993092 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null STEVEN UNIVERSE MAFIA - GAME OVER - Mafiascum.net
He's lucky it's ME who got this role (because I'm too stubborn to replace out), because the VAST majority of Scummers, if they had the role I do, would quickly lose interest in the game and replace out/flake.
...Basically, I'm a tree stump with all the sucky parts but none of the benefits. I'm voteless, will become conftown on D3, and yet, distinctly,
lack
the immunity to actions (in particular, y'know, NIGHTKILLS) that come with 'stumps. Yeah. I'm a bit bitter.
I'm a tree stump day 1 too.
How the mod said I'm not counted as a living person.
mod: is the not voting count and alive accurate
Varsoon: Thanks for pointing this out, actually. It should properly display that there are 20 players alive and 11 votes are required to reach a majority.
Hey vezo.
What did you think about claiming targets for fusing tonight?
The con is scum will know.
Pro is town is more likely to ally themselves together.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
I'm a bit behind but I just read this page. If I had a vote it'd be on beer.
Also I owe a reason why I'm scum reading maxwell.
Someone can smack me later if I forget.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Catching up while I'm working. Yeah I'm not winning employee of the month.
↑Beer wrote:I might be tipsy, but Sonic looks really evil.
Reasonably Rational looks like a puke stain on the wall.
Grapes looks like that guy at a party who's trying too hard to impress and is actually really sleazy and someone who you should probably not befriend because they will do bad things to you after drugging you or something.
Hm.
VOTE: Sonic
I found myself agreeing about Rational but I don't get the sonic read at all.
↑Beer wrote:Veko could be a good person, but I think maybe we got off on the wrong foot and I shouldn't have called his mother a dirty slag. I am sorry, Veko.
farside seems like a reasonable person who I could probably get along with and perhaps even enjoy a me at the pub with her.
mastin seems sweet.
I'm a bad drunk. Not fun, not mean, just sleepy.
aka boring to bring to a bar, but love to do darts and pool at the pubs.
↑grapes wrote:Beer has the least annoying gimmick I've seen in a while. I think they're also pretty town so far in.
The biggest ping I've felt was reasonably rationals entrance. Just slightly awkward. Not sure if it was the overfocusing on claims part or just the outside looking in vibe I got from it but I'm interested in seeing more of them.
And more than half the playerlist for that matter.
↑grapes wrote:Beer has the least annoying gimmick I've seen in a while. I think they're also pretty town so far in.
The biggest ping I've felt was reasonably rationals entrance. Just slightly awkward. Not sure if it was the overfocusing on claims part or just the outside looking in vibe I got from it but I'm interested in seeing more of them.
And more than half the playerlist for that matter.
Are you scum with him or something?
nah I think grapes is town
↑Trench Warfare wrote:We should all totally fuse. Each and every night. Day 1 we should fuse with people we don't understand to try and further the game and limit ego fights.
~Titus
This is bad. I think it's best to align with someone you are town reading. Aligning with someone you don't understand and with some powers in play when aligned helps scum if they align too.
I'd rather help town. Thanks
↑Cheetory6 wrote:I need to drink more Beer to get a read on them.
Especially because of their inner nature.
I do think anyone making a big deal out of #45 isn't good at telling when someone is kidding around or doesn't care [and is a scumble].
Grapes is a shrug so far.
What about 42 do you like? That it has a lot of words in it?
What is your issue with Max?
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:That does make sense, vezok. But.. I'm having trouble believing Lars is scum. He's a dick, not a villain. But if you're actually Sadie and he's really saying that he claimed scum then.. well first of all what the hell is he doing, because he should know Sadie is town and that making you dislike him is a terrible idea, and secondly, there's really nothing I can say to refute you there. If he's flat-out claimed scum to you then what more can be said?
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:I'm not voting Beer with a 77 attitude because of 78. Lars and Sadie are arguing in their PT. There's probably some miscommunication going on. I'm not going to vote Beer just because of what vezok says here. Also, I still find it hard imagining that Lars would be put in a villain role.
Also, you don't like it when I make jokes about canon personalities matching up with what is happening? Should I stop enjoying the flavour, Ricastle? That's why I joined this game.
EDIT: okay, seriously, the roleplaying thing was a joke. I don't think you're roleplaying.
I wanna hear what Beer has to say about this. Claiming scum to to his neighbour just seems ridiculously stupid.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:I'm not avoiding a vote on him purely because of flavour. I DO think that, if Varsoon went to the trouble of making SU mafia in the first place, they will try to make the flavour mesh with the game mechanics as much as is feasible. That's the fun of making theme games. So..there's basically no way for a Sadie, for example, to be scum. For Lars, I could see it happening only because of his personality, but that just means the possibility is there.
I still want to hear from Beer about this. The posts that are being referred to as claiming scum or whatever just look like jokes, and there is obviously friction in the PT. Beer being stupid enough to just claim scum to his neighbourhood partner? I don't really believe that. I don't think you're lying, vezok, I'm just wondering if you misinterpreted.
Cheetory: Sorry, forgot to address that. To me, that post from grapes didn't look like padding to look town. It just looked like grapes was thinking about the game and putting their thoughts down as those thoughts came to them. I do the same thing, and sometimes my posts end up longer because there's some unnecessary shit in them as my thought process develops.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:I know, I know. But if Beer is lying about being Lars, then vezok is also lying about being Sadie. Sadie starting in a neighbourhood with literally anyone else makes no sense. So either they're both lying about their role names, or neither of them are.
Beer hasn't posted since Vezok claimed that Beer claimed scum. Saying 'Beer has done nothing to refute it' doesn't make any sense, they haven't had the opportunity to comment on the situation yet.
Summary: The fact that it's Lars and Sadie is what leads me to believe they are both in a neighbourhood together. Either one is lying or both are lying about their role names. I highly doubt it's the latter, because if one dies and turns out to not be Lars or Sadie, then you know the other one is lying. There's no way a Lars or a Sadie would start off in a neighbourhood without the other. So I'm inclined to believe them. So, if they are telling the truth, then it follows that Sadie is town. Lars is more unclear, and I concede that they could be scum. Personally, I don't think so, but I'm not going to let that stop me from looking at the situation properly. And right now, the situation is that vezok is claiming one thing, we haven't heard the other side of the story from Beer yet, and we already know that those two do not get along. So simply voting Beer would be really ignorant in my opinion.
EDIT: Alright, that's more info from Vezok. Okay, that's pretty bad. And I've already said that I think you're town, vezok, so..
I still wanna hear what Beer has to say, but that's good enough for a vote from me.
All of this together is why I don't like Max. Goes from I don't believe Vezo and he could be lying to calling him town, to writing up crap reason's for disputing the whole push by Vezo.
working, working, working.
getting through somemore stuff.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:Alright, evidently I should keep all flavour out my posts. Noted.
Vezok scumreads Beer. Beer does comment on the situation, saying that they had an argument and citing that as the reason for the scumread. Now, vezok claims that Beer outright claimed scum in their PT. I want to hear what Beer has to say about this.
Seriously. We all have role PMs. Read them. Varsoon obviously put effort into the flavour, and it's freaking awesome. Regardless of alignments, either they are actually Lars and Sadie, or they are both lying. That's all there is to it.
why do you think they are both lying.
I feel like you just are fearmongering the whole situation.
↑Cheetory6 wrote:Or Beer/vezok could be scum, with a scum-flavoured role, with a fakeclaim to prevent massclaim bullshit on D1.
He's lucky it's ME who got this role (because I'm too stubborn to replace out), because the VAST majority of Scummers, if they had the role I do, would quickly lose interest in the game and replace out/flake.
...Basically, I'm a tree stump with all the sucky parts but none of the benefits. I'm voteless, will become conftown on D3, and yet, distinctly,
lack
the immunity to actions (in particular, y'know, NIGHTKILLS) that come with 'stumps. Yeah. I'm a bit bitter.
I'm a tree stump day 1 too.
How the mod said I'm not counted as a living person.
mod: is the not voting count and alive accurate
Varsoon: Thanks for pointing this out, actually. It should properly display that there are 20 players alive and 11 votes are required to reach a majority.
↑Beer wrote:I might be tipsy, but Sonic looks really evil.
Reasonably Rational looks like a puke stain on the wall.
Grapes looks like that guy at a party who's trying too hard to impress and is actually really sleazy and someone who you should probably not befriend because they will do bad things to you after drugging you or something.
Hm.
VOTE: Sonic
Puke stain on the wall? Please, enlighten me.
↑grapes wrote:Beer has the least annoying gimmick I've seen in a while. I think they're also pretty town so far in.
The biggest ping I've felt was reasonably rationals entrance. Just slightly awkward. Not sure if it was the overfocusing on claims part or just the outside looking in vibe I got from it but I'm interested in seeing more of them.
And more than half the playerlist for that matter.
What would you like to see more of from me? And yes, it was absolutely an outside looking in vibe, that's kinda how I approach things(I like that description). I try to take in an image of the game and how things interact and relate to each other.
↑Trench Warfare wrote:Cerb, can you ask Drixx if we can ally? I think it would help the four of us read each other better tonight and get grips on things.
I have asked, I don't mind, contingent upon your slot not being super scummy today. It would be helpful to have insight into each others thoughts so we can avoid certain personality and play style frictions.
↑Cheetory6 wrote:Or Beer/vezok could be scum, with a scum-flavoured role, with a fakeclaim to prevent massclaim bullshit on D1.
Unlikely. D1 bus, in the first few pages of the thread? And double voting scum? Yeah, I don't think so.
Entry post in the scum PT as yeah, I am scum, seems pretty dumb, but plausible I guess, as is the PT mix up. Willing to vote Beers slot, pending Drixxs approval, but unwilling to rush into a lynch.
-Cerb
I would like reads with reason's from you in your next post.
↑Cheetory6 wrote:I'm just saying that it's also plausible that Lars could be a fakeclaim for a scummier flavour name.
IE: Vezok could be scum and Beer town.
Not really leaning that way atm, just find it questionable that you're omnomnoming so hard on flavour here.
no seriously can we lynch this with fire?
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:Cheetory: Okay, ignore the flavour. I'm done arguing about this. My recent arguments don't even have anything to do with that. Also, your first two sentences don't follow.. are you saying that vezok is actually Lars and Beer is Sadie, or was that just a typo? And you're still talking about how Lars could be a fakeclaim which.. still isn't what I'm saying. I'm not saying that Lars is town because it's Lars. I DID say that Sadie is town because it's Sadie.. that was a mistake.
The Beer wagon is based on Beer's stupid posts and vezok's accusations. I'm not convinced because I want to hear what Beer has to say about the accusations. Beer is one of the easiest people to lynch right now, thanks to that 'wink wink' post, is it really that strange that I'd be suspicious of the wagon???
Marquis: SU is nothing like SuperWhoLock. Also, feel free to ignore the sometimes-terrible fandom. Just watch the show, it's a good show.
I recommend KissCartoon for SU watching!
This is fair to think but you really are not attacking those on the wagon just hyperboling the situation
↑radmann9 wrote:I'll talk girls with you. Or you can pick my brain.
↑grapes wrote:Beer has the least annoying gimmick I've seen in a while. I think they're also pretty town so far in.
The biggest ping I've felt was reasonably rationals entrance. Just slightly awkward. Not sure if it was the overfocusing on claims part or just the outside looking in vibe I got from it but I'm interested in seeing more of them.
Beer's obvscum, and Rational's probably town.
Also, if Trench Warfare actually
does
have a clue on why I am what I say I am, then they're conftown. (Otherwise, disregard this.)
Maxwell's also pretty scum, btw. All these scum showing themselves, and not a single vote that I can make to show it. (I suppose I could symbolically vote, but it's pretty worthless given the mod won't even SHOW my moved useless vote. )
Also, Cheet's town.
Calling Mastin town. When ever I disagree with her reads I know she is town.
↑radmann9 wrote:Yeah if anyone was reading scum it would be Mastin. Everything about his posts seem odd. And even if he's just what he claims to be, then we know that Farside is lying. So my best bet for scum read would be Mastin. Followed by Beer even though something about his posts makes me think there's a special clause or something. (Like I said, like a Jester or something if they exist in this game.)
Yeah you are deffinately not the sharpest crayon in the drawer here.
Would vote:
Cheet
Max
Rational
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:Mastin isn't claiming to be a stump. They are just voteless and conftown D3. They still show up as alive, and can be targeted and killed, unlike a tree stump. That doesn't contradict Farside. Their two claims don't actually contradict each other.
Also, I wouldn't actually vote either of them at the moment, radmann, but I'm assuming you're asking me why I find Farside scummy, right? Mostly it was their 50, but it's also the fact that they're quoting themselves in their signature. (I'm kidding, I'm kidding, don't hurt me)
I just don't like their posts, I guess, but it doesn't matter because they have a pretty legitimate stump claim.
Cheetory: I don't know Varsoon at all, but I'm pretty sure that the Jasper, Ruby and Sapphire thing I used as an example is as close to bastard that flavour can get. But you doubt Jester because
that's
too bastard? I just.. find all that hard to believe. Part of making a good theme is, as Rational said, fitting the theme to the mechanics of the game in a balanced way. I'm choosing to believe that Varsoon isn't an ass.
P-Edit: Yeah, considering mastin can be killed, I'm pretty sure they're supposed to show up in the votecount.
This is the first time I've had a tree stump role.
I like having a vote to throw around.
Personally I feel like a small fish in a big pond that most will ignore.
↑Sonic X wrote:mastina, will you stop that terrible habit of yours that is making bullshit reads on people on like page 3? It ruins your credibility. And yes, it CAN go down further
On a side note, maxwell is really town, and those of you scumreading him need to learn to play mafia
↑Cheetory6 wrote:Man it is so scummy to discuss setup.
Farside.
Cmon.
It's not the set up. It's that you want to wave away anyone's thoughts as it could be scum or town. You don't say you are scum reading the slots in question but you want to sway people away from discussioning the idea of feeling they are confirmed.
farside wrote:Calling Mastin town. When ever I disagree with her reads I know she is town.
Is this one of those snide "calling it now reads" or are you actually townreading her for this?
Talk to me far.
If you get my head in the game I promise I'll be more town.
And it might help me get rid of this really gross nasty OMGUS feel I'm getting at you.
It's serious. I've been in 3 games with Mastin where I disagree with her reads early on and she has been town.
You can OMGUS all you want with me I would still advocate your lynch even though I can't vote and all you will say is I don't like her jumping on me. Wahhhhhhh!!!!
Marquis wrote:you're the best
can i just sheep you for the rest of the game
I wouldn't recommend it. People might think we're working together or something.
:c
farside wrote:Would vote:
Cheet
Max
Rational
Why did Beer fall of your list of would vote people?
I'm gonna go not look at this game for hopefully the rest of today because I'm getting frazzled .
Beer started to read like an idiot along the way and I realized half way through my catch up that his play is the too scummy to be scum (yes I hate the saying but there is almost a childish imp laughing behind the screen I can see when I read his post) none of that reads as scum.
Also raging bull's post was crap and calling it a good entry is awful
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑Sonic X wrote:what do you think of beer's shitty omgus on me?
Apparently he is not the only one scum reading you so.....???
I don't really see the scum read to be honest. I believe Vezo is town this game.
What do you think of Chet and why?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑Sonic X wrote:what do you think of beer's shitty omgus on me?
Apparently he is not the only one scum reading you so.....???
actually he was. beer was spamming stuff that looked like cool cases but upon closer inspection is just "this post is bad" "his posts are bad". then when he asked "do you think sonic x is scum??" bins and ricastle went "i agree!". which is not cool, but meh
Like I said I don't see the case but reading it I don't see omgus reasoning.
In the end I expect today to go
Vezo: lynch obv scum beer
Lots of sheeping
Beer ultimately lynched.
Me crying inside with lack of vote.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑Sonic X wrote:what do you think of beer's shitty omgus on me?
Apparently he is not the only one scum reading you so.....???
actually he was. beer was spamming stuff that looked like cool cases but upon closer inspection is just "this post is bad" "his posts are bad". then when he asked "do you think sonic x is scum??" bins and ricastle went "i agree!". which is not cool, but meh
Like I said I don't see the case but reading it I don't see omgus reasoning.
In the end I expect today to go
Vezo: lynch obv scum beer
Lots of sheeping
Beer ultimately lynched.
Me crying inside with lack of vote.
can you ever get your vote back? just wondering.
Just a stump day 1.
I get to vote starting day 2
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
nobody who has played mafia for over 1 month would honestly admit to omgus reasoning.*
like, my rebound on beer is secretly part of omgus reasoning. but you don't see that in any of my posts, or attacks against him
actually i am not even attacking at all. i am defending. from his "attacks" that are actually fueled (secretly) by omgus reasoning. because when i look into the reasoning for his posts it is actually no visible discernable reasoning. which I have shown.
*except me. i just admitted to omgus reasoning.
You know I think your town right?
In all seriousness I agreed with Beer about Cheet and would love to see a wagon on him.
↑Ricastle wrote:No, I want to lynch both of you regardless of the first flip, to cover all possibilities. I'm relatively confident it will yield at least 1 dead scum.
Pedit: lol, that is a shitty-ass post. 70% is a cautious value because it sounds high while also leaving plenty of room for exception. Also I think I made it clear that I don't know who is which alignment, which is why I want to lynch both of you regardless of flips. Are you scumreading me now then?
↑Skybird wrote:I'm liking farside's questioning and poking. Think she's town.
Not liking Verzok's tunnel. Beer's posts are strange and I'm going to assume the posts in their PT are also strange. But I think Verzok is misrepping Beer in order to get him lynched. Scum read on Verzok.
↑Skybird wrote:I'm liking farside's questioning and poking. Think she's town.
Not liking Verzok's tunnel. Beer's posts are strange and I'm going to assume the posts in their PT are also strange. But I think Verzok is misrepping Beer in order to get him lynched. Scum read on Verzok.
Yes. I'm actually a scum double-voter in a neighbourhood with town and decided to go all in a gambit with very little pay-out day 1. How do you arrive at such brilliant conclusions my master Skybird? /sarcasm.
It's days like this I'm happy to say I'm not the only sarcastic person in the world. Thank you Vezo for saying in words to skybird that was in my own head.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Hi Max.
Just from my pov it seemed like you where all over the place in retrospect with your reads. One moment is high and the next is like crazy weird.
I like your response so I will just drop you down my list to null and smack you around when you go crazy weird again.
TLDR: Stop mod gaming and we will get along fine.
Hey Beer: Yeah, don't ever ask about how crazy my days are. I was very spasdic on Monday with my post and couldn't read things in full without interuption. Today I have more freedom to relax (yah caught up at work!) and actuall get my groove into this game today.
I love the ragining bull vote and would fully support that as well.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Radman's scum read consists of many small things that indicate he may be scum, I'll be going over them and explaining them here.
To start with in his post 111 he says he's willing to ally with anyone, really town should be focusing on allying with town. This is a weak tell I'll admit, however I wanted it mentioned.
Later in that same post he throws shade onto Mastin, yet does not actually vote. Taking a look at his post count reveals he's a newer player and throwing shade onto people yet not committing to a push is something newish scum seem to love doing.
There's the same none commitment to his reads in 161, they are full of "I'm not sure" or "something feels weird". Yet he doesn't actually full out say "x is town/scum". Why would this be scummy play?
Well not committing to a read makes it easier for you to change your reads along with the crowd, it is often accompanied with opportunistic voting. 167 is him continuing to throw shade over mastin yet he still doesn't vote.
Interestingly enough he's completely forgotten his mastin read now. He's changed to asking questions which look useful but actually hold no worth.
Then there's his most recent post:
"Or maybe I'm scum like you said"
That one line is so off it's unbelievable. He's also just OMGUS'ing coolDog without actually committing to a push on him. Showing he's very aware of what people think of him and his continuation of him having fluid reads.
Pr-edit:
Why the fuck do you not vote any of your scum reads yet you vote the one you thought could be town?
You know ... I don't feel particularly well today. And your post just for whatever reason tickled the wrong part of me.
So here's how this is going to go.
You are going to give a reads list and tell us who is town and who is scum. Right now.
For every read you get wrong, you can pay me $5 real money after the game. You seem convinced that the rest of us should be voting for people and should have comprehensive reads.
Put your money where your mouth is, or drop it.
@Farside - As a rule I don't submit to people's "demands". You demanded something of me, so I'm going to just not do it. I'm not in this game to play it for you, nor am I in the habit of throwing up a list of "reads" early on day one when there are still people who don't even have significant content in the game. Demanding a reads list at this point is basically translated as "Hi, I want some reason to push a case on your slot, so give me a reads list so I can cherry pick things from it to make you look bad". Nobody playing the game right now could possibly have a reads list with any accuracy, and anyone who will give me a reads list that isn't almost completely "null" right now, and agree to pay me $5 for every wrong read at the end is far too full of themselves and could do with the ego puncturing.
@Everyone - What on earth led to the site meta of people who don't give reads themselves demanding other people produce a fully annotated list of reads, on the spot, or else ... it's nearly the worst thing about this site. It's a horrible practice, and people doing it should be lynched off on principle. If you want to know what a particular person thinks about something, as a specific question. Randomly picking one person and demanding they produce something that cannot possibly be accurate and which nobody else has done (including, in every case I can recall, the demander), and which if the person is dumb enough to actually submit to said demand, they are then enslaved to meeting all other demands afterward ... it's irrational bordering on insane. It's also asinine and a super lazy and sleezy tactic.
@Radmann - Start actually playing the game and stop with the "I'm going to suggest people are scum one at a time to look like I'm doing something" strategy, or I'm going to push to lynch you just on principle.
{Rant Mode Off}
~Love, Drixx
post 266
I didn't see my wording as demanding.
Let me try this a different way.
Give me a read bitch!
I figure if I ask less nicely you may say it's not demanding.
I like tunnel as town
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑Beer wrote:Ah, I suppose if I want to look town, I should give a reads list or something.
Upon reflection, I am actually of the opinion that radmann's first post wasn't as bad as I initially thought it was and I have liked his more recent posts a bit more. For example, I felt the second sentence in Post #156 read genuine. I feel the jester speculation probably isn't coming from a scum mindset and I feel the way he's approaching reads in this game, particularly the mastin read, looks like it's coming from a town mindset more than a scum one.
Tunnel, you wondered why I changed my opinion/vote? This. While I appreciate Beer trying to clear my name after sullying it, this whole post reads trying to find an ally when there's no reason to. Literally the line that he felt was 'genuine' was 'Or pick my brain.' How does that reveal anything? It's scum trying to find allies. The more I read into it, I think it's just the hydra mate goofing around. Now the more sensible part is here to calm the waters. Beer is scum and him being lynched would reveal much.
↑Trench Warfare wrote:Tunnel, I am fine doing a three way hood if they are down for that. Dr. Pepper and I go way back to my first scum game on this site. I will need to discuss this with TSO.
I am really liking Reasonably Rational, particularly the head that said full reads on demand is stupid. If you think someone has vapid reads, make them push for one.
If the three of us are all town and can work together effectively, no scumteam will stand a chance.
TSO, I will change the scheme.
Yeah! The lynch I want is actually going through for a change.
I'm going to disagree about rational.
I asked for his reads because his post were disjointed in my view.
↑Trench Warfare wrote:I think Titus and I have agreed on reads about twice in two years, so don't expect miracles.
Sounds like titus and me. Gl with that.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:Maybe it is, but having to actually look at your posting style to figure it out is still annoying. Titus started off signing their posts but that last one that I cited as being the reason for the my confusion was not signed. I get that it's harder to tell since you guys are actually in the hydra, but from out here it's a pain, trust me. If just Titus signed their posts, that's fine, then I know the unsigned ones are all you.
If one of you doesn't sign from this point on, I'll work to figure it out myself, I guess.
P-Edit: I don't think Beer's post was particularly mean. Where were you when CoolDog was being disagreeable?
Back to Trench: Oh, I'd love to talk about Sonic X! It's a fantastic anime, as long as you squint and pretend Chris isn't there. Oh, and the last season, that was fantas-
The player, right, the player. Better lynch than Beer, not as good of a lynch as Radmann/Ra9in9 Bull or Marquis.
They seem kind of awkward, and their claim was weird, but then again we don't know what their role is, either. At least they didn't claim their entire role like Mr. Mayor did.
Not sure what to think of marquis. I know he can play scum well
Rahman vote on beer really read scummy.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:I was gonna say 'Cheetory, you used that 'refuse' pun once already', but.. I guess it's something else.
Tunnel bringing up a possible crumb is weird, though. That's generally not something you do when the crumber is still alive, bruv.
Also, it's cool, Cheetor.
And farside: Treating unconfirmed people as confirmed is dangerous. Super dangerous. Treating them as 'basically' confirmed is fine, though. That's where you actually look at play. What's up with everybody always calling this behaviour 'fearmongering' when it's just making sure town isn't throwing out 'confirmed' passes left and right?
I don't see cheet looking at the player. That is my issue.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑Cheetory6 wrote:Hi farside.
Glad to know you're ignoring me and just talking about me at people.
I think it's pretty clear that I was implying vezok is more likely to be town than not and was implying that if vezok's claim that Beer had scumslipped in post 1 of his PT was true then I would think he was unequivocally scum, but that appears to not be the case and so I'm still trying to absorb what I think about Beer.
Are you going to keep talking past me as though I'm doing things that I'm not? Because if so I'll feel justified in this lame OMGUS feeling that I've been talking about. c:
Fair enough.
I don't do it on purpose.
I just recall more of you arguing against players reads then expressing your own reads.
Just reads as busy work over scum hunting.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:Whoever said that you should probably focus on getting towny people in there, instead of people you're unsure about, was right. I don't remember who.
Unless you're confident in your ability to sort once they're in a smaller group?
Waves hand.
Hi!
Also grapes. Vote raging till I figure cheet out first.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Why rational is scum.
1. Focus onset up.
2. Responds to stuff only directed to them
3. No scum hunting
4. Passive agressive bs when pushed to make reads.
5. Saying post eater reads fake
6. Pushed one scum read for weak reasons.
He's lucky it's ME who got this role (because I'm too stubborn to replace out), because the VAST majority of Scummers, if they had the role I do, would quickly lose interest in the game and replace out/flake.
...Basically, I'm a tree stump with all the sucky parts but none of the benefits. I'm voteless, will become conftown on D3, and yet, distinctly,
lack
the immunity to actions (in particular, y'know, NIGHTKILLS) that come with 'stumps. Yeah. I'm a bit bitter.
↑mastin2 wrote:(My vote is showing up in the list of votes though, so this is something which you'll probably want to test at some point. Needless to say, though, I'm telling the truth; I have no vote right now no matter what the votecount says.)
"He’s a frozen treat with a whole new taste, because he came to this planet from outer space. A refugee of an interstellar war, but now he’s at your local grocery store. Cookie Cat! He’s a pet for your tummy! Cookie Cat! He’s super duper yummy! Cookie Cat! He left his family behind! Cookie Caaat!
↑Beer wrote:I might be tipsy, but Sonic looks really evil.
Reasonably Rational looks like a puke stain on the wall.
Grapes looks like that guy at a party who's trying too hard to impress and is actually really sleazy and someone who you should probably not befriend because they will do bad things to you after drugging you or something.
Hm.
VOTE: Sonic
Puke stain on the wall? Please, enlighten me.
↑grapes wrote:Beer has the least annoying gimmick I've seen in a while. I think they're also pretty town so far in.
The biggest ping I've felt was reasonably rationals entrance. Just slightly awkward. Not sure if it was the overfocusing on claims part or just the outside looking in vibe I got from it but I'm interested in seeing more of them.
And more than half the playerlist for that matter.
What would you like to see more of from me? And yes, it was absolutely an outside looking in vibe, that's kinda how I approach things(I like that description). I try to take in an image of the game and how things interact and relate to each other.
↑Trench Warfare wrote:Cerb, can you ask Drixx if we can ally? I think it would help the four of us read each other better tonight and get grips on things.
I have asked, I don't mind, contingent upon your slot not being super scummy today. It would be helpful to have insight into each others thoughts so we can avoid certain personality and play style frictions.
↑Cheetory6 wrote:Or Beer/vezok could be scum, with a scum-flavoured role, with a fakeclaim to prevent massclaim bullshit on D1.
Unlikely. D1 bus, in the first few pages of the thread? And double voting scum? Yeah, I don't think so.
Entry post in the scum PT as yeah, I am scum, seems pretty dumb, but plausible I guess, as is the PT mix up. Willing to vote Beers slot, pending Drixxs approval, but unwilling to rush into a lynch.
↑vezokpiraka wrote:He claimed scum pretty much. It's pretty hard to paraphrase.
Also as you can see I'm a double voter.[/quote]
I am not so sure. I think I know what is going on with Mastina, but revealing what is a lie and what is true would be anti-town.
I will keep reading to see if that is right.
~Titus[/quote]
Titus completely walled herself in with the whole D3 thing. I don't see why anyone would want to even really do much more than keep notes on her before then. There's already much more interesting things (Like apparently a Bud Light spilling itself into the wrong PT). But ... it's a Bud Light ... I mean what are we
really
expecting here?
Spoiler:
↑Trench Warfare wrote:Cerb, can you ask Drixx if we can ally? I think it would help the four of us read each other better tonight and get grips on things.
He asked, we concurred. Unless you derail into Scumville today we plan to attempt to do the thing. Great idea.
Spoiler:
↑Trench Warfare wrote:We should all totally fuse. Each and every night. Day 1 we should fuse with people we don't understand to try and further the game and limit ego fights.
~Titus
This. So much this. If there's someone you just can't read or who can't read you, can you please go get a room tonight and figure it out? That should totally have been like a gigantic font PSA or something.
Spoiler:
↑vezokpiraka wrote:No it's chill. We're totally roleplaying. But only in our private char. You know. For authenticity. /sarcasm.
WTF are you talking about roleplaying? I know Lars is a bit assholish in the show, but he's scum here.
Don't do this to me when I'm drinking my coffee. I had to clean up a mess.
Spoiler:
↑Fluminator wrote:My role is pretty cool.
I have less cell service than I though so I doubt I'll be able to post much for the first week. I'll do my best.
Hi. I'm going to give an excuse to be a lurksack in my first post. Please don't notice.
Spoiler:
↑Cheetory6 wrote:I'd be scared to rely too much on flavour.
Would be super duper probable that Varsoon would counterbalance that stuffs.
And cool cool, is it like a casual random pawnshop sorta place or like an EBgames?
I think Varsoon could design and balance around the actual show, as long as he provided the scum team with proper fake claims so that any kind of mass claim doesn't screw them. Yeah?
↑Ricastle wrote:Oh, I see. Mastin is just plain voteless, not an actual stump.
Treestump = conftown who can't be targeted by anything, at the small price of not counting as alive and thus not having a vote. Sometimes triggered at will.
Me = will become conftown upon a trigger (D3), like a treestump, and being voteless, like a treestump, but lacking the immunity of a treestump, able to be voted, lynched, targeted by night actions, and nightkilled.
Like I said. All the sucky parts without any of the real benefits.
But I can't emphasize enough how much my vote should be on Beer right now. (After all, they're too filled with wine to be town!)
This gives me deja vu, but in a good way since I totally won that game. I'm sorry again, by the way. We should probably let Mastin mastastasize into whatever she's becoming.
Umm, so i searched for "mason" and did not find any mention of it other than Cooldogs post. Did I miss something?
Tunnel: I have no objection to the proposed large alliance. I'm not sure what additional input you want regarding your roles utility. Any further planning requires knowledge of how many shots you have, any limitations your power might have, and basically just your full role, and I don't want that information.
I can understand the people who want to keep the alliances between mutual town reads, but I think it's much stronger to use as an opportunity to get additional interaction and conversation in with a null read or someone whose playstyle/thought process you simply don't understand well enough to determine if what they're doing in thread makes sense for town them or scum them.
Sure you're (marginally, and then only if your ability to identify town is incredibly accurate) more likely to involve scum in such an alliance, and perhaps enhance them somehow...but I certainly imagine whatever mechanical advantage scum get out of being in an alliance could be gained by allying internally. Perhaps I'm wrong, and they *can't* ally each other, or perhaps they don't get any benefit from it, or perhaps the benefit they get is stronger if allied with town. Sure. All possibilities. I just don't think it's we are all so good at identifying town, that we'll be able to prevent that from happening if we *only* ally with our town reads, and doing so puts us in a position where we likely wind up with people who don't end up allying, and thus we waste opportunities to gain more information about different slots, and utilize whatever benefits come from the alliances for town.
-Cerb
Last edited by Varsoon on Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
I should stop making cases on my phone, sorry mod for the mess.
@rational: what is the difference between asking for reads and asking you about players in the game?
Are you saying all you do is sit on your ass all game and throw words out with no scum hunting.
Finally: 1 negative comment about 1 player is not scum hunting. Saying so is bs.
@cooldog: stfu
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:RR- huh..what was the point of that besides to draw needless attention on yourself? Not a town move imho.
I like Skybirds response of why he/she is not jumping on the Beer wagon . I think she/he is being genuine. I didn't read anything in the comments that made me think that they were trying to needless avoid voting beer
Not sure what could make of the cop directing. I can see town doing this but I can also see scum ( especially a Godfather role ) also asking for that. For me personally this is null
Agreed. I think Drixx was just trying to be funny, but...kinda fell flat, what with all the highlighting and stuff, makes it seem like a real shot. Unless you were talking about some of my "double talk?"
Farside, all that, and you still can't ask me a specific question. It's not even hard. Just...point at someone, and ask me how I feel about them and why, and I'll tell you.
-Cerb
How do you feel about cheet and why?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑farside22 wrote:That reminds me.
Fuzzy is a scum read too.
Sweet, so fuzzy is distancing themselves from us, and I'm trying to buddy with them against my other head, because we're scum partners who don't have daytalk and are thus uncoordinated?
-Cerb
I don't always make reads based on associations.
Especially larger games.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑farside22 wrote:That reminds me.
Fuzzy is a scum read too.
we can agree on that
farside, im reading RR as town right now. when im town I also hate to make a readslist when i haven't got enough info to make it good and sparkly yet. as scum I would just make 1 on the spot full of bullshit.
do you want to get fuzzy with me? think he is scum
I can't vote.
Do what you want. Also it is 25 pages into the game and he has not pushed on a scum read on anyone.
That's not town.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑vezokpiraka wrote:@cerb: what the fuck do you want from me? I already toks you that my vote counts as two and I can't split it.
A post with votes on two different individuals(ideally ones with no votes on them so far) to see if your vote splits or ends up both consolidated on the second person you're voting for, and leaving said votes on those individuals until after a vote count is posted, at which point you move them back to wherever you want your vote to be. I actually believe you about not being able to split your vote, but the claim is confirmable in thread so I'd like to see it confirmed.
Grapes, I'd like to see you double unvote, then vote the same person with two separate votes in the same post., and leave it up in the same way until a vote count is made.
-Cerb
pedit: that's okay, you don't know me, and really everything I do gives people scum vibes.
What is the point of this?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Is your ability to double vote a 1 day power ie an X shot power or can you use it over several days
Grapes
Do you have to wait to vot again or can you vote back to back
Do you have to double Vote each day or can you just single vote...ie are you a compulsory double voter??
Also why are you being so defensive... I was thinking maybe you were town but your reaction to RR question has made me nervous about you. I don't think the question is unreasonable with two DV this game. If you can me why the question is unreasonable I will listen
I am RR on this Grapes...its possible that you are both town but also possible one is town and one is scum.... As I said before I not assuming anything.
↑TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Yeah I feel like you might be lying and I going to dog you till a) I feel like I believe you are telling the truth or b) realize you are lying
This is scum and anyone thinking differently is either dumb or scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:All of fuzzy's role questions just look like he's trying to do what Reasonably Rational is. While I don't have an opinion on Rational's insistence on the double and multi-voters giving in-thread proof of their roles, (I don't think they're lying, and both of them having the exact same voting abilities would be weird anyways, also it'd be risky to lie because one could accidentally slip up) I understand why they're doing it. They wanna know, whatever.
But almost immediately after that, fuzzy asks all these super in-depth questions which just sound strange, but their paranoia surrounding grapes seems kinda genuine. I'm not sure I could see that coming from scum.
VOTE: Bins
Tell me why you're scumreading NicCage.
If Marquis is scum, they're very cool-headed scum. But I'm leaning.. null, idk, maybe I need to watch them more, but I don't feel good about voting them.
It's fake.
Trust me, it's fake.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑grapes wrote:You're pushing my slot because of role related things, from what I saw, that's what guessing the setup is, is it not? And if it was just based on noncooperation and not strictly role, then you're a fucking hypocrite after you're whole "I'm not gonna post a reads list and hunt scum till after we get flips spiel", but that's an entirely different matter all together and probably not even within the same vein because they're really not the same thing, but you're still a fucking hypocrite regardless. You had your vote on me. You think I'm scum. Nowhere outside of anything not role related did anything I've posted as a player in this game come up in regards to your read on me. That's what I meant. You actually called my early posts town. That's why I think your push is bullshit. Same with fuzzy.
I was really close to pretty much just saying fuck you, kinda wish I did, but because I want to move past the setup spec nonsense I decided to play along. But you're more than content posting obnoxiously long walls, that once again, don't progress the game forward, to keep feeding this distraction and on top of that slipping in some much unneeded insults. So now I'm upset at myself that I actually tried to cooperate with you.
Doing a regular unvote removes all my votes I had previous. Which should be apparent in the latest vote count to anyone with a brain stem. I've proven whatever you wanted me to prove.
VOTE: fuzzy
Qfft!!
As I said lots of double talk and the things he finds scummy are not fucking scummy!
Open invitation to all to talk about fuzzy/cage/rr/tunnelwarriors/skybird/ragingbull
mainly for anyone in this game trying to lynch scum today.
Yea I know there's too many names but I think it's a decent pool to start from.
Fuzzy is scum, rr is scum. I don't have issues with nic he is null. Tunnel was town read, don't see scum there.
Raging bull....I really have no clue what to think.
Skybird I go back and forth with my read on her. Null right now.
Chet is still scum too.
↑MaxwellPuckett wrote:All of fuzzy's role questions just look like he's trying to do what Reasonably Rational is. While I don't have an opinion on Rational's insistence on the double and multi-voters giving in-thread proof of their roles, (I don't think they're lying, and both of them having the exact same voting abilities would be weird anyways, also it'd be risky to lie because one could accidentally slip up) I understand why they're doing it. They wanna know, whatever.
But almost immediately after that, fuzzy asks all these super in-depth questions which just sound strange, but their paranoia surrounding grapes seems kinda genuine. I'm not sure I could see that coming from scum.
VOTE: Bins
Tell me why you're scumreading NicCage.
If Marquis is scum, they're very cool-headed scum. But I'm leaning.. null, idk, maybe I need to watch them more, but I don't feel good about voting them.
It's fake.
Trust me, it's fake.
What is fake? the paranoia from fuzzy regarding grapes?
↑grapes wrote:You're pushing my slot because of role related things, from what I saw, that's what guessing the setup is, is it not? And if it was just based on noncooperation and not strictly role, then you're a fucking hypocrite after you're whole "I'm not gonna post a reads list and hunt scum till after we get flips spiel", but that's an entirely different matter all together and probably not even within the same vein because they're really not the same thing, but you're still a fucking hypocrite regardless. You had your vote on me. You think I'm scum. Nowhere outside of anything not role related did anything I've posted as a player in this game come up in regards to your read on me. That's what I meant. You actually called my early posts town. That's why I think your push is bullshit. Same with fuzzy.
I was really close to pretty much just saying fuck you, kinda wish I did, but because I want to move past the setup spec nonsense I decided to play along. But you're more than content posting obnoxiously long walls, that once again, don't progress the game forward, to keep feeding this distraction and on top of that slipping in some much unneeded insults. So now I'm upset at myself that I actually tried to cooperate with you.
Doing a regular unvote removes all my votes I had previous. Which should be apparent in the latest vote count to anyone with a brain stem. I've proven whatever you wanted me to prove.
VOTE: fuzzy
Qfft!!
As I said lots of double talk and the things he finds scummy are not fucking scummy!
Open invitation to all to talk about fuzzy/cage/rr/tunnelwarriors/skybird/ragingbull
mainly for anyone in this game trying to lynch scum today.
Yea I know there's too many names but I think it's a decent pool to start from.
Fuzzy is scum, rr is scum. I don't have issues with nic he is null. Tunnel was town read, don't see scum there.
Raging bull....I really have no clue what to think.
Skybird I go back and forth with my read on her. Null right now.
Chet is still scum too.
↑Trench Warfare wrote:Short version: I hate that last vote count though.
RR is obviously town before I stopped being motivated. But every wagon has like two people on it. I half way expect people to be yelling no zomg I am right, which puts us in the position of which ego will get propped up since Raging and beer do not seem to be happening.
VOTE: unvoted
~Titus
Vote fuzzy please.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Also there would be two more votes in fuzzy, but I can't vote and grapes is being tested by rational to verify his role because for some stupid reason it's important to do over pushing scum reads.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑farside22 wrote:Also there would be two more votes in fuzzy, but I can't vote and grapes is being tested by rational to verify his role because for some stupid reason it's important to do over pushing scum reads.
? Why do you think Rational isn't scumreading grapes? fmpov they are?
Based on his claim?!? Are you fucking shitting me?
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
↑farside22 wrote:And trench is official on my scum radar.
Oh sorry I forgot to kiss your ass, so you're scumreading me. Total ego fest. Thanks for proving that.
Now I really don't want to lynch Fuzzy
You tell me when out guessing the mod became town and we will talk.
As for the later you made it clear you find he is typically lunch bait without reading a single reason or care, so your additional snark realllllly means shit all to me.
@vezo: I wouldn't stop you, fuzzy to me is more likely scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
I said nothing about fuzzy tunneling.
I called your post fake.
Thanks for playing, sorry to see you as scum, yes I've played with fuzzy before this is not toen
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.