↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:
In other news, the passionate storm has been notably absent from the start of the game.
Why would you expect them to be here for gamestart?
↑ Spider Gwen wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb and say Varsoon's town.
Why?
Also why did you feel it was necessary to change your vote three times on page 1?
@Aneninen
First you vote for me in the sign-up thread and now here...
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:↑ Spider Gwen wrote:@Eagle: It's a joke. I was saying hi to Varsoon.
The vote, or calling him town?
PEdit:
Yes. I just did my research. I'll assume this is Titus speaking. Where's your other head?
Hmmm. Not sure if I believe you're a newb. But that's irrelevant to alignment anyway. I see you've been in two games already, why are you excited about your roleplay only now?
I hate hydras.
Was your vote on Spider Gwen RVS?
↑ Passionate Storm wrote:@51 both heads agree you look like scum. Jeanne's gut.
Anen is making a long post but it sheeps what is already done.
We asked why EE doesn't like the thread. Jeanne pressed on AJ. The "doesn't feel like RVS" was asked already.
The only things that weren't repeats reveal a focus on being on the outside. Don't see how 46 is a joke at all, but Anen's concern highlights he feels like an outsider. the response to 50 seems like buddying and egging EE on.
VOTE: Anen
~Titus
Good vote. I also thought something seemed off about Anen's tone. And as stupid as RVS is, Anen's RVS on me did seem kinda forced and safe as well.
↑ Errantparabola wrote:Sorry. How I see it, town should be acting town to others along with scumhunting. Do you think that town should actively point out the town things that they are doing to accomplish this goal?
This question seems obvious. What answer were you hoping to get from that?
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:↑ Errantparabola wrote:Eagle-
1) For clarification, are you actively claiming to be purposely withholding a vote in order to gauge reactions from people that notice it?
2) In response to your question, I post what I think I can bring to the table. If something has already been said, no need to say it again.
1. Yes.
2. Perhaps. But theory is not necessarily a wonderful thing to bring to the table, especially in RVS. At least, not in my opinion, but that is theory, so I'll stop there.
But now it's time for this:
VOTE: errantparabola
I didn't like the tunneling. But I especially didn't like the way he backed off at the end.
@Passionate Storm: who is green? Who is grey?
I don't think errant was tunneling or backing off. He interacted with Titus and continued to call BS on your purposeful lack of a vote. Justify this.
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:↑ Passionate Storm wrote:
I think we'll keep that quiet. One of us at least would like to post anonymously without meta baggage at some point.
I don't get the errant vote.
~Titus
Makes sense.
It's a weak read. But he kept asking silly questions on the lack of vote while implying that a vote gets more reactions, even after my lack of vote has gotten far more responses from multiple people and I think the responses are more genuine because I believe the intentional lack of vote is not expected. So blatantly ignoring facts to pursue a read and tunnel through certain other interesting things going on around him such as the aneninen accusation or the Gwen response, or even you, which he eventually pursued but backed off to state something reasonable and kind of defend you in a strange way. On top of this, he backs off slightly to clarify, and then responds unreasonably when I call him out on it. In my experience, town is far more unreasonable than scum- they're lives are slightly more expendable and they have less to work with, so they in a way have to be somewhat unreasonable to force frantic scum to try to reason with them or get in an argument with another town, and thus gain a read.
Okay...if town is unreasonable then why is errant scum for being unreasonable? I also still don't see where he backed off.
↑ Errantparabola wrote:
↑ Extrapolated Eagle wrote:I'd like to add to this and state that I believe there IS another type of town that would prefer to sit back and watch, I.e. myself, as well as other players in this game, I believe, but even these players can be forced to scrambling in the dirt with everyone else should no one else create enough content.
I understand. I really do. But I'd like to point out that it's very possible that this is scum here justifying a lack of scumhunting in the future. Setting the stage to defend against future attacks, if you will.
I was liking errant up until this. It's apologetic for no reason.
↑ Klingoncelt wrote:FoS: Passionate Storm
I'm not sure if what you're doing is D1 silliness or if you're both drunken Scum.
I'm going to go make a pot of coffee now, looks like it's going to be a long night.
Why a FoS and not a vote?
@EE
This might just be me being dense but could you quote exactly where errant backed off on pushing you? I don't see it.
Why?
What does the bolded mean?
↑ Passionate Storm wrote:↑ Aunt Jemina wrote:Oh, Nenny, deary, such flattery is unnecessary when speaking to me.
Please, just say, "instinct says she's scum".
Deary, what you say here does not match what you said earlier.↑ Passionate Storm wrote:Actually, AJ is RVS, Aneninen is serious vote.
VOTE: Passionate Storm.
Errantmayalso be sour, however, I am not sure of this.
...Actually, while Passionate Storm is a sourread of mine, I think that I'd rather do this:
VOTE: Klingoncelt.
While I am scumreading them, regardless of their alignment, I think Celty is sour for this:There is no reason for an FoS, least of all when you have yet to cast a vote, at this stage in the game.↑ Klingoncelt wrote:FoS: Passionate Storm
I'm not sure if what you're doing is D1 silliness or if you're both drunken Scum.
I'm going to go make a pot of coffee now, looks like it's going to be a long night.
Like this post here by AJ. Klingon should be swinging here.
~Titus
You like that post? I'd like you to address AJ's scumread on you and accusation that your RVS vote and serious vote aren't what you said they were.
↑ Garmr wrote:6 pages already. After a quick glance I'm going to say
VOTE: Extrapolated Eagle
I don't really trust the bird. He seems to want to get involved in everything. He also didn't really provide a good reasoning for voting epola and never does. I would think a town player would try and push his first suspect to reveal more information instead his sitting back defending himself and I think trying to justify his vote by defending himself.
His other content is meh.
This seems like a bs vote. Why would scum want to get involved in everything?
↑ Errantparabola wrote:Nothing in 142 actually matters that much... Eagle is probably town. I see where you got the whole non-voting shit from now.
↑ Errantparabola wrote:I take that back. I don't think Eagle is town. More like null. UNVOTE:
Give me some time to think
I'm gonna need you to explain your thought process here.
OK Eagle, I see the post you think errant is backing off in now...I disagree.
Now you think the gambit failed...so what's your read on errant?
I could see myself voting a number of people atm, but I'll slap a vote down here for now and see what it does.
VOTE: Garmr
P-edit:
Yeah this was the right vote.