Not this time, actually, which is going to be a pain.Spiffeh wrote:Ranger (sorry you replaced into a scum slot)
This is a
It'll take me a little while to read 50 pages, though.
Not this time, actually, which is going to be a pain.Spiffeh wrote:Ranger (sorry you replaced into a scum slot)
Nope! Bottom of a list is not necessarily scum.beeboy wrote:ew she has me and seniors as scum together. (not to mention me as scum)
While also having spiffeh as number 1 scum.
Directly copy-pasting my notepad file I use, you get this:Cerberus v666 wrote:Because I'm kinda calling BS on ANY read on me from you considering my first post in the game wasn't until page 34, and my relative silence in recent pages...
I take note of who is who: hydra identities, replacements, and such, and then work my way from that. You didn't post, but millar13, your slot, did.notes unedited wrote:Pied Piper = Nacho/Plot
Friendless Seniors = hiplop/Errant
Swordsmith = Ranger
Cerberus v666 = millar13
The Wrong Lynch = Mala/goodmorning
{Tammy, SirCakez}
{The Pied Piper}
{Cerberus v666}
{Skybird}
{dramonic, Axelrod}
{Sakura Hana}
{beeboy, Friendless Seniors. The Wrong Lynch}
{Spiffeh}
I'll just stop you there and answer "yes".Cerberus v666 wrote:Looks good but needs more from RVS
Patience.Spiffeh wrote:Ranger this isn't working for you I suggest you change tactics
More or less. I'm getting reads. You can ask for reasons if you'd like, though I'd prefer you wait until after I've caught up before doing so, since granting the request would eat up extra time and I only have a little over an hour right now before I have to leave.Cerberus v666 wrote:We had this argument in Suikoden didn't we?
OhmygodIcan'tbelievemyslotactuallysaidthisyouhavenoideahowmuchI'mlaughingrightnow.Swordsmith wrote:VOTE: SirCakez
Why not?
Yeah, that doesn't look so good for Errant. Kinda does look like scum-Errant from a superficial-one-post-only-judgment, based mainly on the notion of, "well what Errant's sayingbeeboy wrote:Seniors read progression on Ranger sucks
I actually think Friendless Seniors looks worse than tictac now.beeboy wrote:Ranger let's lynch tictac instead.
That's the problem.beeboy wrote:Spiff is prob town here even if he can't see obv scum.
I thought you were one of the main pushers? You, hiplop, Gorkington, and Fro99er are all I really remember from that game, and I remembered you all disagreeing on some important things but agreeing on literally everything else outside of paranoia and I thought that was among them. I suppose I could have misremembered, though.Spiffeh wrote:Ranger I defended you like all game in Mafiaception lol
I read the current stuff as I see it, which is after I make a post. Like now.beeboy wrote:I feel like there are going to be gaps in our interaction until you catch up
Well if you want it, just ask.Axelrod wrote:I really like this reads progression you are doing, but it would be even better with a little more commentary on what is making people shift around for you.
Well, ISirCakez wrote:Omg Ranger's reads are pretty fantastic.
Not really, but I actually feel empathy for you at that point. Tammy's posting did feel like a betrayal, but there's no tangible reason for why. She's not scum, so maybe it's her pushing someone who is also clearly not scum? (beeboy.)The Pied Piper wrote:can someone explain why they feel that way?
This is one of the reasons dramonic and Axelrod have dropped in my reads.Spiffeh wrote:Ugh I feel like I have too many townreads and someone is dogging me
(Psst, it's because Errant actually is fake this game.)Spiffeh wrote:EP why do you always sound fake to me it makes me sad
I'm sorry, I'm not Cheetory. :(SirCakez wrote:WAIT this means Cheet can join omg
I still owe you BIG time for that. <3SirCakez wrote:Open 623
That game sucked >.<
This is true, though I'd note it also applies to Mirhawk.The Pied Piper wrote:I don't think there were ever more than 4-5 votes on Seniors at a time, but a lot more people were willing to vote them. If Seniors are scum, I'd look for more scum in the people who were willing to vote without voting.
My mini normal also had three scum replace-outs and no town replace-outs, too. Incidentally, Mirhawk replaced in.SirCakez wrote:There were three scum replace outs in a Mini Theme I just finished and no town replace outs.
Case-by-case. In tictac's case, I wouldn't be surprised if I was wrong, but I'm not expecting I am. For Axelrod, my read's shifted a ton so obviously the answer there is I don't have a solid grip. But if any other player could be called new, then I'm not wrong on them.The Pied Piper wrote:Ranger, how confident are you in your ability to read newbies?
Orphaned read: I don't really have any definitive place for SnarkySnowman, and am hoping to see more of him. I liked his early posting, which got him that high in the first place, and his posting since then hasn't made me think "could be scum", I just don't have anything right now that gives me an idea of where he'd be on the town scale, he's just somewhere in there.The Pied Piper wrote:Semi unrelatedly, why is Snarky so high, they are a minimalist like you but they are capable of doing more than literally nothing
Ah, so you've played with me before. Good to know. I don't particularly need to know who you are (to be honest, I could probably guess but I don't see the point), but knowing you've played with me and have a positive impression of me is a nice fact to know.True Ogre wrote:You've obviously done things in detail but I might like to bounce some sorting off you I think. I'm really hoping you're town here.
Well, those two give the most information in my opinion.podoboq wrote:@Ranger: whose lynch and flip provides the most information for town? Is there another metric that we should use to determine who we lynch today?
I was waiting for a votecount. I have one. If the votes haven't changed since then, I will move to you. If they have, then I'll see who they have moved onto and who was moving and evaluate from there.Mirhawk wrote:Aren't you supposed to be on my wagon?
Correction: post-catchup content. Activity is universal across all games. Once or twice a day, I will come in, make a series of posts catching up, and leave again. Content is not. Though frankly I haven't found much a difference between my scum and town games. I'm sure it exists, I just haven't identified it personally. The closest is a slight tell, but even that's not absolute.davesaz wrote:I'd start her in the middle and will need to see post-catchup activity to determine whether this is a strong town entrance or a masterful scum one.
If by manipulative, you mean being completely and entirely blunt and unsubtle about who I want lynched and pushing them hard? Then, yes. There is zero ambiguity; I want one of {Mirhawk, Friendless Seniors} lynched.Mirhawk wrote:I think Ranger is being manipulative to get who she wants lynched.
Nobody asked me to.She's slotted every person into what appears to be a fairly solid read with little to no justification for almost any of them.
To the contrary. I said I was specifically avoiding using it.Oh and shes scumreading my meta when she hasn't seen my town game.
We also had this argument in Suikoden if you recall. You thought it was extremely suspicious for me to hop "conveniently" onto LQ after others had already done so. My statement now is just as true as then: I don't give any regard to how large a wagon on a person is. Scum are scum. I vote for scum, I find scum. It doesn't matter if other people have also found that same scum, I still from my own reasons have found the scum and will vote them. I could be a vanity vote, I could be the hammer vote, I don't care where I am on the wagon because it's irrelevant.Cerberus v666 wrote:Nothing about her catchup seems "fake" to me except the fact that the two biggest wagons are also her two strongest scum reads. That does read as contrived, but it could also simply mean that those two slots have done a number of things which are objectively scummy/anti-town, or that she was swayed by the arguments people have made about those slots which she read as she was catching up.
Well tough.Amihan wrote:I am scumreading the hell out of Ranger's entrance and progression.
I wouldn't say that.Cerberus v666 wrote:Ranger could likely duplicate that particular sort of entrance as scum, so the entrance as a whole is null.
904 felt all kinds of wrong. In particular, Mirhawk being among the likes felt out of place. Your middle-tier also felt out of whack. Pistachi0n felt too low, for instance, and you didn't explain {Pied Piper, TrueOgre}. Pied Piper felt too low especially without explanation, and TrueOgre too high for that same reason. Between {True Ogre, tictac}, you also get players who look like they're the scumbuddies-in-an-otherwise-town-list, similar to Mirhawk above.Axelrod wrote:What did you hate about them?
>"Ranger was sketchy for having Seniors and Mirhawk as top scum"tictac wrote:I did skim recent events too, and yeah, Ranger ending up with Seniors & Mir as top scum is sketchy.
Current preferences pist>Seniors>Ranger>Mir
Well for a start, I'd be an utter hypocrite to say "Tammy looks good, aside from how little I've seen her" when I literally have to rant about my activityThe Wrong Lynch wrote:I don't really like the fact she put Tammy up at a top tier when she was absent for like pages at a time and before that her posts didn't really sway me either way.
Because I'm pushing you and Seniors.Mirhawk wrote:Why is there no justification for her Spiffeh and True Ogre scumreads, but there is for me and Seniors.
"Oh, Tammy posted. Town."beeboy wrote:Hey Ranger can you break down you initial Tammy read for me?
If I'm wrong I lynch the other.davesaz wrote:What if you're wrong and they're town?
Again, my read on you wasbeeboy wrote:Why was your initial read on me scum if my enthusiasm levels where highest at the start of the game?
Except yes I do?beeboy wrote:Ranger you have no reason to understand my scum game.
The short answer is: everything.True Ogre wrote:What do you like about Cakez?
Basically, all the right notes are there. Sakura Hana's posts are not consistent; they come in key areas, but every time Sakura starts posting, I'm left with a feeling which can more or less be summed up as: starts null, becomes town by the time she's finished her burst of posting. Never does she cross into scum, so the townread remains as-is or strengthened each time. This is in fact ironically the only consistent thing. At the beginning, I wasn't sure about Sakura, but by the end of the RVS, I felt more likely town than not. In the middle of the game, I wasn't sure especially since Sakura Hana wasn't posting as much as I thought she would be, but when she came in she looked town. And in more recent times, that trend has continued: her posting starts okay but doesn't give alignment-indicative content, but after a while, I warm up and see things which look definitively town.True Ogre wrote:What are your thoughts there?
That was my last Large Theme scumgame, but that would honestly be like looking at my last Large Theme towngame, which was my fourth game on-site...and that's going by sign-up time; by completion-time (as in, was killed via lynch or nightkill), it was either my first or second. I have eight completed scum games: Machina Mafia (oldest), Mafiaception (second-oldest), Blitz 1 (actually might be older than Mafiaception, definitely finished first), Blitz 7 (not indicative of my normal scum game), Open 628 (once I started playing, anyway; I let PC do the posting for the first half of the game and only started posting when we were the last scum alive), Blitz 25 (best solo-scum example of my play), Firebringer's Marathon (it was a marathon, though), and Mexican Standoff, which was multiball (so I was legitimately scumhunting).SirCakez wrote:I read Mafiaception and her play is nothing like it was there.
Easy. There's more town in the game than scum. Naturally, that means I'm going to have more town reads than scum reads, get them easier, and have them stick harder. Every player in that top tier earned their spot except Tammy. (No offense to Tammy, that's not a comment on your play, merely a statement on the nature of my read: town, but for absolutely no tangible reason.) I don't put players in the top-tier lightly. If I did, Pied Piper would already be in there, but because I have slight reservations about both heads (Ibeeboy wrote:Ranger why where your town reads so sticky? 4/4 of your town RVS reads stuck throughout your entire read list?
It kind-of does, though. If I put no effort into a game, it's not alignment-indicative, sure. I'm lazy as both town and scum, putting as little as needed in. When Ibeeboy wrote:Effort doesn't equal alignment
My replace-in that game was nothing like this one. Did you notice that in that game, I made absolutely no effort to read every page? I read enough so that I could have some genuine reads, and then never read a single page more, because that extra effort was unnecessary: I had some real reads, I could fake the rest, I was sitting comfortably the whole game on those exact reads. I held onto reads that should have died (i.e., Almost50), and only reevaluated reads as necessitated by game content and sometimes not even then (again, Almost50). The one and only time I reevaluated a read was chilledtea, the day before lylo, and even then that was because my sincere scumread on Kop was proven wrong (ergo, game content proved me wrong), so I sincerely believed chilledtea was the mafia roleblocker. (Who was my top priority for lynching, as eliminating the mafia roleblocker would give us free reign.)davesaz wrote:Ranger's replace-in as scum in Open 627 was similar to this one, though much shorter.
Counterpoint: I'mwould never give a read on a single RVS only post, much less a top of the list read, and can't think of a town motivation to do so.
When I became super-confident in Mirhawk and Friendless Seniors.davesaz wrote:How did Ranger suddenly become the town leader?
This.SirCakez wrote:Ok ya Seniors is still scum. Mirhawk has just kind of vanished too.
Still standing by Ranger townread, her entrance/catchup felt super natural and open.
Why is everyone fighting with Tammy she's obvtown stop.
No, the placement of the reads felt wrong regardless of whether I agreed with them or not.Axelrod wrote:So, what your saying is you disagreed with the actual reads?
The difference is, I never give reasons unless specifically asked. You were making a reads list about everyone, and randomly were giving reasons for some but not all, without such an excuse.And you're bothered that I didn't give explanations for why everyone was where they were? I mean, that's a little ironic, isn't it?
My stance there could not be any more unambiguous: I will vote for them if the wagons between {Mirhawk, Friendless Seniors} are comparable in size. Last votecount, that was not the case. I've seen votes since then, but I'm still fairly certain it's not the case. If I'm wrong, if the wagon has regained traction, then I will switch over. I don't care which of them is lynched. They're both scum. So as long as the lynch is one of them, we're good.beeboy wrote:Ranger the only way you can redeem yourself is by voting seniors!
davesaz I've liked the posting of a lot, and I've liked the people townreading him and their reasons for townreading him, and largely disliked the people scumreading him and their reasons for scumreading him. So, a triple-hit: good posting, good interactions from good people, good interactions from bad people. The only way he could be better is to have more firm, solidly good interactions with bad people, and even there he's not half-bad. (E.g. his Friendless Seniors scumread.)Cerberus v666 wrote:Mind giving reasons for the relevant changes?
You've been there for a while? I moved you there in 1309.Cerberus v666 wrote:Also, you don't think moving me up to whatever your top tier of townieness is isn't relevant!! :(
I can give the story behind this if it'd interest you. Short version: how I was raised playing off-site; we refer back to the RVS (which is most of D1) constantly. I wouldn't normally give analysis until D4 or so, but I still compile reads with reasons in my head.Tammy wrote:The last two games I played with Ranger she was scum and did reads similarly, but from what people who were defending her in machina said, this is pretty much what she does as far as reads starting from rvs.
Well, sheMirhawk wrote:I meant that you deliberately left Skybird out of the lynch pool to try and make people think he wasn't a viable lynch.
This is a fair method of reading me.Tammy wrote:I won't be able to make a kind of determination of her reads list until we get a flip or two.
Well, most likely, yes.Spiffeh wrote:I think tictac might be scum
And the scum motivation for lying about a past game, with easily-found facts, which multiple members of the current game were in, is...what, exactly?Spiffeh wrote:Like especially since saying I caught her in Mafiaception is just wrong
I am not opposed to this.Snarky literally chimes in the post directly after someone asks him to be vigged
He is clearly paying attention to this game but is refusing to post
Yes he has a reputation for being lynchbait but in my experience he has not been THIS useless Day 1
He needs to be vigged tonight
Call me a cynic.SirCakez wrote:We have 4 days, we could move a new wagon.
Uh, but throwing one wagon clearly ahead of the other is doing exactly that? It's having consensus on one over the other.Cerberus v666 wrote:Also, I'm not fond of how ranger, after saying she was okay with either party being lynched, is the move which throws one wagon clearly ahead of the other, rather than doing as she said she would and moving if it seemed the consensus was a lynch on the other.
And? The problem with this is...?Cerberus v666 wrote:Your vote is what caused the votes to swing one way.
Hey, so you want to know what the scum counter-wagon to {Friendless Seniors, Mirhawk} is?SirCakez: Spiffeh, Tammy, Mirhawk, Friendless Seniors (4)
Can you switch your vote, then?pistachi0n wrote:This vote combined with the posts before it (by seniors and others) has had me starting to see the case for seniors scum.
Oh? What happened to your scumread on me? This is not how you talk to a scumread.Friendless Senior wrote:get your head out of your ass please.