Newbie 1714 (Game Over)
Forum rules
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Seeing as how the word "lurker" was already used, let me make this my first thing to say, as might come important anyway.
I'm a European and my time zone often disagrees with those of most of the players. For example, the day 1 started at 11:09 p.m. for me. It's now 6 p.m. and as soon as I got back home, I decided to check mafiascum because I knew the game would start soon. And I'm already being called a lurker. LOLed.
VOTE: sad because I was in a game with him :^)
Will get to reading later, I'm dead tired.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Sometimes I will be inactive for a few pages and then come back with a longer post. Often a few pages appear while I'm asleep because time zones. When that happens, I'll be making longer posts which address everything that happened this far. In order to make this clearer to read, I'll be dividing them into parts.
Part 1: pages 1-2
A couple of months of chat mafia. One game here, as Town Tracker.
Is he?
Tone is a great way to get reads. That includes sarcasm. Noted your opinion.
How is a vote at RVS a push?In post 10, beeboy wrote:Although your push is based on misunderstanding a joke I made you are probably town aligned and we are only 10 posts into the game!
I like that approach to IC.In post 14, Ranger wrote:
<3beeboy wrote:Senpai please teach me ;-;
I think that, as far as how I'll IC, the best way in general will just be to let things be unless I see an obvious need to intervene, e.g. if a newbie expects to seriously no-lynch on D1 I'd need to tell them why we don't do that.
Also, I know you know the answer to this, but no spoilers. I want the newbs here to think about this:
{beeboy}
{dvds}
{Zyf, sad}
Also, the Ranger, the Ranger who made bracketed read lists!
To be honest, not a fan of them.
Precisely why I don't like bracketed read lists. More of a "on a scale from X to Y" person.In post 30, Raskolnikov wrote:You can call me rask
Ranger always does it from town to scum, though it's a bit annoying because you don't know how strong the extremes of the list are at any given point.
Not particularly scumreading anyone atm but poking her is necessary.
I think you might have missed the part where Ranger explained her approach to ICing.In post 38, Zyf wrote:Noticing that ranger's active in a different thread right now but ignoring this one.
So while I don't think that's enough evidence to bring someone to L-2, I would like some explanation, as an inactive IC is not exactly helping out.
1. Because it spells Fox, as well as f(x) if you read it in a specific manner. Also, "oh" and "ex" are two words-not-words that I feel describe me well.In post 43, Sickofit1138 wrote:I do like what be seen some rask.
I definitely would like some more conversation to hop onto.
So 2 questions:
1. Why did you choose your username?
2. How long have you had a general experience in mafia? (Not necessarily just this site)
2. Already answered.
You might want to avoid that - just because someone is FoSing your townread doesn't make them scummy. What you're doing is buddying and could be interpreted as Chainsaw Defence. Not saying it is, far from it - but I think it's a bad play.In post 45, Zyf wrote:Double ?
Also because I'm too lazy to go back and quote rask's response to my question...
UNVOTE: f-oh-ex VOTE: beeboy
Firstly because I now have more support for my reasoning against the inactive coasty townie, andbecuase beeboy is voting someone I'm reading as town without giving me info to hink otherwise
I like that post. Good eye with noticing that Rask made his vote pointless by diluting the pressure it aplies. One point to beeboy.In post 47, beeboy wrote:1. It isn't an omgus because rask wasn't voting me.
2. I don't like how Rask made his vote lose any form of pressure by saying it was a poke rather then a real read. Not only is that playing it way too safe for me to think it is town it also fails to actually apply any pressure with your vote.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Part 2: pages 3-4
A bunch of reads with no comment. From a person who barely writes anything game-related. You'll forgive me if I don't consider these very seriously.In post 52, Sickofit1138 wrote:If you must know.
Zyf: Null-town.
Rask: Null-town
Ranger: Null
DVD: Null
Sad: Null-scum.
Beeboy: Null-scum.
Also, sudden scumreads on Sad are noted.
Probably a hasty opinion but a valuable post. Sad was also in my first newbie so I'll try to use that to read him.In post 53, sad1492 wrote:Uh-huh. Scum reads on me because of only 1 post.
Opinion: Sick is simply sheeping Ranger, his partner. Zyf town.
Foses: not yet anyone. At least for another page
People please, scum reading ANYONE on the first page requires skill.
"any biases whatsoever", ah, language is important and this is a very strong emphasis. Let me pull up 2 posts.In post 54, Zyf wrote:
I have to agree–reading sad as scum with one post is a little discomforting.In post 53, sad1492 wrote:Uh-huh. Scum reads on me because of only 1 post.
Opinion: Sick is simply sheeping Ranger, his partner. Zyf town.
Foses: not yet anyone. At least for another page
People please, scum reading ANYONE on the first page requires skill.
F-oh-ex, ayale, and dvds all have yet to make meaningful posts, so while I have a suspicion that one poster among us is scum, I hesitate to make pushes for 2 players being scum.
For now:
Null-Town: Rask-although not by much, they do seem to be posting in the interest of the town, and do not appear to have any biases whatsoever.
In post 26, Raskolnikov wrote:Liking zyf here. Beeboys response reads fairly relaxed though I don't know how good as scum he is.
How is zyf at the bottom here?
Rodion (may I call you Rodion?) seems to care a lot about zyf - first pointing out his low position in Ranger's bracket list, then putting him on top of his own. That makes Zyf's praise look suspicious to me.
Awfully pushy.In post 57, Zyf wrote:
Could you perhaps get a read on ranger?In post 56, dvds12 wrote:So I have been rereading the fourm and right now everyone is null for me as of the moment, since not alot of discussion has been going on and it has just been kinda chitchatting, have not been able to make out good reads on everyone yet.
We've been posting more than 'chitchat' and I'm wondering if I'm just being paranoid by reading them as scum.
Ditto. Ranger seems to be a good IC so far but no actual alignment read from me.In post 58, dvds12 wrote:To me all of rangers posts have been more IC related than actual game stuff, so that is why to me I read her as null for now.
I don't like people who immediately jump with "But I did this and that, you should townread me!".In post 59, Zyf wrote:
Hrm.In post 58, dvds12 wrote:To me all of rangers posts have been more IC related than actual game stuff, so that is why to me I read her as null for now.
What's making you read me as null? Afaik I've been trying to get discussion going.
1. Again pushing about opinion on Ranger.In post 64, Zyf wrote:
What about ranger?In post 62, beeboy wrote:Task is still scum and you are still town.
And sad? Do you read them as null or do you have a good explanation as to why you think they're scum?
2. Take a look at the last questions. It's an awfully loaded question:Do you have a null read on them or do you scumread them with a good explanation?
Tsk, tsk, tsk. I don't like that.
Asking a person X why people A and B both scumread a person L is a pretty bad question. Especially at this stage of game. Especially when the person B (sickofit) made no meaningful posts so far.In post 66, Zyf wrote:
So then why do you think sad is being read as scum by /both/ ranger and sickofit?In post 65, beeboy wrote:Sad and Ranger are null because nothing they have done stands out to me.
What Zyf is trying do to here is: "two people scumread him, come on, you can't have a null read on him". Compare with what I said about his previous post, just above.
I don't like how arbitrarily you call Ranger and sad (more or less directly) scum and then brush off what sickofit is doing, even if you yourself analyse it as bad.In post 69, Zyf wrote:In post 67, beeboy wrote:Because something stands out to them that I am clearly not seeing. (I literally only have cop out answers as these are null reads of mine)
I also want sickofit to explain his read first as I already know Ranger wouldn't commit herself to something she can't explain even as scum.Yeah definitely agree on making sick explain first:
Right now it looks like ranger's scum and then sickofit is just agreeing to boost the argument, without a real argument of their own other than omgus, which at this stage could probably been changed.
Appreciating the (apparent) honesty here, so I think I'll move you back to null.
Bold because it will be important in a second.
Noted but not much comment at this time - meta and "too obvious" are a load of WIFOM in Newbies.In post 74, Raskolnikov wrote:I find it hard to believe town ranger isn't townreading zyf, especially considering how she talks to him in 51 which comes off as treating him town.
The last game I was in with her she was pretty actually apparent scum in that normally she wouldn't be completely misreading the game, assuming my own reads aren't off themselves. This isn't nearly as bad but still weird; I would expect her scumgame to be a lot better after that but then again this is hardly a red flag either. Ehh.
So Zyf was asking question "why do you think sickofit and Ranger scumread sad", then says twice that he wants sickofit to explain his read, then he jumps to saying "sickofit scumreads sad because omgus".In post 75, Zyf wrote: Currently, I'm definitely not reading Fox as scum so I'm going to tentatively say Ranger-Sickofit scum team?
I'd like to hear their reads explained first before I go any further, but I'm struggling to decide which one I want to lynch...
Sickofit on the other hand is a weaker read for me, it's just they seem to be trying to lead the conversation astray, they don't seem to be interested in giving valuable read explanations,and they read sad as scum because omgus...they just seem to be following ranger too closely...
Hrm...UNVOTE: ranger and VOTE: sickofit
Also, thanks fox, I'll hopefully see you in a bit.
1. Sickofit never got to explaining his read.
2. You're inconsinstent.
OBJECTION! Leading the witness!In post 77, Zyf wrote:In post 74, Raskolnikov wrote:I find it hard to believe town ranger isn't townreading zyf, especially considering how she talks to him in 51 which comes off as treating him town.
The last game I was in with her she was pretty actually apparent scum in that normally she wouldn't be completely misreading the game, assuming my own reads aren't off themselves. This isn't nearly as bad but still weird; I would expect her scumgame to be a lot better after that but then again this is hardly a red flag either. Ehh.Do you think sickofit is following ranger as a scum team and that's why sick also didn't post their explanations?
Also to ranger: Unfortunately, deliberately not sharing your reads sets a precedent for the newbs like myself, so now I'm having difficulty reading sick as town, too. If everyone else follows your strategy, then we're basically toasted because no one can convince anyone else of...well...anything.
Second praising of Rask btw. Also, me and Ayale in the same bracket as beeboy and sad? That's just... wrong. I made like 2 posts at the time and Ayale made none.In post 79, Zyf wrote:
I see what you're saying, but the difference is sad literally had posted once (on the first page) without any substantial thoughts yet ranger immediately read sad as scum. I think they took offense due to the one post + first page, not the fact that it's RVS rn.In post 76, Raskolnikov wrote:
You're arguing against early scumreads and fos and at the same time scumreading sick/ranger as a team?In post 53, sad1492 wrote:Uh-huh. Scum reads on me because of only 1 post.
Opinion: Sick is simply sheeping Ranger, his partner. Zyf town.
Foses: not yet anyone. At least for another page
People please, scum reading ANYONE on the first page requires skill.
That being said, I like your thinking. I'd like to put you in town.
Updated thoughts:
{Rask}
{...no one}
{beeboy, F o x, sad, Ayale}
{dvds-your lack of interest in getting any thoughts down bothers me, but it could easily be newb caution. Please, the more you put, the better it is for us as a town as a whole}
{Ranger, Sickofit}
Not sad this time? Trying to strengthen general scumread on Ranger and sickofit and townread on Rask?In post 84, Zyf wrote:Nice, welcome aboard, Vandit.
Interested mostly on your reads on Rask, Ranger, and sickofit.
Your mafia experience?
Note that at this point I'm scumreading Zyf already so I might be prone to tunnelling. Asking about one's strongest reads isn't necessarily scummy... but Zyf keeps rubbing me wrong.
Awwwwwwwww, you care so much about how other people view Rask! It's so cute!In post 86, Zyf wrote:*Mr. Lonely plays in background*
Whenever beeboy gets back:
Do you still read rask as scum?
You already answered that question yourself.In post 87, Zyf wrote:Sick, whenever you get back on, you'd better explain why you read sad as scum.
Hm, so is Rask pushing people townreading Zyf?In post 88, Ranger wrote:
I didn't say anything about not townreading them, now, did I?Raskolnikov wrote:I find it hard to believe town ranger isn't townreading zyf, especially considering how she talks to him in 51 which comes off as treating him town.
They went to clean the floor after the flood.In post 99, Zyf wrote:Yo where did everyone go
Get it? Because you wrote 6 posts in a row?- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
No one asked you that yet? :O They should be PUNISHED for that CRIME.In post 178, Raskolnikov wrote:
You're the first one to ask me that!In post 174, F-oh-ex wrote:Rodion (may I call you Rodion?)
I'd prefer rask just so things don't get confusing, I already feel buddied though
Still scumreading you slightly <3- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
At the time of my post sad was at what, L-3? L-2? As I mentioned before, I've played one game with him so I more or less know what to expect from him, I believe. Pressure on him was a very good method of gaining a read so I stayed on him so as not to alleviate it. If you accuse me, as you suggested earlier, of staying on sad in hopes of hammer happening so quickly, then wow, I wish I could read the future the way you think me to.
I'd need to read the game carefully to make an opinion of Vandit. I'll admit, I didn't touch the thread during the night. I'll actually decide today or tomorrow if I am going to need a replacement because while I'd hate to be that person, I also wouldn't like to cripple the game by not being able to pay enough attention.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
The fact that you mention offsetting protective action seems like Too Much Information for me. You seem to suggest Doctor/Jailkeeper would be on Ranger and that Mafia Roleblocker tried to target them (what else could be the "offset"?).In post 292, beeboy wrote:I don't think Ranger was killed for only being the IC she was probably also killed for having correct reads.
There had to have been something there to offset the chance she was targeted by a protective action last night.
I think you just revealed too much. Too Much Information, maybe scumgloating, too? Either way, I think you are either Mafia RB or a partner of one.
VOTE: beeboy- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Corrected for you: If Mafia has 1x RB there is 100% chance there is a protection role. And why would you mention Ranger being targetted by a protection action out of a blue?In post 294, beeboy wrote:If mafia has 2x goons there is a chance there is a doctor.
If mafia has 1x RB there is a chance there is a doctor.
I believe this info is very public.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
You didn't really answer my question. This brought nothing to the table, except maybe some Information Instead of Analysis right now. And IIRC Ranger wasn't such a strong general townread. Hell, she wasn't even #1 popular townread.In post 297, beeboy wrote:
Because that is always a risk the scum team needs to consider regardless of whether or not they have a roleblocker.In post 296, F-oh-ex wrote:
Corrected for you: If Mafia has 1x RB there is 100% chance there is a protection role. And why would you mention Ranger being targetted by a protection action out of a blue?In post 294, beeboy wrote:If mafia has 2x goons there is a chance there is a doctor.
If mafia has 1x RB there is a chance there is a doctor.
I believe this info is very public.
Also, your thesis was that Ranger was killed to silence her and her reads. That's a bold statement and you conveniently didn't mention the part that it's a huge WIFOM. In hopes of trying to make us go after Ranger's reads, perhaps? That would give you a huge towncred since Ranger mentioned you once as your top scumread.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Er.In post 298, beeboy wrote:If Ranger was being scumread and had wrong reads I don't understand why she would be killed.
It could indicate that Rask is scum but meh.
1: Day 1 lasted like 2-3 days. Those early reads would shift 100 times and Ranger was an IC. Fear-killed, maybe?
2: People who were a strong general townread would be more likely to be protected.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
"If Ranger was either going to burn herself or another townie into the ground why was she killed?"
I implore you to read what I've just written - day 1 lasted 2-3 days, those early reads would shift 100 times. Assuming that Ranger would lynch a mislynch, after 3 days of IRL time, is just dumb.
Protecting the general town read > protecting IC tbh.
If she was scum read so strongly, fearkill makes all the more sense.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
What's weird about commenting on something that catches your eye and rubs you wrong?In post 322, Raskolnikov wrote:
Err, before you caught up on vandit and formed an opinion (280) you scumread beeboys NK spec?In post 293, F-oh-ex wrote:The fact that you mention offsetting protective action seems like Too Much Information for me. You seem to suggest Doctor/Jailkeeper would be on Ranger and that Mafia Roleblocker tried to target them (what else could be the "offset"?).
I think you just revealed too much. Too Much Information, maybe scumgloating, too? Either way, I think you are either Mafia RB or a partner of one.
VOTE: beeboy
How can you even discuss the nightkill if you haven't looked at vandit (rangers 2nd scumread)?
Oh no, how did I dare discuss the nightkill, aaaaaa!!!- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
I never said I didn't read the game, did I? I usually make 2-3 thorough rereads before solidifying opinions - that's what I referred to as solid reading. Also, Ranger's reads were early reads, she posted them what, 1-2 IRL days into game? That's hardly final enough to draw a nightkill while being a strong townread is.
I'm not mocking you personally, I'm being generally sardonic.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Er, where did you get that I DON'T have an intent on Vandit? I just followed the trail I saw and as I said, I'm kinda busy until Saturday. I've seen a policy lynch suggestion for Vandit and hell, I'm down for that if we don't have a better target in out collective hive mind. As per scum reading, I haven't dug deep enough yet to make an opinion whether he's such an obvious scum or an idiot town.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Why wouldn't I vote someone who stroke me as scum. Leaving a vote right now is of no much consequence, not at this stage, and everyone shouts not to vote Vandit anyway. And I actually dropped the topic for the time being yesterday when I saw it going into a dead alley so I'm hardly pushing it anymore.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
How the fuck did I imply ranger was not IC, Ranger being IC is a freaking fact. I suspected Mafia RB being in play from beeyboy's posts and if there is one, there's a Doc/JK too. This means Mafia wouldn't want to go for the most obvious kill.In post 342, Zyf wrote:Yep. Agreed
So what are we speculating? Scumpartner or PRs?
Or both?
Also fox at the beginning of toDay you mentioned that killing general townread>killing IC.
Since you imply ranger was not IC, who were you expecting to get attacked?
And to be honest, I didn't have a good guess on who would be killed.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Okay, now I see what you mean. I think I already answered this but let me restate this becaues I might not have written it clearly.In post 348, Zyf wrote:
OMFG lmao what a failIn post 345, F-oh-ex wrote:
How the fuck did I imply ranger was not IC, Ranger being IC is a freaking fact. I suspected Mafia RB being in play from beeyboy's posts and if there is one, there's a Doc/JK too. This means Mafia wouldn't want to go for the most obvious kill.In post 342, Zyf wrote:Yep. Agreed
So what are we speculating? Scumpartner or PRs?
Or both?
Also fox at the beginning of toDay you mentioned that killing general townread>killing IC.
Since you imply ranger was not IC, who were you expecting to get attacked?
And to be honest, I didn't have a good guess on who would be killed.
I meant general townread XDDDDD
The fact that Ranger was killed, rather than you or Rask, agrees with what came to my mind when I read beeboy's posts - Mafia RB exists. Existence of Mafia RB guarantees existence of Doc/JK. Therefore, if Mafia RB does exist, Mafia would expect their best kill to be protected and would instead go for a less optimal option - in this case, an IC.
Take this with a grain of salt obviously - this is my hypothesis and it's quite a long shot but it's my best answer for "What do you think actually happened and why did it happen?".
Regarding Vandit claiming, it seems that he is the agreed lynch so I don't see why he wouldn't claim. It will also be better if he claims now rather than 1 day before deadline so we can discuss his claim.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
So you're sick of this gamestate?In post 406, Sickofit1138 wrote:
It's true. I REALLY hate this dead gamestate.In post 405, beeboy wrote:I have had a recent realization that if we stall the hammer to long and let the game die that is anti town.
HAR HAR.- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
- F-oh-ex
-
F-oh-ex Goon
- F-oh-ex
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 358
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Poland
Eh, in my previous game I was Tracker and despite trying to hold back my instinct to townlead, I gained a massive towncred. I wanted to avoid it this game so I played badly on purpose. I wanted to be just scummy enough to be "next lynch" target and not to get NKed. I was going to claim day 3, whether it was 1v4 or 2v3. Had I survived N2, we'd have won probably.
Zyf, I scumread you and since you were leading, that read affected the way I perceived the game a lot. Confirming your alignment would allow me to read the game better. Also, I didn't see you getting NKed in case you were Town because you were obviously not a PR. - F-oh-ex
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex
- F-oh-ex