Mini 1802: Paint Mafia Sequel - Game Over!
Forum rules
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
are you actually serious about this? if so, why do you think so?
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
i can't really tell if i'm operating on the same wavelength as everyone else on this so i'd like to clear this up ASAP. at least for D1, i am treating the color flip exactly like a regular lynch. i don't think scum would have any way of manipulating colors pre-D1 lynch so doing it in this way in effect gives two chances of hitting scum instead of one, with the corresponding information advantage (i usually expect content surrounding scum reads/affecting who the lynch will actually be to be more relevant in terms of sorting alignment than content surrounding town reads) and the possibility of clearing a player. although, now that i think about it if we're going to play it this way i would prefer to avoid an "obvious" target for the D1 color flip.
i thought about trying to "clear" a strong player or a player who is dangerous as scum but i don't really think that's useful and it is a bad thing to rely on the assumption scum couldn't just NK them. outside of that i haven't really thought about it much so i'm open to suggestions
also,
is the claim actually something you're considering disbelieving? i don't see why this is something you'd even bother to ask if this isn't the case.In post 46, Spiffeh wrote:Why did you feel the need to claim that-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
there are actual play reasons I have for hiplop being scum that are unrelated to him just ignoring me. I just want him to answer my question first.In post 85, beeboy wrote:Like I said Hiplop is asking to be flipped.
If the conclusion he is scum he should be lynched.
pedit: <3
re: the second line, what do you think of my 51?-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
treating it the same as a regular lynch in essence forces people to do more and makes it more difficult for scum to hide: commit to more stances, post more reasoning for their scum reads, try to actually accomplish things, and so forth. that combined with whatever flip we get, when played correctly, would be much more productive - it would essentially be like playing two day phases before N1In post 90, Aristophanes wrote:What else is there to gain?
on the other hand, speed-flipping just reduces it to any standard D1 with maybe a clear
last game iirc scum could paint someone blue (town) once. there almost definitely is a similar mechanic in place here, whether it's the same or it's as you say.In post 91, beeboy wrote:I agree that a guilty result would always be reliable day 1 since a day-framer is incredibly unlikely and I don't even think scum would have a framer. Although I think it is pretty odd to assume that scum don't have any form of tailors/godfathers, I checked the last paint mafia game which did not contain anyways for scum to appear town. Although as a result I actually think it is more likely for scum to have a godfather considering there wasn't any in the last iteration of paint mafia and having a flawless way to confirm townies feels a little too powerful. Although I have reasons to not scum read hiplop here I am incredibly uncomfortable with "confirming" him as he is literally asking for it which is raising all sorts of alarm bells.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
did you even read the post?In post 92, Thestatusquo wrote:optimal play is a bullshit term people made up so they can pretend that the arbitrary actions they take are better than the arbitrary actions others take.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I'm only even suggesting this for D1. the key here is that, barring something like a godfather role (which in this case would be scum which starts the game as blue), whatever flip we get on D1 will be reliable. it's less worth it once we need to worry about the flip being wrong.
if it's played right, having in essence two day phases (the second of which with the knowledge of one person's alignment) before scum can even do anything could be amazing. I don't see why the possibility of that should just be thrown out entirely.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
that's fine with me tbh.In post 97, beeboy wrote:I am still not willing to flip him if he continues to ask for votes, I am going to do it when it is time to lynch someone. Godfathers are weaker then tailors and I think they would be more likely to be in this game.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
what exactly is "tilting" you about it?
it doesn't seem difficult to understand - at best just try to flip someone you think is scum-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I agree with this, btw. I don't like that he really did jack shit besides trying to discredit my flip strat; that kind of entrance seems more typical of scum looking for an easy way to post as opposed to town trying to figure anything out at all.In post 106, Nina Williams wrote:Nina - "thestatusquo"
Host - "Why?"
Nina - "Their opening was all sorts of wrong, and there was no attempt to even get involved"-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
and you think this is a good reason to not attempt to think about how it should be used this game ... or address what I _have_ written about it ... or so much as form a scum read?
this is my issue with you in general: you've done absolutely nothing so far to game solve, and I don't really buy "mechanics confusion" as a reason for this. all you've done so far was jump on leading wagons with other people - while this is reasonable if you aren't sure exactly how your vote in this situation should be used, it doesn't excuse not trying to form reads at all. you haven't posted any reasoning or tried to question anyone at all based on their actual play and it makes me think you're mostly using the early-game confusion as an excuse to hide (the alternative being something like "I'm tilted on who to vote, but I know I don't like players X, Y, Z").-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
regardless of who it is, I would expect a town player to... post reads... or ask questions... or do literally anything at all to sort people, rather than what TSQ did. what he did was pop in, make one vague snipe at me, and then do absolutely nothing else. it isn't productive and it isn't a town entrance; it is fairly standard for scum to just sit and vaguely snipe at things when they aren't sure what to comment on and want to look like they're doing things.In post 128, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Explain to me why you think this is TSQ!scum rather than just TSQ being TSQ?
do you have meta that suggests this is usual for TSQ, or?
regardless of TSQ, TBG is probably town for what he said about beeboy. I usually don't expect scum to try to point out town slips, and I like the way he specifically called out Nina on the TSQ wagon rather than the scum alternative which usually looks like "don't like this wagon" with hardly any specifics. the reasoning didn't look forced, either.
also Ether/Cheetory, that is amazing. is it OK if I steal that for my avi? (I'd guess that was your intention, based on the image size, but I don't want to just steal it without asking first.)-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
that really doesn't have anything to do with it. people obviously don't take the game seriously right at the beginning, where there is no serious content. however, at the point where you came into the game, it was out of RVS, or at the very least there was serious content that you could read and judge which had nothing to do with mechanics (in my posts alone I was hinting at hiplop and Spiffeh being scum) - your focus felt really off because you didn't even try to sort through any of it, just snipe at what I suggested about the flip phase. if you had come in, joked around, and then tried to sort through reads, it would have been fine; you did notIn post 135, Thestatusquo wrote:Like part of what I don't like about your attack (although I'm less concerned about it than certain people on the wagon) is that it puts a burden on me that wasn't put on literally anyone else in the game. I was supposed to be serious and trying to sort out the game in my first and second posts? Literally no one does that in the current site meta. The fact that you singled me out over literally everyone else in the game who made random/jokey entrances into the game is really kind of strange.
claiming that "you're capable of being more involved as scum" is also irrelevant, because if you are scum here, I don't think you _realized_ how forced it looked; I think you thought "this looks like a good way to get involved" and posted it.
usually I'd agree with this. I liked this in particular though because he specifically called it a town slip. it's much harder to backtrack after calling something an outright town slip than just saying "X looks town", which is a stance that requires a lot less commitment.In post 135, Thestatusquo wrote:I disagree with you on the TBG thing. In my experience scum are more likely to search for reasons to call people town early on, because a) they are trying to not make enemies and b) they already know people are town and are thus more likely to call people town than town because town is unsure.
what do you think Nina has to gain by "role fishing" there?
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
which reads do you disagree with and why?In post 144, Nahdia wrote:starting to get nervous about pieguyn... they seem to be proactively sorting but I keep coming out with the opposite perspective on events as them.
I agree that the TSQ rolefishing argument is a bad one (I'm still unsorted on Nina ftr), but at this moment I don't think it's scum-indicative. some people always just call out "role fishing" whether someone actually has anything to gain from it or whether there's anything to lose by someone claiming what they're being asked for. I saw this in the last large theme I played and TSQ strikes me as someone who would do the same. I'm hoping I have more insight over this after he answers my question.
I'm not really satisfied with Nahdia coming in here and happening to push both TSQ and Nina as scum, though the rest of her catchup seems ok.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
um, what?
if this is in reference to me, that's not what I was trying to say at all. :/-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
can you elaborate more on the TBG read? also I can explain the beeboy read if you want.In post 154, Nahdia wrote:I didn't like the timing of your beeboy townread (i do townread him now but at the time you said he was town i had him as mixed vibes), and I didn't really like the TBG read. not saying that like, you were logically incorrect to have those reads. it's just, in my reading I kind of got the opposite impression from both of those situations
p-edit: :<-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
before I compromise, I want TSQ to fully respond to my post, and I want Spiffeh and TD37 to generate at least some amount of content.In post 178, TehBrawlGuy wrote:@everyone else: Can we get this wagon going please, or at least discussion. This is stagnant AF and that makes me sad.
speaking of TD37's slot, do you disagree with my thoughts in 131?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
my issue is less about the mechanics confusion and more about the fact that, even outside of the mechanics confusion, he had literally no reads whatsoever. I could potentially see the flip confusion coming from him as town and I kinda wish he didn't replace out cos I wanted to see what he would do after I straight-up prompted him to not think about the flip for the time being and give me scum reads. but I don't see a town player going "I'm too tilted because of this flip mechanic, so I don't have any idea about scum reads" which is what he basically did. what I would expect a town player to do is something like "I'm tilted because of this flip mechanic, so I'm mostly just going to ignore it and move on".In post 187, TehBrawlGuy wrote:I agree that it's an awfully convenient way to justify a TSQ vote/speedwagon and general lack of content, which I dislike, especially since hiplop should know how likely it is that the color flip is accurate on D1, so it does earn minor scumpoints. My only issue is that if you assume town!hiplop, then his actions all make sense from the PoV of someone who thinks it's all useless. In short, I can see that coming from either town!hiplop or scum!hiplop, with Scum being a little more likely.
even if you don't understand how to use the flip, then at best figuring out who to flip and figuring out who the scum are are two separate, independent events - not knowing who specifically to flip isn't a reason for not doing anything at all to look for scum in general
while this makes me happy (<3), I've spent quite a while talking about why I think it's better to try and flip scum reads like a standard lynch. why do you disagree?In post 191, Ranger wrote:It's not a matter of lynching.
It's a matter of who we want confirmed town.
And pie is a player I very much would want to be confirmed town.
also, another point about this is that I think I'm usually fairly transparently town when I'm town, so using it to flip me would just be a waste. you (and other people) might have a different opinion than myself on this but I expect it would be more optimal to flip someone else if we're attempting to flip town players-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
which games are you using as a reference for this? also ftr the last sentence is something I've considered too.In post 239, Spiffeh wrote:All caught up
VOTE: Nahdia
Her tone is off from the few games I played with her where she was town
And I feel like she'skiiiindapoking and prodding at things to seem involved but don't really remember her stating any concrete scum reads/making pushes.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
tbh Nahdia's reaction to the above Spiffeh post that I quoted is more subdued than I usually expect town to react when they have that argument pushed on them. if I'm in a game with someone who I've played multiple games with and they start pushing me because "my tone is off", my reaction is usually something along the lines of "this isn't any different than how I was in our previous games, what the fuck is going on?". on the other hand, when I'm scum and someone has correctly pushed me because of my tone being off, and I know I haven't correctly emulated the tone that I usually have when I'm town, I know I can't really react that way without looking like obvious scum so I have to kinda sorta shrug it off and hope no one else notices it. which is much more similar to what Nahdia did here.@Nahdia:do you have any response to this, and can you elaborate in more depth on why you think Spiffeh is scum?
actually that combined with what I pointed out on her previously kinda makes me want to lean towards a Nahdia vote, pending TSQ's response and what I see when I look through her games
I could probably vote lala. despite being stream-of-consciousness, her catchup was actually fairly content-light and didn't have much in terms of original content. actually, now that I read it again, I have all sorts of issues with 218 (her reads list), in terms of hedged language/scum being careful with what they're saying. the most obvious one is the read on TBG "TBG seems town but I'm still going to be wary of him for ... no specific reason", which is something that I attribute to scum looking like they're trying to be logical and consider all of the possibilities. the reads on UTL and Nahdia have similar nuances in phrasing/tone that I attribute to the same thing.
this read looks flat-out fake. the major reason is, from what I can tell, lala seems to be a player who forms reads heavily based on tone/gut (I could be wrong on this, if I am correct me), and she literally _in the same post_ handwaved at least one read because of "idk, gut". I could see an argument such as "your reads are bad", but she explicitly fucking calls her out for "not having anything else to back up her reads" - this is a much easier callout to make as scum than town since it's the kind of thing that _looks_ nice and is objectively true, i.e. difficult to question, as opposed to something that you have to argue and back up. I also take issue with the last sentence because there's nothing specific there - usually when town have issues with tone they have at the very least something vaguely specific to back it up (even something such as Spiffeh using town games as a reference), but here there is none. again, it's a stance that is much easier to take and requires less commitment.In post 218, lalaladucks wrote:nina, gameshow/interview/whatever post was entertaining but uh, the reasoning for the reads was basically just gut - got anything else to back em up now? tone reads awkwardly though could just be newbness i guess... still atm = = = nullscum
in all honesty, this explicitly reads like she's attempting to line up a TSQ/Nina dichotomy when there's no good reason for it - I don't really have any idea of what her thought process behind this conclusion actually was.In post 218, lalaladucks wrote:shea/tsq, i want you to be town but your posting doesn't look town to me :/ i'm prob wrong about either nina or shea since they're going after each other but i think this slot is more likely = = = scum-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
actually fuck it
vote: lala
i think a lala (or Nahdia) scum flip points pretty strongly to TSQ and Nina both being town. i think that both lala and Nahdia are posturing around this in a way similar to how i would expect scum to behave when lining up lynches - both are mostly just sitting back and fueling it from the sidelines without getting too involved in it either way-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
i have town reads on UTL, dwlee, Ranger, TBG, and maybe Spiffeh pending a few things. this doesn't really help in terms of who the current wagons are, but it's a part of why i don't really want to lynch inside of {TSQ, Nina} anymore even though TSQ still hasn't done jack shit and i don't have a town read on Nina. i really cannot emphasize how dissatisfied i am with 218 as a reads list, and she isn't even the only one who's fucking doing it. i think that if TSQ and Nina are both town, it's something that scum would consider attempting to take advantage of
i would like if people could comment on if they agree/disagree with my thoughts on lala and why.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
how?In post 258, TehBrawlGuy wrote:but I still prefer a Nina flip because it's a 2 for 1 on Spiffeh too if Nina flips Scum-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
oh, i see it.
/shrug
while i don't think Nina's 106 was a town post, i don't think it's as scummy as you seem to think it is. i've seen posts like that coming from scum but if it's all you have then eh - i think lala's reads list has much more blatantly obvious signs of being fabricated than Nina's did, that have much less likely of an explanation than "town who just wanted to try a different entrance".
i also don't think that your logic for Nina-scum condemning Spiffeh is particularly solid. i've seen more egregious mistakes coming from town who have just derped. i can't think of where OTOH but i know that _i've_ had weird mix-ups like that which have no real logical explanation behind them - sometimes people try to make a reads list and just get two people confused in a way that seemingly makes no sense. it could be that they're both scum (i don't even town read Nina tbh), but if they are, i don't think it's for what you're pointing out.
p-edit: @TBG-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
there's also the point that, *if* Nina is scum here, she could have just been making up reads entirely and was originally planning on listing Spiffeh as one of her "scum reads"
i think that regardless of what Spiffeh's alignment is, that possibility is far, far greater than the possibility that she just happened to "slip"-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
that's exactly the reason i'm asking about itIn post 263, Nahdia wrote:i dont really see the point in asking someone who never gives explanations to elaborate on something
if you feel this way, then why haven't you tried to engage him at all over his apparent scum read on you? i would expect that if Spiffeh is sitting there with little content, and his first real scum read was a scum read on you which you knew was wrong and potentially disingenuous, then engaging with him over it is exactly the first thing you would want to do in order to draw out more indicative content from him.In post 263, Nahdia wrote:what little content spiff has as well as his relative disconnect from this game are the basis for my scumread.
i think that instead, you deliberately tried to avoid it out of fear that it would make you look worse-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
the part I take issue with is specifically "i'm prob wrong about either nina or shea since they're going after each other". that just read like a bullshit throwaway statement she threw in as an afterthought, rather than having any kind of thought process behind it. I don't understand why, if she thought this, she didn't actually stop to give it any consideration when analyzing the game. nowhere in her reads list or in her catchup did she ever actually try to address the interactions between those two or figure out which one she was wrong on - she was perfectly content just calling them both scum and leaving it at that.
again, it is something that points more to her just posturing here
also I still don't understand what you're trying to say in 265.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
you're misinterpreting my pointIn post 271, Nahdia wrote:anyone reading the game can comprehend why someone skimming to catch up would set a dichotomy between those two slots. you don't have to agree with it, but you're essentially suggesting ducks pulled it out of nowhere. if that's not disingenuous, it's ignorant.
it is possible that a town player might see two slots pushing each other and "set" a dichotomy, yes
my issue with it is twofold:
1. the complete lack of anything at all towards resolving it. I don't really care if you think it's "ignorant" to think someone might form a dichotomy between two players. it's flat-out common sense that just accepting something like "this is TxS" is narrow-minded at best and completely fucking stupid at worst. there is the possibility that you're just wrong and both players are town - which is something most people know to be disastrous, i.e. TxT arguments leading into chain mislynches ... there is the possibility that scum is pushing at least one of the lynches ... there is the possibility both players are scum ... situations like this are much more nuanced than "this is TxS". she just wrote it off as "I'm probably wrong on one of TSQ/Nina but I have no idea which one I'm wrong on", and left it at that. there was no follow-up on it, no pointed questioning aimed at confirming whether she was, in fact, wrong on one of them or which one she was wrong on outside of one really vague question to TSQ which was _before_ the TSQ/Nina fight even happened. the thought process she displayed had no depth to it at all, which is more indicative of scum than town.
2. even if it is possible, it's a weird thing to focus on from a town POV. town players don't usually see an argument and, with no analysis of what is actually being said in the argument, think "one of these people is scum". that just isn't something that happens. if someone sees an argument, between two scum reads, and starts thinking that they might be wrong about them, the obvious thing to do is to start analyzing and trying to break down what is actually being said so they can see who is actually in the right in the argument, who looks more like they're BS'ing the reasons for the other person being scum, who seems defensive, the compositions of the two wagons, and so forth. that kind of thing should be a major point of contention for someone who's scum reading both players and apparently thinks that something in there is compelling enough to warrant them not being scum together, but she didn't comment about any of the things I would expect her to be focusing on if she was town here: Nina's read on TSQ's entrance, TSQ's read on Nina (in particular the thing about "role fishing", which has been a huge topic of conversation), my scum read on TSQ, TBG's stance on Nina being linked to Spiffeh, or anything like that.
on the other hand, from a scum POV, it is clearly beneficial to try to get people to buy into a bullshit argument between two town players by reinforcing the notion that there's scum in the argument. and if you're going to do something like this, it usually looks very similar to what lala did: push vague scum reads on both of them individually without actually committing to a firm stance in the argument. (Ranger and Spiffeh should remember this all too well. )
that's what my issue is. saying it was because she "pulled it out of nowhere" isn't even close to my point - it's that the way it was done isn't remotely town. the way in which she formed her reads on both of them individually wasn't organic and there was much less follow-up on it (read: absolutely none) than I would expect from town who actually had conflicting feelings about their reads there
even if "gut" townreads weren't fairly common, this doesn't really address the point I'm making - the point is that it would be a bad situation *if* he started talking about the read on you and it started gaining traction. logically, it would be better for you not to even risk a situation like that coming up unless it was necessary, which it wasn't (as he wasn't pressuring it very hard). on the other hand, engaging him about the read on you is a natural next step from a town POV: if you were scum reading him based on his lack of content, and his first real "content" was a scum read on you which you knew was wrong and probably disingenuous, then hell yes you would attack it.In post 271, Nahdia wrote:you're suggesting i fear elaboration on a scumread on me from a guy who had 5 minutes prior answered just "Gut" when I asked him to spell out a townread. ridiculous.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
it is also noted that you chose to selectively engage with me about this one point while ignoring the rest of my reasoning for lala being scum. do you have a town read on lala or... ?
p-edit: /shrug
it's an incredibly misguided way of thinking at best, and it's a type of thinking i see scum employ significantly more often than town, explicitly *due* to how convenient for scum it is-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
actually, I agreed with the idea that Nahdia wasn't committing to any firm scum reads. though I can't say that I'm really OK with him just coming in here, voting the leading wagon, and continuing to not generate any other content.In post 287, Bellaphant wrote:Pie, I can't see why you are pushing this? Spiffeh's reads are kinda terrible and I can't see any effort from him to interact with the slots either. The only person with weirder reads is lala, who's 'eeeh, maybe' and 'I've read you as scum before when you were town' and 'gut' seem super forced.
also, tbh, I don't have any problem with Nahdia's response in 282.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
if Nina flips blue, I want attention focused on lala during the lynching phase, full stop. can we agree to this?
I don't agree with the argument that itle "scum slipped" by omitting Nina from his reads list. however, I do agree that in general leaving Nina off of the reads list when she was a major focus is somewhat weird. the other thing is that he called Spiffeh's 46 decent when it really really wasn't, and town read him due to "nothing about his play pings me at all" when it was only page 2, which kinda reads like he was stretching to find a reason to list him as town.
p-edit: that's kinda why I asked Spiffeh for the games he was using as a reference, so I could cross-check if what he was saying was actually well-reasoned or not. unfortunately, he disappointed me :<-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
can I point out that lala's response to me addresses basically none of the points I was actually making?
can I point out that lala still has ignored basically everything surrounding the TSQ/Nina argument from earlier - both what they posted about each other and other people's stances surrounding it?
can I point out that, despite claiming that she originally just left the TSQ/Nina fight alone because she didn't have any time and didn't want to sort through it... even now that she _has_ came back and started posting again, she's done fucking nothing to try and actually sort through the situation better? she literally came back, wrote these posts directed to me, and then put a vote on Nina with _no_ further consideration. let's suppose she is actually just town who takes pause at the Nina/TSQ interactions - if she actually believed this, she would realize that something like this would be something you'd have to actually address before voting, since it could significantly affect the outcome of the lynch (or in this case flip). as just one example, suppose TSQ is the scum in the pair - what now? then voting Nina would just be a waste, and as it stands she would have done literally nothing to stop it or figure it out... because ignoring the possibility of it being a mislynch is such a town mentality to have ...
can ANYONE tell me why they think lala is town, outside of "natural posting lel"? this is fucking textbook scum play when you see two town players infighting and don't know how to inject yourself into the argument in a way that makes yourself look good from it. I don't even know how worth it is to fight the Nina flip tbh cos a Nina town flip would further back all of this up, but god _damn_.-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
what was your read on Spiffeh again?In post 353, Dwlee99 wrote:Pie you can have a townread +1
I was actually contemplating moving over there cos I don't want to run this into a deadline scramble and it still doesn't look like there's much consensus over whether we're trying to flip town reads or scum reads or something else, and it seems people are complacent with flipping Nina (despite the fact that there basically has been no reasoning given for scum reading her outside of her entrance post, and the link to Spiffeh which is really meh and not well-reasoned even if she *does* wind up being scum). Spiffeh, itle, and obviously lala are all much better wagons, tbh.-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
you break my heart. haven't you been saying this whole time you've agreed with my read on lala?
I think Ranger's approach this game is fairly standard for her. I think that her just doing her own thing, especially in this situation, definitely falls in line with how she would play as town, and there's another reason that I find her town based on her play which I don't really know if I should talk about at this point or not (since it's kind of speculative...) and either way I don't really see why we would lynch her when she's claimed a confirmable town role.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
even if you "don't buy the part about her being modconfirmed at some point", why is that a reason for lynching her on day 1? it's more correct theory-wise to leave her alive until day 3 or so, and then lynch/question the claim if she still hasn't been confirmed by then-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I guess I'll just say it: I think her being clear is exactly the reason she's being this "unhelpful and opaque". I don't claim to have a good accuracy reading her, but if I think about it, I think trying to play less open and more under-the-radar in order to dodge NKs until later in the game is something she would do.In post 393, TehBrawlGuy wrote:I would love the speculation and meta on Ranger - is it normal for her to be this unhelpful and opaque as Town?
hence why, if D3 comes and she tries to claim some bullshit role which can't actually get confirmed, _then_ it's correct to lynch her unless she has a really compelling explanation for itIn post 393, TehBrawlGuy wrote:This whole thing just reads to me as a Scum gambit to coast to late-game and then deal with the claim by being a Scum PR or just going "oh i was drawing the NK lol".-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
_why is lala town_In post 377, itlepip wrote:lala is town.
explain in detail if possible, and if your reason is "natural posting" I'll slap your head off.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
she claims a confirmable role so that people (in theory) can rule her as being scum and focus on scum hunting elsewhere, and then tries to play under-the-radar so she can survive as late into the game as possible.In post 398, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Why would a town PR "trying to play UTR and dodge kills" claim confirmable under no pressure on D1? Her actions don't line up as Town PR, they don't make sense as Town VT, but they make a lot of sense as Scum imo.
i've definitely seen something like this done in other games, specifically the idea of a clear trying to keep themselves alive to reduce the amount of people the player list has to sort. this seems entirely plausible to me and i'm not really going to speculate on her role is when i have no way of knowing if i'm evaluating every possibility or not-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
i'm saying Ranger claims a confirmable role on D1 to reduce the amount of scum hunting pressure placed on the rest of the player list (only 11 people to sort instead of 12), and then from there, she tries to play under-the-radar in order to survive as long as possible.
i'm not claiming it necessarily is what she's doing, just that it's the first possibility that i can think of. but either way you're correct to say it's a stupid thing for her to lie about-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
i don't know if this is a misrepresentation or if you're just mixing up my point but i don't really like you handwaving basically everything i've wrote about her this game as "her readslist seemed vapid". even if you don't agree with my point, i've explained in death why i specifically think that the *way* she caught up and formed her reads wasn't town-oriented, and why the reasoning she gave behind her reads seemed fake, not just "vapid". i've also pointed out that her "i didn't have any time to look through Nina/TSQ more" is just a bullshit excuse she gave to stall the wagon out, as even when she *did* have time, she didn't do it.In post 405, Nahdia wrote:so what's the case on ducks besides "her readslist seemed vapid" or is that it?
meanwhile
VOTE: spiffeh-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
probably because if she did, there would be people like ... yourself ... who continue to question the claim despite it being a "confirmable role" claim. you said it yourself, right? it would be much more difficult for her to back up the claim if she made it under pressureIn post 406, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Okay, but why would she claim it at that time? Why not once she took heat, which she probably wouldn't, considering she's playing UTR anyway? Hell, taking some heat and THEN claiming would give us a decent body to analyze.
claiming immediately makes more sense when you realize that claiming it under pressure is still somewhat risky-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
for one, it isn't just "that readslist". it's the readslist, what she did leading up to the readslist, and her approach to the game in general.
second, her latest posts are scummy, for a few reasons which i've explained already. first off, you call it "content", but there really is no content there. she literally came back, "responded" to me, put a vote on Nina, and left again. you seem to be voting Spiffeh for a lack of content - this is the same fucking thing: putting a vote on the leading wagon and offering no reads whatsoever. the response to me itself was mostly irrelevant, and ignored the majority of the arguments i was actually making - as just one example, her response to me saying she was ignoring Nina/TSQ's argument was ... ??? ... and her response to me saying she had no original content was basically just to shrug and say "yes, everyone else keeps saying what i want to say" with still no attempt at generating original content. the entire response is like that, those are just the first two i can think of OTOH. i would like to know what you think her latest content actually was
and i've already said this, but the last line of 326 is scummy for an entirely different reason. she claimed her intent was to "sort Nina/TSQ out later". then she came back and blatantly voted Nina without putting any effort into doing this at all. does that strike you as town who actually takes pause at the Nina interactions, or does it strike you as scum who's just bullshitting a reason for stalling out the Nina interactions?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
how the fuck is this any different than what Spiffeh is supposedly is doing?In post 422, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Lala's pretty clearly disconnected, see:
someone who apparently is disconnected but actively makes up excuses to not read people is much worse than someone who has done nothing of the sort. if you want to push another wagon just to see what happens, that's fine, but this is a really poor excuse for giving her a pass for anything
what specifically don't you like about it? is there a part of his reasoning or the way he's pushing it that comes off as disingenuous?In post 415, itlepip wrote:I don't like how hard you are pushing this at all.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-