In post 11, Titus wrote:Interesting, why are you pushing the Podo wagon and not joining the Wake one?In post 10, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah uh
Next person to ignore my post 8 by not voting podo or me is getting voted, fair warning
VOTE: Titus
funny guy
In post 11, Titus wrote:Interesting, why are you pushing the Podo wagon and not joining the Wake one?In post 10, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah uh
Next person to ignore my post 8 by not voting podo or me is getting voted, fair warning
Irrelevant, uninformative, unfunny, unamusing. Are you scum who is trying to be funny and is failing?In post 40, Sickofit1138 wrote:VOTE: Trancend... Because lApsa only posted 11 smilies .... Then Trancend posted 12!!!!!
Seems artificial to me. First "wow we're already out of RVS" sounds fake to me and then saying who he likes and dislikes without providing any reasons behind it whatsoever. Also seems little tense to me.In post 75, Sickofit1138 wrote:Wow and we're already out of RVS.
Liking transcend here so far actually. UNVOTE:
I also like implosion.
VOTE: Mirhawk
I don't like the way he gave some kinda wiifm shit to push against a lynch. On his secon post on P 3
Town does whatever they think will improve their winning chances.In post 89, Sickofit1138 wrote:ummm town wouldnt type a post to stand out, that outs attention on them and away from hunting actual scum. ... so it sounds like you are insinuating that he is scum. i think it could be that you are scum pushing against an early mislynch.
I think he's trying to pocket Implosion here. Again, I don't know where all these town and scum reads come from. He has a thing for Implosion, that's for sure considering he mentioned him two times already.In post 149, Sickofit1138 wrote:TLeaning almost50. putting himself too far out there in a 1v1 to be scum
SLeaning Wake. i dont like the way he shows himself in his Titus interractions.
@ wake
Implosion seems to be legitimately getting reads on people Right now.
Why? are you SReading him
I don't see where this "drawing attention -> not scum" logic comes from.In post 169, Sickofit1138 wrote:Actually Zachary feels like stupid town to me. He is drawing too much suspicion to himself to be scum I think. Why exactly am I actually being scum read at this point though? I haven't seen the reasoning for it yet.
I don't like this post. Mark as "scummy".In post 184, shannon wrote:If I was a mafia team with him I'd have replaced out by now, I can only imagine how annoying mafia chat must beIn post 176, Dunnstral wrote:Zachstral shannon maf team
In post 192, Lapsa wrote:getting there
for starters - your post feels like flirting with me too much.
you know... colors.
do me a favor and don't ride my back
I find this somewhat interesting.In post 226, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 224, Performer wrote:Other than "vote is still on wake it's where I want it" and a post with naked vote on Wake, I don't see a case from you on Wake?My vote is now on shannon who I'm quite sure is scum
In post 243, Mirhawk wrote:In order to not stand out he could have simply not voted.In post 99, Wake1 wrote:Mirhawk———✶Honestly,.Performerdidn't say he wanted it to stand out. Are you assuming he did?
He deliberately voted no lynch, what possible reason could he have done that for unless he wanted people to notice it.
In all honesty the more I talk about it the less I like it.
I like this answer.In post 246, Performer wrote:To fish for reactions ! First day of d1 , we had plenty of time to talk over things, get wagons generated, etc. Unless there are special cases, then no lynch is typically a bad way to go.In post 244, Mirhawk wrote:Hey performer, why did you vote for a no lynch? It's obviously not going to stick, so why not just place no vote?
Oh and someone asked if I was an IC before - I'm not going to answer that question.
@Implosion, why the change of heart?In post 248, Zachstralkita wrote:Now's probably a time to get this shannon counterwagon going pal, I know you put the slot into null but I have a scouter-type ability for finding scum (which people....don't really put faith in... but it works)Performer wrote:I am going to wait and see. imp is hardly the type to lurk.In post 245, Zachstralkita wrote:Fun fact guys, Dunnstral has hard tunneled me D1-2 before and I flipped Town. He just gets a little excited sometimes.
Are you going to.. do anything about this?Performer wrote:I find that strange as well, imp saying he is close to townreading you . Not only that, but him saying his tone is typically scumread by others, is also frankly weird.In post 241, Zachstralkita wrote:How does that work? You're the sole benefactor of my wagon.implosion wrote:
Zach i'm like pretty close to townreading you. I just need you to give me some more to work with.
This makes me think Sickofit could be town and Zach actually knows it.In post 310, Zachstralkita wrote:Weird, sure. Scum, not really.In post 308, Dunnstral wrote:I don't understand how you can see nothing bad in what sickofit has been posting
Mafia knows each other -> if shannon is not mafia they can mark her as town -> if shannon is mislynched they blame ZachIn post 313, implosion wrote:Why did you choose to ask this question and why did you phrase it this way?Boem wrote:@Zach, what makes you so sure shannon is scum? Several people marked her as town, this is a potentially dangerous move for you.
Huh? We're discussing rhetoric principles here?In post 323, implosion wrote:I just don't understand why you felt the desire to warn Zach of this.In post 317, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Mafia knows each other -> if shannon is not mafia they can mark her as town -> if shannon is mislynched they blame ZachIn post 313, implosion wrote:Why did you choose to ask this question and why did you phrase it this way?Boem wrote:@Zach, what makes you so sure shannon is scum? Several people marked her as town, this is a potentially dangerous move for you.
What is so hard to understand there?I find it noteworthy that you phrased it as "this is a potentially dangerous move for you," rather than something like "why are you putting yourself in danger like this."I don't normally give other people advice or warnings like this in the course of my play. Do you want him not to be scumreading shannon? Why is it helpful to you for him to be aware of this "danger?" What if shannonisscum? If you yourself have a nullread on shannon this just seems like such a weird post to make, preemptively warning someone that they might get blamed if someone is mislynched when you are not townreading that person in particular and there's not a ton of pressure on them so that them being lynched quickly is unlikely.
You need to take a chill pill. And to unvote Dunnstral.In post 339, Almost50 wrote:What the FROG!! So, ignoring you = scum?? Bc you say so is town?? And your #336 is ridiculous and scummy on it's own. re-read what I said. I said "we may have better lynching options" but never specified whom these might be. For you to take to mean I already intended to vote YOU is basically a subconscious scum!claim. You could've provided "something" for me to read through and decide if it's convincing AT ALL.
Sorry, mate.. but you're obv!scum to me right now.
VOTE: Dunn
Podo seems like a well-meaning newbie town here.In post 340, podoboq wrote:I would be OK with this. He says he voted me because I ignored him early, but I didn't have a real conversation with anyone in the game until today.In post 339, Almost50 wrote:VOTE: Dunn
Not the only thing he's said that's scummy, but it's a bulletpoint I wanted to point out.
In post 188, Transcend wrote:VOTE: boem
don't like the longpost about sickofit. looks sorta like candy coating a wagon with the most momentum.
i don't like the reads he gave in 183 shortly before voting
don't like the fos on shannon. but maybe that's because i have her marked as town.
such tunnel
Implying that was my point.In post 368, Transcend wrote:>:)what if i'm scum pushing your lynch
thanks for communicating to me like you know i'm town >:)
I haven't played with him before so maybe I'm wrong but he sounds naive sometimes.In post 393, Performer wrote:Boehm what's your definition of newbie town? Because based on his 3 completed, I wouldn't say he's a newbie.Podo seems like a well-meaning newbie town here.
What're your thoughts on your 2-man wagon?
Come on, that was a cute post.
This makes me happier about my vote.In post 621, Transcend wrote:In post 612, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Piechart has some contrast issues, but nice job.
Mirhawk didn't really say anything. He voted for Sickofit which is about the only interesting thing from him. Meh.
I'm just shamelessly sheeping Dunnstral for now.
VOTE: Mirhawk
and i'm no longer happy with this vote
Everyone stops right now. RIGHT NOWIn post 634, Mirhawk wrote:Seriously you guys need to stop talking so friggin much. I'm never going to catch up at this rate.
This. So much this.In post 645, Mirhawk wrote:For what? The only thing she's done is complain about Zach's posting style.In post 354, Transcend wrote:*tr on shannon intensifies*
I'm refering to bolded/underlined sentences.In post 696, Zachstralkita wrote:Dunnstral's a member of the bad scumhunter group by the way, he's evidenced that enough.
, but then again I'm town and enjoy playing to my win condition and you're scum who's backed into a corner(which isn't there and you backed yourself into) and if you're town then you created the corner but it's somehow magically the fault of everyone but you.Titus I will happily lynch myself to spite you
You can wait til tomorrow, I'll be dead by daystart.
You promised, man.In post 79, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 78, implosion wrote:What makes you say this? It seems pretty tame to me.In post 73, Zachstralkita wrote:So this game is Honey Bunches of Clusterfuck already.
nothing i just now woke up and got the day 1 notification and it was 3 pages so my little brain felt overwhelmed for a second
it's ok i become intellectual at some point later
He says he's mason.In post 960, Transcend wrote:he's masonIn post 959, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Dunnstral has been saying all over the place how town I am so he may be pocketing me
Interesting, Nosferatu also had a gut read on him in 178. PeregrineV too in 300.In post 961, Transcend wrote:giving botd because idk why
VOTE: implosion
my gut's been telling me baaaad things about this guy
You think nosferatu is town? Based on what, his gut feel about implosion?In post 965, Transcend wrote:yeah well i think nos is town.
idrc about PV right now he's been useless all game.
i'm going with right now that 2 mafia wouldn't group themselves together and be masons. plus dunn's softs were pretty telling of this fact.
It can be argued both both ways in my opinion. If you are town you don't want investigative PR to "waste" a check by investigating you. Scum can also ask investigative PR to check them to try to appear like they have nothing to hide. Conclusion: this discussion is pointless.In post 977, Wake1 wrote:I'd be stoked to get cleared by an investigative PR.In post 968, shannon wrote:Someone was calling for an investigative role on me, and someone else voted and then moved (maybe this was Titus and Zach). I get that I'm not a great contributor this game, I think it's a combo of being sick, RL busy, other game busy, and unused to playing with so many people.I would encourage an investigator not to waste their action, and I'll try to do better to keep track of what's going on in the game and to contribute.
This reads to me like you want the theoretical PR to not look in your direction.
I meant I've never played closed setup, without knowing roles.In post 992, podoboq wrote:How so? What do you already know about this setup that you know you've never played before? The only things you really should know are your role and the number of players, but this reads like you know more than that.In post 959, Boem_u_dusi wrote:I've never played this setup before so I'm confused.
OK can both of you drop that? It's ridiculous. Thanks in advance.In post 1031, implosion wrote:Literally though like, why do you think I would lie about this? What do I gain by lying about knowing what an acronym means?In post 1028, Performer wrote:I find it very difficult to believe you don't know what NAI means. I've seen you before in other type of games . You have plenty of experience.In post 1027, implosion wrote:Like, why would I lie about not knowing what an acronym means?
Is this an invitation? This doesn't sound towny.In post 1167, Nosferatu wrote:sorry, I'm just in too many games.
replacing out
rip my replacement for having to read through all this.
pedit: or you guys could lynch me, that could happen too.
What is all this about? I was just considering voting Nosferatu because I think people are more likely to be scum when asking to be replaced, speaking from my (limited) experience. I rarely see town replacements and inactives.
OK this is a very shitty post. If you are scum, this is completely unethical. If you are town, you're just ridiculous.In post 1184, Nosferatu wrote:that's a loaded question. If you guys were still looking for scum, ^^^^^.In post 1171, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Is this an invitation? This doesn't sound towny.In post 1167, Nosferatu wrote:sorry, I'm just in too many games.
replacing out
rip my replacement for having to read through all this.
pedit: or you guys could lynch me, that could happen too.
Is this good enough?In post 1202, Wake1 wrote:I feel like he's coasting by posting infrequently, with few sentences, and not really risking drawing enemies/scrutiny to himself. I want him to stop playing so safe.
1195
Your town and scum lists seem believeable to me, but why is Lapsa a scumread to you? Few people expressed some doubts about him, but for me his thought process seems town.In post 1287, Sickofit1138 wrote:Idk what to even think now.
Too many pages I got like 30 while I was on holiday FOR A DAY
Town: Titus, Zach, Shannon, Dunn, po, Agar
Scum: implosion, transcend, Lapsa, Wake
VOTE: Wake
I will attempt to catch up soon, I'm working all week.
iK I'm helping town too much right now and normally I would replace out, but apparently that makes me cod scum
An yes I just know someone will SR me for this post.
I bolded this because I think it's a very good point and is worth discussing - Nosferatu doesn't attract so much heat as Sickofit and that's weird. On the other hand, Sickofit is really not looking good and maybe the scum know that and are already heavily distancing from him.
I've only played one newbie game here so far and 4 total on different sites, with different setups. I've never played a large normal.In post 1305, Performer wrote:Before the page 47 behaviors from Zach + Wake, I was thinking Nos was a good place to go too. I was even tr on Wake , as it seemed he was figuring things out logically and wanted feedback on his reads lists, which looked like he was trying involve folks.In post 1172, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Hmm, Sickofit or Nosferatu. I like having good choices.
Then I voted Trans, agreed with him about scummy Nos before the replace-out post, he asked me to vote Nos and he wasn't even voting Nos at that point, I turned down the request since starting a new wagon was pointless, then his 1159 placed me as scum, as scum, Zach suddenly came out with 1162 placing me as scum too .
When I was newer to FM, I used to think scum was more likely to replace out, but down the road I found town was more likely. It also depends on the situation. In this case, Nos stated replace out due to too many games. Zach and Wake's egregious pushes on that slot also made me lean town on that slot . I've seen this happen before.Boem, tell me how many games total have you played , as well as how many large normals you've played?
VOTE: Wake
It sounds really cool however, I have to keep that line somewhere.In post 1307, Performer wrote:Code: Select all
You've been sowing seeds of division all game but you haven't fooled everyone.
What on earth is even meant by this from Wake about Titus??
Huh?In post 1389, Performer wrote:Zach what the??? Scum Masons in a normal & balanced game???? This looks very fishy from you .In post 1387, Dunnstral wrote:No they can't because this is a normal gameIn post 1385, Zachstralkita wrote:" Masons " can also be mafia-aligned
@Boem my invite to imp, extends to you as well.
Yeah that's what I thought.In post 1391, Zachstralkita wrote:If the cop should check anyone, it's one of Dunnstral/Titus.Boem_u_dusi wrote:Hmm, what's the probability of them claiming mason as towns?
I think cop should check one of them to make sure.
What about Nosferatu/Sickofit?In post 1394, Performer wrote:@boem my invite to vote Wake or Transcend, who I have in my notes as scumreads.
---
First we have originals, then cc, then possible multi-town teams, then scum-mason talk (which makes no sense as scum are already aligned).
This is insane. I 'm going to take a breather from this game for rest of the day.
This is just insane.