Mini 1805 [C'est fini!]
Forum rules
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Dwlee: Why us in particular?
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
UNVOTE: Creature[/vote]
Sounds like it would be making a case on someone with little to no evidence, or voting for them on a really bad reason.In post 46, Robbnva wrote: If you can't see how it's easy to fake pushes early game then yes you are absolutely inexperienced. I've faked pushes late game as scum so early game is a breezeI was asleep.
Dwlee and Robbnva's banter, to me, implies some sort of familiarity between the two, even though they're opposing each other.
F-oh-ex
A little AtE-ey.In post 121, F-oh-ex wrote:Jsyk, thisismy first game outside of Road to Rome. Go ahead, be a condescending prick and call me an idiot.
So far Dwlee's given this answer twice. I think he's using that as an excuse to not form reads on the specific players, or to get out of not having them. Feels a little scummy to me. His 144 feels to me like he realized the above argument and thought it through.In post 142, Dwlee99 wrote:
I can see him doing that as town or scumIn post 141, Robbnva wrote:
Dwlee, don't think you ever answered thisIn post 97, Robbnva wrote:I'll ask you a question before my phone dies. What's your thoughts of atm who I basically guided him towards things he could give an opinion on and instead of doing that just started questioning me.
Where do you see him being antagonistic?In post 127, Smithereens wrote:I'll give Dwlee benefit of doubt and assume he's being antagonistic for the sake of arguments/activity. Not an ideal tact imo given all the activity, so take the hint.
I'll put myVoteonSmithereensfor now, because I want to hear more from him.- Eggman
-
Eggman
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
So you think the scumteam in a 13-player game would be three people?In post 13, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay so scum team is dragon, crazy and eggman. Thoughts?
Have your reads changed any? Do you have anyone you'd rather vote for now?In post 103, MarioManiac4 wrote:
I was going to vote for atm based on Page 3 but his recent posts are much better, so this is where I'm at right now.In post 100, atm487 wrote:Well other than a slight(EMPASIS ON SLIGHT) scum read on Robb, I can't think on who to vote for- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
I just realized I forgot that ending. Thanks Creature
What I was going to say was, F-oh-ex, Robb, and Dragon were the only ones to respond to my question.
On 188, I wanted to make a post to show I was reading, but I wasn't really sure what to say, so. Uh.
If it helps discussion any, right now I townread Dwlee, Dragon, and Creature.
Dwlee, because of the back-and-forth between him and Robb and his responses (they left me with a good feeling)
Dragon, because of gut mostly
and Creature, because in the other game I played with it (where it was mafioso) it didn't really post a lot and mostly lurked, and today it's been one of the most active players.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
As clarified by his post after that, that was just an acronym for "at the moment" and not some code or attempt at buddying.
I'd say MM is fine in my eyes, as while he hasn't talked up much I can't see many serious holes in his logic.
For the scumreads, I'm leaning towards Derek (reasons pointed out in 248) and stelo (he was here at some point, why hasn't he shown up?)
I'd put Robb and Smithereens at low null, because of gut feelings. Can't really make a read off of those.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
I'd try to scumhunt, but a. I'm not aware of the methods to do so and b. I don't see anything to go off of. So let me respond to Derek's post.
quote="In post 253, Derek12"]
Uhh could you expand on these a bit more? Your scumreads are either sheeping or completly unsubstantiated. Could you also explain why you consider stelo's flaking to be scummy? I'm not seeing how it's alignment indicative.[/quote]In post 252, Eggman wrote: For the scumreads, I'm leaning towards Derek (reasons pointed out in 248) and stelo (he was here at some point, why hasn't he shown up?)
I'd put Robb and Smithereens at low null, because of gut feelings. Can't really make a read off of those.
Derek: It felt to me like you were restating Dwlee's opinions and joking around with him. Sorta read like buddying.
Stelo: IMO, inactivity is a scumtell.
Smithereens: To me, at least, it feels like he's taking a negative attitude with this game. Also, while we're on the topic:
I don't like this post very much because I don't understand his logic over my question. I WAS looking for an answer there, although the intent seems to have not come across. Every mod can do things differently, as well, so I wouldn't know the exact ratio of a 13-player game, hence the question.In post 239, Smithereens wrote:In post 205, crazycrabman wrote:In post 188, Eggman wrote:the question is not phrased to imply that he's looking for an answer so much as he wants to be seen asking it:
'How many scum are in this game?' is excusable sometimes.
'So you think the scumteam in a 13-player game would be three people?' Not really.
Robb, I've thought about since the last post, and changed my mind about, simple as that. I'd put him in null now.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
No, I claimed I was rereading the game and pointing out things I missed before and closed that tab in the middle of writing it. You're deliberately misinterpreting that post.In post 288, F-oh-ex wrote:^This. He claiemed he actually closed the tab and his post did't send out.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Because I meant to vote Smithereens pages ago to see what he would do about it and for (an admittedly small amount of) pressure, but the format was incorrect so it never actually went in.
PEDIT: you said the tab I closed was for me, saying my favorite desert was vanilla ice cream for the RQS. I said, the tab I closed was my catching-up post.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Derek: After I wrote the post saying I was rereading and I closed the tab where I had written a post on what I had missed before, F-oh-ex said the tab was where I was going to crumb VT. It wasn't, so I accused him of misinterpreting my post.
Speaking of which, my favorite desert is vanilla ice cream.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
If we're talking about my logic for crumbing, here it is. If we weren't, here it is anyway.
So far, all games I've played with Vanilla Townies had them confirmed by the setup. So, a VT claim would be rather useless as defense, no?
I don't know how the common opinion on VT claims is with closed setups, as this is my first with that. So in case I had a wagon started on me, which has happened quite a lot in my experience, I wanted to have something else to back up my "useless" claim. As F-oh-ex pointed out, I did kinda forget to answer it, so that leads us to here right now.
(I feel like I'm talking too much about myself, and not enough about you guys. Any way to fix that..?
Also, I'm reconsidering my scumread on Derek, because it seems that the friendliness between him and Dwlee could be from them being IRL friends. Those avatars are too similar to be a coincidence.)- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Smithereens: how would you feel about the scumminess of Creature's defense if, hypothetically:
a. we were both town
d. I was town, and it was mafioso
b. we were both mafiosos
c. I was mafioso, and it was town
(I think that we're both town, and the "scummy" part of Creature's defense is just it misremembering stuff (I do that a lot as town, too).)- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
How so? The scummiest thing you could possibly take away from this is "uh, I posted it in the QT, look there", and I feel like that's sort of a reach. It flew over my head first time I saw it.In post 473, Creature wrote:
This looks like an SvS interaction.In post 472, Robbnva wrote:Pretty sure all of my reasonings have been posted. Finish catching up and if you still can't tell I'll point them out. I'm heading out to pick up my son.
Given that it looks like Crabman's only scumread is on Creature right now, this doesn't make much sense.In post 520, F-oh-ex wrote:Scumreads [in that order] - Creature, Eggman, crazycrab (mutually exclusive to be scum with Creature)
UNVOTE: Eggman
VOTE: Creature
This vote is opportunistic. Too opportunistic. Probably a mafioso trying to get his wagon going.
uh whereIn post 546, Robbnva wrote:Also I think egg town slipped and I don't think it was a "fake" town slip so while I still question why he felt the need to crumb vt, I feel he's probably town.
VOTE: Crabman for now. That was a bad vote, it's only fair to repay in kind.- Eggman
-
Eggman
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
In post 609, Robbnva wrote:Crab. Your other game you did this big wall of players and explained your reads and put them in scummy order and stuff. You explained your reasons and you were pretty close to being right.
Why would you try a new strategy if that worked so good for you?
These two posts happened within a minute of each other. Food for thought.In post 610, Robbnva wrote:Fuck it
vote: crab
Somebody please investigate creature. Clearing that slot would make me sleep better
From then through now, Smithereens still pushes for the Egg/Creature lynch. Somewhat admitting that Crabman looks scummy, but downplaying it to make his point. Also, seafood puns.In post 611, Smithereens wrote:It really stinks that two really good wagons mysteriously disassembled themselves in favour of a guy who merely looks fishy. If this wagon is a mislynch, at least it will be an informative mislynch.
Slip, or just wishful thinking?In post 616, Smithereens wrote:
Excuse me for being skeptical but my games differ even more than hisIn post 614, Robbnva wrote:Smitherines. honest opinion does the person who made this post look like the person playing this game?when I'm town. There was one game where I got removed and banned for a week as a townie. Are you going to scum read me because I'm acting completely different?In post 632, Dragon of the West wrote:I think a lot of people abandoned the Eggman wagon earlier. He handled the pressure of all the votes on him well. While he's still a scum lean for me for now, he's not near my top. I think some others were reading him closer to null/town even. Creature still bothers me because of the blatant lies and shotty reasoning to back off the Eggman wagon so early. His reason was the crumb claim. While it's possible this really swayed him, his logic was completely faulty. That makes me feel like he was hoping for an Eggman lynch to get himself some town cred once egg flipped town. While I think creature is my strongest scumread at the moment, I'm still suspicious of others and I think Robb is right to say we should use more of this day to put pressure on different people and get more ideas on them. Especially with a few inactives that we're waiting to get replaced. That being said, the day can always end up going back to a lynch on creature after we've gotten more reads on everyone else
The "faulty" parts here are saying I crumbed when I never actually did (although I set it up) and jumping for the opinion of others. Is that what you saw, Dragon?In post 282, Creature wrote:I've been ISOing everybody and:
- Eggman has crumbed VT, which I find very unlikely he'd do that as scum.
- There are 6 players scum reading him excluding me.
So I am no longer scumreading Eggman.
This post makes me feel better about Derek, for some reason.In post 650, Derek12 wrote:
Are you still scumreading Eggman and Robbnva? If so, please explain your scumread on Robbnva because you haven't really touched on it much from what I can tell.In post 630, crazycrabman wrote: No, I didn't forget abut them, I was asked who I thought the scum team was I believe (or that's how I interpreted it), and that's who I think it is.
It's later.In post 595, Dwlee99 wrote:
I might try to explain later, right now I'm too busy feeding in league with mah boi norbert who sets francis on me as support viktor taking all my farm. feelsbadmanIn post 584, Smithereens wrote:ffs you're mature af. If you want me to talk to you in the same way I'd talk to a challenged person, that's fine too.
What caused you to stop scum reading Eggman/Creature?
What caused you to move to Crazy?
Are you scumreading anyone but Creature or Eggman right now?
@DotW:In post 668, Infinity 324 wrote:Hi guys, been following the thread, here are my thoughts so far
Eggman - Looks like noobtown to me, I don't like how fast the wagon on him formed, and crumbing VT seems more like silly town than weird scum
Creature - Probably my strongest townread, he seems to be very open with his thoughts and actively scumhunting. His thoughts on leaving the egg wagon mirrored my thoughts at the time.
Dragon of the West - Also seems open, brings up good points and genuine-looking thoughts
atm - Probably confused town but I'm not sure
Dwlee - Really liked his activity early on so he's probably town, just wish he would stop being lazy
Derek - null. I like his pushes, but some of his posts don't seem to be doing very much and my gut says he might be scum
MarioManiac - null leaning scum for gut
F-oh-ex - Probably town because the depth of his analysis is more likely to come from town and his emotions seem genuine
crazycrab - I was scumreading him up until recently, but the thing about him trying to change his playstyle doesn't seem faked, and his comment along the lines of "I don't know what I can do to make you townread me" is very classic town frustration for being wagoned.
Robbnva - null leaning scum, it's kinda worrying that he hasn't done anything particularly towny yet since he's been very active. Also, his logic-based scumhunting style seems almost too easy--he's very experienced so he should know that town often uses bad logic, perhaps more than scum does.
Smithereens - null leaning town, for his aggressiveness. Something feels off about him to me, not sure what it is though
VOTE: MarioManiac let's do it.Infinity: What page were you on when you held these opinions on Creature, Robb, and Smithereens?What for? The big quotepost was by Creature.
This response is confusing. Is it town? Smart play? Are the two mutually exclusive? Robb?In post 692, Robbnva wrote:Yes because that's not manipulative. That's just smart play. Cmon infinity you are a better player than this
A one-week vacation? Have fun! Don't forget about us!In post 702, atm487 wrote:Aw shit, I gotta go on a week long trip, thought this game would be faster than usual. Well it seems I have to leave on Saturday and will be back on Saturday. RipIn post 704, Infinity 324 wrote:If you're so confident creature is scum, why aren't you voting him?
Are you talking about Crabman or Creature here?In post 705, Robbnva wrote:Cause there's plenty of time in the day and I've found one scum so I'm looking for the others.
In layman's terms, town tunnel their scumreads. From experience, I take Robb's side here: I've had scumreads but instead of acting on them then and there, tried to find the scumbuddy.In post 711, Smithereens wrote:
Reason. A player who is uninformed is likely to stick to a person who they've discovered is scum with a high degree of confidence. Moving off it simply shows how little profundity the discovery actually made on the player. If Rob's town, then he isn't too concerned about the town win con, and he clearly shows it. Otherwise he's scum.In post 709, Infinity 324 wrote:Do you have a reason you think it's more likely to come from scum or is it just experience
This post just feels like "If you're not me and don't have my reaction, you're scum". Not everybody will be a gold miner, Smithereens! Some will be paleontologists.In post 723, Smithereens wrote:There is nothing weird about the fact that it's not normal for a town to not get hyped about finding a scum and just leave it be.
[This post is getting big, so I'll start a new one for pages 30+.]- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Objection! According to my words, it can either be town OR smart play! But thank you for your other responses.In post 901, Robbnva wrote:
Not sure why it's confusing. Yes it's town, yes it's smart play, imo yes they are.In post 897, Eggman wrote:This response is confusing. Is it town? Smart play? Are the two mutually exclusive? Robb?
PEDIT: I'm asking if the reasons you were scumreading Creature were the ones I pointed out: the crumb claim and the reason he left my wagon.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Robb: you're saying you'd lynch Infinity and Creature. What happened to Crabman? You were on that wagon until petroleumjelly replaced in - did you reconsider any after that?
F-oh-ex: I would say it feels like Creature's off the table about now and we can reconsider him D2. I'd vote in {Crabman, Infinity, MM4}.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
So, based on what I've seen of other people's opinions, it seems that you consider Creature to mutually be scum with either Crabman or me.
VOTE: Crabman,FoS: Smithereens (un-FoS Crabman)
I propose lynching Crabman today, seeing how he flips, and if he's town lynch me or Creature tomorrow.
Because I don't get the cases on Infinity and Dragon, which also (to me) seem a little OMGUS-y (didn't Infinity call out DotW in the first place?)- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Yes. So if Crabman flips scum, then we can call Creature town.In post 1151, F-oh-ex wrote:In post 1146, Robbnva wrote:In post 1143, F-oh-ex wrote:Just to be clear, because I think you referred to me among others, by saying "Creature and Crab are mutually exclusive scumreads" I mean that I have a scumread on both of them but I do NOT see them as partners so one of them flipping scum would be a towntell for the other one in my eyes.
(Of course, I forgot about MM4. If that lynch gets traction, I'll support it, because Smithereens.)- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
EBWOP: I misunderstood the amount needed for a lynch, but I still have intent to vote. Whoops.
My philosophy on when to claim VT hasn't changed: however, if I saw a VT claim coming from someone who was about to be lynched, my first thought about them would be "lying mafioso" instead of "actually a VT". So, like I've said before, I wanted to back up the claim with something to avoid the D1 mislynch I had predicted.In post 1217, petroleumjelly wrote:Eggman, Newbie #1703, Post #241 wrote:Biscuitoid: He's just giving me newbie vibes. True Neutral. (Although, claiming VT on Day 1 is a bad bad move, for future reference.)In that game, Biscuitoid just claimed out of the blue. While I personally don't think that's a good strategy, it got him townread by mostly everyone.Eggman, Newbie #1703, Post #303 wrote:Claiming VT is useless. I don't know about you guys, but as a mafioso I would never claim VT.Nor as a townie, either. The only times I will claim VT are when I'm about to get lynched and in LYLO. Which is exactly what I say in this next quote.
From the looks of it, Eggman was eventually run up Day One, claimed Townie, and eventually hammered himself in order to help Town achieve a lynch. On the one hand, given the above quotes, I am less inclined to think Eggman is scum in this game. But on the other hand, Eggman reallyEggman, Newbie #1703, Post #548 wrote:I am a Vanilla Townie. Oh, only other acceptable time for VT to claim: in "roleclaim or die", or LYLO.wasmuch more proactive and helpful in that game than this one. Eggman, could you please elaborate on your thoughts of claiming Vanilla Townie on Day One? And if you do not think it is acceptable toclaimTownie on Day One, why do you think it is acceptable tocrumbTownie on Day One?
Evidently, it worked. So I'm happy about that, but I probably won't try crumbing in the future.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Smithereens, no. Dragon, I can sorta see (my main reason is that neighbors aren't explicitly the same alignment). atm, I'm not sure. Petroleumjelly, yes (I don't see it).In post 1330, Creature wrote:Is it weird I am thinking scum must be within petroleumjelly/atm487/Dragon of the West/Smithereens?
A weird post to quote for what is presumably a note.
howIn post 1338, Creature wrote:Is it possible scum wanted to kill Dwlee99 to WIFOM Smith?
Adding to this, I have a gut feeling that whoever killed Robb was someone he was particularly abrasive to, so it was less of a calculated move and more of an emotional one.In post 1339, Creature wrote:^ I think mafia killed Dwlee99 because:
- SK would see Robbnva more as a threat to him rather than mafia who's just eliminating strong town reads and keeping WIFOM in the game.
- I don't think a vigilante would shoot Dwlee99, some showed paranoia but I don't see someone doing a hero vig here.
smith, how was Dwlee being antagonistic: i didn't see that at all, and it feels to me like you're doing what creature did with the opposite intent (lying about someone to throw shade at them)In post 1349, Creature wrote:
Huh what?In post 150, Dragon of the West wrote:
he's gonna play that way regardless of what you say to himIn post 127, Smithereens wrote:I'll give Dwlee benefit of doubt and assume he's being antagonistic for the sake of arguments/activity. Not an ideal tact imo given all the activity, so take the hint.
at end of D1 I townread only Robb and Dwlee, so I can see what the mafia was intendingIn post 1359, Creature wrote:Nvm, I think Robbnva got widely town read at the end of D1.
VOTE: Smithereens
Putting this back up.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
A wall followed by a wall, great. That's how you do it.
I thought he said town, then scum, then nvm town.In post 1374, F-oh-ex wrote:That flood gave me cancer. Also, SK is virtually confirmed because why would a Vig shoot either Dwlee or Robbvna? That "if" looks like trying to force a "townslip".
Also, you point out Derek is Town to you then you say "nvm Derek is Town". Consistency?
VOTE: Creature A shame his wagon died yesterday.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Since DG replaced in, I'll remain suspicious of that slot, but I'll try that strategy of "finding a mafioso, then finding his buddy".In post 1400, petroleumjelly wrote:1.)In post 188, Eggman wrote:
So you think the scumteam in a 13-player game would be three people?In post 13, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay so scum team is dragon, crazy and eggman. Thoughts?
Would like to revisit this now. Eggman, were you of the opinion that a 13-player game would have a two-player scum team? Did you think there would be multiple scum teams?In post 267, Eggman wrote:I WAS looking for an answer there, although the intent seems to have not come across. Every mod can do things differently, as well, so I wouldn't know the exact ratio of a 13-player game, hence the question.
I didn't know how many mafiosos would be in this game, since this is my first game of this size. While I was writing that post, I forgot about the 1:3 method, as well.
4.)Eggman, could you summarize your case on Smithereens?
1. I didn't like his tone all throughout D1
2. Tunnels Creature and I while the rest of us go for a Crabman / atm lynch
3.
He later says that that's a towntell, as town should be making bold statements and not caring about contradictions. But from experience, contradictions do not a living townie make.In post 766, Smithereens wrote:I don't pay attention to my posts Dragon, if you read on you'll see that's why I lean town on Rob. He doesn't do it either. However, someone is wrong on the internet and it's my destiny to correct them.
4. (To me, at least, it feels like) he talks about theory as much as, if not more than, the actual game
5. MM4's defense seems very much like one of the scum variety
6. Spends the entire day arguing on why we should NOT lynch Crabman, then flips his vote to Crabman at the end for the hell of it
FoS: Dragon, Vote: MM4
I don't think there's an SK. It's more probable, to me, that there's a vig who felt slighted by Robb and killed him for that, but later found out he dun goofed.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
In post 1429, petroleumjelly wrote:3.)Eggman, why did you vote for crazycrabman on Day One while offering up one of yourself and Creature on Day Two?
Based on your Day One posting your top scumread was Smithereens (and I see that is apparently still true based on your recent vote), so I don't understand why you would resort to a sort of 'gambit' offering like that.In post 1148, Eggman wrote:So, based on what I've seen of other people's opinions, it seems that you consider Creature to mutually be scum with either Crabman or me.
VOTE: Crabman,FoS: Smithereens (un-FoS Crabman)
I propose lynching Crabman today, seeing how he flips, and if he's town lynch me or Creature tomorrow.
Because I don't get the cases on Infinity and Dragon, which also (to me) seem a little OMGUS-y (didn't Infinity call out DotW in the first place?)
because I felt that as a town we were stuck on me and Creature, I wanted to move us to Crabman and MM4, so we could come back to Creature and I the next day.
4.)Eggman, in explaining your case on Smithereens you said:
Could you explain this?In post 1426, Eggman wrote:5. MM4's defense seems very much like one of the scum variety
he puts smithereens first, especially saying "nothing here to note" when a few of us have noticed things there. To me it feels like a mafioso making an attempt to defend his buddy.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
What'd stop you from an MM4 lynch? IMO he's one of the scummier slots due to the Smithereens defense.In post 1493, Creature wrote:I'd go for atm487, unlike Mario, nothing makes me hesitate to vote him.
@Infinity: part going off of Creature's {lynch list}, part because neighbors are not masons. I don't really suspect him as of now, but I'll keep the FoS up to remind me to look into his posts next week.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Smithereens / DGB: I've already written a post on Smithereens, I'll go over DGB's iso tonight.In post 1532, Infinity 324 wrote:Ok this is stupid.
I want everyone to list their top 3 lynch targets for today and explain in detail, if you haven't already, why they are there. Then at least we will have something to discuss and we can compromise or if worst comes to worst just plurality lynch where everyone gets on the wagon of the most popular scum spect. For me it would be dragon, Mario, and eggman.
Or at least say something, I'd rather get into stupid arguments with dragon that this. Hopefully the replacements will help.
MM4 / NJAC: mainly because of lurking and the slot's defense of Smithereens
I wanted to lynch atm for his --posting / inactivity, but I think Titus will breathe some fresh air into the slot. So, uh, strike that.
Creature: I don't remember the exact reason for it, but we could try revisiting this lynch from D1?- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
It wouldn't really be a townread now, just a point against my scumread. And to explain the second point, let me apply Smith's own quote: MM4's move was scum insofar as he was scum. If MM4 / NJAC is town, it's just a townie saying they townread this player. If MM4 / NJAC is scum, it's a mafioso defending their buddy.In post 1559, Derek12 wrote:@Eggman
Do you still agree with this? Also, I don't really get it in the first place. Looking at it now, you seem to have more points against Smithereens then just MM4's defense of him. Why did you believe that MM4 flipping town = town Smithereens?In post 1229, Eggman wrote:Intent to Hammer: MM4
If he's town, that would reluctantly make me townread Smithereens, who I've had suspicion on all game. If not, hooray.
I wrote a small case on Smithereens. (Totally forgot to look back at DGB, but I will do that right. now.)In post 1556, NJAC wrote:
Pretty sure? What's your case on DGB that makes you "pretty sure" he's scum?In post 1549, Eggman wrote:I'm not sure who the third mafioso could be, but I'm pretty sure on {DGB, NJAC}.
Will look through DGB's ISO and reread Day 1 for Titus's question.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
The first one to bring up a vig, which is what I'm thinking as well.In post 1420, DrippingGoofball wrote:
I get that, but the scum is always more worried about SKs than town.In post 1418, F-oh-ex wrote:On one hand SK will probably try to target Mafia. On the other one, eliminating him would get us rid of one NK.
No one is considering a vig for the second kill?
Opposed to the Creature lynch, even when there isn't much threat to it at all. "Randomly" votes our D1 lynch.In post 1436, DrippingGoofball wrote:And, seriously? Two people are voting Creature???
VOTE: crabman
Scumreading MM4? That could possibly be some small distancing. Or, if she's town, she scumreads MM4 as well. Hmm.In post 1444, DrippingGoofball wrote:Yeah... when I read that I thought they were scum together... but he flipped town.
There's a button for exactly that; the little white page.In post 1455, F-oh-ex wrote:ISOing is nigh-worthless if you didn't catch up and don't know the context of situation in which the said posts were made.
Yet you haven't said anything attacking MM4.In post 1490, DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm trying by helping lynch MarioManiac.
Getting replaced by a pretty good player is pretty pauseworthy, Creature.In post 1504, DrippingGoofball wrote:
I can get behind that.In post 1493, Creature wrote:I'd go for atm487, unlike Mario, nothing makes me hesitate to vote him.
Alright so. What I got from this:
DGB scumreads MM4 / NJAK. I'm in favor of lynching NJAK today, because that lynch would give a little more information about DGB.
Who's my vote even on, anyway..?- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Titus and Infinity, I wanted to fully reread Day 1 to refresh myself with the particulars of the Creature lynch. While reading, I found this in F-oh-ex's first post:
Isn't Neapolitan a mafioso role?In post 105, F-oh-ex wrote:Favourite dessert is neapolitan ice cream btw.
Actually reading now.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Also: What does this part of the sentence mean, exactly?In post 1555, Titus wrote:Was the NK someone pushing Creature NKed N1?- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
So I read up to page 24, and it seemed that the Creature wagon ended there to be replaced by the Crabman wagon. So here's some thoughts I had on that.In post 132, Creature wrote:If Smithereens flips scum, it must make Robbnva very town-aligned.
VOTE: Smithereens
Creature is the first player to vote for Smithereens / NJACIn post 161, Dwlee99 wrote:
Looking ar smithereen's post again this really bothers me. Creature never said that they got a town read from like one post or something, it was based on the pushes people were making across multiple pushes.In post 60, Smithereens wrote:There's absolutely no way you're getting a town read from the very first post a person makes in the game. If you could I'd just copy/paste that post everywhere I went as scum and you'd be none the wiser.
VOTE: Smithereens
Crabman, who would become the mislynch, gets a bad feeling from Smithereens's first two posts but doesn't feel like they're enough to justify a scumreadIn post 174, crazycrabman wrote:Smithereen's posts do seem scummy but two posts isn't enough for me to make a decision on.
"I know for a fact"? My "I like your town game, Creature" post is just a roundabout way of saying "I townread you, Creature", but this is the cold hard truth. Scumslip..? Titus, how do you feel about this post from your slot?In post 234, atm487 wrote:OK listen, so I have been inactive lately because I have had alot on my mind and some stuff happened, but listen. I know for a fact creature is town, his posts are very revealing and if he's playing scum, he very good, if not, then he is very good at town too, rooting out the obvious people that have been active, for now, I would like to re-review all the posts and wait a little before voting, because many of us have been active and I am having a hard time deciding who to vote for, my apologies
Still not sure about the relationship between you two besides "IRL friends".In post 237, Dwlee99 wrote:OOC: Who is perturbed by the amazing Derek12 account?
When I'm at L-1 and claim, Creature moves his vote here to try and get rid of some of my pressure. This is a couple posts before his post where he says "Egg crumbed and I think he's VT"In post 277, Creature wrote:VOTE: MarioManiac4
Let's go here, his play here is WAY different than his town play I know.In post 350, Dragon of the West wrote:OOC: what was that show from the 90's with the guy who would always say "howdy neighbor"? Was that the one with Tim Allen talking to his neighbor over the fence and they never showed his neighbor's face? I've been trying to figure it out all day and it's killing me
This also flew over my head: at the time I thought it was just an atm shitpost (no offense meant atm)In post 405, atm487 wrote:noone gonna hammer the scum?
Conftown's thoughts on the matter.In post 458, Dwlee99 wrote:I think creature is the scum here.
VOTE: creature
it seems like creature is attempting to tie himself to egg.In post 518, F-oh-ex wrote:Crab smells fishy to mePUNS
Dwlee starts the Crabman wagon, Robb objects.In post 565, Robbnva wrote:
Curious why him over creature?In post 557, Dwlee99 wrote:we should lynch crazy
Smithereens tries to steer our lynch back to Creature and I...In post 571, Smithereens wrote:Why so many votes on Crazy when there's an objectively sound case on Eggman and Creature..?
then in 5 posts changes his mind about me and only votes Creature.In post 576, Smithereens wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Creature
I'm thinking Crazy is a counter wagon to relieve pressure off Creature. Atm help lynch this guy. Eggman isn't happening.
Gotta go, I'm seeing a show now.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
Because I didn't understand what your question meant and you didn't clarify after I asked you to.In post 1587, Titus wrote: The reread does little to answer my question. Like for instance was the townie that died N1 pushing Creature.
I do think Dwlee was suspecting Creature before he went to the Crabman wagon, so, yes.
Not really? His wall, to me, just looks like catching up, but with each point in a different post rather than one giant post. I feel like his reads on 64 are fine, as well.In post 1550, Infinity 324 wrote:Eggman, do you think creature's recent posts have been scummy?
I will repeat, I bet my scumread it's a Vig.In post 1599, F-oh-ex wrote:A question to the more experienced players from a newb: I know the consensus day 1 was that there are 3 Mafia but since it's apparently a multiball or SK exists, can we be still sure of this? I don't think it's a scumslip per se but this post rubs me wrong.
Sarcasm. I hope.In post 1614, Dragon of the West wrote:In post 1552, DrippingGoofball wrote:
Fantastic, help me bus my buddy!In post 1549, Eggman wrote:I'm not sure who the third mafioso could be, but I'm pretty sure on {DGB, NJAC}.
Da fuq is thisIn post 1554, DrippingGoofball wrote:Eggman's reads are a hot mess and he's my other scum buddy.if DGB flips scum i'd honestly use that as evidence to lynch njac
Derek, why the blank vote on Creature?- Eggman
-
Eggman
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
(I don't see it myself, as evidenced by that one post I made. Where?)In post 1662, NJAC wrote:Nvm, I already saw it, but not sure that was a townslip.
Eggman's Read List, Because I'm Not Sure What Else To Put Into This Post Edition:
Eggman: Role PM
Derek12: He has been consistently scumhunting and doing his best. Leaves a good taste in my mouth.
Creature: I liked its posts on day 1, although it seems not many of you did. After its big wall at the start of Day 2, it's been erratically popping in and out
Infinity: Seems like he's been asking questions and thinking his posts through to make them sound like town. Higher than neutral, IMO.
Dragon: still not sure what to really think of them. I know I was somewhat suspicious of them, but I forgot what for. Probably something about the neighborhood.
F-oh-ex: Loses points in my book for agreeing with/defending Smithereens, but has otherwise stayed consistent. Also, Neapolitan soft? Check me tonight bro
Titus: You probably already answered this question, but why wouldn't you need to read the game as town..? Gains points for trying to catch NJAC with a possible scumslip.
(Both of my scumreads replaced into slots that I already found scummy and I have written posts for, so...)
NJAC: not sure I have stuff to say about this slot, so let me bring up the fact once more that both NJAC and Titus had extremely similar OPs.
DGB: in addition to Smithereens' moves, that healthy dose of what I can hopefully presume is sarcasm doesn't help my opinion of her.- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
- Eggman
-
Eggman Goon
- Eggman
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 393
- Joined: March 8, 2016
In post 1673, petroleumjelly wrote:2.)Eggman, please place me in your latest Read List. Also, I will ask you not to color code your reads like that -- I have a particularly difficult time reading your yellow text without highlighting it.
Ah. You hadn't posted in a while, so because of life stuff I sorta forgot what I was feeling with you.
But after going through her iso, I'd put PJ down as Strong Town. She definitely thinks her posts through, makes valid points, and asks good questions. (She also read the game )
3.)Eggman and Infinity 324: you have both pressed on Titus for not reading the entire game. Is there a reason you are not similarly pressing DrippingGoofball for not reading the entire game? They have both literally said they prefer to hunt through direct interactions.
I'd say, because I forgot due to life stuff and DGB replaced in much earlier than Titus and NJAC. But, hey, that's a good point! One more thing to add to my DGB case. Thank you PJ!
5.)Eggman, how do you know about Neapolitan (Cop) roles? And why have you only seemingly noticed F-oh-ex mentioning his favorite flavor is Neapolitannow, as opposed to earlier in the game? Has something changed?
I read through the wiki.
The intent of my reread was for me to look closely and see things I missed, as well as where the Creature wagon started. F-oh-ex's RQS was something that I, on the first read, had missed.
6.)Somebody sell me on the Creature case. I have a Townlean on him. Why is he scum? I do not find the "lying" about the Eggman crumb persuasive in the slightest. I do not think his Day One hunting by "process of elimination" is scummy. I assume there is more meat on the bone?
Although I'm townreading it, the best reason I can think of for lynching Creature was by our good friend, Smithereens: he believed if we lynched Creature, we could use the information gained from his lynch to come to a conclusion about me. - Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman
- Eggman