Mini Normal 1823 - Game Over
Forum rules
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Don't rush meh, I'm slow! :<
Saru called my other body scum but didn't like the speed of the wagon.
Normally wagon speed can easily indicate how it's driven. I haven't got to see if there was a quick counter wagon, but if there isn't that's normally a good sign that scum are voting with town.
I saw that Saru claimed VT. Call me biased but I see VT claims as town rather than scum when you look like a promising lynch.
So, what's the case on Saru here? Saying that my other body contradicted but didn't lie? I'm sure there's more to it than that.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Town white knight more than scum. So what else was there?In post 755, Zyf wrote:The case on saru is that + the fact that your slot was scummy af but Saru was the only one who came in and WK-ed it, which either means scumbuddy protection or scum trying to get town points.
I haven't seen yet, can you confirm is Saru was at L1 with intent when claiming?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I'm being blind, post me the claim?In post 757, Mimikyu wrote:No, she was never at L-1 with intent.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Okay, so it was L2. Lets think about it for a second. What benefit does claiming VT while scum ever get you?
You have the same chance of getting lynched but you don't take any PR's down with you.
So, what else was on the case?
-Whiteknihting
-Mis use of words
And if Saru was scum with me, why am I not the one being lynched considering I made the lie (well my other body).
And if your reasoning is because Saru was whiteknighting, then I call the bullshit and say, before I commented, whiteknighting here was understood as calling town town for town cred. (This excludes Zyf who has actually said scum buddying, which is more of a realistic answer).I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
If you got that out of my comment, then you're an idiot.In post 764, BlackStar wrote:So... You want to be lynched?
It's more looking of a motivation to why the wagon on Saru was happening.
I'm still waiting for other reasons Saru is scum.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Well, it is. Out of all my comments, you only took that comment.In post 766, BlackStar wrote:There's no need for personal insults. And you literally said "if anyone should be getting lynched, it's me". It's not idiotic to intrepret your post the way I did
Can you answer why I wasn't the lead lynch for lying and Saru was for white knighting me / scum buddying (more scum buddying of course).I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So why was he pushed for such weak reasons.In post 767, Xkfyu wrote:He's not scum, I've already said that.
Unfortunately, you probably aren't either...
I mean, maybe I'm missing something, but I can't see any other case.
Who do you think is scum then? And reasons.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Okay, so we are getting someone.In post 771, BlackStar wrote:You were the leading lynch. And then Saru made a bunch of horrible posts that we couldn't ignore and a wagon formed on Saru.
So in your opinion, going by your reads, who was the better vote, me or Saru.
Who else were wagoned during this time? Because I know I'm town, and I'm going with Saru as town, so unless this town has 10/10 detective skills (sarcasm) forming wagons would have been avoided by scum if there are any.
I assume people pushing such weak negative reasons on Saru would be a good place to start.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
On the edge of my seat.In post 775, BlackStar wrote:I'm working on the case against Saru. Hold on for a whileI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Almost fell off my chair!
So what's your point here? It's "justified" but scum can't opportunity vote here? Why shouldn't people have concerns with fast pushes?In post 778, BlackStar wrote:He thinks that the wagon is suspicious for forming quickly even though it had a justifiable reason for forming: someone being caught in a lie
I don't see this as ripped apart, I see this as someone rejecting his opinion immediately. Players that are intimidated will back down when people play the experience card. That's not alignment tell at all.In post 778, BlackStar wrote:His logic is ripped apart here and instead of acknowledging that, he weakly tries to keep justifying what he said.
I mean, this is a weak contradiction. He's saying that he's not defending him for his contradiction (and you can see that the primary reason is because of a fast wagon). The second part is backing up his read. I agree, he's incorrect and it's a bad reason to town read someone, but it's not way scummy.In post 778, BlackStar wrote:He said he wasn't defending a contradiction in one post, and then in all the posts after that he admits that Eagersnake contradicted himself but still tries to say that the contradiction wasn't scummy. We all know that he'd been defending eager, but he keeps denying it and it looks to me like he wants to distance himself from eager.
His action here was for seeing contradiction different to a lie, as the issue here isn't the fact of him WK or buddying (correct me if I'm wrong). This also depends on how you interpreter it, most people think that town shouldn't ever lie (I think that's wrong on certain situations) but town can contradict themselves in games with adjusted reads, forgetting or just reading incorrectly. I wouldn't consider these situations as a lie (just to point out the terrible reasoning from yourself in the argument).
If it's weak, why is it in your case?In post 778, BlackStar wrote:Weak ATE
You posted yourself that people see you as scummy, so how can you even consider adding this?
Okay, lets get this straight... There is more than 1 scum.In post 778, BlackStar wrote:If you don't think he's town, why have you been questioning his wagon? Why have you been protecting him all this time?
Scum bus for a start. Although I can see this comment as a complete flip flop from him and more swapping his opinion, this is part of your case I do like.. However, a bad wagon is a bad wagon. If I think you are scum (for example) and I think Saru is scum (for example) then you voting Saru will trigger my scumdar. I want to know the motives to it and what not.
Looks like sarcasm.In post 778, BlackStar wrote:Another contradiction
Now, to counter you claim on him, why didn't you bring up this point
In post 287, Saru wrote:I'm slightly leaning towards Snake being noob town
Scum don't hunt for actual reasons... All I'm saying.In post 369, Saru wrote:I don't think Snake is town. Try again Mr.Transcend.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Your TierShift reasoning is shitIn post 784, Xkfyu wrote:Scum:
algebra - Weak reason for such a strong town read in Post 36. Actually, now that I've gone be to see this, I'm gonna vote him for this, and his weird 55 and 57, which doesn't look at all natural to me.
Mimi (not with TierShift) - Post 615. I checked the Activity Overview page at the time of this post, and TierShift and MariaR were both listed right next to each other at the bottom of the list (sorted by post count). See my 622.
TierShift (not with Mimi) - For his reasoning to want to lynch Gerry in Post 143.
I like the Mimi reason though. I'll ISO there next.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
10/10In post 791, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:O I didn't see ved so I thought you tr him no he's the 3rd scum and i'm just reading all his posts like
"Bs bs bs"
Try and give something rather than throwing shit around.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
At least you got something right!In post 797, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:HOW THE FUCK DO YOU PPL SR THIS???????????I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Explain this to me.In post 129, Transcend wrote:Blackstar feels scummy but i fosed him instantly in our game and he was town lol.
Are you saying that you don't want to look at Blackstar for being scum here because he was town in the last game?
How many games have you had with him?
I mean, this is pretty bad.
In post 223, Transcend wrote:BlackStar: do people (not just me) tend to fos you a lot (every single time you post)?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Sit down, let the adults talk.In post 801, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:I'm gonna enjoy lynching VedI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Probably because town aren't too smart right now.In post 804, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Why are you here again?
Feel free to posting useless shit while I wait for Trans to log on.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Pretty spooky.In post 806, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:How's it like to know you replaced into a slot where all 3 of your partners were already found out must fucking suck huh?
Easy games like that are fun, eh?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Doesn't that touch borderline policy lynch.In post 810, Mimikyu wrote:Likely not, but the point that we shouldn't focus on lurkers because "there is plenty to talk about" is silly because it's possible that all we are talking about is a bunch of townies.
Surely it's the fake content or lack of it with posting you want to look for.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Plausible, just not probably.In post 812, Mimikyu wrote:Nope not at all.
In no way have I ever advocated for lynching one of the lurkers instead of one of the actives. I have and will continue to advocate for us not ignoring the lurkers just because there may be other talkative people available, because the fact is that it's possible that everyone super-active is town.
Define active in your eyes. Not being prodded, 10 posts a day? Can these posts be "Yeah this person is scum" with nothing else?
This is why I dislike the 'lets kill all lurkers'.
It's an opportunity place for scum to join, it's an easy way out.
That said - putting high pressure on lurkers I do like.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Well at least we can agree that empty posts count to lurking.In post 814, Mimikyu wrote:Agree 100% that 'let's kill all lurkers' is bad. My goal in my statement was to place pressure on the lurkers.
There are no hard lines, but tends to be relatively infrequent posting coupled with empty posts.
I haven't checked your ISO yet, who are your reads?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I mean... I'm not sure to take you seriously or not.In post 816, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:I'd love some examples of "empty posts" btw
If you don't know what an empty post is, go play in the corner and I'll shout you over for the next one.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Talk to me about Trans.In post 818, Mimikyu wrote:and Transcend are all town
Originally I thought that Trans was just having the louder players as town, then I noticed that Trans is likes xkfyu as scum, so that case was out of the window.
I don't like her early game she distances for blackstar looking scum, but doesn't have any intention on following her read apart from referring to a previous game.
With Tieshift, do you agree with Xkfyu's comment? 784
Also with algebra, do you think his post has any backing?
You also like Xkfyu as scum, do you think he's bussing his team mates? His vote went from Tieshift to algebra and I feel that the only decent scum read he had was the Mimi out of the 3.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
801In post 819, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:There are 2 types of empty posts what is one to you?
Here's a prime example. Don't think at all it's because it's against me, but it's actually from having nothing. This comment doesn't help town at all. If you're scum, of course you are going to be holding your scum view on my slot, if you're town, you aren't looking to progress the game. Keep in mind this is an example, and I've read you already.
I've seen your posts, I don't think it's scum sided, however, I think you are getting lazy as town as the day goes. You feel comfortable with not looking for "my buddies" but instead happy to leave you vote on what you expect to flip scum.
Wanted to clear that up before the "OMGAWD you scum read me with no vote".
When you feel ready to look for my "buddies" let me know and we can discuss.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I'm sure Trans won't take offence.In post 822, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:LMFAOOOOOOOOI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I thought you had a vote on Saru, I guess I was wrong there.In post 826, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:You really haven't been reading I called you Transcend and Zyf for reasons stated before read the near end of my ISO to see it
you said one of the empty posts I expected so that's fair I would call that filler but the empty post I normally mean is saying posts that look like they mean a lot but mean very little or just don't have any real context/content to them
example: Cop has an inno on player C so we prob shouldn't lynch player C because they are most likely town and I don't think they're fake
This is an empty post because there're saying things people already know and are adding nothing to the convo at hand.
So, tell me, what connects me with Trans and Zyf? It's a good start, and I might be willing to give up my buddy Trans.
Filler and empty post mean the same to me. You either want to give something to town or you don't. I get it, I post like that when nothing is happening.
A filler post has no content, an empty post has no content. If that's all someone is giving then it falls under lurking. Nice one on trying to counter the argument though and look more proactive after I bring it up. (I actually want you to be like that, for the record)
Also, I'm not sure I understand your argument here. You are saying that someone responding to a "He's town, I'm a cop" post with "Yeah he's town" is any less of an empty post than "Why are you here again?"
Explain this theory to me again, because I think you've been eating those crayons.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
On a scum side - I don't recall them as of yet. If I did, I would be working with the read.In post 828, BlackStar wrote:Who do you think is making empty posts so far?
Remember this is day 1, you get the friendlies out of the way, you get the rabblerabblerabble out of they way and then you move onto finding reads and catching out content.
That said, there's still a few people for me to read.
On a town side - Sonia, but I've already stated my opinion there.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So your entire case is because Trans and Zyf voted Saru, which lets confirm, both are for my lynch, but yet buddying me?In post 829, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Did you read the statement I made before that Transcend did about contradictions also Trans and Zyf both have Saru as hard scum and insta dismiss the case for WKing a town (protecting their scum buddy (that's you btw))
to answer the 2nd part of your question think of it as saying a lot in a post but in a whole the statement means very little.
I'm sure that you have more than that, although the way people have been providing cases in this game so far, I wouldn't bet my dolla dolla on it.
What I get from you from this post is, games are so easy, and players like Zyf and Trans are so bad at scum, no effort needs to be made and you can vote just within these names.
Yeeeaaah, no...
Lazy town are just as anti town to lurker town imo.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I mean, I'm not arguing if Zyf or Trans is scum or not. What did you get my from post?In post 832, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:
This is a direct contradiction to what Zyf has been doing all game and that's hardcore pushing Saru not caring if he claims or not (also makes me think he doesn't want to lynch you cause scum)In post 569, Zyf wrote:can we please let vedith at least play before we decided to lynch them
What is towny in the slightly sense about this has no reason to town read it at ALLIn post 227, Zyf wrote:
^In post 226, Transcend wrote:Okay Blackstar. Duly noted.
transcend gets very minor town points
I also think that you are mis understanding who my scum view is currently pointing at.
I'm not sure how you connect me Zyf and Trans up with those 2 posts, but this is a conversation we can pick back up after I get more from Trans.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I'm not sure if this reaction from you is you worried (I'm not even sure why) or actually believe it.In post 862, Zyf wrote:"Influential" still cracks me up
Hell no I'd have to be like a fucking commuting rolecop for anyone to listen to any shit i say i a positive light
This is something we can address later as I'm at work now.
VOTE: Transcend
Any reason you're avoiding interating with me?
If you missed my post - 802
I also have an opinion on you in 820I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Well, we are getting somewhere, I guess.
Why didn't you pressure it then if he appeared as scum?
Can you spell out your Saru read of scum. Treat me like I'm really slow and explain in good detail.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Do games normally need to revolve around you?In post 876, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:He prob thinks i'll townread him if he helps me lynch you...It's not gonna.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Town can lie about their role. It's not welcome but they can.In post 1140, algebra wrote:why do you feel the need to confirm? cuz your replacee was lying, and you are too?
VOTE: dwlee
Also, would you have preferred he denied or ignored it?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Me first with what?In post 1146, Dwlee99 wrote:u first
Onto Trans?
Because he won't interact with anything scummy I am bring up to him.
I want to know about him and Blackstar. Trans said that Blackstar looks scummy, but decided to drop it. Why?
Trans is saying that people are scum claiming to convince others to vote, and with several newer looking players in the game, it's a scum tactic to get them onside imo.
You go!I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
The answer there should be obvious.In post 1150, Dwlee99 wrote:No, I was asking why is vedith a bad vote.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Because he's not coming across as scummy at all. He's responding, he's giving his reads. His reads are a pile of shit, but his reads are a lot more genuine that people like Trans.In post 1152, Dwlee99 wrote:not vedith, ugh, why xykfu or however you spell it is a bad vote.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Do you honestly wonder why people think you are scum?
Dwlee is a BP. All we need is further proof in the game and it's one of scums biggest problems. Even if he is scum lynching him today is not the right option.
Just think about it for 2 seconds.
If we lynch Dwlee and he flips BP I'm FOS anyone on his wagon. Scum will want this claim lynched.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
How the fuck does further proof not exist?In post 1160, Mimikyu wrote:The problem is this further proof doesn't really exist.
That being said, it's probably not the best idea to lynch him today, especially after dwlee's entrance which I've actually liked.
VOTE: Xkfyu
Yeah I don't like that vote either.
Why not Trans?I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Then vote Trans...In post 1162, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:mother fker how many times do I have to say that I scumread YOU TRANSCEND AND DW (Was Zyf) those HAVEN'T CHANGED
Pedit - Good.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Zyf posting was at a level that as scum he would be caught out easily in a game, and yet be a huge threat to scum if is was town.In post 1184, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:how many times do I have to say that claim doesn't make sense
he said he was acting SCUMMY to get hit when that would do the exact opposite scum would keep him alive and it's really convenient he's a role that can't prove himself
If he claimed tracker cop or something that wouldn't want to be hit and was acting weird because of that I'd understand that and would believe it cause that logic MAKES SENSE
BP you want to be pro town and want mafia to hit you not be scummy and leave you alive
Zyf was scared scum who claimed with barely any votes on him to get votes off him
Regardless if you believe him or not, lynching a claimed BP on day 1 is not the correct move.
I can imagine that the scum are just sitting back and watching you push for a BP lynch rubbing their hands. That just makes you stupid though.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Saru gets it.In post 1187, Saru wrote:You're assuming that pointing fingers at lots of people was seen as a scummy action by Zyf himself. He probably thought that he was being a genius scum hunter, and that he was showing off how townie he was by making cases on people which might make scum nervous eventually. It's a bit of a naive(and stupid) plan, I admit, but given that he's a newbie to normal games, I can easily see him thinking up of such a plan.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Regardless, we're not lynching a BP claim day 1.In post 1195, Xkfyu wrote:This is ridiculous.
Tomorrow you and Sonia can fanny about in the corner and draw that slot as scum with your new crayons.
Trans needs to be the lynch today. Avoiding confrontation, not scum hunting at all. Anyone town reading Trans I want a proper reason to why.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
I've had it when you know you're town (obviously) and feel like you're playing the right way (even if not) and just get overly frustrated because people aren't seeing things the way you do.In post 1204, Xkfyu wrote:I agree with you. What was ridiculous was the childish tantrum.
I wouldn't call it a childish tantrum but instead frustration.
Could also be frustration from scum, but I doubt it.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Maybe you should consider providing a better case than "They posted about one another".In post 1206, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Half my ISO is trying to get Dw/Zyf and Trancend and Ved lynched and no one is doing SHIT
Sonia - Pretend you aren't as gifted as we all believe, and you don't have all 3 scum pinned ( SHOCK HORROR )
Give me reads on all of the other players, if you have any.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Then don't expect people to take you seriously.In post 1209, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:No.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
Well to me it looks like an attempt to get people Trans played with before (I assume that Sonia and Gerry have played more with Trans than any of us) to town read him with AtE. The reason I think it's fake is because of backing down after with the acknowledgement that he is being toxic in the game and could get forced replaced.In post 1215, Xkfyu wrote:Vedith, have a look at the posts that Trandscend said he was trolling me in. They start at Post 312 and end at Post 351.
I have some thoughts on them, but I'd like to hear your opinion on them first.
It tells us nothing overall from Trans align and yet, if I read correctly, shows us that Gerry and Sonia are of different align to Trans. I would say Trans is scum.
I don't see any actual trolling on you, and it's just trying to insult to get people to follow.
I can review it later with more surrounding posts, but I don't I'm going to see it as town.I claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
In post 1255, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:Xkfyu has been consistent asking the right questions trying to move the game forward and is overall a lot more towny then any of the ppl voting him
stop lynch him assholes but then again I really shouldn't have my hopes up for how this game is goingI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
So you fully believe Trans and think he's not being playing like scum? I've tried to discuss with Trans in the game but he won't speak with me probably because he knows I won't let go.In post 1362, Dwlee99 wrote:Uh huhI claim scum \o/- Vedith
-
Vedith Survivor
- Vedith
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21212
- Joined: June 18, 2015
- Location: Surrey
x shots are pretty normal for these games, at least what I've seen of them.In post 1364, texcat wrote:I don't believe the claim, but I didn't Zyf' s claim either. The 2 shot part of it is just too convenient.
The claim isn't what concerns me.I claim scum \o/ - Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith
- Vedith