In post 977, Zyf wrote:
ah you want me to explain /why/ it's bad
Sure
it's opportunistic as fuck
first of all, you have sonia, who's pretty highly townread, "on the fence" so that if things go your way (someone pushes them) you can vote them, while keeping them high enough not to get any weird looks
next, you have Xkfyu as scum, which you never go on to vote for because there's no wagon there
third, you put two lurkers in your scum pile but don't do anything with it, simply saying you think "one" of them is scum–in other words, you can vote whichever wagon gets more force later on
also you have half of your list below town as possible votables
you also conveniently forget people; i don't appreciate that, because those are freebies for later on.
Lastly, you say I could "easily be scum" followed by a sentence suggesting I'm null to you
so that you can get away with it no matter what happens
you also say you don't have a "solid read" on me but apparently voting null people when there's 4 scum in your list is normal
1) Zero interest in voting Sonia today. Reading my post it's clear there's a distinction between her and your position on my list, despite me being ultimately undecided on both at the time.
2) No point in pushing a wagon that has no traction on day 1. Waste of a vote.
3) Not voting either today, but seems likely one is scum. Not the only person to have this stance.
4) Day 1 reads should be fairly fluid, because anyone with a firm list is either overconfident or ignorant. Additionally, I had a total of 4 as possible votes. Nullscum and below are possible for votes from me. Nulls are not. 4/13 is not half.
5) If I was "forgetting people to be freebies later on", isn't casting slight shade just strictly better? This just doesn't make sense.
6) My wording on you doesn't imply a null. It implies a null-scum, which you yourself picked up on when you so nicely organized my list.
To be honest you did a good job pointing out potential issues in my list, but that still doesn't make you town.
mimikyu..