I'm familiar with the mechanics of the game and i've played quite a few of irl ones, but never on a forum and i'm no expert of the live one anyways. My native language isn't english so please excuse me if i have some trouble expressing myself. If i was scum i'm pretty sure i would be unmasked after less than 48 hours. I'm a terrible liar, but you only have my word for it. Actually, it's also a very different timing and thought process than in a live one, so maybe i'm better at it. Or worse, we'll see. Anyway for now i don't have much to share with you guys ; i've skimmed through some of the other games and i'm impressed with how little people seem to work with when trying to figure out who's scum. I don't feel that in this domain i have a lot to share but i'll try to be as active as possible to not be a deadweight in the debates.copper223 wrote: Don't knock yourself down, your opinions are as important as everyone else's.
Ofc if you happened to draw scum I guess it sucks to be you and I'm coming for ya. Don't knock yourself down, your opinions are as important as everyone else's. Ofc if you happened to draw scum I guess it sucks to be you and I'm coming for ya.
Accountant, sorry, should have made that clearer. I don't think something that obvious would help anyone clear his name.In post 37, JaeReed wrote:You agree with Accountant, or you agree with oncilla?In post 32, Astyanaxx wrote:I agree, for what it's worth.Accountant wrote:@oncilla: Do you think that JaeReed seriously believes that statement will make them seem townie?
Yeah maybe that's a bad way of saying it. I mean that i don't feel like having a completely new player and a new but familiarized player is enough to make the game "newbie". There's no point generalizing into "newbies should do that" and "new players can do insane things" when you're basically just talking about me and Stapler.In post 67, Accountant wrote:What do you mean that they're repeatedly bringing it up?In post 66, Astyanaxx wrote:@Jaereed I don't see why you guys keep bringing up that the game is supposedly newbie while only me and Stapler (which apparently lurked for a while and seems familiar enough with it) are confirmed ones. Just treat it like an average game.
You mean any other input on the game generally ?goodmorning wrote: This is cool, but please respond to 53!
It's not, i'm just getting sidetracked.copper223 wrote:@Asty
We are still waiting for Kuroshira to join and oncilla said he knows how to play mafia but is unfamiliar with mafiascum, as far as newbies go this is one looks pretty balanced.
Why is it relevant how Jae treats the game wrt to there being more or less new players?
Not really, at that point. The discussion about lynch or no lynch seems to me like a meta debate between two players eager to discuss game theory, with little to no consequence on the game itself. Reasoning behind most of the votes has been sound - even on me - (except the random votes obviously), although it seems people are holding to some of their deductions... like you in 56.In post 80, goodmorning wrote:I mean the part where I said "go back and see if you see anything you'd call weird."In post 78, Astyanaxx wrote:You mean any other input on the game generally ?goodmorning wrote: This is cool, but please respond to 53!
I did, and i was directly concerned by the remark. It seemed to me like pre-game banter.In post 86, copper223 wrote:@AllDid everyone else, before GM posted that she was 85% joking, get the same impression as accountant?In post 85, Accountant wrote:The excessive amount of question marks means GM isalmost certainly joking, which means it reads to me as faked paranoia.
