If I thought you were making up a read on me, I'd be voting you because you'd be scum, Pie. Your read that I was tunneling TOB was garbage, not made up. There's a distinction there. And that distinction unfortunately wrecks like 90% of your points. Specifically you wondering why I'm voting OA over you shouldn't really be a point anyways (OA's response was in a different dimension of bad, considering he decided to be unreasonable with me after seemingly deciding to explain himself first). Yeah I'mma fight your "Aj's tunneling TOB" statement. What kinda tunnel goes "Yeah I have nothing more to address with TOB for now" after two or three posts? For the basis of your read on me, it seems pretty self-explanatory why I think that read is atrocious.
You go on to talk about how I don't try to change your mind on me. I very rarely address reads on me. Or... at least recently I haven't been bothering in any of my games because it's too fucking boring to argue about the one known constant to me. All it leads to is a bunch of WIFOM especially when it comes to meta or "I think he'd do this" sort of statements. Why don't I try to get you over your read on me? Because I couldn't care less with your read on me. It also makes this game a hell of a lot easier if people use me as a wagon since I don't have to guess if it's a wagon on town or scum. Ergo, I don't really care if I end up getting run up.
Specifically with my post on OA, you make up some semantics on how me saying "scum reading S_S with 3 posts while no read on Dunn is bad" when I should just say "S_S read is bad". What does it matter, really? To me, as bad as the S_S read was, not having a read on TOB or you is more perplexing. Not having an opinion is just a lack of trying. If OA flips red, I need to know WHAT CAUSES a distinct lack of reads there. There's no reason to stop at "reading S_S as scum here is bad" because that's far too shallow in the issues in that post. Really, you set it up as me being scum and attacking OA, all I see here is you trying to fit me into an alignment with no basis. The information
I
want involves connections like why OA would avoid mentioning you/TOB. I could shout that it's stylistic but really it's common sense. "Why are you scumreading S_S" answered with can be answered with 'gut' and the best you get is someone saying 'that's a weak reason'. Cute, what's that actually do you? Unless you have a lot of those marks, all you get is general disapproval.
With 396 in particular, I'm not particularly interested in Syr's scum read (as explained above, not interested in fighting them). My belief is that Syr did not play the sequence out naturally. Reading into his posts, he acted suspicious at what had occurred, but his reasoning wasn't sound and reinforced my idea that OA and Syr could be a pair. (This reason is because in my town flip at an L-1 lynch, him calling OA/Dunn a partner of mine makes no fucking difference. If he wanted to push again, it'd be as a 'you white knighted Aj' sort of deal, meaning regardless of how to pursue either Dunn or OA in that situation, it would require throwing out the reason to cast suspicion in the first place). Is there reason for him not to unvote? Sure, but to lack any reconsidering (as alluded to), no, he's suggested such that I'd expect suspicion where none was found..
of posts that don't really have a suspicion behind it early on.