This is some really scummy shit right here.
--
In post 118, Io wrote:I personally don't really get any use out of RVS until after some scums die and we can get associations, so really I've just been watching people's posting patterns moreso than who's actually being voted.
With that being said I frankly see nothing wrong with either of you two, QR's RV has a reasonable explanation, and you're at least going for trying to get discussion and stuff going and considering Mafia thrive in inactive town's I say that's at least good enough for you to not be of immediate concern to me.
I'd like for the memes to sort of die down soon though, because there's no way to read someone who is just meming about. Part of the reason I put my RV on empire because he's just a meme.
In that case I am vey interested to see what you come up with! ja?
--
In post 129, BTD6_maker wrote:I forgot about this game because I didn't receive any link or Day Start message.
So far, there's not much content here, apart from the N0 Global Neapolitan fakeclaims.
The Mod messed up in one respect. Sample Role PMs were not provided. Thus, I can claim my team (which is paraphrasing, not quoting):
I am on the blue team.
As sample Role PMs were not provided and there was flavour in Role PMs, this should essentially confirm me as Town, particularly as it is generally common for Town to be green and scum red. In Opens, I don't think scum are ever given fakeclaims.
lmao this is a town post from BTD.
--
In post 139, Donempire wrote:Alright BTD is talking bullshit.
It is really easy to get the colors for both factions just by asking the mod for the colors. In fact, i have asked what was up with the faction colors and thats how i knew red was scum and what was up with the blue colors. I have no doubt the mod wouldve said towns' color to me even if i was scum.
So you knowing blue is town proves nothing. Unless you're trying to prove you asked the mod for towns' faction color. Scum.
VOTE: BTD6_maker
This is some scummy shit right here.
--
In post 144, Chickadee wrote: In post 139, Donempire wrote:Alright BTD is talking bullshit.
It is really easy to get the colors for both factions just by asking the mod for the colors. In fact, i have asked what was up with the faction colors and thats how i knew red was scum and what was up with the blue colors. I have no doubt the mod wouldve said towns' color to me even if i was scum.
So you knowing blue is town proves nothing. Unless you're trying to prove you asked the mod for towns' faction color. Scum.
VOTE: BTD6_maker
I feel fine adding you to my scum pile for now. Though, I can see where you could be looking out for town.
Not bottom tier scum, but like, I'll get a lot of info on you from a flip.
This is some towny shit right here.
--
In post 148, Sesq wrote:Sorry, I never got the PM that this was starting.
I'm going to read the game now.
tbh
why am I not surprised.
--
Bruh how the fuck do people even eat popcorn that fucking fast.
--
In post 174, DeltaW wrote: In post 129, BTD6_maker wrote:I forgot about this game because I didn't receive any link or Day Start message.
So far, there's not much content here, apart from the N0 Global Neapolitan fakeclaims.
The Mod messed up in one respect. Sample Role PMs were not provided. Thus, I can claim my team (which is paraphrasing, not quoting):
I am on the blue team.
As sample Role PMs were not provided and there was flavour in Role PMs, this should essentially confirm me as Town, particularly as it is generally common for Town to be green and scum red. In Opens, I don't think scum are ever given fakeclaims.
There was no flavour in the roles, there are only VTs and MGs, also I told everyone that the blue team existed.
Bruh you fucked up.
--
This should never been a thing in the first place.
--
In post 189, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:No one is confirmed and the mod is a good guy.
Let's all go back to actually playing mafia
Okay, at this point I thought this could also be some really scummy shit right here. Did you agree or disagree with the theory of BTD being town based off of that post?
--
In post 192, Donempire wrote:Alright. Even though BTD's logic is still bullshit, and his response was sketchy, i cant base my whole argument on him throwing a gambit like that as scum.
Time to find another unholy victim.
UNVOTE:
This is still some scummy shit btw.
--
If I trust you and think you're town I'll look into this some more.
--
In post 207, Io wrote:
Do you do anything other than fluff and vote?
Okay, why are you asking LUV this opposed to just everyone else. Because I am seeing other people do this exact same thing.
--
In post 217, Io wrote:Lil Uzi Vert wrote: In post 213, Io wrote:You're saying that no one is playing the game.
That's the definition of a complaint.
No, its not. Nothing in that statement implies I'm unsatisifed with the situation.
It does, but whatever, you're rather pointless to argue with since you can't even notice a blatant contradiction like you posting fluff while complaining about no one playing the game.
And you still miss the point entirely that you've posted nothing but fluff until I called you out on it, and all you've done since then is try to detract from my accusation that you've only posted fluff by saying I'm scum for pointing out you're contradictions.
VOTE: Lil Uzi
i was just going to leave it at that, because you could just be ignorant, but I realized typing that last sentence that you are just trying to avoid my accusation and beat around the bush to try and turn my accusation into a reason I am scum.
tbh, I feel like this is PURE OMGUS except it's just has some sprinkles on it to make it seem like it isn't.
--
I will gladly powerlynch you.
--
In post 227, Io wrote:OK, that was a bad analog. I really shouldn't use those.
Basically what I've been saying is that you were putting this idea forward and not following the idea yourself.
The idea being "actually playing mafia."
And why did I say you were not following this idea?
Because until I mentioned you were only posting fluff and votes that's all you were doing. You weren't trying to do anything to play the game or contribute to discussions.
Is that clear enough for you? Because I don't think you are understanding anything I'm saying because you still have not addressed the core of this argument I've been trying to get across to you.
All you had said in regards to the argument I'm making is in 218 where you said this:
In post 218, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Also if you notice, when you first accused me of complaining, I replied with the same tone you used because I didn't find it a fair accusation. I'm still struggling even now as I write this as to how you thought I was complaining. As for fluff, it's NAI. It has no bearing on my alignment. It doesn't get anyone lynched but yet scum still try to push it as AI. Baffling.
Which is just a strawman because I'm not disreguarding with this, I agree with this, yet you're saying that I'm voting for you because of your fluff.
I've hopefully made it clear I'm voting you because you're being contradictory with what you are saying and doing and trying to use me pushing you to contribute a reason I am scum.
Yeah except I feel like other people are fluffing and you going for LUV for fluffing makes me draw questionmarks.
--
In post 231, Chickadee wrote:
Io and LUV seems town on town to me.
The post that started that whole thing, LUV saying let's get back to playing, was not pointless as Io pointed out. I can see how it'd be taken that way, but everyone came in harping about a day start PM, when it was obvious (at least to me) that there wasn't one. It was a distraction to the game.
Thinking about it now, I'm going to go back and take note of that whole thing, for reasons.
This can be a scum!Chick post tbh.
--
lol.
--
In post 250, DeltaW wrote: In post 186, Donempire wrote:Wait wait
did you tell everyone who asked or did you just tell mafia outright?
cause if its the latter THAT conftowns btd
Considering the blue claim was an abuse of human error I will not further comment in any way on this matter so as not to conftown or confscum anyone.
Stop.
Commenting.
On.
This.
This post should have never been made.
--
Okay, maybe MM4 can be town.
--
In post 279, Io wrote:UNVOTE:
How about no. He's at L-2, well now L-3, and I'm not particularly fond of having someone at L-1 or L-2 for a rvs.
Because heaven knows someone will lolhammer on accident.
Okay, your Io interactions are making me think TvS, except I'm trying to figure out which one is which at this point.
--
In post 324, MarioManiac4 wrote:i dislike io wagon because occam's razor is a thing
it's more likely io just has a cold and calculating playstyle than scum using a claim to be a VI to elaborately jump on the wagon than to jump on for the scummy things QR has done.
also the wagon composition is pretty horrible.
Okay.
You can be town for this.
--
In post 350, DeltaW wrote:VC 1.7
Io (L-2) - Lil Uzi Vert, QuantumRadius, Dongempire, Kop, Chickadee
QuantumRadius (L-6) - MarioManiac4
Lil Uzi Vert (L-6) - Sesq
Spawn Campers (5) - Flairs, ex-Assemblerotws, BTD6_maker, Kawso, Io, ex-taiho
Assemblerotws is due to be kicked for being AFK for too long (boo).
taiho has left the game
With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.
(expired on 2017-07-16 11:16:00)
In post 355, Kawso wrote: In post 348, Io wrote:
Also me voting someone with a valid reason is not hypocritical as I said I wan't going to lynch someone or let them get lynched in RVS. And voting someone with a valid reason is the exact opposite of RVS.
But if you yourself had a valid reason to vote why were you so scared of a lolhammer?
VOTE: Io
I almost freaked the fuck out and would haved deathtunneled you out of pure fucking anger for this.
I mean 90% of the time this comes from town but still.
Give the fucking replacements a chance to come up with content.
--
You are still scum.
--
In post 358, Io wrote:
It's not, but why are you sounding shocked if you were so confident I'm scum?
Okay.
You can be town for this.
--
In post 365, Donempire wrote:Sesq, shut up for a second if you're not going to help. And no, lynch and running LUV doesnt help. Or wait wait wait, dont shut up, you still need to help the town or you're the next in the chopping block.
Now that i got that out of the way, i want to answer IO's post pretty quickly. ('Cause i cant answer it in depth now that electricity cut removed the post i was making. Fun!)
First off, RVS is a section, its not an action. Random voting is a different thing altogether but by the time you made that post we were out of RVS milleniums ago.
And i think you got off the wrong foot. The fact is,
no one, especially me, was trying to lynch QR.
We were trying to get some information by pressuring him and L-2 wasnt going to end up in a lolhammer. And know what, we did end up getting information. If not information, at least QR is fairly active in the game now. You saying that really makes me feel like you were trying to steer yourself away from a lynch that wasnt going to happen anyways.
And you werent following the game, you said it was RVS in post godfuckingknowswhat00, in which point it was very obvious it wasnt. And you isoing someone to get information rather than trying to find information on whats happening right now leads me to believe you were isoing people just to find some easy places to push (not to get information, but to lynch).
A stretch? Definitely. But im confident enough by your behaviour overall that that was your endgame when isoing flairs. Just to say you contributed. And thats why i want to LYNCH you now. I think i got enough information by now. And if you do get lynched, i'll be the one to pull associates.
(by the way 321 is bs)
Scumposting right here.
--
In post 372, Io wrote:VOTE: Dongempire
You're pushes on me in particular are feeling very scummy.
Like you're whole argument is that I don't follow the game and am wrong about RVS.
And really the fact you are willing to lynch me over just that (and me ISOing) and to end the day right now with such confidence saying that you're going to lead day 2 and find another scum off me flipping scum is pinging my suspicions a bit.
Also since you're saying I'm also scum for ISOing and voting Flairs is furthering my suspicions on Flairs to the point I am very confident if one of you is scum you both are.
Okay this is better thank you