Mini Normal 1961 - Game Over
Forum rules
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
no. but that's not the pointIn post 97, northsidegal wrote:lapsa, you don't feel any need to defend yourself now?
In post 99, Bory wrote:
Because I can't see a problem in his post so I wanted to know what is the problem you see in the post.In post 93, Kokichi Oma wrote:Also why did you point that out to just Bory? That's a bit weird.@Borywho is Kokichi talking to in the post you quoted?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
because Bora is my scum buddyIn post 106, Kokichi Oma wrote:Lapsa, why did you @ only Bora and not the other people who were in the discussion of semi defending you?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
Bory seems to have a "mind of a programmer"
I can relate to:
that's not alignment indicative though.In post 112, Bory wrote:
I can't read.In post 111, Sunlit Diamond wrote:
I'm confused about why you responded to that question. It was clearly directed at Lapsa, about you. Can you explain?
just something to consider when reading himabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
you would have received a different answerIn post 154, mozamis wrote:
please dont do this. if you are town its really unhelpful.In post 109, Lapsa wrote:because Bora is my scum buddy
obv if you are scum, go for it!abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
unsure what exactly are you asking hereIn post 155, mozamis wrote: thought the guy was joking?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
unfiltered thoughts are most revealing. sounds like you are against thatIn post 166, Lord Gurgi wrote:With that in mind, please refrain from excessive multi-posting (especially eight multi-posts).
It makes it harder to follow the thread of the game and muddies the water.
Also, it's downright unpleasant to read the game when it's just a font of unfiltered thought.abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
how so?In post 171, Lord Gurgi wrote:
The spammy posting confounds any conclusions we could draw from the lurking.In post 170, Shinobi wrote:@Gurgi - I get that you don't like the spammishness of some of the people posting, which I get, but what do you think of our lurkier posters?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
comparably similar level of cogent read reliabilityIn post 174, Lord Gurgi wrote:Let me ask you this: How reliable of a read do you think you have from me, whether leaning town or scum, compared to mozamis?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
@mod it's greatIn post 200, Dunkerdoodles wrote:Mod Notes: Are you guys ok with this VC format?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
you just didIn post 317, Shinobi wrote:If someone puts another vote on Impede I'll declare intent.abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
what's the point telling me that?In post 324, Transcend wrote:yo lapsa idt we're gonna get shinobi lynched today
but hmu tomorrow if we're both thereabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
@Assemblerotws how come your seeing affects questions Kokichi chooses to ask?In post 332, Assemblerotws wrote:
Because Bory was the only one I saw defending him.In post 93, Kokichi Oma wrote:Also why did you point that out to just Bory? That's a bit weird.abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
@mozamis you poor, misguided fool. Shinobi is scum
abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
it's a waste of time explaining vote reasons to scumIn post 410, Shinobi wrote:Stop throwing naked votes around and start making your logic known, please.abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
it's very important to convince other people to vote too. otherwise typically nobody will be voted. or somebody. most effective is getting people to believe you and repeat your right opinion. unless we convince people to vote scum will be lynched so it is very important suggestion to explain people their votes. voting through your reads stand up for talking through making sense. NB: read this! it's a very suggestion importantIn post 416, northsidegal wrote:
if you want to get scum lynched you'll need to convince other people to vote them, too. typically i've found that explaining your reasoning is more effective in getting people to believe you than just repeating your opinion. also, nobody is always right on their first guess - talking through your reads is a great way to make sure that they make sense and stand up to scrutiny.In post 413, Lapsa wrote:
it's a waste of time explaining vote reasons to scumIn post 410, Shinobi wrote:Stop throwing naked votes around and start making your logic known, please.
anyways, just a suggestion.abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
you do realize that's just continuation and you are making it worse?In post 423, northsidegal wrote:
yeah, i realize that and i think that's entirely valid. i don't want to get into a lot of theory talk but without even the pretense of a reason i'd default to not voting someone over voting them. i'm not even questioning your vote on him, i'm just asking you to explain something behind your vote. i presume you have reasons for who you're voting so i'm interested in hearing what they are.In post 422, Lapsa wrote:@northsidegal what you might not realize is that you essentially defended Shinobi in a risk free way
mozamis gave a readPlayerX wrote: Hmm... Why should I vote Shinobi? Oh, I member - he's the dude being naked voted. Ain't worth bothering.abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
intentionally or not - she defended youIn post 434, Shinobi wrote:because you have no way of knowing the difference wrt if she's defending me or notabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
that's just falseIn post 455, Shinobi wrote: you haven't presented any reasoning so you can't draw any conclusions about anything because you don't know why she's doing what she's doing.abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
northsidegal is unlikely to know why I'm voting ShinobiIn post 466, Shinobi wrote:
No, I'm pretty certain you haven't explained your read on me.In post 458, Lapsa wrote:
that's just falseIn post 455, Shinobi wrote: you haven't presented any reasoning so you can't draw any conclusions about anything because you don't know why she's doing what she's doing.
Do so now, please. I'm really not a fan of you constantly dancing around the subject.
^ that's a conclusionabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
Day3
Transcend
+ transcendentally bold & wrong
+ mozamis #408 (vote)
Not_Mafia
+ replaced bory
A Simple Plan
+ classic scumstrat
+ framed
! #209
Sunlit Diamond
. claims being newbie
+ #162 (too much TRs)
Assemblerotws
+ borken reads list
+ mozamis #234
? mozamis #525 (soft bus?)
- strong town read on mozamis
Flavor Leaf
+ boon hammer maneuver
+ mozamis #234 (lurk fos)
- rvs vote from mozamis
northsidegal
- lots of bullcrap
- first to call out asp
- sunlit's #548 (meta)
Spoiler:abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
if that's what you want to hear - I don't really care about you twoIn post 573, Not_Mafia wrote:It does
to such an extent that I'm willing to bet a game on it
unless meaningful game material comes upabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
agreed. it sucksIn post 592, Sunlit Diamond wrote: Lapsa, that whole "it doesn't matter" thing you said in response to N_M not being Bory is confusing. Are you basing your Transcend read entirely on him and not his slot overall, or...what?
not entirely. gurgi didn't ping scum to me much either.
but yeah - mostly because it's like 4th or 5th game together w/ Transcend.
I do (naively) believe that I can read him fairly well.
he's bold and jumpy yet honest and wrong.
subtle tells of information deprivation is what pings town the most.
and he's fairly accurate on not going overboard with pushes
on Not_Mafia - I'm slightly less certain.
found bory to be more town than gurgi.
in a way - I find NM's play similar to Transcend's, just bit more cheeky.
e.g. their reaction to my replacement mixup is pretty much the same - NM just took 1 more additional stepabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
also - I'm trying to open up because I think this is a good moment to strike and hijack the game
(and I welcome town to do so)
scum is crippled - there's vig going around and encryptor got removed
if I'm correct and indeed there was a plan to frame and flash lynch ASP - I have already raised suspicion of that
I expect scum to be extremely cautious and lurky this day.
situation is fragile and one sentence can ruin their game
(keep an eye on "oh, I was so busy" excuse posts in following days)abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
I believe that Shinobi was a juicy scum targetIn post 595, northsidegal wrote: what makes you think asp was intended to be framed?
I personally tunneled him out of fear.
his play seemed eerily subpar to what I expect from him yet big picture didn't come together and there really wasn't strong scumtells
also - it was sort of a tribute to our last game where I tunneled Titus whole game.
and I dislike voting townreads even if that helps to avoid no-lynch (speaking of impede, kokichi)
Transcend chose to tunnel Shinobi similarly as I did.
I guess part of the reason was to probe me
Shinobi had everlasting push on ASP which didn't gather much steam
(so I wouldn't call it a huge threat in ASP!scum scenario)
northsidegal jumped on ASP vote pretty much immediatelyIn post 595, northsidegal wrote: where does the flash lynch part of that come in?
I find such reaction fitting for panicking scum
NB:in case that's not obvious - I'm speaking of framing in a general sense (vs actual Framer role)
I disagreeIn post 595, northsidegal wrote:
you realize saying this is entirely counterproductive, right?In post 594, Lapsa wrote:I expect scum to be extremely cautious and lurky this day.
situation is fragile and one sentence can ruin their game
(keep an eye on "oh, I was so busy" excuse posts in following days)
if town unites and opens up enough - in a long term that puts scum in a very awkward position.
there just won't be enough believable scumreads to make
but yes - that restricts scum hunting. can agree on that. trick here is to act quickly
(keep an eye on those who do dare to come forward)abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
sometimesIn post 598, northsidegal wrote: i don't think this makes sense - presumably a juicy scum target would be someone that was obvious town, right?
if obvtown is influential and correct - then it's a juicy target.
I guess Nero would qualify
in Shinobi's case - I believe motive to be different.
which is - to make contagious chain of town scumreads on each other
mix of always oscillating null, slight town/scum lean.In post 598, northsidegal wrote: are you trying to say that you actually townread shinobi yesterday and day one?
sounds convenient but I can't help thatabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
because I actually thought I'm replying to sunlitIn post 598, northsidegal wrote: why are you talking as if i wasn't the one who asked you (referring to me in the third person)?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
WIFOM moreIn post 598, northsidegal wrote: surely if i were scum and that was my plan then i would have typed something up over the night and actually started pushing him today, wouldn't you think?
this is what I mean by bullcrapIn post 598, northsidegal wrote: also, what does "panicking" have to do with anything?
I can't figure out town intent for such a question
vig + dead encryptor + calling out possibility of ASP framing => lack of plan, fearIn post 598, northsidegal wrote: if i'm scum here, why am i scared?
also - your question seems to be logically broken.
it sort of implies that you admit being scared
are you losing coherence on purpose to look like you are scum hunting?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
yesIn post 601, northsidegal wrote: but do you have any reason to believe that?
please, be more specificIn post 601, northsidegal wrote:
this is entirely inconsistent with everything you've been saying since about the end of day onemix of always oscillating null, slight town/scum lean.
sounds convenient but I can't help that
seriously?In post 601, northsidegal wrote: why should i believe you?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
it does make sense. you basically asked me to defend you in your placeIn post 604, northsidegal wrote:
"wifom" is a lazy excuse for a point that doesn't make sense.In post 602, Lapsa wrote: WIFOM more
not anymore for sureIn post 604, northsidegal wrote: you're saying that my plan here was to frame asp and to get a flashwagon on him - my play today isn't consistent with that theory.
perhaps there wasn't intent at all and you were just panickingIn post 604, northsidegal wrote:
i'm trying to figure out what you're saying - i didn't see the clear connection between me voting asp and me panicking.
this is what I mean by bullcrapIn post 598, northsidegal wrote: also, what does "panicking" have to do with anything?
I can't figure out town intent for such a question
I see it as a scum slipIn post 604, northsidegal wrote:
and what does this have to do with me voting asp?vig + dead encryptor + calling out possibility of ASP framing => lack of plan, fear
hasted reaction - as if it's completely obvious that ASP must be scum and everybody should unquestionably follow
ok... taking back that oneIn post 604, northsidegal wrote:
my question isn't logically broken, nor does it imply that i'm admitting to being scared, nor am i losing coherence at all. if you were more specific i could give you a better response than this but you've just stated things that aren't true. you implied that i'm scared scum; "why would i be scared if i were scum?" is a perfectly valid question - your reasoning on that wasn't entirely clear.also - your question seems to be logically broken.
it sort of implies that you admit being scared
are you losing coherence on purpose to look like you are scum hunting?abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
mostly PoE. it's the only scenario I got that makes complete sense
assuming you are questioning events of this particular game and not game theory in general
no - I didn't knowIn post 601, northsidegal wrote:you know what i'm referring to. the entire game you've been treating shinobi as if he's scum - there's never been any indication that your read on him was oscillating or that it was a slight town/scum lean.
you are correct - I have been treating shinobi as scum
don't think there's much indication of that if anyIn post 605, northsidegal wrote:
seriously?In post 601, northsidegal wrote: why should i believe you?
yes, seriously - like i said, what you're trying to tell me is entirely inconsistent with your play the entire game. is there some reason i should believe you? some indication that you actually held this opinion before?
best reason there is is that nothing really forced me to share my read on Shinobi
then again - so far you are doing crap job for me to care.
it feels like you are just using affirmation to sow doubtabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
^ talking about this bitIn post 604, northsidegal wrote: i'm trying to figure out what you're saying - i didn't see the clear connection between me voting asp and me panicking.
I find your inability to figure out what I'm saying fakeabcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
then why do you even expect there to be a good reason that somehow magically confirms genuineness of my Shinobi read?In post 611, northsidegal wrote:
just because at the moment i'm not convinced that you're scum doesn't mean i'm taking everything you say as the truth, nor should i.In post 608, Lapsa wrote:why shouldn't you believe me?
my disbelief of your opinion on shinobi is unrelated to my read on you - it comes from being inconsistent with your play.
that leads to my next pointIn post 611, northsidegal wrote:
i'm not sure i'd really call that "emphasis". i was explaining why i had asked the "panicking" question - the reason was clarification.Lapsa wrote:another interesting scumtell is that you claim not to understand me
perhaps that's true. perhaps not
thing is - town usually don't emphasize that at all
i've never claimed to not understand you in general, just on specific points that were unclear to me.
we are going back and forth for quite awhile - yet somehow you haven't really revealed anything.
this is precisely what I mean by panicking. either lurking (which I'm sure you did) or "discussion" full of doubt, questions and vagueness
for Christ's sake - I'm calling you a scum. there's a huge pink elephant in the room
at the very least vote me and shout out loud:
Lapsa is lying, he's clearly making things up to cover his ass!abcedminded- Lapsa
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Lapsa
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: August 30, 2014
oh that is so confusingIn post 615, northsidegal wrote: when you say this, are you referring to today or previous days? like, are you saying that nothing forced you to share today or previously?
I fucking linked itabcedminded - Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa
- Lapsa