I am reading overeagerness to jump to conclusions that imo can easily be wrong. Add to that the weird opening and the vote on UCV which altogether is making me scumread serg.In post 82, Sergtacos wrote:In post 52, Internecine wrote:Why Flubber over SephirothI agree with sheep here, why does Internecine care? Sheep did say he's down to lynch either. Perhaps Flub is scum and Seph isn't and thats why Internecine voted Seph and is asking sheep why he's voting flub instead of seph?In post 53, sheepsaysmeep wrote:why do you care
First off, I don't think Seph could be scum because of the possibility. He was scum in our last game so i don't think he could hit scum again. Yeah, I want Flub lynched even more now.
VOTE: Flub
In post 116, mozamis wrote:So consolidated town/p.o.e list:
Town: moz, kat, flubber,kat, sheep,
3 scum in: Seph, Inter, Serg,Hopkirk, UC, Scishm, Bjaber, Human
strongly suggest we stick to those 8, almost 50 pr cent chance already of hittng scum.
If this is coming from town it is very misguided. How in the world do you conftown 5 people this early on? Where's your sense of healthy doubt? This forces closed-mindedness. Not only that but then you also encourage sheepy to go with your reads or back them up. This is so scummy that the only defense I have for it is it might be too scummy for scum. Plus I reject the notion that active = posting a lot everyday. People have lives, you can lurk and post a lot of junk and you can be active by posting only once or twice a day/every 2 days. It's all in the attitude, content, and effort. Not to mention the fact that the best scum are those that are actively driving the discussion to suit their nefarious needs. Yes of course not all, and lurking is still typically a scumtell but you definitely need to be careful about about labeling people without much thought.In post 134, mozamis wrote:well, i cant really help that. altho my maths is bad, the calc tells me its 37.5 per cent.
you're an exp. alt, you know that those 5 guys i listed are so likely to be town. and also that most of the scum team prob havent posted yet.
VOTE: Moz
If this is a reaction test well here's my reaction, fix my perception of you.
You say it's game related but don't explain. How does that make it better than a personal reason?humaneatingmonkey wrote:VOTE: Flubb
Not personal, like Serg's. This is game-related.
I can see 1 scum being among flubber/seph. I'm getting an early town vibe from sheep. And I agree that UCV's thing about RVS is not AI. Intern actually looking up players' profiles before the game starts struck me as interesting. It's definitely more pre-game effort than I have ever given and ever will probably. I just can't decide if that makes him more likely to be scum or town.
The rest I don't really have anything to say about.