You need to make your votes bigger lol
Open 710: MKUltra - Foreign Spies Win!
Forum rules
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
This feels kinda LAMIST to me tbh.In post 19, Technical Difficulties wrote:To that end, standard reminder that, yes, this is multiball, and yes, scum scumhunt too. That said, town is the only faction actively hunting for both teams, town is the only faction completely uninformed, and town is the only faction that can have most of its members die and still win. So on one hand, fuck multiball scumhunting (thanks Impede for signing me up for this), but it's also possible by tells that are different from singleball.
Like you're throwing out (very) general advice for what you think town ought to be aware of, and the last paragraph kinda feels like it exists to demonstrate that you're scumhunting.
Like I feel like the conclusions you've drawn are kinda weird/unsubstantiated for this stage of the game? Like I'm not really sure what you've seen that's AI from either Beef or Mumble. What does 'weird' mean in this context, and what does this context even mean lol?In post 19, Technical Difficulties wrote:N_M vote/wagon is good, Beefster/Mumble seem town. Sky is weird and that might be due to toning against meta.
------
I'm pretty sure statistics don't work this way lolIn post 21, Tatl and Tael wrote:Failing to doc us results in us dying and statistically means that y'all lose the game which is not fun for you.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
re: Math/TD
(spoilered just cuz I write a lot and I'm trying to make my posts easier for people to read)
@Hawk also because I talk about the hydra thing in the spoiler
Spoiler:
-----
tldr: I feel like Math is being pre-emptively defensive and LAMIST and I think 48 is a :/ post.
VOTE: Technical Difficulties
-----
So I basically agree with Red but I don't really feel like Hawk was reaching when he called out Red, because Hawk doesn't see the hydra thing as being AI.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I get townpings from this but idrk how to articulate why rn.In post 69, Sky_Paladin wrote:The fact that his activity was to countervote me made me feel that he resented being poked. Or it could just be rvs. I don't know. I guess I'll see where it develops.
-----
Really? I didn't read that as defensive; it sounded kinda honest and genuine to me.In post 71, Tatl and Tael wrote:Eek this reaction, "I did not read everything properly" sounds too defensive for town. However props to voting someone who's voting the player who voted you, odd move for scum.
-----
I don't think I can answer this question because you seem to be asking me to answer how I think town!*you* would play this, and not just how some generic random town player would act in this situation, and I don't have any experience with you upon which to base an answer.In post 74, Technical Difficulties wrote:@Everyone scumreading my opening: What do you think town-Math does in that situation? More specifically...
1. Do you think town-Math even tries to lie low? (if no, this implies I'm lying about the nature of this hydra)
2. Assuming town-Math DOES lie low, how does town-Math do it differently in the opening?
No, what I'm arguing is that you were pre-emptively defending against *scumreads on impede if he's the main poster*In post 74, Technical Difficulties wrote:You're correct that I'm preemptively defending against people who expect too much of me.
My problem isn't inherently the activity thing so much as this whole thing boils down to the fact that it seems like you're expecting the slot to get scumread and you're basically telling us not to worry about it because you'll be around to pick up the slack. It's the fact that you feel the need to defend *now* against potential future scumreads from impede's posting that's bothering me. It isn't the activity thing; I don't really care that your head will be low activity, and that isn't really my point. Like you sound overly concerned about potentially being scumread because of impede, and you're telling people not to worry about it because you'll pick up the slack, which is what I find scummy.In post 46, Technical Difficulties wrote:I'm mostly afraid that Impede scums it up and gets our slot lynched because I haven't been here enough to produce readable content.
Also I feel like you're being kinda manipulative in that you're *very* subtly misrepping my point from 'I think math is pre-emptively defending against scumreads on impede's half of the slot' to 'I think math is pre-emptively defending against his lack of activity'. Like there's a subtle distinction between the two, and I find the former to be scummy and is what I've been posting about, but I don't think the latter is relevant or important to your alignment given that it's a teaching hydra.
-----
Kinda agree with this; I feel like scum would be more awkward around someone literally claiming scum, instead of going along with it jokingly like they did.In post 82, Tatl and Tael wrote:Vague townread on Iconeum for their reaction to the ice mafia claim as well, maybe?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Honestly kinda townreading most of those posts because I don't think scum reacts to someone claiming scum by joking about it and carrying through the joke for multiple posts tbh.
In post 118, Technical Difficulties wrote:Kop’s entrance pings me. Although I always feel like scumreading Kop because he looks tryhard.
a) I don't really see tryhardIn post 118, Technical Difficulties wrote:Somewhat inclined to agree with Kop on N_M. Although I can see some effective scumplay in his posts.
b) These two statements are kinda weird juxtaposed with each other? IE his entrance pings you but you agree with his main point? Like it's kinda weird to argue both at the same time
c) Your slot wants to policy NM (a sentiment that has since been echoed by others), you say there's things about NM's play that you could scumread, and NM is the leading wagon, and you leave it to start a vanity sesq wagon?
Yeah I kinda feel like this right now. The only person I'm scumreading atm is TD; everyone else is null or townleaning. I don't much like that I have like no significant scumreads besides the one but I feel like that might be a feature of multiball, idk.In post 124, Tatl and Tael wrote:the only person I feel strongly enough about to consider as an alternative is RedFlavor but even them there's stuff I like?
I kinda disagree with you on RF though, I'm tending town on him overall.
Why on me and mumble?In post 124, Tatl and Tael wrote:Sesq feels town, Skitter has been bumped up to near locktown, not happy with mumble, Kop is okay.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I guess I was kinda surprised by the strength of the read given what I've posted thus far, and it's making me wonder if the read was given out too easily, if that makes sense?In post 128, Tatl and Tael wrote:You really feel like you're trying to gamesolve. I've also seen you several times as scum and generally know what to look for and am not seeing it this game.
Mumble literally copy pasted a bunch of posts from a game where he was town and got locktowned by me page 1 and I want an explanation of why he did it because it feels like he's trying to get the same townread.
Also link the mumble game?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
That was like six months ago and I don't think you've played with town!me, but fair enough.In post 131, Tatl and Tael wrote:Given that I essentially (correctly) claimed a guilty on you last game before you claimed vig to get out of it I don't think it should surprise you that I'm townreading you?
Yeah I agree with you in that I don't think it inherently conflicts, but it's still kinda weird to at once shade someone's posts but also agree with the main argument posited in those posts.In post 133, Sesq wrote:@skitter 127 point b does not conflict, someone can come in being a tryhard and you can also agree with them
you've never had any scum agree with you on something and had it feel a bit weird?
also not a fan of this trend of people scumreading for explaining a thing then voting another thing. something is off.
Is the last line directed at me? If so, I'm not really sure what you're referring to?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I now explicitly support this and if NM's getting policied I'd prefer it happened today rather than later.In post 137, Sky_Paladin wrote:If he flips town it removes a non-contributing player so we don't have to deal with him in LYLO? We don't have a vig to take out the trash this game so I'd rather do it on day 1 so we can get interaction reads over a slot nobody is supposed to care about. It seems a lot of people have an opinion some way or the other, so I think a flip there increasingly has merit.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Hmmmm, I guess I can buy this.In post 146, Tatl and Tael wrote:When playing the game with Boonskiies I took the time to read every single game you've played. I feel pretty confident in my ability to ascertain that.
If I couldn't recognize your towngame I wouldn't have had the confidence to push on you like I did in the boon game
I guess I'm just feeling kinda wary of your slot atm because I'm getting some pocketing / buddying vibes from you guys rn and it's disconcerting me a bit and making me kinda paranoid.
Like I feel like Key was low-key defending me to Iconeum. And like explaining my posts for me?
-------
I think it's mostly gut atm, and I can't articulate it super well right now. I guess he just seems very open and forthright. Like he doesn't seem to be trying to be evasive or misleading or manipulative.In post 151, Tatl and Tael wrote:You mentioned this a bit but can you explain more?
It's mostly from this -> I feel like if scum got called out for reaching they probably don't immediately back down and admit they didn't read everything? Like they'd be more self-conscious imo.In post 66, RedFlavor wrote:Also yeah I was kinda reaching, I did not read everything properly when I voted that
Like this feels very open and reflective.In post 125, RedFlavor wrote:Someone asked me about what would I expect from math's scum game, I thinked about it and it would probably be pocketing some people and outing their scumread, so I agree that it might be early to TR him.
I feel like I'm getting his unfiltered thoughts about the game, if that makes sense?
-----
a) sheIn post 154, Iconeum wrote:Agreed it's early, but I noticed it and found it worthy to mention.
Regarding Skitter, his 38 was in response to TD's 19. I feel that post would have been better suited as a response to your 21. It strikes me that he chose TD's post over yours to respond to.
He only responded with a joke on statistics.
b) I'm an applied math major and after working through a sequence of classes in probability, I feel oddly compelled to point out when people are misapplying statistics lol
c) RC's post was kinda LAMIST also but it differed from TD's in that he actually gave concrete scum behaviors to look out for in this particular game (although now that I think about it, I don't really recall seeing TT follow up on that anywhere ...), whereas TD's just threw out some incredibly vague and general advice. Like TD's advice wasn't really directed towards any specific purpose and was so vague that it wasn't actually helpful. Like at first glance, his advice seemed useful but if you actually thought about it, it wasn't. So it looked like it was there more to make him look good and like he was contributing then to actually help people look for scum in this game, which is why I called it LAMIST.
------
I'm reading your posts but tbh I'm having trouble parsing them and figuring out what you're referring to much of the time.In post 164, Sesq wrote:can you guys please read my posts before you respond to them?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
@Beef:
I don't really like the Hawk -> NM vote.
The Hawk vote in the first place was reachy imo, and when people pushed back on it you fell back on a safe NM vote.
Also I don't understand your readslist at all tbh. I have like only ~4 reads that vaguely much with yours, and I don't really get where you're coming from on most of the rest of them.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Like sometimes when I see a readslist that I fundementally disagree with I can still understand it because it's cohesive. Like I can say something like 'It makes sense you're scumreading A if you're scumreading B in this gamestate' even if I disagree with both of those reads if there's a central POV binding together the reads.In post 181, skitter30 wrote:I have like only ~4 reads that vaguely much with yours, and I don't really get where you're coming from on most of the rest of them.
I just don't see that in yours. It feels like a bunch of names stuck in a random order that don't have much to do with each other. There's no cohesion or direction and it just fundamentally doesn't make sense to me.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
In singleball, I'd definitely agree with your first line, but I kinda feel like in multiball that a wagon can be scum-driven (and thus appear to have little resistance) but still be on scum because there's two scumteams who want to eliminate each other.In post 191, Mumble wrote:Beefster wagon was too fast...not scum, I think.
@Tael: You didn't really care about your question to me, did you?
And looking at the wagon (TD, Sesq, RF, Iconeum, Sky), I think the following:
-> I still think TD is likely scum but not with Beef. And they're still my biggest scumread, which means in singleball I wouldn't touch any wagon they were pushing with a ten-foot pole. But I'm still trying to wrap my head around the idea that a wagon could be scum-driven and still be on scum which is overall making me kinda unsure whether or not I support it; I think it's scum-driven but has merit.
I'm not particularly impressed by TD's initial case tbh; it overall feels like Impede picked a random player (like what prompted him to choose to look at Beef in particular?) and found that Beef's ISO made him pushable, so he just pushed him. Like the push feels like Impede felt like he needed to push something and found Beef and found that an ISO-dive of him makes a good case, as opposed to actually finding Beef scummy in the first place and then writing a case on him.
Like Impede's Beef push feels more like a vehicle for Impede to push *something* than Impede actually scumreading Beef, if that makes sense.
At the same time, I do *not* like Beef's reaction to getting pressured, and I really don't like the Hawk->NM vote.
-> Sesq's vote is :/ and I overall feel like her votes are lackadaisical in that she seems to be fine with pushing like anything.
->RF's, Iconeum's, and Sky's reasoning all echo some of the problems I've had with Beef's posting after TD started his wagon. Red called out Beeff's bizarre reasoning on Hawk/Red and I like his vote but I'm having a lot of trouble articulating why. Like it doesn't feel agenda-y, but more like he found something scummy and voted it. That doesn't really capture why I like it but I don't know how to explain it better right now.
I like sky's more than iconeum's because it just articulates like all the things that I found *wrong* with that readslist. Like it feels like he looked at it from several different angles and found it lacking in several ways. His post feels multi-dimensional and like he's trying to understand beef's motivation.
Like I feel like I'm largely townreading the back end of the wagon more than the front end, which is weird.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Sorry for being absent, just finished midterms
You're making a rather compelling case for your policy lynch.In post 199, Not_Mafia wrote:RedFlavour and Hawk are lockscum
--------
And I'm saying that I find this to be scummy.In post 201, Sesq wrote:i was unsatisfied with the game state, willing to vote almost anyone, but didnt have any strong scumreads - waiting for a purpose.
Sky is on the wagon ...
--------
I'm getting townpings from him occasionally but I can't say I feel strongly enough about him to townbin him confidentially.In post 209, Beefster wrote:T&T's mumble case is garbage. Mumble is obvtown.
-------
I thought it was a town post tbh.In post 222, GuyInFreezer wrote:HOWEVER, #219 is a very terrible (scummy terrible) and ppl should put some more votes on that dude.
-------
There's a bunch of things I rather dislike about TD's readslist but I'm not going to put time into picking it apart because they replaced out and won't be able to like talk about it.
Read on me is actually quite bad imo.
Also it's weird that they asked to be replaced, made a whole readslist, and then popped back in to vote GIF. I don't much like it.
Also I don't get why he out of all of his scumreads/pl's, he picked GIF to vote.
And I suppose I'll never find out lol.
-------
This feels weirdly defensive of GIF tbh? Especially since you start off by saying that it's hard for you to 'derive intent from quite minimalistic posts'. Like his posts are hard for you to parse but you're going to use them to towncase him.In post 236, Sky_Paladin wrote:I have issues with GiF's playstyle as it's hard to derive intent from quite minimalistic posts. However he is actually engaging players in most of these posts - eg 57 when he votes Hawk 'for reaching', 121 when he questions Kop/TD about reaching, expressing an opinion on NM, and a few other things.So I feel this is more likely to come from town and I'm not really interested in lynching there.
I'm evaluating Beefster's response.
Also like it's weird timing? There isn't much pressure there and it's not like he was in imminent danger of being lynched, so the bolded feels kinda off.
-------
I mean, yes, I support a pl on him in general but I feel like it's too early in the day to settle on a PL on him?
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Felt genuine and like he was *trying* to me. Like it doesn't feel faked to me.
Why do you think it was scummy?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I don't really like pl's, but that game showed me he really oughtn't be anywhere near LYLO, and I'd rather pl today than like two (game) days from now or whatever.In post 262, Sky_Paladin wrote:
I actually think this game that the right option is still to lynch NM day 1, and now there is a chance. So I am going to push for that chance.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Not Mafia
I agree that he's playing pretty much exactly the same way he did that game.
VOTE: Not Mafia
I still think TD's slot is scum thoug
It felt more *try* than *tryhard* to me. Less like he was trying to justify it and more like he was trying to work out what he was thinking.In post 263, GuyInFreezer wrote:
That "trying" had a lot of scummy intention.In post 261, skitter30 wrote:Felt genuine and like he was *trying* to me. Like it doesn't feel faked to me.
Why do you think it was scummy?
As if he wanted to justify(? dunno if it's the correct word here) that "townread" too hard- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
a) me pushing TD wasn't really gaining traction so me sitting on my vanity wagon doesn't exactly accomplish much.
Like the slot is kinda absent and no one is listening to me, so me and my one vote can't do very much right now, but I'm hoping that if I say it enough maybe someone will join me at some point. If a TD-slot wagon re-emerges I'll rejoin it happily.
b) Yesterday I was objecting to the fact that it felt kinda too early to settle for a PL cuz I want to ensure that the day doesn't get cut off prematurely, but the gamestate is starting to get kinda stale/apathetic and like no one's talking.
The only wagon with *any* sort of momentum rn is the NM one, partially because Sky just voted there, so I decided to join it to see if anything interesting happens.
------
@mod: I'm going to be v/la Sunday-Wednesday cuz I'm traveling to a wedding. I'll probably be able to post, but not super regularly.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
For some reason, I thought it was max 1 kill per night, but upon reflection I have no idea where I got that from.In post 267, GuyInFreezer wrote:Yes let's PL with two scumsided nightkills
Going through the current wagons (based on the last vc from the last page)
-> Beef - not super feeling scum!beef right now.
-> NM - a great pl and he's playing exactly the same way as scum!nm did in open 711, but yeah this is a bad idea
-> redflavor - I think town
-> iconeum - I think town
-> GIF - not sure. I don't really have a read here but forestalling a PL in this setup is probably town-motivated?
-> Hawk - agrees with GIF that a PL is a bad idea and switched to vote RF (with GIF) but is also shading GIF by saying that he might be partners with NM
I don't think Hawk+Red is a thing.In post 274, Hawk wrote:Who says the Policy Lynch hits town?? Are you that convinced lynching NM flips green? That's some scum partner talk there.
-> TD slot - still scum but people aren't into it right now.
So for now I'll
VOTE: Hawk
@Mikan - are you like going to do anything?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
In post 284, Hawk wrote:Skitter what about my play was scummy?? GiF confidentially stated that we shouldn't PL and gave a double mislynch as his reasoning. It's not shade, it's just pointing out Gifs logic should be that NM is a mislynch which not even scum would know.In post 289, Hawk wrote:No I don't. You could be gambiting as partners. Or if you are scum gambling he's not 2 in 11 that you know could be town which are pretty good odds. It being multiball doesn't change the fact that confidentially saying someone is town isn't logical.
You agreed with his logic and unvoted because of it and proceeded to then pick it apart and explain why you think it's illogical. So I'm calling this shading because you're at once agreeing with his point but also attacking him over it.In post 274, Hawk wrote:Also yes that is worst case scenario. Who says the Policy Lynch hits town?? Are you that convinced lynching NM flips green? That's some scum partner talk there.
And you also posit he might be *that* confident because they might be scumpartners. If you really think this, I'm not sure why you aren't like doing anything about it, like voting him.
I mean, just because the players changed it's still the same slot?In post 284, Hawk wrote:Why is TD slot scum still?? Don't bring up anything about the hydra or Maths play versus dinos play cause that isn't talking about the "slot" -_-;;
I don't really understand why you don't want me to bring up math's play / the hydra when that's the basis of my scumread.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
(sorry, was traveling)
In post 297, Hawk wrote:Also it regarding the slot I was basically asking why you think the slot is scummy independent of TD since well you said the slot is still scum...
OK, so do you want to lynch NM as policy or because you legimately scumread him?In post 296, Hawk wrote:Because I didn't think it was alignment indicative. I'm not meaning to sound like I'm attacking him? I'm just paranoid I guess... I agree that we can probably do better than a policy lynch with 5 days left. I disagree with his logic that NM is town and that we shouldn't policy lynch him because of that "fact"/"confidence" he's spouting.
If you actually scumread him, I don't understand why you backed off when GIF said a PL is bad in this setup. If it's policy, I don't understand why you agreed with GIF that policy is bad and unvoted and then got into a whole debate about whether or not it's bad while also accusing him of being NM's scumpartner.
TLDR: I don't really get the vibe that you *want* a NM lynch, between how you joined it and how you were willing to back off it pretty easily, so I don't really understand why you got into a whole argument with GIF later about it, wherein you were shading him and arguing about the efficacy of a pl in this setup.
Like given you don't actually seem to *want* an NM lynch, your argument with GIF kinda looks like it happened for the sake of having an argument.
--------
Oh yeah, by that I just meant that just because there's a replacement doesn't mean that TD's scumminess should be forgotten.In post 297, Hawk wrote:Also it regarding the slot I was basically asking why you think the slot is scummy independent of TD since well you said the slot is still scum...
-------
Why is this OMGUS or deflecting to other viable wagons? He's going through the votes on his wagon.In post 307, Beefster wrote:OMGUS?
I'm afraid deflecting and calling attentions to other viable wagons does not count as a legitimate defense. Try again, scum.
Given 258 and 260, you've became a lot more confident about hawk!scum. Can you walk me through why?
--------
In post 316, Hawk wrote:YOU'RE FUCKING RETARDED IT'S THE QUOTE NM POSTED WORD FOR WORD EADLIER THAT EVERYONE IGNORED AND DECIDED WAS NAI!!
Always serious remember to announce L-1
pedit:... maybe I'm just to strung up. Guys please forgive me if I'm coming off as an insane o right now.
These actually feel kinda town to me?In post 322, Hawk wrote:
.... i... I know this has to be joking... you claimed scum...In post 319, Not_Mafia wrote:I agree, anyone who claims scum is scum
pedit: okay I'm getting off I'm not in the right mindset for this trolling...
-------
Again, given how confidentally you were calling him scum above, why do you want to hear more of his defense? In the posts I quoted above, you kinda seemed like you were convinced he was scum and you were ready for a lynch already.In post 342, Beefster wrote:We probably could have used more time to hear his defense, but we'll see how important that is after the flip.
In post 353, Kop wrote:This feels like a fake reaction.
This basically.
-------
I'm not really into Hawk anymore. I don't really like how Beef has interacted with the Hawk wagon, so
VOTE: Beef- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I still kinda think this is flipping town, but meh.In post 445, RedFlavor wrote:Thanks I'm free now
I don't think I will play multiball ever again because I literally scumread everyone then they did very townie things and I put them to my townreads
If you think he's probably town, why were you on his wagon ?In post 446, Sesq wrote:BBBBUT WAIT
when i said "but I understand" in #384, i meant i understood where rf was coming from, because there is a legitimate case to be made. Also, he looks like scum I guess. more than anyone else.
anything and everything deserves total clarification
thoughts on the lynch: he's probably town. at least it gives us something to talk about
Still think mikan is scum.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
@mod:Has mumble been replaced? Also
VOTE: GIF
I don't like the way you pushed the Red wagon and I don't like any of your twilight posts.
I also have scumreads on Beef and Mikan. My only townread of note right now is Iconeum but it's weakening.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I think this is a pretty weird post. Like you pop in during twilight to ask GIF about Kop (ie as opposed to talking about something topical like Red wagon or the rc/mikan/gif thing).In post 439, Sky_Paladin wrote:Gif, while we're in twilight, thoughts on Kop?
As an aside I have been too busy to really focus on this game; I'm probably going to drop out if I can't commit properly by the next phase.
Like why is this directed at GIF in particular? Why were you specifically asking about Kop at that juncture?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
You were lobbying for votes on him by like asking anyone who posted to vote him. You took it from like two votes to L+1 in hours and I still maintain that he wasn't scummy. He was like awkward in a trying newb town kinda way.
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
It's a read based on a fact, so I don't really understand the distinction?In post 466, Mikan Tsumiki wrote:B-Because ummm... I think its kinda easy to push someone for pushing a mislynch.
I-I think you're pushing a fact and n-not a read, s-so in the event GiF flips town y-you can u-use your justification you built up as a scapegoat.
Aaaah sorry! I must be wrong.
a) sheIn post 467, GuyInFreezer wrote:Oh don't worry he's not even pushing the fact well because this guy is clearly not explaining how I was able to get that wagon up so fast in the first place.
b) I don't really get what you're trying to say. You lobbied for votes and people listened to you and did it. I don't know why people listened to you. Like you, me, and like half the game agree that you were responsible for yesterday's lynch so I don't get what you're asking me about exactly.
Like this kinda articulates why I didn't like the wagon. It felt low-hanging-fruit-y on a guy that was like awkwardly newb town and people were just saying he's scummy but never really explained *why* they thought that. Like it felt compromise-y and like people didn't care enough about who got lynched so they just went along with you, which makes me think it was at least partially scum-driven.In post 468, Sky_Paladin wrote:to remove a fairly inactive player, although I can't specifically recall why RF was being scum read other than this
This entire post feels like awkwardly over-explain-y tbh.In post 468, Sky_Paladin wrote:
K, so from this snippet I think you're saying that you were asking GIF about Kop to see whether or not you ought to join the RF wagon or do something else because you wanted to know what diffrentiated Kop and RF but then hammer happened before you could go anywhere with it.In post 468, Sky_Paladin wrote:What made RF special over Kop?
Turns out the answer was 'nothing'. After that I felt completely disempowered. I was ambivalent on the RF lynch, and then while I was deciding whether or not to push elsewhere, there was a hammer. So I just gave up and called it a night.
So this is like weird given that in your initial post you popped in during *twilight* and said as much. Why would you be asking GIF about Kop to try to figure out if you should push RF that day if you knew that the hammer happened already? Like in the snippet I quoted you're making it sound like you first asked GIF about Kop to try to figure out if you should join the RF wagon or do something else but then hammer happened, but the two events actually happened in the opposite order. And you *knew* that at the time given that you literally said in your initial post that it was twilight, and I specifically asked you about making that post during twilight.
Something feels kinda fishy here tbh.
Tbh the fact that you're voting here with me makes me want to leave it which means I should probably be voting you.
VOTE: Beef
Reading through the Gif/you thing doesn't really do much to change that opinion.
I don't see anything townie and I rather disliked the L-1 tbh. Does the fact that one of your biggest townreads is voting the other bother you?In post 473, Sky_Paladin wrote:It's miles-away more towny than TD IMO.
Yeah, and that's what I don't like about it.
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I'm saying that I don't like it because it felt compromise-y and like people went along with it because it was just *there* and were just like 'why not?'. I don't actually think that most of these people actually sincerely thought he was the best lynch but just did it because it was an option. Like weren't you getting those same vibes?In post 519, GuyInFreezer wrote:
So just jealousy. gotcha gotcha.In post 518, skitter30 wrote:Yeah, and that's what I don't like about it.
Because I don't know who wouldn't want to lynch their scumreads more effectively than rallying people who have shown interest in lynching the same scumread.
Spoiler:
Like these are very compromising-y posts. Sesq doesn't think that 'suspicious' is a bad thing but voted anyways. Beef just did it cuz you asked him.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
OK, and does like concern you at all?In post 521, GuyInFreezer wrote:I only said that wagon was "compromise"because it probably was for others. It wasn't for me.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
So, I think that wagon composition matters *a lot*, and being on the same wagon as someone I significantly scumread feels wrong. Voting with Beef bothers me more than I like my GIF vote, which kinda implies to me that I scumread Beef more and I ought to voting there.In post 533, Iconeum wrote:skitter's 518...
Voting beefster over a vote that beefster made on GiF... While in that same post you attack Gif for the very reason beefster is all over GiF...
Really seems weird. Continues to attack GiF in 520 while skitter's vote is on beefster for doing the same thing.
VOTE: skitter
At the same time, Gif's response to the Red wagon/flip is a little weird. Even if the fact that the Red wagon was essentially a compromise wagon didn't bother him at the time, the fact that he still doesn't really seem concerned by that *even though* Red flipped town isn't really sitting well with me.
Like a non-insignificant portion of that wagon was people just going along with GIF, and the whole thing just felt very complacent-y/compromise-y and like people just did it cuz it was a thing that was happening and they didn't really care about it or what Red actually flipped.
(And I think that Beef's vote was one of the worst)
Like ... you agree with me that the wagon was kinda compromise-y and that opposing scum might be on it, so why don't you seem to be much concerned about this?In post 524, GuyInFreezer wrote:No?
He was my scumread and I wanted him lynched?
And this game is a multiball so it is totally acceptable and understandable that scum would be on different scum wagon?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
No, because I don't like the Red wagon, neither yesterday nor how GIF is fine with its lackadaisical composition despite Red flipping town.In post 537, Sky_Paladin wrote:You're currently voting Beefster so may I presume you are on board with this now?
But a hammer had already happened and he had sporadic activity anyways so I don't really get why you'd think that pushing Kop at that time would be remotely beneficial or like accomplish anything, *especially* if you thought he'd be around tomorrow.In post 537, Sky_Paladin wrote:I totally expected him to be around in day 2 and I was wondering if I should push there in this day phase.
Like, there was a hammer. You popped in *after* that to ask GIF about Kop so that you could decide if you should push him. He was lurking so he probably wouldn't be around before the thread locked anyways. You think he's going to be around the next day. So like why bother to ask just then at all?
Idk it still feels weird, and your entire explanation feels over-explained.
I have absolutely no idea why you'd do that.In post 537, Sky_Paladin wrote:You are suggesting that I came in to the thread, said "Hey guys look at Kop" and then killed him overnight to bring attention to myself because ???.
And yeah, the kill is weird, and without the kill I probably would have blipped over the post, but like that context *is* in fact there, and in light of that context your post becomes weird too; together I think it's something that bears probing.In post 537, Sky_Paladin wrote:I agree the Kop kill was weird, and my post is only weird because Kop also died. Otherwise it's nothing special.
Gif's voting mikan ......In post 537, Sky_Paladin wrote:I don't see where this is happening? GiF/Mikan were my strong townreads at the start of the day
There has been no accompanying wall of rage and if today we mislynch tomorrow it's 3-2-2 barring no cross-kill. So, does GIF voting mikan bother you?In post 537, Sky_Paladin wrote:Generally my townreads cross-voting is not an issue, because there's usually an associated wall of rage from both posters where I can deduce alignment and either join in or reflect back on the flip later.
Unless it's LYLO, then I'm screwed.
See above.In post 537, Sky_Paladin wrote:@Skitter You have kind of pushed both GiF and Beefster this phase; and while you are voting for Beefster, do you have a clear position?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Like the wagon was filled with bad votes. I don't think that the fact that it's multiball means that the bad votes ought to be ignored.In post 539, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Because I was scumreading RF?In post 538, skitter30 wrote:Like ... you agree with me that the wagon was kinda compromise-y and that opposing scum might be on it, so why don't you seem to be much concerned about this?
Like all these "concerns" (Oh noes wagon went weird it must be on town etc) you mention doesn't really have the same effect in multiball.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
The wagon was god-awful and I can't believe that I'm the only person who sees that.
It's a town wagon in multiball. Kop flipped green. Are you really trying to discredit the notion that amongst {Gif/NM/Sesq/Beef/Hawk/Mikan} there's likely to be scum?In post 452, Viomi wrote:LYNCH: RedFlavor (7) - Kop, GuyInFreezer, Not_Mafia, Sesq, Beefster, Hawk, Mikan Tsumiki
A good portion of these votes are *really*, *really* bad, and I can pick apart the wagon one by one if you need me to. I think Beef's was the worse, especially since he's like blaming GIF for the wagon even though he participated in it.
(In the one game I played with you I made a huge thing about how gross the screen wagon was so you think that this isn't something town!me does because ...?)- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Since you didn't really respond to my last post, can you explain:In post 543, Sky_Paladin wrote:I can't abide by you voting for Beefster yet criticising the wagon and not really pushing any other angle (other than my Kop post I guess). This doesn't look like the town Skitter I know.
a) Why you have a problem with me voting Beef even though I'm criticizing the wagon. One of the major reasons I'm scumreading him - and therefore voting him - is because of how he interacted with it. Specifically because he let GIF talk him into voting pretty easily, like without really evaluating it for himself, but then blamed him for it today. Like yesterday he was happy to go along with whatever was being pushed (this is one of those complacency votes I was talking about before) but today he tried to duck responsibility for being on a townflip by blaming GIF.
Why can't you 'abide' my Beef vote exactly? Like I don't really get why you're treating 'voting Beef' and 'criticizing the wagon and not really pushing any other angle' as being like contradictory or mutually exclusive notions.
b) why you don't like my criticism of the wagon in general? Like I strongly believe that there's very likely scum on that wagon given that it was a townflip in multiball and someone on it already flipped green. Is this a premise you disagree with?
c) how you think this differs from my towngame?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Why? I think they're rather scummy.In post 564, springlullaby wrote:I haven't read the entirety of day 1 but I don't like much the mikan votes.
I don't understand the connection between the first half of this quote and the second half.In post 564, springlullaby wrote:A)The speed of the Beefster wagon makes me think the RF lynch wasn't scumpiling;
Did you get to Tatl's twilight posts? Wasn't such a huge jump from those posts to the fact that he might be the doc.In post 564, springlullaby wrote:B)Kop's iso reads as low key no content: with susp on mikan and tatl , but not enough that it looks like defensive NK. -> I guess the NK was targetting a possible low poster flying under the radar doc.
C)The Taetl iso looks like a bunch a crap I'm hard pressed to see the rhyme to that kill so won't speculated there.
+1In post 572, GuyInFreezer wrote:Man TD rep-out post still bothers me.
(also mathblade and mathdino are different people)
1. iirc, yes. At least, I don't think that any reason was given for it beyond lol!NM.In post 576, Aneninen wrote:VCs.
(1) Was Not Mafia an RVS wagon?
(2) Was the RedFlavour wagon a counter to Beefster's? (Meanwhile my slot was wagoned too.)
(3) Who was scum here?Kop, GuyInFreezer, Not_Mafia, Sesq, Beefster,Hawk, Mikan Tsumiki
(2) and (3) looks important, especially because the Beefster-wagon seemed to fade into nothingness.
2. Kinda? Beef happened, collapsed, there was a bunch of scattered votes, Hawk happened somewhere, and then GIF got Red to happen. I don't recall offhand if Red was a signifcant wagon between Beef the lynch. Beef consistently had a few votes throughout the whole day phase I think.
3. Unknown. I think Beef = Mikan > Gif > NM > Sesq, although I don't understand NM or Sesq and Sesq was voting someone she thought was town. I think the wagon is gross but this premise is meeting resistance. I'm in middle of trying to get sky to explain to me why he's objecting to me trying to analyze wagon but he hasn't responded in a few days, so yeah.
Roleplay, causing Mumble to replace out.In post 577, Aneninen wrote:What has his replacement done so far?
I'd be very interested in hearing about this theory.In post 578, GuyInFreezer wrote:I have a very reaching tinfoil theory of Sky/Mikan blueteam.
How far should I speculate this?
Yes a hydra, yes like all of their posts were scummy since the very beginning.In post 580, Aneninen wrote:Was Technical Difficulties a hydra? Regardless of the answer this post is scummy.
Yes, TD started it. I picked it apart 195In post 581, Aneninen wrote:Was the Beefster-wagon launched by TD, in 167? Sesq and RedFlavour jumped on it on the same page. Than came Iconeum. And Sky Paladin.
Yes, and flipped doc too. (RC is Tael or Tatl or whichever head of that hydra he is; Alisae is Mikan)In post 581, Aneninen wrote:In post 405, Tatl and Tael wrote:
First off you're scum
Second off I've survived the first night of my presence in game one game this year and it's also my only win
Gif is scum trying to bait the doc off me to kill me
If I am dead 1) doc is a moron and 2) speedlynch gif
And he got Nightkilled, didn't he?- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Sorry, had a boatload of hw due today but have time for this now.
Putting this here cuz I found the kill flavor confusing:
Ice mafia killed: TT, Aneninen
Fire mafia killed: Kop, NM
Beef flipped town, RF flipped town.
There's 7 players alive, 4 town, 2 ice mafia, 1 fire mafia.
I kinda think that we probably want to lynch the fire mafia today so that we don't have two kills tonight.
----------
I guess I'm just going to ramble a bit about where I'm at. I don't have many firm conclusions though.
Mikan is very, very likely scum imo. I've been saying that throughout the game and I havne't really seen anything townie from the slot like at all.
I'm having a lot of trouble seeing town!sky; I think his vote on me yesterday was gross and he feels very band-wagon-y and oppurtunistic in a holistic sense.
Iconeum I haven't really seen anything scummy from, nor have I seen anything specifically townie recently. I guess they're town by default cuz there has to be town somewhere? Idk, I don't really feel confident about it.
Sesq's posts confuse me. I can kinda see sesq/hawk as being a thing since both hawk and aneninen were soft-defending her and her playstyle a lot. I guess I feel like she's lynchbait if town and the fact that there was never a serious push on her is a little bit surprising to me.
I didn't really have a read on Mumble. Spring's posts are really weird; I'm having a lot of trouble understanding how she's been coming to her conclusions. Spring/sesq probably isn't a thing. I don't really understand where her readlslist is coming from (especially the strong townread on Mikan)
I guess GIF is more likely town than not as well, but I don't feel confident about it either. Still don't like his involvement in the RF wagon. I don't think he's a hawk partner (their fight over the pl on nm doesn't really feel like partners to me).
@GIF: What do you think about the fact that RC wanted you lynched if he died?
--------
tldr:
{GIF, Iconuem}
{Sesq} -- null
{sky/spring}
{mikan}
probably not hawk partners: GIF,
maybe a hawk partner - Sesq
(I want to go through Hawk/Aneninen's ISO to get a better feel for who partners may or may not be.)
-------
going to go through today's posts now.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Hawk had NM as a consistent scumread, and Aneninen was building up to an NM push.In post 619, GuyInFreezer wrote:Who were scumreading NM again?
OK, why was that a give-up message? I don't really like your sudden read-reversal on Mikan.In post 626, Sky_Paladin wrote:I agree Mikan is almost certainly scum with that give-up message so consider my vote there in spirit.
Why did you come to this conclusion? And if you think he's a wolf, why didn't you try to lynch him before now?In post 631, Mikan Tsumiki wrote:All I'm saying is gif has 4 to 5 days to mislynch me before I powerlynch him because he's a fucking wolf
I mean, you had an entirety of like four posts day2 so it doesn't really seem like you're much interested in sharing your thoughts with us anyways.In post 633, Mikan Tsumiki wrote:If GiF R-rushes my lynch today b-before getting a chance to o-out other reads o-or to let me explain my read on him, then he's scum because he scared of me being a threat. I deserve to have my reads outed because I am town a
Yes, I'd be interested in this; I've been having trouble figuring out who hawk's partner would be. (Or who Mikan's partner might be)In post 640, Iconeum wrote:Mikan Tsumiki - scum / Most sure about this one, pretty sure partnered with aneninen based on ISO. If anyone cares I can go into further detail here.
How does 300 and 310 fit into your partner theory?
Why?In post 652, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Please do.In post 640, Iconeum wrote:If anyone cares I can go into further detail here.
Cos I see Sky as very strong potential partner of Mikan.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Can you explain how you got these partners?In post 658, Iconeum wrote:I'd seriously love an explanation on that Mikan town read bro
In post 640, Iconeum wrote:Sky_Paladin - scum / not with Mikan
Sesq - town
Mikan Tsumiki - scum / Most sure about this one, pretty sure partnered with aneninen based on ISO. If anyone cares I can go into further detail here.
skitter30 - not sure
GuyInFreezer - town
Springlullaby - not sure- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Is this accurate:In post 657, Sesq wrote:springlullaby is ice and tried to frame me
You said you would kill ane, and you're saying that since ane was fire mafia who died to ice mafia, the ice mafia is trying to frame you as having performed the kill?
I guess I'm a little skeptical of spring deliberately trying to frame you since she started pushing you before you said that and didn't bring up the ane death until you did.
I dislike the following though:
Yeah the logic is bad and not townie ... but I don't think it's scummy either. It's just ... bad. I don't really get why you're pushing it as being inherently scummy when it's just ???.In post 659, springlullaby wrote:Sesq, whereas I was scum I wouldn't see the point of your "gambit". Me being town just make me go wut about your reasoning. I have zero control over NK's so what you are saying is akin to me saying, "yeah sesq is scum who killed Aneninen to frame me by saying that I killed Aneninem to frame him"
That kind of logic is just bad and not townie and I don't know how people are not reading it as scum. Plus the casual jokes about who you are going to NK, it's just piling up.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Yeah but posting that after he asked to be replaced is kinda weird and kinda makes me think he just did it for the towncred.In post 659, springlullaby wrote:but Technical Difficulties's #225 (IIRC) is a strong town read from my going through D1
Yeah but the scumteams only have two players apiece so I'm not sure how much resistance that there would be.In post 659, springlullaby wrote:Beefster was quite obviously town to me just on account of the speed of his wagon. You better bet that, esp in multiball, there will be resistance to a wagon on scum.
I want to vote mikan but sesq isn't on it and I know that a lot of people are interested in it and I don't want the day to end just yet by a lolvote.In post 659, springlullaby wrote:BTW, this is actually a good post from skitter BUT it lacks a vote.
Tbf, two different hydra heads wrote those two different posts, so idk if that's necessarily scummy.In post 661, Iconeum wrote:How do you explain the read change between 167 and 225, where TD goes from scum!beefster to town!beefster? That's a full 180 there.
Yeah it's a rp alt of alisaeIn post 668, springlullaby wrote:Whose alt/hydro is Mikan? It occupes to me it was larking or rp'ing or something.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
GIF, what do you think about this?In post 653, skitter30 wrote:I kinda think that we probably want to lynch the fire mafia today so that we don't have two kills tonight.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Then I guess I think it's probably suboptimal for you to want a Mikan lynch today given that you strongly think they're partners with sky.In post 681, GuyInFreezer wrote:
Guess that's optimal.In post 680, skitter30 wrote:
GIF, what do you think about this?In post 653, skitter30 wrote:I kinda think that we probably want to lynch the fire mafia today so that we don't have two kills tonight.
I have no leads on the fire one though.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
GIF, I actually find it quite troubling that you started the day pushing for an Alisae lynch given that you think they're ice mafia; it's kinda hard for me to believe that you've overlooked the notion that it's obviously optimal to find fire mafia today.In post 682, skitter30 wrote:Then I guess I think it's probably suboptimal for you to want a Mikan lynch today given that you strongly think they're partners with sky.
I mean, it is possible that scum shot RC to frame you, but from my POV, it's just as likely that scum!you shot RC because you thought he was going to push you the next day, and that you're now brushing off the connection as a frame attempt.In post 692, Alisae wrote:Its much more likely that Scum shot RC in attempt to pin me for shooting him after RC's twilight read on me in attempts to help score my mislynch.
Therefore, GiF's read is not a naturally formed response.
Like idk if the RC kill directly points to scum!you .... but I don't think it directly points to you being framed either. They're both valid WIFOM-y options to me, so I'm not putting super much thought into the implications of the RC kill especially since it could just be he got killed cuz they figured out he was the doc, or for some other reason altogether. Like idk if the RC kill is directly related to you, meant to look like it was related to you when it wasn't, or not related to you at all, and I don't really think there's a way for me to come to any firm conclusions about this, so I'm just kinda ignoring it, cuz otherwise I'm probably just going to get stuck pondering WIFOM.
Yeah that's why the NM and Kop kills are kinda bizarre to me.In post 692, Alisae wrote:Why would you ever shoot someone who has mislynch equitity?
I don't really like GIF's reaction to the NM kill tbh. Like he said that it likely came from someone who was scumreading him and was looking for scum from the opposing team. I guess the next thing I'd do there if I believed that would be to go look at the people who scumread NM and see which of them makes sense to have performed the kill. But he just kinda dropped that idea and never really followed up on it so it felt like he was just largely shading anyone who scumread NM without actually doing anything about it.
And it felt kinda distance-y and posture-y since GIF had been loudly proclaiming a townread on NM - if he floats the idea that someone with a scumread on NM killed him, it kinda distances him from the kill.
Tbh I don't often have people complaining about the wallposts and also say that I'm low-content at the same time.In post 696, Alisae wrote:their FoS on Skitter seems like they are just forming reads on the spot.
I don't think it's possible for her to know that you're town even if she's scum given that it's multiball. I don't think that you're scum together, but from her POV if she's scum it's quite possible that you're opposing-team scum.In post 696, Alisae wrote:Spring is making no attempt to get a read on my own play because she knows I'm town.
+1In post 696, Alisae wrote:Her read on me is extremely lacking in that its day 3 and there should be more then enough information to get a read off of my slot. It really doesn't feel like she's trying to sort my alignment here. And if her townread on me is so strong then it really doesn't feel like she's making any attempt to really defend my lynch, if anything it feels like she doesn't care if it goes through. Hence why I asked for a towncase, if she was town and thought I was town and had a strong townread on me, she would attempt to do everything in her power to make sure I am not the lynch today. However she's not doing that.
(Although I disagree with the notion that your slot is town; my read is still mostly based on TD cuz you haven't really been posting much. Most AI thing I got from *you* is that I don't like your Red vote - he was obviously a new player and I think that you calling him scummy for finding the rp scummy is kinda predatory given that I'm pretty sure you know that the rp made it harder for people to read you.)
Kinda agree. I want you lynched, but I don't want you lynched *right now*. I think that the day can still be used to sort other people. I'm not sold on scum!Ico tbh, but I do feel :/ about GIF and spring.In post 698, Alisae wrote:When it comes to Icon, I would like to see why he thinks I'm the pigeon's partner, but I kinda just think he's scum for attempting to rush my lynch today. Like I kinda don't get why he's in such a hurry.
I don't like how easily you dropped the Alisae townread when they questioned you on it.In post 705, springlullaby wrote:BTW, just throwing another wrench in there, this is multiball, no scum can actually know that another player isn't scum. This is just eww from Alisae and makes me thing ego parade OMGUS more than scum because it's just so dumb.
Anyway. I'll be reviewing the game once more sometimes tomorrow, put in a definitive vote and call it a day.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I mean, I don't disagree with the notion that he was probably an attempted cross-kill. However, I don't think I agree with the idea that scum who were thinking about cross-killing would have necessarily expressed a scumread in thread. I'm not saying that they *wouldn't*, so much as I think that 'attempting to cross-kill NM' isn't particularly correlated with 'expressing a scumread on him in-thread'.In post 716, GuyInFreezer wrote:
I can only see NM kill as an attempt to xkill. Like, think about it for just a bit. Would killing NM for wifom reason worth it when there are others?In post 710, skitter30 wrote:And it felt kinda distance-y and posture-y since GIF had been loudly proclaiming a townread on NM - if he floats the idea that someone with a scumread on NM killed him, it kinda distances him from the kill.
...You know what, I'll just come clean. I'm just mostly salty that even he get to eat a nightkill over me.
And either way, I don't like the way you reacted to it since it felt like you were trying to distance from it.
Just because GIF is pushing it doesn't imply that he did the kill to frame you given multiball; I am seriously considering the possibility of ice-mafia-you and fire-mafia-gif.In post 713, Alisae wrote:Its being pushed, therefore it was probably a frame job.
In that scenario, you killed RC and are trying to brush it off as a frame attempt, and GIF saw that this was something he could push you with even though he had no involvement.
Sorry, I misread your post; I thought you were saying that they were being ego-y on purpose and that it was scummy.In post 718, springlullaby wrote:I'm not sure what you are referring to but to recap if isolated, I a)read TD as town, b) read Alisae as annoying, even more so with the putting forth of dumbs argument that I underlined.
I'm trying to separate the two not to get all my reads jumbled up because of dislike of the later's posting but Alisae is not protown, that much is clear. Though the sheer ego-ness, defensive over the top tone of the posts make me think more annoying than scum.
Can you eli5 why it's scummy for iconeum to be doing this? ie why he isn't just being lazy and/or inept town? (And more specifically why you think it points to him being ice-mafia in particular?)In post 720, Alisae wrote:
Form your own reads based on your own conclusions.In post 717, Iconeum wrote:So yeah I'm basicly sheeping this read at this point
Plus I can bring up multiple quotes where RC as said that he cannot read me reliably.
Can you not?In post 726, Alisae wrote:man I never knew telling people that they're incompetent and that they're trash could be so god dam fun.
I don't. By the time you replaced in, your slot was scummy cuz of TD, so that became my default read on the slot from that point on until/unless you do something to change that read. And since then, I don't think you've done anything particularly town-motivated. Or, more accurately, I think you're completely capable of faking the vaguely town-motivated things you've done - scumhunting today. (Especially given multiball)In post 735, Alisae wrote:You think I'm town
(I call it 'vague' cuz I think that you're trying to look town today cuz you're actually in danger of being lynched. IE I think that the scumhunting is at least partially a survival tactic, as opposed to you just doing it cuz you want to find scum)
Also I don't like how you keep on arguing that people's scumreads on you are bad because they know you're town when it'sliterally impossible for anyone to know that in multiball- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Yes, I'm aware.
I don't think he's scummy. You haven't explained to me why he's scummy (And not just inept town). Given multiball, I might follow even you there if I independantly thought he was scummy, but I don't.
Like I don't think he's scummy in the first place, and the fact that you and sky want it makes it even more dubious.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
I kinda said this already, but in case it wasn't obvious, I don't think it's a scum slot. Or more accurately, I don't think he's done anything actively scummy, and in comparison to multiple other players (you, alisae, gif, and spring), he seems townie, and he's probably like my fifth or sixth choice of a lynch today, out of six players. I think a lot of the things people are using to call him scummy might just be signs that he's new. I haven't seen anything inherently scummy from him.
Also I can't just ignore who's voting for there.
Also I had read your post.
I had looked at the vcs prior to your post and I didn't find anything particularly conclusive imo.
I feel like your post is kinda designed to push a narrative tbh, because you say:
Which I think is very valid and a good place to look for Hawk partners.In post 685, Sky_Paladin wrote:So I am interested especially in people who found a reason to vote not!Hawk, because those players might be the other Fire scum, and I agree that our strat should be finish off the red team so there's one less night kill a time.
You say about me:
But your lynchpool, based on hawk votes, is iconeum, gif, mikan. I'm not in it, and GIF was previously a townread and alisae cross-voted, and I don't really feel like you're actually interested in my unvote or the alisae cross vote given that you don't follow up with either of these anywhere.In post 685, Sky_Paladin wrote:Skitter had also been voting Hawk and empty-unvoted right before this vote count had gone out; she switched to Beefster.
I kinda feel like your post was more about justifying an iconeum push than actually looking at the hawk votes tbh.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
No, he hasn't, which is why I said that; I elaborated in the rest of the paragraph. I don't townread anyone right now, so I'm resorting to ranking people by how scummy I find them. He's like the fifth/tied-for-fifth/sixth least scummy person. (I'm having trouble deciding if I townread sesq more or less than him). He hasn't done anything townie recently, but he hasn't done anything scummy either, which makes him less scummy than my scumreads, so I want him lynched less than them.In post 758, Sky_Paladin wrote:Emphasis mine. That's an interesting choice of words. May I presume he has done something actively towny to make you town read him? Please indicate where/how.
I don't think the reasons given to scumread him are particularly compelling, or at least, I don't think they do much to explain why he's scummy and not just new town.
I thought it was a good idea to look at the Hawk voters. I had. After doing so, I don't think that the Hawk votes were particuarly conclusive or gave any solid leads, which is why I didn't really have much to say about your vca.In post 758, Sky_Paladin wrote:These appear to directly contradict each other. Could you please clarify for me?
I liked the GIF wagon. I didn't like that Beef had joined it and I wanted to leave it cuz he joined it, which told me I scumread Beef more so I voted there. I never had a problem with the Beef wagon (I unvoted solely cuz I didn't want a lolhammer while there were two slots that weren't doing anything; we ended up having a lolhammer like the next day IRL anyways.)In post 758, Sky_Paladin wrote:the Beefster/GiF wagons terrible even though you wanted to push both of them
or tldr: I was cool with a wagon on either of them but the way beef joined gif made me want to vote beef more than gif cuz I didn't like his vote. I left beef cuz I didn't want a lolhammer with two empty slots
I still don't get what you don't like about this, and I don't think I called either wagon terrible. (I called the *red* wagon terrible, cuz it was. I also called *my* wagon terrible, cuz it was). I don't think I called either of the beef or gif wagons terrible. I did say that I didn't like beef joining the gif wagon.
I still think GIF is sketchy and I think I might be voting for him shortly. (I'm trying to come to some sort of conclusion whether or not that convo I linked comes from partners).
Hawk and red weren't concurrent so these two things have like nothing to do with each other. Like I was actively v/la for like the entirety of the formation of the red wagon so the fact that you're using that as a reason I'm not a hawk partner is silly.In post 758, Sky_Paladin wrote:When you switched your vote off of Hawk and on to Beefster, you didn't join in the push on Red Flavor,
(Although tbf I wouldn't have voted there anyways if I was around cuz I was townreading him)
Yes, I agree that the goal of the game is to look at what's happened and to use that to make informed guesses about what's happening, but I feel like you aren't sharing what you're actually thinking, so much as looking for things that you can push. Like you feel pre-meditated and planned. Like you're pushing this because you can push it and you think it'll gain traction, and not so much cuz you actually think he's scummy and want to lynch scum.In post 758, Sky_Paladin wrote:That's because it is. I am trying to correlate what has happened in the game so far and project it to an end - and then make alignment guesses based on where I feel that path is going
a) I wasn't aware that your scumread on me was so big that you're POE'ing teams (and therefore potential Fire mafia) based on whether or not they could be partners with meIn post 758, Sky_Paladin wrote:I'm 'not interested' in your unvote of Hawk because I don't think you are Fire mafia; and if you are mafia with any of Mikan/GiF/Icon that excludes that player from being Fire. Icon could easily be either Fire or Ice mafia, and so that's why I'm favouring the vote there. I AM interested in you hating on both the GiF/Beefster wagons, but less so now that Beefster has flipped green - you could legitimately be town hating two wagons, or you could be scum buddying. WIFOM.
(IE this feels like something you just made up to respond to me saying I didn't like your post, as opposed to something you've been thinking this entire time)
b) I think your reasoning for me not being a hawk partner is silly and completely inconclusive given that the red wagon happened while I was v/la.
c) You say 'you're not interested in my Hawk unvote cuz you don't think I'm fire mafia', but then you say 'you don't plausibly see me being fire mafia cuz of the unvote' - you're reasoning for why I'm not fire mafia is the hawk unvote as far as I can tell? Like you're using the conclusion as the premise so this is really twisty circular logic. I'm not fire mafia cuz of the hawk unvote, but my hawk unvote isn't interesting cuz I'm not fire mafia.
d) I feel like there's something else very twisty with the logic in this paragraph but I can't figure out what it is right now; I'll get back to it if I figure it out.
I find that mikan/hawk vote to be *super* interesting given that we *know* hawk to be scum but we don't know about the alignments of mikan or spring or icon or you or me or gif or sesq.In post 758, Sky_Paladin wrote:The Mikan/Hawk vote is interesting, but not as interesting as Mikan pushing for Spring.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
In post 767, Sky_Paladin wrote:Skiiiiiiitter who are you going to vote for.
I feel like you want to vote GiF because you've wanted to since forever, but you're not voting because...?
Whoops, sorry, I was on my way to a thing and hit submit accidentally before I finished the thought.In post 768, skitter30 wrote:Idk. I feel kinda stuck with this game, and I fell l
Basically, idk. My goal for today is to find fire mafia, but I feel kinda stuck - people aren't posting and I feel like I'm basically talking to my scumreads. I have a scumpool - you/GIF/Alisae/spring - and I think that most, if not all, scum are within that group. I really want to bounce my ideas off of someone I think town, but my townreads aren't posting. The townreads aren't even that strong anyways, but to refine them I'd like need to talk to them .....
I don't think you're partners with Hawk. Or at least, I don't see anything either pointing towards that or ruling it out. Same with Spring/Mumble.
I'm not joining a wagon pushed by my scumreads on someone I don't scumread.
I'm basically trying to decide if I'm going to vote GIF or Alisae. Probably Alisae cuz I'm very confidant the slot is scum even if I'm not sure if it's Fire mafia.
I'm leaning against thinking that GIF is fire mafia cuz I think that convo that I linked *probably* doesn't come from partners. I really want input on that but you're the only person who responded and I don't really trust you right now.
I'm also kinda wary of setting down a vote cuz I've kinda gotten the vibe that scum may have figured out who each other are at this point, and I'm worried that if I vote a townie scum will pile on.
Actually I think I'm just going to vote Alisae. I don't know if I'm going to make much headway figuring out fire mafia while talking to myself. Even if they're not fire mafia, I'm fairly confidant that Alisae's scum.
VOTE: Alisae- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Dear Alisae,
That isn't the only reason I scumread you; I was trying to write something parallel to your 'you're bad for not voting scum'. I'm not using a hammer vote as a justifcation for a scumread. (ie the fact that it was a hammer isn't the issue)
Math was scummy cuz he was being LAMIST and was like looking for towncred. Impede was scummy cuz he was making things to push so he'd look busy. Your vote on red was gross (not cuz you hammered a scumread but cuz you know quite well that the rp alt was hard for people to read and you using that as an excuse to scumread a guy that new for saying that he didn't like it is scummy). I think you're putting up a show of scumhunting today cuz you'd have been lynched if you didn't start doing something; it's a survival tactic from you as far as I can tell.
I don't think Icon is scummy and I won't be voting them until you can tell me why they aren't new town.
I think your slot is scummier than Spring and the fact that like all of my scumreads want it is suspicious (yes multiball, yes aids, no that doesn't change my mind)- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
Yes, I think I just said that. I don't care about the game super much and I can't re-evaluate cuz I don't trust any of the people posting right now, and if I can't bounce ideas off of someone I can't re-evaluate.In post 777, Alisae wrote:"I don't care abut the game anymore I just want my only real read dead because I am incapable of re-evaluating" syndrome.
Those flip town 100% of the time.
The only thing I'm sure of is that your slot is scum. I'm not sure about much else.
I don't think that these sorts of reads flip town 100% of the time; they haven't in my experience. It's the only thing that I feel good about in this gamestate and I'm trying to use my read on you to figure out the rest of this mess.
And you are in no way obvious town.- skitter30
-
skitter30 she/herLast Laugh
- skitter30
she/her- Last Laugh
- Last Laugh
- Posts: 32951
- Joined: March 26, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Est
No, I don't think so. I really haven't seen *anything* townie from your slot tbh. And the fact that you got wagoned means you aren't exactly obvtown to everyone else either.
I see little reason to believe you telling me that given that I think you're just going to say whatever you think will get me to unvote / change the read.
And why are you telling me I'm throwing the game? If you think I'm scum tunneling on town .... isn't this exactly what I want to be doing? I can only be throwing the game by tunneling on town!you if I'm town. - skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30
- skitter30