In post 258, InfernoBrafin wrote:
I'd like to put out and explain my scumreads, since it feels to me that the game has slowed down. Sometimes these help generate new conversation.
Mathdino:
For the most part, this slot feels sort of town to me. But the whole semantics thing has me kind of uncomfortable, and here's why. Math claims that his definition of scummy is not the same as scum-indicative, but whenever Inferno or I pointed out that something was scummy, even before either one of us scumread him, he treated it like it was. How can he both say that the word scummy isn't the same as scum-indicative when he uses it on others, but it is whenever anyone else uses it on him? It's super inconsistent, and I can't see any townie double-thinking that hard ever. If this weren't the case, I probably would town read him.
Beef:
There's a few things that pings me on Beef.
1) He makes a semi-serious vote, and then takes and obvious RVS vote seriously. That doesn't make any sense to me; he's foregone RVS and then interacts with RVS?
2) His next few posts are weird. He reads us as kind of scummy, MD as kind of scummy, but then says that it's probably not SvS. Then he says that it's probably us because "Math is hard to read at first." Didn't he just read Math?
3) Then he admits that he might be misreading us and does a complete 180 on another player without giving reason, and then OMGUS votes the first person that points it out.
4) He's done little actual scumhunting, just made general statements and kind of skirted issues as they've arisen.
By themselves, they're not much, but together it feels to me like he's scum. But I wouldn't put Math and Beef together as a scumteam. Beef has been super agressive to Math, while Math has just ignored it for the most part. I don't see scum doing that.
More on my third in a bit.