In post 579, OnTheMark wrote: In post 91, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 86, OnTheMark wrote: In post 85, Reasonably Rational wrote:I wonder who has a pregame ability to utilize in these 24 hours, and what will happen when it comes about?
Current guess is scum influence on which plane we'll be in each phase.
-Cerb
Hi town. How you doing?
I guess that line of questioning is silly and will lead us down a path of ruin.
I'm fantastic, thank you for asking! Trying to get synced up with my other head, and taking a bit of a break from work because I've been focusing on the work shiz all day. ^^ How are you doing?
And yes, it might not lead us down a path of ruin, but I'd rather not go there. Mastin is smart, if she didn't actually claim the whole thing and she's town, then not claiming it is probably a reasonable option. If she's scum, then whatever they claim will be perfectly reasonable, just like their refusal to claim will be at this point.
Besides, there are other details about that whole situation that make it a lot more helpful to not push them on it.
@Chara: I'm sad that you're a miller, and happy that you're a miller. Sad because now I need to be paranoid all game, happy because if I can get past my paranoia, I get to know you're on my side!
@Maid Cafe: Noted. Not going to be giving you anything, but, good to know.
-Cerb
I find it odd here, that Cerb's thoughts here directly contradict my thoughts in post
96 among others. However when I asked him for something he disagreed with he said, in post
392 nothing. This is one of the things that makes me worry. Cerb generally doesn't "mind meld" for lack of a better word this early and I was supremely scared.Drixx, while being offline, tends to favor the "case" type of arguments, and lots of data and endpoints. The fact Cerb decided to not really think about it long and then blow off the question seems odd. It's more like a "I don't give a shit to answer this." That's not really how I expect someone who town reads another to disregard what they are saying. The Titus/Kiana question was more an after thought but I was mainly trying to get a feel for Cerb. (And yes I'm calling the slot Cerb until Drixx pops in. Deal.)
Cerb has also tried to spend most of pregame and D1 towards a mechanics based play style instead of a reads based one from his opening.
In post 495, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 494, OnTheMark wrote: In post 493, Venmar wrote:it's the first time i've heard of the theory, pretty null on it, more interested in the reactions to it. i honestly thinks it's kind of silly and we should just lynch productively and naturally to what the gamestate demands, but it's not like i haven't seen wackier theories have some merit.
Interesting. Why did you try to form a wagon on yourself if you think wagons should form naturally?
Seconded.
Also, that whole theory thing is, as someone else said, simply something to keep in mind when town lynches scum D1, not a reason to deliberately try to lynch town.
Also also another thing, but I wanna wait and see what everybody else has to say before I bring it up. <3
-cerb
Now notice that Cerb specifically mentions that he agrees with my point on wagons forming naturally. He says a minor contradiction in which he says games should always be solved from a role POV. That's not always the case. If a role provides evidence, e.g. you KNOW someone did something, that is mod confirmed obviously don't ignore it. Similarly if someone says they did something, then that gets taken into account. However, the point about role POV directly goes counter to this being a Varsoon game. Take for example Steven's Universe. That game was specifically solved through the power of a town block and THEN actions. Not ACTIONS then town block.
In post 510, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 504, Maid Cafe wrote:I don't really think we should try and solve this game from a role/role usage POV, especially day 1.
~B
You can always try to solve a game from a role usage POV. Not necessarily from the role alone though, so you're half right.
-Cerb
Notice here it's a "disagreement" without teeth behind it. It's like "you're half right" but he doesn't actively discourage or dissuade the parts he finds wrong. In fact, Cerb has been rather quiet in terms of that, just sort of floating. I haven't seen Cerb actually take a stance for something he believes in. Players with far fewer posts have left a stronger imprint on the game. Drixx's being MIA while that annoys me is typical for his personality/work life balance. Lumia gave a reason so I'll back off for now on them, but I want to see some townie content before D1 is up from the slot.
In post 537, Reasonably Rational wrote:I'm also considering asking everyone to just vote for themselves until a VC happens to see if we can identify who the thief is, but...alignments were rolled after roles were made, so that won't be useful since the decision was made pretty early.
Oh, also: A50, when was your vote stolen? Midday, at day start? Were you told anything about the source of the vote steal? Like if it was a card used by someone?
-Cerb
Now this is where one contradiction is a potential fuckup, a second is shame on you. Earlier, Cerb agreed with wagons forming naturally. Now Cerb is arguing for the destruction of current wagons in that everyone votes for themselves. Not only does this NOT address the core problem of people missing votes, it hides the voting pattern, and goes strictly against the mechanics post Cerb agreed with me on. He can't both agree and disagree with himself can he? If other players are missing votes (I have not received such a PM) then that would come up in a VC or if A50 is telling the truth the players inbox. The only thing hunting for a vote stealer does is create chaos and distract from hunting scum.
Mainly the buddied feeling hasn't gone away where it actually has with Titus/Kiana which is a nice bonus.
In post 390, Reasonably Rational wrote:I miss A50 too. I also agree that natural forming wagons are more important than whatever venmar can do, particular this early in the game.
-Cerb
This is kinda the nail I think in the coffin. With Cerb agreeing with me with a lack of mechanics focus (or rather more accurately flip flopping) whatever Venmar is claiming to do Cerb seems to be frightened of or scared of. He wants natural wagons over Venmar's ability and a then to remove those wagons because a vote stealer exists, despite the effect that comes from the player voting anyone receives the same results.
I'm pretty sure Cerb is buddying scum here, and those townreading RR I would love to have opinions from.
Although I lost my dare. Damn it.