Even
So, before I share any thoughts I might have on other slots, I want to engage this issue head on before you decide to lynch in MYLO, show me posts from Nauci that actually seem scummy, and I will address them to the best of my ability.
I'd agree, this is something I'd also like to hear before sharing my thoughts.In post 754, Oxy wrote:teacher - Please out your check, now.
You are claiming tracker, so you have either an inconclusive check, a check on dead, or a red check.
If you have a red check, scum already knows who the red check is on. That person is probably not going to spew prior to your check.
If you have a check on dead, you are terrible. (lol)
If you have an inconclusive check, then I want to know it now - before YOU have a chance to gather more information.
Thank you. I like your avatar, but I don't know I can say that as a mod.In post 756, Oxy wrote:Welcome to the game BH; I'm a big fan of your work.
Let's start this. Early game fluffing doesn't mean anything, Nauci never really steps up in any of her games and starts the serious action. Then I don't know if she saw your question, sometimes people miss questions all the time, but, if you really wanted it answered you should have asked again.In post 468, teacher wrote:My Nauci Case[lEarly game fluffing. BUT had played with TGP before 8 and ignored my TGP meta question 139 made before he was VLA. Both are weak grounds, as she had discussed TGP's meta before my question. I was more seeking an inconsistency.
This is factually incorrect. James Brafin was saying this is a town meta where he lurks Day 1, Nauci stated that she felt TGP was trying to pocket her. She never mentions lurking as a basis for the scumread, but instead at the time said she was discouraging lurking. Her lurking was due to health issues and she probably should have replaced out earlier.But there is in fact an inconsistency. Nauci's first discussion of TGP says that she remembers nothing. 26. But then she tries to build a scum case from her previous game. 65. Inconsistency all the more suspicious because James says this is TGP's common Town!meta. 143 THIS is my biggest issue, along with
I have no idea what a vanity wagon is. Not what this has to do with anything. Someone votes you so they are scum? Bad attitude.the vanity wagon on me both early when Thor and JB's responses indicated I would not be gaining traction, and later, when
Another factually incorrect accusation. Nauci asked for a VC because she was pretty sure but not positive it was L-2. She was not willing to hammer clearly and was not sure on the count. I mean, it seems like if she had miscounted and hammered, you wouldn't have liked that either.Providing intent to L-1 but doesnt, while encouraging early L-1s -- i.e. a contradictory push to the JB wagon while staying off it (to avoid suspicion?) 227
You cited your own post.What I view as a slightly misreppy attempt to add onto the valid early scumcase on me (91)
Are you serious? The line in the second post was a joke because she was falling behind.
This is absurd. Different people deal with different things in different ways, YOU might have returned here for relief, Nauci does not necessarily. The same way I take Advil after my wisdom tooth was removed but my sister took the heavy painkillers.Dont know what to make of complete disappearance before break. Real life happens, and Im glad youre through withdrawal and wish you the best on the continued recovery generally. But Im quite surprised that housebound Nauci would not turn to this at somepoint for relief. This is null, I debated not listing, but it is a question in my mind if I am honest.
My thought are, it was a quick post, and I do not know the reasoning behind that vote. I am not allowed to message her and ask, and I wish I could.In post 759, Irrelephant11 wrote: @brassherald, welcome. When you get a chance, I'd love to hear your thoughts on 576 followed by answering this on behalf of your slot:
I would have hammered. No lynch is worse for town than lynching a VT.In post 459, Irrelephant11 wrote:Meanwhile, @ Nauci, you say you were sick between 236 and 371. Okay. Please comment on the things you wish you had had a chance to talk about then. Would you/wouldn't you have hammered, if you could have? What do you think about 250 compared to 333? Or 259, where Teacher throws out sheeping me? 271? And at least three other posts of your choice.
I'm going to flip these. Read lists are not useful because all they are is a list. I prefer to actually analyze and give my thoughts rather than just "X is scum" I'll provide reads with some reasoning, but a formal read list is not my style. Plus, I see no point in listing nulls, if I have nothing to say on a slot (usually on Day 1 or earlier Day 2) they're null.In post 772, Flicker wrote:PEdit2 @ brassherald: Can you post a quick read list/lynch pool/general impressions cloud?
PEdit3 @ brassherald: Why don't you think read lists are useful?
Okay, one vote where she checked a game and posts her read on meta. Wow, you really cracked the case there!In post 775, teacher wrote:1. You say it is "factually incorrect" that Nauci "tries to build a scum case from their lurking." Look at the post I linked -- 65. Nauci read TGP/NK (jailkeeper) as scum from "straight lack of content bias" and because "HE did that in a game" where he was scum. That is a scum case from lurking - factually correct.
Never heard this phrase before, stop trying to shade me for not knowing your phrase.2. "Vanity wagon" is a phrase you must have heard as an SE. It is a one vote wagon that will not gain traction to a lynch. Moreover, suggesting I am scumming someone for voting me shows a stunning lack of appreciation for the game. I cannot have said more times that I get why I am suspect, and didnt blame people for voting me. I blame Nauci for staying there even in the late day when it is clear I could not be a consensus.
You try to coordinate on lynches by lining up reads, not by sheeping other people. This is a game where you need to do the thinking, you don't get to pass it off on someone else by sheeping them. Your townreads can be wrong. You can be wrong as town, but sheeping is a great way to pass off blame.To respond to 771, I see two issues.
Compare this:With this:In post 771, brassherald wrote:Trying to coordinate on lynches, though is a good thing.So we shouldnt expect analysis? Why is a readslist not useful to anyone else? I find them useful.In post 771, brassherald wrote:I will not do a read list. It's not useful for me, and I don't feel it is ever useful for anyone else to read them. I will not budge on this ever again.
Compare this:With this:In post 771, brassherald wrote:Sheeping is distinctly negative utility for town.And consider the background strategy. Forming a town block negates the inherent block mafia can have, and can provide tells if you move the block around during the day for wagon analysis. I will try to dig up a strategy article from back in the day when I used to play more, but at least then, building a block was a big strategic bonus.In post 771, brassherald wrote:Trying to coordinate on lynches, though is a good thing.
Thanks, it's Supreme, but in New York, that's just the regular state court.In post 876, teacher wrote:Good luck tomorrow. The Sovereign district or Supreme? (or other?)
Chainsaw defense is when you defend someone by attacking their accuser. It's considered a scum tell. I'm not sure it is because it is rather widespread on the site, including where I've seen it from too many people in the game for it to be only scum.In post 896, Irrelephant11 wrote:what's a chainsaw defense?
You're a sweet kid, Oxy.In post 1155, Oxy wrote:ayyyy good lynch
The game was 5 pages long, and it was a large theme.In post 1176, brassherald wrote:I was in a game that was, in practice, won in the first post. I was Night Killed before making a post, too.