Echo Bay Grits SEO [game over]
Forum rules
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Okay I've skim-read the whole thread now, I'm gonna go through everything in detail here:
Pages 1-10
Neither town-reading nor scum-reading page 1 shots, if anything Eddies/Cheekys shots areslightlytownie on the basis of recklessness but it all looks like RVS would in a normal game
No need for this shot on the basis of random stage shooting/reads... slightly scum-ish
I'm pro the PRICKS/non-shooting/townbloc idea merely on the point that it adds a level of control to who we end up shooting rather than leaving it to peoples whims, considering that there's 13 dead by the time I've got here we've already cut down some of the mess you'd expect from a game this size and to keep having people shooting semi-randomly is just lowering the number of people scum need to hit to win (I'm presuming they still have nightkills in this setup or have I missed something here?), since you're mostly hitting town with these shots.
Sidenote we should be keeping a FOS/votecount IMO
To an extent yes, we may be "thinning the crowd" with chaos shooting but I'm the fact that half these people have been shot without properly being analysed first suggests that coming out of RVS the strategy is anti-town.... I'd rather not shoot anyone than randomly hit a load of townies.Sando wrote:
Votes is fine to scumhunt, the protection strategy is just to impose some controls on the randomness, it has nothing to do with scum vs town, other than town preferring order while scum prefer chaos.In post 39, Taly wrote:Circular protection might be easier to document moreso than votes, but I still want people pushing their town and scumreads as if we were thinking about someone to lynch.
I like this actually trying to solve the game early on without shooting > town-reading this.In post 61, Taly wrote:
Ehh... I like that he used his shot to form reads, but I don't think shooting randomly helps town at all, and I don't think he's working for town to congeal at the moment. I want him to respond to me more before I have a more solid read.In post 52, Ankamius wrote:Eddie's right that Cheeky's Ari shot was really scummy, so I already feel townish on him.
So a sheep?In post 53, Srceenplay wrote:
Eddie said they are scum.In post 50, Taly wrote:To what degree, and what warrants someone being killed early like this?
I'm guessingCheeky'sflip will give you more insight intoEddie'salignment?
Why not? Because you're scum and random shooting hits more townies?In post 72, Chickadee wrote:Why are we trying to be serious and game solve this early?
Comes more from town though... scum wouldn't be trying to find strategies to hit more scum?In post 97, Lovebird wrote:
Can come from scumIn post 93, Almost50 wrote:
Yeah! Scum who's trying to break the game and minimize the casualties.In post 85, Lovebird wrote:I think taly also seems like scum
So your strategy is to FoS anyone who looks townie early on? I was always under the impression that if you think someone looks like a townie its more likely they're town than the reverse.In post 101, Lovebird wrote:Idk. I think scum who don't want to get shot know that they have to be obvious town really quick. Or, that's what they expect they need to do, at least.
Why state the obvious?
I don't think so...?In post 115, Lovebird wrote:In post 22, Sando wrote:@Taly, let's make a townbloc mmmk.
You state you'll shoot anyone that shoots me, I've stated I'm shooting your shooter. As people join townbloc we create a circle of protection via mutually assured destruction. People without a shot left can't join, since they can't "protect" anyone else.
Keen?
Fluff?In post 33, Sando wrote:
Townbloc is sort of a misnomer, more a non-shooty-bloc.In post 30, Taly wrote:Let me make sure of how this plays out-
We protect each other by shooting who shoots us.
People who don't join the townbloc and wavelength with the protection won't be apart of this.
My biggest worry is, how would we have a strong idea someone is town who assures protection/a shot against a shooter? It's a bit early to form reads.
Step 1: Person A says they'll shoot anyone who shoots person B. Person B says they'll shoot whoever shoots person A. Thus anyone wanting to shoot A or B gets shot themselves.
Step 2: Person C wants to join. A shoots anyone shooting B, B shoots anyone shooting C, C shoots anyone shooting A. Thus you have circular protection.
Step 3: Keep extending this out as people join.
If we decide that someone in the bloc needs to die, we just nominate someone to shoot them, I'll take that as first responsibility if required.
That said, I think this would work if we just all said "we'll shoot anyone that shoots into the bloc" without the whole circle thing, but I'm just spitballing at this point.
This gal's giving me bad vibes on the basis that he's scum-reading people trying to implement ordered, townie strategies.
Can we PLEASE stop this anti-town play? It isn't helpingIn post 118, Ankamius wrote:Shoot: Gorkington
I'm going to be dead by the time I'm home from work tomorrow so I want somebody fun to talk to in the dead thread.
Have a good night everyone!
In my opinion, a game this big implies at least the possibility of multiball, ergo an early scum hit shouldn't lead to a straight up town read.In post 124, Lovebird wrote:
Maybe gork flips scum.In post 122, Ankamius wrote:Why are you waiting for a flip?
Coming out of the random stage they look more scummy than at first but I'd argue that they look as much reckless/poor townplay at least initially. Personally I'm more likely to read people that at townbloc-ing as more intelligent town on the basis that they actually want order and to work out the game but it's too early IMO to put anyone random shooting down as scum.In post 136, TheBrie wrote:
I would have thought random shots were more scummy. At least they benefit scum unless they hit town by chance, and scum isn't going to shoot scum, but may very well shoot a townie under the pretence of randomness.In post 77, Lovebird wrote:I wonder if the random shots are more towny than scummy
Or they may just not be thinking this through.
Remember reading this on my skim through which is why I requested to join in my first post... it's better than no strategy.In post 157, Sando wrote:I've decided that the circular protection scheme is just too much admin at the moment, and I think just group-think is fine for now.
So I'm starting the Players Rightly Impressively Correctly Killing Scum club. Anyone who wants to join the PRICKS club just has to say that yes they want to join the PRICKS club. I'm going to assume Taly is part, and I'm also part. To join you must still have your Day 1 kill.
Rules:
1. You can only kill people who have shot a member of PRICKS, unless...
2. A majority of PRICKS members decide to kill someone (this could be inside or outside of PRICKS), in which case someone can shoot that person or will be nominated to kill them
3. Shooting outside of 1 or 2 will result in removal from PRICKS, although not being shot unless you shot into PRICKS.
4. You retain membership in PRICKS if you shoot within rules 1 or 2
Rule 2 will not come into effect until there are 11+ members of PRICKS or ~48 hours from now.
Agreed. If we can get PRICKS big enough it means we can at least act as a voting quorum would in an ordinary game and I think that's the best strategy we've got right now (NOT that I would necessarily say we should continue it into day two when we've got more evidence to go on, although keeping the element of collective control is probably a good idea. Allowing individuals to act on their own generally never leads to best results for the group as a whole and I would expect to see scum exploiting that fact).In post 158, Sando wrote:
Not so much, but they're useless in the circle since they don't have a shot anymore to offer protection to the rest of the circle. Maybe once we get critical mass they can join, otherwise they're on their own till tomorrow.In post 154, Iconeum wrote:This isn't a townbloc. This is purely self-preservation.Do you honestly think everyone who shot already is scum?If not, you seem very happy to not include them into your 'town circle'. If it's a townbloc, you'd be letting people in based off of reads and/or gut. Not having a shot left.
Exactly the point about not leaving it to individuals to act of their own. Let's have some collective unity as a town.In post 175, Varsoon wrote:Shit wait, he's probably a cit
Stating the blatantly obvious, the post you're referring to as a scum-slip objectively isn't so why do it? Apart from to push wedges between people and set up targets for mis-kills? (This is an all round silly post from either alignment)In post 192, Sando wrote:EBCs (my acronyms are better, mod) know that they win once they're the only faction, so if we're all EBCs then the game is over. You not realising this says you're not an ECB.
I do get the point of just shooting people who haven't posted as opposed to those who have in the early stages but it does minimise the information you end up with and your proposed shots list is far too long to even have a majority chance of hitting scum, even if by pure dumb luck all the scum were in it. Try developing some actual reads based on posts and tell people what you're thinking, worst case scenario then if you're town is that you're wrong but other people can glean information from what you're thinking. Super long lists like this make me think you want to LOOK like you're looking for scum without putting any effort in to solve the game.In post 223, Creature wrote:Recommended shots:
McMenno, Chickadee, Momrangal, Not_Mafia, Davsto, Austerity, randomidget, Kokichi Oma, SnarkySnowman, Vaxkiller, TheBrie, Harambey180, StefanB, light_ganski, Theta Alpine, katokashi, Archwing, wingedcatgirl, Gammagooey, Bins, ooba
Are you scum or just nihilistic?In post 235, Srceenplay wrote:Everyone is an echo bay cit.
it’s the apocalypse and it’s the last man standing wins.
Game broke you are welcome. Continue with your killing.
My bet is scum.
Thank you, thank you, thank you for talking sense. At the moment the most townie person in this game.In post 248, Taly wrote:Cool.
I wake up to see shots fired and quite a few people NOT following an ordered strategy, and all 6 of the people killed during this time flipped town.
>There's very minimal possible reason as to why they'd be shot this early, and there's no answer better than the other for the most part. WIFOM.
*If there's anyone that has any decent argument behind the motivation of a kill; then explain it to me, because I'm failing to find reasoning behind people dying.
>We did not get ANY valuable reads, or discussion from these killed people, because someone just shot randomly without really engaging.
Numerically, it's more difficult for town to win now since we've had plenty of townkills and very little reference over them.
Does anyone STILL want to keep "thinning the herd"?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Can't find a game in which we played together but you modded Micro 651, I was scum in that (where I accidently self hammered due to my post restriction, don't think I've played on this site since then)In post 574, Davsto wrote:@light_ganski - have we played together before? Your name and avatar seem familiar but I can't place which game exactly and the ones my instincts said you were in you weren't. Any chance you remember?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Catch Up Part Two: Pages 11-25
Taly gets more town the more I read. If you're not in the bloc and really have to shoot to satisfy some inner urge, let's try and hear why at least.In post 250, Taly wrote: See.
This shit right here is another reason why random shooting is bad.
Now we CAN'T figure out whyVarsoonbelievedIconeumwas a better shot and more likely scum.
Hmm, why not play to win as town? Scumread thisIn post 252, Gammagooey wrote:heya
taly you're not going to be particularly happy with this game if you take it as seriously as you are
Or, we could discuss our reads and vote as a group for who we want to kill next like we would in any other game. Mad idea I know, butIn post 253, Iconeum wrote:we can make a kill-list and begin to shoot it top down in order to control all killings. This works if there are enough of us so we can ninja the kill each time.
fp'd by crazy Taly and others
Good point but how would we do this?In post 263, Sando wrote:One thing I've been considering, at some point the mod's activity levels is gonna play a part of this game since kills need to get resolved before moving onto the next one. I'm assuming any scum have daychat so have the advantage in terms of coordination. Probably a decent idea for us to have a good handle on the xyzzy's activity habits before scum start exploiting it against us. Admittedly I dunno how they do that without painting a massive target on themselves...but still, worth considering.
I get this on the basis of not being able to extract information in these situations, but kills should still eb agreed on by the group if possibleIn post 266, Sando wrote:On the subject of mod activity, I think we implement a town-rule. Anyone submitting a kill within say 1 hour (at this player level this seems safe) of the mod resolving a kill should be the target of any towns kill.
ie, if you're on and you see someone shoot within an hour of a previous kill being resolved by mod, shoot the person that sent that kill and break any scum cycle that's happening.
Scummy why would you shoot people who haven't spoken at this stage.In post 273, Gammagooey wrote:i was hoping to do this before 10 pages of junk but just to let ya know
my plan is to absorb catharsis from this game like a sponge in an ever increasing pool of blood
Kill: Harambey180
Sidenote, why do people scum read overexplanation? I feel like I'm missing an obvious point on that but I've never really got itIn post 288, Iconeum wrote: I don't like the overexplanation you provide
There are entire pages of this game that are zero analysis I hate it (page 13 I'm looking at you)
In post 326, Creature wrote:Recommended shots:
Chickadee, Momrangal, Not_Mafia, Davsto, Austerity, randomidget, Kokichi Oma, SnarkySnowman, Vaxkiller, light_ganski, Theta Alpine, katokashi, Archwing, wingedcatgirl, Gammagooey, ooba
Updates: Removed Bins (and the already dead)
Already said how much I dislike just listing the inactive players to shoot. SCUMHUNT PLS.In post 327, Creature wrote:Though, it's more likely just half of the players there are scum.
No but his early stuff doesn't fill me with confidence (I'll come back to that)In post 336, Ausuka wrote:I kinda wanna dayvig Lovebird. Should I dayvig Lovebird?
Not good enough, why did you scumread him. Analysis before kills pleaseIn post 377, Lovebird wrote:Someone said I used my shot randomly, not true. I scumread ank.
Anyone saying "this is NAI for me" rubs me up the wrong way: if it is anyone could find that out from meta so why can't someone else point that out? JUst a minor concern thoughIn post 397, Davsto wrote:I could also show some meta to display how this is fairly NAI for me especially earlygame, or that setup spec and similar are arguably a way of scumhunting, but regardless of those your read is bad simply through the fact that the entire type of "scum have to fake scumhunting" reads are basically not relevant in multiball+traitor games.
In post 411, Srceenplay wrote: In my opinion it’s not a normal game of mafia. More like a party game to kill the time.FOS Srceenplaystop being anti-town, actually partake or don't bother
The worst being bulletproof might indicate traitor if it's multiball considering that the traitor that already flipped had a bulletproof but I'll confess that's only a suspicion
Part one definitely, but that still doesn't merit a shot that hasn't been voted on. Thank you for being pro-town and saying you'd discuss it though (townpoints for you)In post 434, Austerity wrote:Probably time to share what I was thinking. Scum have a LOT more to lose by getting shot than town do. So I think the PRICKS are likely to contain at least a few scum, probably more especially if there are multiple teams.
Gonna go back and look at the circumstances surrounding people joining. I may be willing to take a shot in there even knowing that it will get me shot-- although I'll definitely discuss and not just yoloherotime it. (Because that has worked out so well thus far.)
Is this townie though? Considering the number of people not wanting to take this game seriously I actually don't think so... by not putting up, she's not risking anything if she's scumIn post 449, Austerity wrote:Well, it shows that you prioritized humor over avoiding getting seen as scum.
That's something worth noting.
I actually quite like your point here, discussion kills are better but at least you actually care about finding scum.In post 451, Austerity wrote: I think it's a lot closer to removing a target on your head, the target being the threat of a random kill. Discussion-based kills are a lot closer to lynches which is something you can actually fight; if you get randomkilled, there's nothing you can do.
And just because town lolshooting isn't working out... doesn't mean they're going to stop doing it.
Obvious scum bluff would vote if he wasn't already deadIn post 499, SnarkySnowman wrote:Really didn't expect to live... I guess someone saved me???? :/
tempted to vengeance shoot Vax but I don't know if that's actually a helpful thing to do.
Can we please have more of you? <3In post 532, Taly wrote: In the same breath, I'm pretty aggravated with the game state. I feel like there's only a margin of people going with the voting idea, and I'm getting tired of being written off as"too helpful"or anything along the lines of being suspected because I'm putting inEFFORT.
Comes in, says nothing does nothing. Please contributeIn post 533, Not_Mafia wrote:22 pages fuck me
Agreed with Ausuka's assertion (post 547) that it's a multiball, which increases the possibility that the other bulletproof was another traitor? (the worst right?) Then again 3+ bulletproofs isn't unrealistic.
Townpoints for youIn post 547, Ausuka wrote: But right now, if I want anyone dead, it'd be Srceenplay. The gimmick where he insists we're all town just feels like a fake scum thing to me. It's overdone and he has far more conviction in it than what I think any townie should realistically have to the point where it's totally unnatural. Like, is 398 a real thought? It's basically Srceenplay engaging with the game normally except he adds "OH YEAH BTW WE'RE ALL TOWNIES LOL" at the end. Like, why write this as town who legitimately believes that we're all echo bay citizens? It'd be interesting to see what he does when he realises that he was wrong about us all being townies, in any case.
Why not do it yourself, after all you aren't in PRICKS... could be him just wanting someone else to take the fall if it goes wrongIn post 548, StefanB wrote:I completly agree with the shot of Srccenplay, please someone do it!!!!IGMEOY
Happy to join people on this, have made my point about his anti-town play alreadyIn post 570, Taly wrote:1)You've made no assertion at all about any of the BP claims.
2)Thanks for ignoring me, andVax/TWfor being sensible, andStefanB/Ausukafor directing a post about you.
3)You've already used your shot, so this is a borderline shitpost. 29
VOTE: Screenplay
If anyone wants a shot onScreenplay, I encourage votes here. I'm still pushing for the Vote Count idea even thoughSandoandStefanBare the only people that's recognized its existence.
Remember playing with him before I left this site for a while, might not be AI for him but I'd really like to see more as wellIn post 570, Taly wrote:Not_Mafiaalso posted in other places before even daring to look at this thread. His debut post was unbelievably underwhelming. 553
1)Do you have a strategy for the town to go about this gamestate, or do you agree/disagree with the ones stated? Why?
2)Thoughts on shooters that are alive?
Definitely confbias but I see your point, gonna ISO him once I'm done with this postIn post 573, Davsto wrote:
Maybe it's just sorta the fact that my theory for Mom!scum involved them being BP and they turned out BP that's making me see it as a bit of a confirmation so maybe it has the potential to be a little biased. I still think they're scummy regardless. It's just a final little bit that settles it for me yk?In post 570, Taly wrote:Also, I don't think it's known whether or not being BP is AI? I highly doubt it is, so I'm iffy here.
Townpoints for you too
How do you suggest PRICKS decide on who kills? (I do get why this is though)In post 598, the worst wrote:
Literally anti town and anti WANKERS for me to explain in more detail rn sorry.In post 589, Sando wrote:
What then? If we leave it up to whoevers online then the scum in the block are gonna just flake out on using their kills, admittedly a tell but not one I'm really confident on reading. We could vote on the shooter I guess, but admin, urgh. I mean it matters not D1, but I think we should have a process in place for D2 onwards.In post 585, the worst wrote:NOPE
Ah thanks for clearing that upIn post 611, Lovebird wrote:
You misread. Ank said it was fluff. That was me disagreeing.In post 572, light_ganski wrote:I don't think so...?
This gal's giving me bad vibes on the basis that he's scum-reading people trying to implement ordered, townie strategies.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
'Twas for the best.
Thanks for the explanation, and I now agree, but only on later days. Today/probably tomorrow we'll ensure the maximum of discussion.In post 636, Sando wrote:
As to the second point about shooting back at opportunistic kills post-resolve, my fear is that in later days scum are going to draw up a kill-list and just run through it to win the game. They can co-ordinate within themselves and know the mod activity, and they can artificially create their own end-game. 5 scum and 7 town left, scum just shoot 5 times in a row and we're left with 5 scum and 2 town, nothing townies can do at that point in time.In post 626, light_ganski wrote:I get this on the basis of not being able to extract information in these situations, but kills should still eb agreed on by the group if possible
To stop this, the only option is to break the cycle, town need to be on top of it and kill the over-eager submitter, without waiting for everyone to get on board with it, since that'll take too long and scumplan comes to fruition.
Not something to be concerned about D1 I don't think, but something town need to keep in mind in later days.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Not Mafia's entire ISO. Was gonna look at some others first but this one is most... to the pointIn post 533, Not_Mafia wrote:22 pages fuck me[/quoteIn post 628, Not_Mafia wrote:Don't tell people what they can't beIn post 743, Not_Mafia wrote:
You activated my trap cardIn post 741, Bins wrote:i think not mafia is scum cause he hasn’t shot yet
Shoot: Bins
The worst part is, is this even AI for him?
I hate this game- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
In post 713, Creature wrote:Notable slankers:
Not_Mafia
Austerity
hebichan
Theta Alpine
katokashi
wingedcatgirl
Comparing PRICKS with creature's slacker list (I don't disagree with it for the most part), I'd add randomidget to the slacker list too.In post 657, Sando wrote:PRICKS (and sometimes WANKERS and PRANKERS) members:
Sando
Taly
the worst
Iconeum
TheBrie
Chickadee
Wingedcatgirl
Theta Alpine
light_ganski
If we're considering that scum are more likely than not to have held their shots (though I wouldn't give TOO much weight to this), and that there's going to be at least a couple of scum on PRICKS for the sake of keeping out of the firing line, I'd lean scum on anyone who hasn't contributed much but is also on PRICKS. (Call me on this if it's bad logic though)
Other than those, on PRICKS I like the look of Sando and Taly. Both contributing and working and I've already addressed that in my walls. Not as sure what to think of the worst, lots of low content posts > makes me iffy but there's far worse people. TheBrie's not been as active, and most of her content's been focussed on shot analysis - though I see nothing wrong with that, 704 and 707 are constructive. Iconeum's been low energy, made several posts espousing the need for PRICKS and refused to give explanation for reads (265). Chickadee's said sod all too.
So townreading sando, taly, creature.
Town lean the worst for now.
Genuinely struggling to town read most others here.
At the frustrating point where I want to policy kill anti town actors but in this mess it'll probably do nothing for us.
My gut wants NM to go, my head wants to hear more from him. Though I'd like to see srceen bleed
Theta alpine, you're on PRICKS but you've not said much about people yet. What are you thinking? (and that goes for anyone else who isn't giving detailed thoughts tbh)
If people have questions give me them, I need something to help get me thinking- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Who would you shoot out of his first pool? (with a reasoned argument)In post 793, Srceenplay wrote:
I don’t.In post 792, the worst wrote:I like Theta's list tbh
There is a person in each of his pools I’m willing to shoot.
I quite like the lists myself- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Sorting this player list is a nightmare but here we go
Town Bloc > ie. Shooting here warrants a shot from whoever's online
Taly - Probably the most constructive player in the game, has been sensible, made realistic arguments for who's town or scum (and is trying to sort people as town as well as scum), plus about the only person who gave their reasons for shooting someone
Sando - Looking for town not just scum and I give that great credit in this mess
Theta Alpine - Came in late, would like to see more but has been thoughtful and considered and has put forward who he thinks is town as well
Ausuka - Like 547 and 843, and agree with the point about srceenplay (864)
Davsto - I like this one, feels like a strong town analyser to me
Weaker town/in the middle > Will not shoot today BUT would like to improve my read of before I'd town bloc them
StefanB - Constructive
Vaxkiller - Not ready to townbloc but I don't see much reason why he'd be scum either. I would like to see a readslist or something similar here just so I know what you're thinking
The Worst - Feels genuine to me
TheBrie - Yes I'd like to see more, but I like what analysis this one has posted
Weak scum (PLEASE INTERACT)
Austerity - Really hasn't said enough that I get info from and I don't like that
Chickadee - 846 / 856, claims that Nero will likely kill him from meta, yet doesn't use then expectation he's gonna die soon to actually contribute. Seems to be disengaging whilst claiming he isn't disengaging
Lovebird - Not a fan of anything she's said, really
Wingedcatgirl - ANOTHER low energy player. Ughhh
Momrangal - Really not sure what to think on this one... null (can someone tl;dr the debate around her pls)
Nero Cain - Waiting on the replacement to be active before moving this off null
Stronger Scum Reads AND Anti-Town Players
Srceenplay- Anti-town. The everyones town joke was passable at first, but 411, 434 and his shot indicates an anti-town mindset. Can't reach D2
Not Mafia- Seems to not give a shit, the king of all lurkers, known from meta as an anti-town player in general who can't be trusted D2
Iconeum - Anyone who refuses to read people (265) and scumreads explanation (702) is a red flag for me
Randomigdet - Where are you? 3 nothing posts
Archwing - Has only posted to complain about the length of the game and moan, to the point where I'd forgotten he was in the game
BBMolla - The above two points apply
Open for questions if there are any- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Aye I think this is the right strategy, discuss among PRICKS where we should put our shotsIn post 886, Sando wrote:
Yep, end of day, chat with PRICKS and people you trust and if you get a quorum I think go for it.In post 883, the worst wrote:I'd say shoot people who we think are scummy.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
^seconded all of those questionsIn post 915, TheBrie wrote:
I do not understand what you said there. So I'll just repeat my question with more details.In post 906, Sando wrote:
No more that potentially having to publicise it makes it not so useful at all? I think it's a good idea but I haven't fully thought through the implications yet and putting it out there for others to think about too.In post 884, TheBrie wrote:Seems sort of reasonable. But how could the list work if it's not publicized?
How does anyone know they'll be shot unless they forfeit their shot, if the list isn't public?
Also, unless this is just one person's list, it has to be settled in public.
This sounds like a completely unworkable idea- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Has random actually said anything else yet?In post 1132, Theta Alpine wrote:
right now random and bbmollaToranaga wrote: what are your wolfreads?
pretty sure at least one of them is scum
pEdit: Nopeeeee... why did I even bother ISOing then- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Just an aside, low post still alive players... other than Magna (him plus BBmolla = 17 posts), no one has more than one post less than you. So by that logic you'd still be a reasonable targetIn post 1192, Iconeum wrote: I think the shot is best spent on the low-post still alive players, so we can actually play a game on D2 with a manageable number of players. Yes, this is actually pro-town.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
In post 1274, Taly wrote:...and the apathy level is going up again...- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Basically, my logic behind the Not mafia kill:In post 1210, StefanB wrote:Bins was speculating that Not_Mafia was scum because he hadn't shoot yet.
Then Not_Mafia killed her.
Then a long time later (There were quite some shoots between Bins dead and the shoot of Not_Mafia) light_Ganski shoot him. (There were a lot of post from Light_Ganski if I remember correctly where she did mention Not_Mafia)
Thats how I remember the whole dead of Not_Mafia.
Was already wanting to shoot him or srceenplay, hopefully both for obvious reasons. Preferred a Not Mafia shot cos I know what he's like with randomly hammering and general anti-town play, and he didn't seem to give a damn about the game, so didn't think it would be good if he somehow slipped through the net D1. Shot on that hunch and got lucky.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Okay first thoughts:
Regarding the nightkills: this implies to me 2 teams and a serial killer as opposed to three teams. Firstly, the flavour implies this; we already know of grits and munitions companies and the existence of an 'executor' (which does not imply a second team in my opinion). Secondly, considering the number of relatively baseless/random shots people have taken I find it statistically unlikely that we haven't hit a third scumteam, whereas only one serial killer would have to slip through.
Secondly whilst I like Austerity's suggestion I don't see any reason that scum would co-operate? Firstly, if we're considering each team has 3-4 members it would suggest there's still several alive, and it would be more beneficial to them to shoot outside of themselves and get shot if we did this than waiting patiently to get shot or shoot their partners? And secondly, if there IS a third team it is possible the teams already have a majority in combination in which case we actually need the scum teams to shoot at each other in order to win this (and scum will need to shoot each other to win as well), so they would have no incentive to shoot at OUR reads but their own.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
The fact that xyzzy explicitly suggests BPs and strongmen in the rules but no other special roles suggests not
Though they have said (1458) that not all mechanics are public so it's not impossible
I'dprobablybet on SK > third team > vig though (over vig on that, over third team based on my explanation in 1463)- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Trying to sort my thoughts out here
Not in any particular order:
Townier players
Fairly confident townread now on vax
Gammagooey looks better and better through D1 and I think he's town
Davsto and StefanB as well
Scummier players
Ausuka - this is what I mean about not. Being. Able. To. Townread. Players. In. This. Game/ This is not by any means a confident scumread but there's something in my gut niggling me about this one
Theta Alpine strikes me as apossiblesecond partner to taly? Its a weak af read but those two's TRs of each other don't look at all natural
Austerity and wingedcatgirl both feel like lacklustre scum, not really rocking the boat or pushing anything hard (case in point wingedcatgirl's unnecessary hesitation in her D1 shot, I get caution and discussion because I'm generally a cautious player but this strikes me as scared scum)
Lovebird is likely scum. The disagreements with taly D1 doesn't strike me as townie vs scum but as one team vs the other and her entry today screams "I'm bragging about shooting scum". Ergo she is the most likely munitions goon I am seeing atm. The fact she DIDN'T just shoot me straight outmarginallyimproves my opinion of this slot but I'm still highly suspicious
Spoiler: PRICKS question
Second post coming up- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Sorry all I'm terrible at writing posts quickly, but I'm concerned *someone* is gonna shoot me unnecessarily and I won't be able to get all my thoughts out and I have some highly pertinent points to make here that no one else has brought up properly yet
So to the mysterious third nightkill.
First of all I do NOT buy the idea of there being a night vigilante in this setup, if anyone has reasons otherwise do tell us.
So that leaves us with SK or third scum team. I'm not completely ruling out the possibility of the latter, but I find it unlikely considering:
- > What we already know from the setup and flavour, it is strongly suggested that there are only two teams representing the two companies (grits and munitions) AND that flavour suggests the existence of a singular 'executioner' character (less so the second point but its still relevant)
> The lack of strongman flips OR kills: we had one NK (TheBrie) that was presumably carried out by a strongman but none of the scum yet flipped were strongmen, and no-one has been strongman-killed during the day phase. This is weak evidence for there only being a strongman SK as opposed to there being strongmen on the scum teams (though I accept this is a much weaker point)
- > Firstly, whilst avoiding the day one shitshotshow is beneficial no matter your alignment its vital as SK... if you die you've lost. So whilst I don't think PRICKS membership is alignment indicative as to town vs group!scum,it is highly likely that the SK was within PRICKS
> Secondly, in a single-ball game, playing as SK is considered so difficult and anti-fun by many players precisely because they've got to look townie enough not to be a lynch target and not townie enough or threatening enough to be an NK target. But in a game with at least two factions, where some players believe there's a third faction, and where it is possible other factions have traitors as grits had one, looking scummy is likely to draw shots from scum looking for the other team or looking to recruit their traitor (it was confirmed in signups this game had recruiting traitors, correct?). Thereby, an SK would best fulfil their win conditions by playing townie and not drawing scumreads
- > There is the explicit possibility in the sign up thread for multiple shot bulletproofs, and the worst has already claimed to be one, yet no other multiple shot bullet proofs have been flipped and as far as I recall there's no one else alive who a shot has failed on, which suggests that there is a dearth of 2+ shot BPs in this game
Because it would make sense for ONLY the SK to get extra BP shots, as if they don't in this set up their win condition (killing everyone else) is significantly more difficult to reach
Let me draw your attention to 1429:
I believe it is highly likely, as I have set out, that ONLY the SK has multiple BP shots, and ONLY the SK is a strongman.In post 1429, the worst wrote:we have had exactly zero non-1-shot and exactly zero strongman flips
discuss
The worst fits the profile of how I would expect a serial killer to play in this game. He has been generally townread and played an upfront open game, making more posts than any other player and generally being one of the more well-explained players. He was one of the earliest members of PRICKS (see 167, 169). He is also claimed two-shot bulletproof, and appears to believe he is the only one (1436).
At this point I amfairlyconfident in reading the worst as serial killer, but obviously I would like to see what others think of this and I will not be depriving myself of my shot on him anytime soon. Open for comment.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Very fair point, if I didn't think you were SK. But this reads of misdirection to me: "let's look for group!scum (which we're already doing) because I'm not group!scum so people won't shoot at me and I'll survive to endgame with unspent BP shot(s)"In post 1485, the worst wrote:also highly disinterested in hunting for a serial killer until we have 1+ more groupscum flip, minimum.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
AtEIn post 1487, the worst wrote:damnit ganski I thought you were cool.- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Usually I would agree but IMO we've already got enough information to deduce the SK's existenceIn post 1493, the worst wrote:"let's shoot scum with associatives first then if we don't win the game shoot other scumfucks"- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
This setup seems unlikely to me (vs scum teams with 3/4 members), and even if it turns out to be correct I don't want to presume we've got all of the grits, I don't want a nasty surprise in that regardIn post 1525, Vaxkiller wrote:SO here is how I see it.
There were 3scumbad factions and now there are 2
Flips
2 grits goons plus a grit traitor 1 shot BP
1 munitions goon
???
So with 1 team completely wiped (I can only assume so. I cant imagine a 4 person scum team with 3 factions with what we have left... unless the rest of you are all scum, which is mind boggling) This gives us a good idea of what to expect with the other scum teams.
With 11 people alive, if the other teams follow the same exact setup, it means we would have 5 scum left (seems unlikely)
Im thinking the munitions scum team may consist of a goon + Strongman (and only be 2 ppl)
And the third team could be the same OR consist of 2 goons and a traitor."I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
/Also think SK is more likely than third team"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
I think that point was a misunderstanding of "there are mafia team(s) with at least 2 goons" as "the mafia teams ONLY have 2 goons"In post 1550, StefanB wrote:Rereading Lovebirds ISO I see what people meaned.
There was also a very early point about most scum are traitors, tell me where that came from?
Though I am fine with a lovebird shot too atm. Her activity today (and she's posted quite a few times) consists of bragging about the taly shot (1385, 1386, 1387), making a list in which she seems to want most people shot (1393) without reasoning, and threatening to shoot me (1473) without feeling the need to divulge why"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
That wasn't a terrible shot though
If you want to hipshoot people for hitting your townreads, can you please make those reads more clear? I had to go back to D1 to find any evidence of you TRing wcg"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
1 makes no sense to meIn post 1596, the worst wrote: we have a maximum of 9 shots left d2.
mechanically shooting me is great but
contextually shooting me is a scum claim.
1. groupscum have to kill me to remove SK WIFOM
2. SK has to kill me because I'll out who they are d3
why?"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Disregard that last post I get what you mean from 1608
I'm too slow"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
In post 1644, xyzzy wrote:[/color]Theta Alpine, Echo Bay Munitions Co. goon, has died.Yous have made my morning
Feeling a LOT better about lovebird after the theta shot and flip, my working assumption was love as likely munitions and theta as possible grits so this makes her a lot townier in my eyes"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
I think 5 town, 2 munitions, 0 grits, 1 SK is also possibleIn post 1654, Ausuka wrote:3 town, 3 munitions, 1 grits, 1 SK?"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Wait lemme read it again"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
I feel like it *could* be the full death flavour, but I'm not saying that for certain"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
Tbh I wasn't reading theta as a likely partner for NM either, but ymmv
The fact he did flip munitions is why I'm feeling lovebird as more likely town now"I wld also argue that I have seen avocados with more passion" - pirate mollie
Currently running911: What's Your Emergency?- light_ganski
-
light_ganski Goon
- light_ganski
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 899
- Joined: April 11, 2016
- Location: In a hallucinatory state induced by chronic sleep deprivation and 13 tabs of acid
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski
- light_ganski