In post 46, Ankamius wrote:Oh Cheeky got shot.
Srceen can be town, then.
UNVOTE: CheekyTeeky
VOTE: Sando
I feel like this comes from scumIn post 52, Ankamius wrote:Eddie's right that Cheeky's Ari shot was really scummy, so I already feel townish on him.
Same as mafia month. Just because you might not do it, doesnst' mean you shouldn't try.In post 72, Chickadee wrote:Why are we trying to be serious and game solve this early?
NoIn post 78, Ankamius wrote:Have you played with Aristophanes before?In post 73, Lovebird wrote:In post 46, Ankamius wrote:Oh Cheeky got shot.
Srceen can be town, then.
UNVOTE: CheekyTeeky
VOTE: SandoI feel like this comes from scumIn post 52, Ankamius wrote:Eddie's right that Cheeky's Ari shot was really scummy, so I already feel townish on him.
Doesn't seem like people getting away with it so far.In post 89, Bins wrote:if I was scum i'd shoot just because id get away with itIn post 77, Lovebird wrote:I wonder if the random shots are more towny than scummy
Why?
Can come from scumIn post 93, Almost50 wrote:Yeah! Scum who's trying to break the game and minimize the casualties.In post 85, Lovebird wrote:I think taly also seems like scum
What?In post 96, Ankamius wrote:Try shooting him then, see how long you live after that.
Tell people to stop random shooting and do strategy postsIn post 102, Gorkington wrote:how do i make myself look obviously town
But, you already proved this wrong by hard defending taly.
Towny
Why did you vote sandoIn post 111, Ankamius wrote:I came into this game expecting to be dead early on day one anyways so I might as well do something useful while I'm here.
In post 22, Sando wrote:@Taly, let's make a townbloc mmmk.
You state you'll shoot anyone that shoots me, I've stated I'm shooting your shooter. As people join townbloc we create a circle of protection via mutually assured destruction. People without a shot left can't join, since they can't "protect" anyone else.
Keen?
Fluff?In post 33, Sando wrote:Townbloc is sort of a misnomer, more a non-shooty-bloc.In post 30, Taly wrote:Let me make sure of how this plays out-
We protect each other by shooting who shoots us.
People who don't join the townbloc and wavelength with the protection won't be apart of this.
My biggest worry is, how would we have a strong idea someone is town who assures protection/a shot against a shooter? It's a bit early to form reads.
Step 1: Person A says they'll shoot anyone who shoots person B. Person B says they'll shoot whoever shoots person A. Thus anyone wanting to shoot A or B gets shot themselves.
Step 2: Person C wants to join. A shoots anyone shooting B, B shoots anyone shooting C, C shoots anyone shooting A. Thus you have circular protection.
Step 3: Keep extending this out as people join.
If we decide that someone in the bloc needs to die, we just nominate someone to shoot them, I'll take that as first responsibility if required.
That said, I think this would work if we just all said "we'll shoot anyone that shoots into the bloc" without the whole circle thing, but I'm just spitballing at this point.
TownyIn post 114, Almost50 wrote:True story: Someone's up at 5+ in the morning, playing mafia and watching Star Wars: The Force Awakens.
Hint: It's NOT because they want to play nor is it because they want to watch the movie. It's called insomnia
Maybe gork flips scum.In post 122, Ankamius wrote:Why are you waiting for a flip?
In response to me?In post 126, Ankamius wrote:Ok
That has nothing to do with my alignment but go ahead and posture I guess.
Probably benefits scum, but comes from towny thought process I think.In post 136, TheBrie wrote:I would have thought random shots were more scummy. At least they benefit scum unless they hit town by chance, and scum isn't going to shoot scum, but may very well shoot a townie under the pretence of randomness.In post 77, Lovebird wrote:I wonder if the random shots are more towny than scummy
Or they may just not be thinking this through.
Thinking too surface level. Loses to scum just going for looking towny.In post 572, light_ganski wrote:Comes more from town though... scum wouldn't be trying to find strategies to hit more scum?
No. Of course not.In post 572, light_ganski wrote:So your strategy is to FoS anyone who looks townie early on? I was always under the impression that if you think someone looks like a townie its more likely they're town than the reverse.
You misread. Ank said it was fluff. That was me disagreeing.In post 572, light_ganski wrote:I don't think so...?
This gal's giving me bad vibes on the basis that he's scum-reading people trying to implement ordered, townie strategies.
In post 846, Chickadee wrote:Well I guess that means I will die soon.
@thebrie not mafia is a known troll and plays to troll. He will shoot on a whim regardless of reasons. This kind of game was probably just calling his name for the lols
In post 72, Chickadee wrote:Why are we trying to be serious and game solve this early?
In post 267, Chickadee wrote:Wow. A lot of kills while i slept. Can’t say I’m surprised.
Varsoon hasn’t slipped yet right? Varsoon if you around and still alive why would you have rather shot iconium?
In post 269, Chickadee wrote:There’s too many flips for me to keep track of what’s resolved :Dead:
In post 511, Chickadee wrote:Soooooo Vax just potentially got someone to waste their shot. Noted.
In post 520, Chickadee wrote:Oooo we're not all town! Confirmed now.
In post 830, Chickadee wrote:What did I just come back to?????
What associationIn post 954, StefanB wrote:Lovebird: She has asociation with flipped scum, I more and more think she is scum.
It's not entire ISO, just posts I think show she's scummy.In post 964, Davsto wrote:Lovebird (a weaker one here but a lot of posts and not a huge amount to any of them. Stuff like saying "hmm Chickadee could be scum going by her ISO", posting her entire ISO and.. not saying a word actually about it. Maybe it's playstyle so I'd have to have a little metadive but it's odd.)
How can I take them out of context if I didn't even say anything about them?In post 973, Chickadee wrote:All of those quotes are taken out of context, and brought back with no context (commentary).
Also slipped should be flipped here. I feel like that really changes the meaning. I didn't see it until just now.In post 952, Lovebird wrote:In post 267, Chickadee wrote:Wow. A lot of kills while i slept. Can’t say I’m surprised.
Varsoon hasn’t slipped yet right? Varsoon if you around and still alive why would you have rather shot iconium?
Idk if I even could explain it. Just, thought I'd quote to show what I'm looking at.In post 975, Davsto wrote:Fair enough. But you still haven't explained any of them and it's not like they're the kind of quotes that go without explanation - sure the first and second are pretty bad I guess, and the third and fifth are a little dodgy, but I don't even get what you're saying is wrong with the fourth and last. It hardly needs an essay, just something there.In post 967, Lovebird wrote:It's not entire ISO, just posts I think show she's scummy.In post 964, Davsto wrote:Lovebird (a weaker one here but a lot of posts and not a huge amount to any of them. Stuff like saying "hmm Chickadee could be scum going by her ISO", posting her entire ISO and.. not saying a word actually about it. Maybe it's playstyle so I'd have to have a little metadive but it's odd.)
In post 520, Chickadee wrote:Oooo we're not all town! Confirmed now.
I guess feels like "oh no, doctor is dead" thing.In post 830, Chickadee wrote:What did I just come back to?????
Lol. Unbelievably wrong.
Oh nooo, didn't write 5 paragraph essay, must be scumIn post 1300, Taly wrote:3) 948 to 952 are nothing but say that Chick is scum for little to no reason.
You're ignoring context I said that in.In post 1300, Taly wrote:958 seems like survivalistic posting, given they aren't making any attempt to push their reads or ideas. They mostly just shade others while ignoring any attempt to townbloc.
Ya I'm prodging don't think there's much to do with no votes or no shots.In post 1304, Taly wrote:Their "Mother's Day" post was sympathetic and I believe it's outside-game genuine; but in-game, it reads as a prodg
Definitely rightIn post 1329, Austerity wrote:I don't actually think he's incredibly likely to flip scum-- as in, I wouldn't be surprised if he flipped town.In post 1324, Taly wrote:I do see the likelihood thatIconeumis scum, I just haven't found a lot of reasoning that explicitly points to that. I've stated multiple reasons behind my recommended shots and nobody's given a major opinion about them. I'd rather see people actually state their thoughts behind someone-scum versus"yeah, I want him to die"
But the argument for shooting him is just that it's very unlikely that, if he is town, he will ever be able to get to the point where people are confident he is town.
In a nightless game, you deal with the question marks sooner rather than later because that's the only way to weed out scum hiding in the townreads.
Reasoning has nothing to do with alignment. If you think that you'll lynch town nonstop and get tricked by reasonable scum nonstop.In post 1331, Taly wrote:I'm sorry, but in what world does it occur to you to just shoot the one person defending a reasoned townread in a game that can easily become chaotic? They've made their reads and thought process clear and you shot them because... they didn't agree with you? I still don't know why?
Lol.But it's great to know that you're only concerned with posting WHEN someone suspects you.
In post 111, Ankamius wrote:I came into this game expecting to be dead early on day one anyways so I might as well do something useful while I'm here.
In post 112, Lovebird wrote:Towny
Why did you vote sandoIn post 111, Ankamius wrote:I came into this game expecting to be dead early on day one anyways so I might as well do something useful while I'm here.
In post 113, Ankamius wrote:Pure fluff posting
In post 115, Lovebird wrote:In post 22, Sando wrote:@Taly, let's make a townbloc mmmk.
You state you'll shoot anyone that shoots me, I've stated I'm shooting your shooter. As people join townbloc we create a circle of protection via mutually assured destruction. People without a shot left can't join, since they can't "protect" anyone else.
Keen?Fluff?In post 33, Sando wrote:Townbloc is sort of a misnomer, more a non-shooty-bloc.In post 30, Taly wrote:Let me make sure of how this plays out-
We protect each other by shooting who shoots us.
People who don't join the townbloc and wavelength with the protection won't be apart of this.
My biggest worry is, how would we have a strong idea someone is town who assures protection/a shot against a shooter? It's a bit early to form reads.
Step 1: Person A says they'll shoot anyone who shoots person B. Person B says they'll shoot whoever shoots person A. Thus anyone wanting to shoot A or B gets shot themselves.
Step 2: Person C wants to join. A shoots anyone shooting B, B shoots anyone shooting C, C shoots anyone shooting A. Thus you have circular protection.
Step 3: Keep extending this out as people join.
If we decide that someone in the bloc needs to die, we just nominate someone to shoot them, I'll take that as first responsibility if required.
That said, I think this would work if we just all said "we'll shoot anyone that shoots into the bloc" without the whole circle thing, but I'm just spitballing at this point.
In post 117, Ankamius wrote:Yes that's fluff lol
In post 118, Ankamius wrote:Shoot: Gorkington
I'm going to be dead by the time I'm home from work tomorrow so I want somebody fun to talk to in the dead thread.
Have a good night everyone!
In post 120, Lovebird wrote:Waiting for flip to shoot ank.
How is saying that your reasons for scumreading don't actually catch scum not engaging with pointsIn post 1331, Taly wrote:You keep trying to degrade and write off my reasons for suspecting you without actually engaging with the points I made.
Why does talking to the person I scumread matter?In post 1331, Taly wrote:You could've easily engaged with me, directly talked to Chick, or any specific scumread you've had in this game.
