Mini 2011: Partition Mafia (Game Over)
Forum rules
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Lol this game would destroy any mislynch records.
Yeah putting me and wisdom and koki in one group is a trap.
But only nsg, wisdom, koki, and I would know that.
Would be really ballsy to make the biggest group all town because it's scarier for town to lynch the biggest group. I think we might be looking at 2 scum 3 townies.
I think it was a deliberate move to put us together in one group. So I want to lynch either group 1 or group 2 because I don't know anyone in group 3.
If you are an alt in group 3 expose your main.. unless you're chicken.
FREEEEEDOM! VOTE: Group 2
Guessing it's 2 scum 3 townies. Meaning lose 3 to get 2. Leaving a group of all townies and a group where you would lose 3 to get just 1 scum. Group 2 is the way to go.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
I am inclined to agree with thisIn post 47, zMuffinMan wrote:i do think "i would prefer..." is more natural from town than "i'm town and would prefer..." though, especially in a setup like this where, with the current split at least, town dies D1 no matter what
But the rest of your post is a little ehhh because well.. words < actions. Kind of easy to say something like that when you aren't actually in the group of your biggest scumread.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
In post 53, Wisdom wrote:Its troubling me than other than kokichi everyone else in 2 interpreted the grouping like I did, but its still the case
Im put in 2 so we dont lynch 2
Do we or do we not lynch 2?
Getting mixed signals- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
That is slightly worrying. I would have thought other groups would be interested in voting for 2 also. I don't know if this confirms the idea that town would be afraid to lynch the biggest group, and therefore we have more scum in 2 than out, OR if scum did go the ballsier route and put 5 townies in one group but they don't want to ne caught pushing it.In post 79, Wisdom wrote:
Problem with that is only people from 2 are pushing itIn post 62, Pine wrote:2 has been too easy to push
Here's a real tinfoil theory not real men's 5 posts that I admit I may not have understood but all seem to say the same thing:
As far as I can see only group 1 was pushed by someone not in the group. What if that's because group 1 contains 2 scum and their partner the 3rd scum is pushing it for WIFOM?
That said.. I am pinged a little by realmen and muffin. Feels to me like they're pulling some 'too scummy to be scum' shenanigans to get town cred. But I can't see why they would themselves together in one of the smaller groups AND bring attention to themselves like that. Is that what he's talking about when he says REAL MEN? Becauase it sure as shit would be ballsy.
All in all I'd say my preference is group 2 >> group 3 >> group 1
I think there's a big chance group 1 has 1 scum in it (1, 1, 1 or 1,0,2 or 1,2,0 are imo the different possibilities we're dealing with) but activity wise seems to be the towniest group.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Missing word 'put'In post 135, BuJaber wrote:But I can't see why theyputwould themselves together in one of the smaller groups- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
So nobody in group 1 is voting for group 1?
@Cake - yes I think so. I think muffin and RMOJ were trying to wind people up. I'm not saying it's necessarily scummy but it's anti-town. RMOJ also used a whole lot of words to basically say "scum must be in group 3 because they put me in group 3". (If I misunderstood tell me but I think that's a concise summary of all of his theories). This is more or less what anybody who voted for their own group has said, so why did RMOJ need to do it in a 'showy' way?- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Bah.. it's 1/1/1 split isn't it... group 1 votes for group 3 group 2 votes for group 2 group 3 votes for group 1 because scum don't have to influence town all groups are pretty much the same to them they want to leave the choice to town. I also suspect that the scum in group 1/group 3 are from the late posters.
RMOJ/fitz/pine ? Seems the most likely team if 1/1/1 split
Maybe dramonic/koki/nsg
Because I don't like how dramonic called koki "japanese name person".
Pine and nsg because both sort of implied they'd be ballsy with the split if scum. I find it hard to believe 2 townies would say the same thing.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
*regarding how they would play as scum.In post 167, BuJaber wrote:Pine and nsg because both sort of implied they'd be ballsy with the split if scum. I find it hard to believe 2 townies would say the same thing- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Unfortunately this is partition mafia so I wouldn't be voting foryouI'd be voting for your entire group. And I'm still unsure if that's the best group to lynch because there's still plenty of good resons to vote for my own group.
Also I've convinced myself that group 1 must contain 1 scum. So there's 1/3 chance your group has 0 scum.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
In post 187, DeasVail wrote:But I'm also a bit perplexed by the over-the-top group talk here. Sure, I get that it's the theme of the game but I struggle to understand the relevance of statements like "No one not from Group 2 is voting for Group 2". I don't get the point! There arethree scum, not 10.
That's sort of the point.
You'd think that if group 2 had 2 scum in it then you'd expect at least some of the 7 townies not in group 2 to have some suspicion regarding group 2.
Ignoring the mild dissing of our scum abilities muffin has a point about so many of us group 2 'ers voting for our group.
Which leads to another reason why RMOJ pings me. He is
a) the only one to make a big deal about him self-voting
b) arbitrarirly picking which among the self-voters is a "REAL MAN"
And c) changed his definition of manliness when he started taunting me to vote for his group claiming THAT would be the ballsy option.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
So by PoE you are putting dramon and fitz in the town pile.
I'm not comfortable dropping my suspicion of them yet.
It would be okay if fitz was also in group 3 but him being a suspect brings all 3 groups into play.
And I have sneaking suspicion that if it's a 1/1/1 split then nsg is behind it. (Obviously they can't be together in that case)- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
@riku - how difficult is it to read kokichi's name, and call him koki? Especially when seeing everyone else calling him that. I just got a sense that he's doing it to downplay how much contact he has had with koki.
@nsg -
Based on individual reads:
From most supicious to least:
dramon and RMOJ.
Koki, pine and fitz
Riku, nsg,
DV, Eddie, muffin
Cake, wisdom
But based on voting behavior I'm a little paranoid about lynching group 3 because several have expressed interest in doing so. Also I can't shake the feeling that group 2 was purposefully made the largest group. I mean yeah it's the most even split you can get which also may suggest 1/1/1 split, but still they put an interesting combination of players in it and I just don't think it was random. Group 1 is the least active in general which makes it difficult to deal with. Unlike a normal game I don't think scum would want to avoid the discussion here as much as in a normal game. I'm inclined to townread the inactivity.
The other thing that makes me not want to lynch group 3 is that my scumread on RMOJ sort of depends on him having a partner in group 3. If there is only 1 scum in group 3 then it most likely isn't him. Because I don't think he would have been so explicit about voting for his own group if he were alone in there. I think if scum he is using a mix of reverse psychology and wifom to make us avoid voting for group 3; and I just don't think it's worth the risk to do so unless there are 2 scum in group 3.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Sorry this was a response to Cake not riku.In post 259, BuJaber wrote:@riku - how difficult is it to read kokichi's name, and call him koki? Especially when seeing everyone else calling him that. I just got a sense that he's doing it to downplay how much contact he has had with koki- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
It implies he forgot the actual name.In post 265, SirCakez wrote:I don't think this makes much sense. How does saying "japanese name person" downplay contact?
@fitz - If G1 has 1 scum then G3 has either 0 or 1 or 2. So 1/3 chance of having 0.
Late to posting meant posting after most have already posted. I didn't know about your weekend drop in activity. That said if you see my recent posts I've begun to lean towards townreading inactivity in a game like this. Though now I know that's NAI for you either way.
I really like your 266. It shows some similar trains of thought I've had myself. And if any group is going to have 0 scum it would be yours.
Are people serious about the pr claims? I thought this was confirmed all vanilla/goons?- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
So theoretically we could have day PRs.In post 1, implosion wrote:This game is pseudo-nightless. The mafia have a 1-shot nightkill that they may use any night after night 0. They may not use their kill if it would cause the mafia to have as many players alive as there are town players alive. There are no other killing abilities in the game. There are no other night actions in the game.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
People talking about how scumsided this is or whatever.. you are assuming our ability to find scum remains the same throughout when it should get better as every lynch is more educated than the lynch before it.
Not that it matter because scumsided or not we all signed up for this game and have to play it. You can complain about balance later. Tell me where the 3 scum are. That's all that matters.
Riku - I never said it wasn't reachy. It was an early game read. It is inherently less evidence based than late game reads. But if I turn out to be right please give me the credit I deserve for that scum sniping.
Let's talk about dramon individually - the people who townread him.. what is townie about their posts? I've read their ISO multiple times and don't see anything that could give you that impression. I can accept a null read but please link one post that is townie. Because I read indifference at best and intentional fluff at worst.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Kidding me? Of course I will in this game.
. Even if I'm wrong I'm still likely to hit scum anyway.
Besides I'm not basing my lynch decision on the dramon/koki association. That was just one of 2 scumteams I proposed for IF the split is 1/1/1. Though I suppose this particular pair could be in 0/1/2 split but I'm really doubting scum had the cajones to be put 2 scum in G3.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
You think group 2 could have 0?In post 364, Eddie Cane wrote:and by that I mean group 3 because it lynches scum 100% of the time- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
The only thing that was stopping me from voting group 3 was that I thought RMOJ and dramon are too scummy to be scum and my strongish townread of cake. I read cakes ISO and I couldn't see what made him a strongish townread for me . So if I take out these two factors group 3 becomes a pretty attractive lynch.
I'm also not convinced eddie is town but we do agree on one thing - group 3 has to contain 1 scum at least. No way all 4 of them are town.
But I'm paranoid thinking about the wagon progression:
why was group 2 not hammered? I'm pretty sure we got to L-2. Maybe L-1 if I missed a vote.. isn't it weird considering we only needed 4 votes from outside the group for a lynch? Even if there's 1 scum in group 1 not 0 scum benefit a lot from lynching the big group. If scum aren't in 2 why didn't they?- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
How bad is that really in a game like this though if the benefit is 4-5 townies dead? And also generally speaking people don't scumread both the hammerer and the L-1 vote together.In post 394, Wisdom wrote:i mean they'd look sus if they suddenly voted for 2 there- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
About timeIn post 497, SirCakez wrote:On another topic since 2 is dying today - can we talk about REALMEN? I just looked at their ISO and it's entirely shitposting, mechanics talk and unexplained reads. There's no real gamesolving. IDK how I had them at null.
Wisdom: you definitely swap koki out. Koki is either 100% telling the truth or is scum. The flip would tell us the answer. Also everyone has suspects from group 3. I for one am not townreading any of them except possibly cake. Swap koki with realmen. Or swap koki with dramon. Or maybe even muffin because I'm not seeing what makes him so town either except for the fact that he's agreeing with dramon which is suicide for scum. Because dramon's strategies are horrible imo.
And for those doubting koki -
Why did he vote for group 2 long before claiming?
How would he know about wisdom's role?
I like the idea of locktowning koki tomorrow, and we have a good chance of hitting 2 scum if we swap him with someone in group 3.
Alternatively we can maybe swap DV or eddie with koki since there's some disagreement on who scum is in group 3. Like it's such a polarizing group.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
@Dramon:
Confirmed scum is in group 2 as per koki's suggestion.
I see no reason to doubt him.
BUT even if he's lying there's still a good chance to hit scum in pine/riku. AND if not he'd be confirmed scum. I'm not worried about lylo as much as you seem to me. The day 2 partitions are going to tell you a LOT depending on where they put koki.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Group 3 wagon was starting to overtake group 2 and THEN koki claimed. That means he wasn't worried about group 2 getting lynched.
If he is scum pulling a gambit it's to protect someone from group 3. And honestly why would he do it just to protect 1 person? He'd have to be protecting 2 scum in group 3.
Or it's for WIFOM reasons and one of his partners is in group 2.
In both of these cases we swap him out with someone in group 3 and we have a very good chance of hitting scum.
But really he's just telling the truth so your point is void.
Besides you have plenty of other suspects in group 2 so I don't know why you're advocating against it.
Pedit - ah lol a 3rd claim.
Okay let's swap cake with koki and lynch group 3. How is THAT for guaranteeing a scum lynch for the maximum potential price of 3 townies.
Pedit pedit - wait what 4 claims? Muffin what's yours?- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Did everyone just miss this vote count which put group 2 at L-2?In post 300, implosion wrote:
Cannot confirm or deny.dramonic wrote:@Mod: confirm/deny that this is mountainous?
And RMOJ who's been advocating for self-voting out us there then quickly unvoted shortly after this vote count.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Except in your scenario we are guranteed only 1 scum.In post 692, dramonic wrote:
OR we don't swap and have a 100% chance of hitting scum.In post 690, BuJaber wrote:In both of these cases we swap him out with someone in group 3 and we have a very good chance of hitting scum.
This is incredibly basic.
At least with mine 1 scum is pretty guaranteed and a good chance of finding 2 scum.
Muffin do you townread and believe wisdom?- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
I won't argue with you anymore.. I have the best solution.
Muffin swaps himself with wisdom.
Wisdom swaps dramon with muffin.
Guaranteed 1-3 scum. And muffin and wisdom would be 2 confirmed and living townies.
Unless one of you actually thinks a swapping role can be scum. Because that seems bastardy to me.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Bus driver is so different wtf
In a game where scum have all the power in deciding who goes in which group, giving them the power to change their mind during the day seems cruel and op to me. That is why it's bastardy.
The ONLY reason to give this role to scum would be to fuck with town into falsely townreading the player. It's bastardy.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
How so.. put 1 confirmed town with scum tomorrow. Force them to lynch them and kill the other confirmed town with your 1 shot.In post 710, DeasVail wrote:
If scum don’t have any roles like that then the game can be easily broken.In post 707, BuJaber wrote:Bus driver is so different wtf
In a game where scum have all the power in deciding who goes in which group, giving them the power to change their mind during the day seems cruel and op to me. That is why it's bastardy.
The ONLY reason to give this role to scum would be to fuck with town into falsely townreading the player. It's bastardy.
It's not broken and town can still lose.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
In post 719, dramonic wrote:
It's like you think partitioning is bad for town.In post 707, BuJaber wrote:Bus driver is so different wtf
In a game where scum have all the power in deciding who goes in which group, giving them the power to change their mind during the day seems cruel and op to me. That is why it's bastardy.
The ONLY reason to give this role to scum would be to fuck with town into falsely townreading the player. It's bastardy.
It makes scum way easier to lynch.
Then again, there are people like you who don't want to lynch confirmed scum, so...
What's wrong with putting both you and koki in group 2. And putting wisdom and muffin in group 3. Also guuarantees 1 scum if we lynch 2 with the added benefit of protecting 2 townies.
If partitioning helps town what's the point of this setup anyway? Partitioning allows scum to manipulate the lynch.
Partitions gives clues to town and throughout the game we gain info from the partitions and flips. But partition in it's essence is scum's power. That's why they don't have normal night kills. They can guarantee town die with every lynch until we get to below 5 or less living members which is when they're forced to put 1 player alone in a group.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
In post 732, zMuffinMan wrote:dram isn't actually a setup cop, buj...
What the hell.. then what he did is confusing and anti-town as hell. It completely distracted me and sent me off on a tangent with regards to the swaps.
Because of muffin's claim I think we can use both of your abilities in a cooperate way to give us an even better option. Also because we disagree on RMOJ. Sure I'm less sure about my scumread of him but I'd feel a lot better not intentionally saving him from the lynch. He just has bugged me because he does a lot of posturing but hasn't been as consistent with it as he makes it seem. And he seems obsessed with willingness to die as the only basis for reading people. I also can't decide between cake and muffin. I was beginning to townread muffin based on conviction and tone but what he's saying is really bad.In post 745, Wisdom wrote:If you dont buy into the "koki might be scum" paranoia why are you against swapping pine/riku to group 3 and lynching group 3?
Because I can agree with him that lynching group 3 is not the best move (assuming you both have swaps - if muffin is lying about the swap it's a different story obviously) but lynching group 2 without any swaps is DEFINITELY not the most 'optimal'. It is what scum would try to advocate as the safest option but it's lazy and while dramon and muffin are both right that guarantees 1 scum it also lynches 4 townies 98% of the time.
More on my suggestions coming uo. I need to think about it a little and write it in a separate post.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Okay first of all
Muffin swaps first
Wisdom doesn't reverse the swap.
We hammer after both swaps.
If any of these things are not done it is a scum claim from the actor.
Are we agreed so far?
Pedit - I don't like dramon at all this game. He's pretty much my number 1 scumread. I might ask you to swap him but it won't be to save him. It would be to put him in a lynchable group 2.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Yes cake would be a good choice. If he's scum we'll soon know. But I actually want both you and muffin alive that is why the order is important.
Committing to the order gives is a way of boosting our trust of both of you.
I'm trying not to let my reads influence this because otherwise I'd just be saving wisdom and koki and not giving a damn about anybody else.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
So it would go like this:
Muffin swaps with wisdom.
Wisdom swaps muffin with dramon (or someone else from G3.. I won't go against majority I just really think it should be dramon)
Pine/riku contains 1 scum if koki is telling the truth. Koki dies if he's scum. 1 scum guaranteed.
Potential 2nd scum in piku/riku/dramon.
Muffin's agreement with this woild go along way into making him more credible with his push against group 2 all game. Also it involves him taking a leap of faith so we can take a leap of faith. Also since all of this should be agreed upon in thread lying about it later is a scumclaim in my book so a betrayal is not a total loss. And the worst case scenario 1 scum dies anyway which is what everybody who wanted group 2 lynched has been saying all game so they have no leg to stand on if they disagree.
I know it's better to lynch 4 people instead of 5 but there's no other way to save wisdom and still lynch both pine and riku.
And koki I'm sorry I wish there was a way you could live too but this might be the only way to get muffin to agree and it also guarantees the other people agreeing because they look like hypocrites if they refuse to lynch what would be 100% guaranteed scum regardless of how they read you.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Wisdom issue with that is muffin doesn't believe koki.
And it's easy to just call him scum for it but if he's town and doesn't believe koki he isn't going to swap riku/pine.. he'll save his ass by swapping someone else.
If muffin agrees to swap with riku and then lies about it that is an even bigger scum claim than him not going first (which already is in my book because difference between wisdom's ability and muffin's is that muffin can save himself by swapping into the group we put townies in while wisdom pretty much puts his faith in our voting ability) WE can fuck with wisdom but muffin can fuck with US. So if either of them is scum it's worse for us if muffin is scum so he has to go first.
Him refusing = scum because this is pretty basic stuff. Wisdom is not powerful without supporters. Muffin is.
But yeah if muffin agrees to swap with riku and then you swap pine with cake... or RMOJ if you really want... I'll lynch group 3.
I'm not prepared to lynch group 3 if dramon isn't in it. Obviously I'm putting my reads above everyone else's but I don't think I can be wrong about both dramon and RMOJ. One of them is for sure scum. And mayybe both.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Dram and muffin kept saying they wanted to lynch group 2 as is to "guarantee 1 scum dead". When I suggested seaps that guarantee 1 scum dead plus a possible 2nd or 3rd they ignored it.In post 1001, Wisdom wrote:Bu and whoever else scumreads dram: No matter how stupid I think he's being here with sticking to the probabilities and such I think he is being genuine here. Cakez is waffly and I think has decent chances of being scum. Realmen agreeing with me makes me think he could be scum buddying me. muffin is going to use his swap. So I think dram's the best choice here.
They're not being genuine. They're trying to nuke this game by appealing to emotion to get townread or frustrating the motivation to play out of the players. Exhausted / emotional town make bad decisions.
Do you know me? Who are you?In post 1035, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:
its ok i really think bujaber is town hereIn post 1032, northsidegal wrote:Wis before you swap I'd recheck the bujaber townread. That'd be how this turns disastrous.
he's always more of an asshole when town
@fitz - I think you read the old version of my proposal(s). I'd like to hear your thoughts on the recent ones.
Though to me I can compromise on anything else as long as:
1. Muffin and wisdom announce their swaps before they do them.
2. Muffin swaps first.
3. Pine and riku are both lynched.
And dramon lynch would be a bonus that I think would give us an additional scum lynch.
Anything else I am flexible about.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
In post 934, BuJaber wrote:So it would go like this:
Muffin swaps with wisdom.
Wisdom swaps muffin with dramon (or someone else from G3.. I won't go against majority I just really think it should be dramon)
Pine/riku contains 1 scum if koki is telling the truth. Koki dies if he's scum. 1 scum guaranteed.
Potential 2nd scum in piku/riku/dramon.
Muffin's agreement with this woild go along way into making him more credible with his push against group 2 all game. Also it involves him taking a leap of faith so we can take a leap of faith. Also since all of this should be agreed upon in thread lying about it later is a scumclaim in my book so a betrayal is not a total loss. And the worst case scenario 1 scum dies anyway which is what everybody who wanted group 2 lynched has been saying all game so they have no leg to stand on if they disagree.
I know it's better to lynch 4 people instead of 5 but there's no other way to save wisdom and still lynch both pine and riku.
And koki I'm sorry I wish there was a way you could live too but this might be the only way to get muffin to agree and it also guarantees the other people agreeing because they look like hypocrites if they refuse to lynch what would be 100% guaranteed scum regardless of how they read you.
TA-DA- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
This is the 2nd time.
We are having a game-related disagreement. This is unacceptable behavior. We're not animals.
You can't play mafia and not make any assumptions at all. Scum will have a field day with us if we are only doing the "trust no one" approach.
In a normal mafia game if 2 people's posts contradict each other you'd never opt for ignoring both of them because you can't guarantee which is truthful. You would analyze each and lynch the one you feel is less believable.
Risking 4 town to lynch 1 scum just because we are too scared to trust our reads is bad play. Also there is info gained. Even with the worst case scenario that wisdom is the only scum in group 2 and we swap him out with a townie (which btw is a scenario that doesn't fit with everything that happened) we would know for a fact that wisdom is scum and that there were 2 scum outsude of group 2.
@eddie swapping koki out has the same end result. If you guys are not townreading anyone based on claims you can't say that wisdom might be scum so we can't not lynch him and then assume koki isn't lying too.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
I had you as conftown until everyone suggested that these swapping powers could be scum.
These same 'cautious' people are now letting you do whatever you want.
If for some reason dramon and RMOJ play like this as town and wisdom got the 50-50 wrong with riku.. we're screwed. You'll just swap in a townie.
You going first means town has some control and they can protect themselves.
Not going first is pure selfishness on your part and recklessness on town's part for letting you.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Well not swapping is a different thing alltogether and it's a waste of a PR.
But when a sizeable number of people agree to the swaps if wisdom doesn't follow through he looks incredibly bad. You trust him based on mutual destruction.
My suggestions were up for debate. The use and order of the swaps shouldn't need to be debated imo. There's only 1 right answer.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Same as what we can say now. Except with an increased chance of 2 scum in group 2. Probably points to one of the PR claimers.
And who agreed to that solution of yours apart from you? There were still people opposed to that. I don't actually remember you saying it I thought you were advocating for a group 2 lynch without swaps the whole time. You and dramon did not seem flexible on that point and THAT I was strongly opposed to. You don't just lynch the group wothout swaps when there are 2 PRs in it, one of which is confirmable so at least we'd know that wisdom isn't lying about the claim which could come in handy for setup spec even if you donXt townread him for it. Not to mention we can strongarm his choices.
You and dramon wanted to lynch group 2 as it was without doing anything which was a decent choice back when we had WIFOM only but once we have PR claims in it you never do that.
I'm not saying you have to townread koki and wisdom but by advocating to lynch group 2 without swaps you are advocating for the exact move you would be doing if koki and wisdom were confirmed scum. It is a play that assumes they are scum. Any other assumption makes it a bad move. If you don't trust them you come up with a way to test them. You don't just punish them for claiming.
The whole basis for the 100% guaranteed scum thing is that koki is telling the truth or is scum. If he is scum he has to be the only scum in group 2 otherwise it's a dumb ass move and koki is way too smart for that. You can easily swap him with some other suspect and lynch and see if he was lying or not.
The compromise I remember you talking about is swapping yourself with fitz (I think.. maybe it was eddie) If you did suggest this one then it was buried in your pushes for no swaps at all and I'm sordy I missed it. I do know that dramon never suggested something like that though.
All of that still isn't about the point I made. I was saying if we took the time to agree to the swaps and swap orders then town would be in control of your PRs and we would be able to trust you both because lying would be suicide for either of you. Nobody was willing to come up to an agreement. Everyone was still arguing about whether to swap or not and whether wisdom is town and whatever. Stuff that didn't actually matter. Because all the claims so far in this game can be tested and managed. It's all out in the open and during the day.
You shouldn't have ignored everything I planned out just because you didn't like the players I was swapping.
Especially when I then followed through with a very flexible plan that basically gave freedom to any swap you choose as long as you go first and wisdom goes second and pine/riku are both lynched.
But even my completely flexible and reasonable plan was ignored. So whatever we're now basically relying on reads only. Since the whole swapping thing was done haphazardly.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
Is that my fault?In post 1277, dramonic wrote:
How's that working for you so far?In post 1276, BuJaber wrote:Because all the claims so far in this game can be tested and managed. It's all out in the open and during the day.
I can't single handedly force wisdom and muffin to swap town's choices under threat of lynching them. I need support.
What should have happened is an unofficial vote for who muffin swaps and an unofficial vote for who wisdom swaps and we go with majority for both and if muffin/wisdom don't comply we treat them as confscum.- BuJaber
-
BuJaber Mafia Scum
- BuJaber
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: November 8, 2017
First of all I was never the one suggesting we lynch group 3. That was wisdom my idea was to swap people into group 2 to make it more scummy.
Second of all you don't account for the possibility of town koki town wisdom (and town Buj). Which is the strongest possibility in my mind followed by koki scum town wisdom.
Thirdly you're not factoring in the advantage of having confirmed towns. And not factoring in the negative EV of town deaths.
Now that you've explained it nicely yes I can see where I went wrong with the 100% guaranteed scum lynch. But that play is not the optimal play. It isn't even the least risky. It is simply the one that guarantees 1 scum dead.
The advantage of swapping out koki is that you either know for sure that he is scum OR you kill 1 scum AND confirms koki town.
The advantage of swapping out wisdom is that if someone else flips scum you have wisdom's ability to use again or even if he doesn't have a 2nd shot he might soak up the scum's kill if they think he has a 2nd shot.
For now please swap pine and let's lynch G3. G2 is tainted by wisdom's swap we can't lynch it based on koki's claim anymore. - BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber
- BuJaber