There aren't arguments for it over a pure democratic voteIn post 52, zMuffinMan wrote:i live in a good country so i dont know much about gerrymandering
what are the arguments for it over pure democratic vote?
Basically states get to determine how the redistricting process works, and some states allow the party in power in that state's legislature to draw the districts. Some state parties are corrupt and have redrawn districts to grant them an unfair advantage in elections - like splitting a democratic city into four parts so that no one district has enough democratic votes to win the election
There are several civil rights groups trying to fight this in the Supreme Court currently
Like this isn't optimal so much as a tactic used by corrupt politicians to gain and obtain power
(And there's another issue that about 100 years ago Congress capped the size of the House of Representatives at 435 I think, which means that more popular states do not have proportional representation in the electoral college - CA has 55 votes for just under 40 million people while Wyoming has 3 for just under 600,000)