NY214: Project Pinecone (Game over! Town wins!)
Forum rules
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Ah look, some WIFOM, this will help us
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
CiaoIn post 39, brassherald wrote:I didn't say hi to anyone this game. (And I'm keeping that way)
Aloha, which means both hello and goodbye.
I'll keep you guessing which it is in this case.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
No lynching on day 1 is actively not scum huntingIn post 80, Inferno390 wrote:
I would hardly call this scummy. It’s well within RVS. It is odd tho.In post 78, profii wrote:Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?
I would vote you Elbirn , but I’m flip flopping like crazy.
Self voting is super dumb because it is wifom between omg is he brave scum or is he OMG double bluffing for reaction tests- at least in town!elbirns world he is reaction testing but the question I would ask is, let me know if you get anything useful? You generally don’t
Ideally I say we move on from both of these but no voting on day 1 in my mind is worse than a self vote haha.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Well this doesn’t look like RVS. Porque por favor?
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Which ones and whyIn post 89, Gustavo wrote:I don’t like your posts so far
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
The following post needs to be read in context of “RVS I suppose”In post 127, Ausuka wrote:
Why is this scummy to you?In post 78, profii wrote:Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?
The self vote was bad - if you are scum, voting yourself is anti win con, if you are town, then we all have wifom over the slot because it could be a random gambit/reaction test but it certainly doesn’t help scum hunt
Then we had he no vote. Obviously excluding vigs, we can only kill scum via lynch so again, anti win con play
Admittedly - it moved us out of RVS
I think I’ll be looking at this Rask wagon in a bit for a serious vote, whilst it’s bad play, I’m not sure I’m calling it scummy. As much as I said to Elbirn lynch your scum buddy, I was more interested to see how he felt about the apparent counter reaction test, I’m assuming he Elbirn is town for trying that play (even though i don’t like it)- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
oh yeah you like fast forwarding day 1In post 151, Gustavo wrote:In post 145, profii wrote:
The following post needs to be read in context of “RVS I suppose”In post 127, Ausuka wrote:
Why is this scummy to you?In post 78, profii wrote:Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?
The self vote was bad - if you are scum, voting yourself is anti win con, if you are town, then we all have wifom over the slot because it could be a random gambit/reaction test but it certainly doesn’t help scum hunt
Then we had he no vote. Obviously excluding vigs, we can only kill scum via lynch so again, anti win con play
Admittedly - it moved us out of RVS
I think I’ll be looking at this Rask wagon in a bit for a serious vote, whilst it’s bad play, I’m not sure I’m calling it scummy. As much as I said to Elbirn lynch your scum buddy, I was more interested to see how he felt about the apparent counter reaction test, I’m assuming he Elbirn is town for trying that play (even though i don’t like it)
I dunno what your lack of forthcoming schtick is all about though- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
I dunno why but I get that a lot - I tend to stick to things that are factual or logical and people tend to be really scared of it but idk why.In post 148, brassherald wrote:I go to bed and literally the entire world posts while I'm asleep. LITERALLY!
Serious question to everyone, can anyone read profii? Because I always scum read him and its happening again, and I know I can't read him.
Also, HitAlt, am I one of the people you have played with in the past?
for example, no lynching vote is a bad play as it is against our only way of killing scum. It's undisputable, it's not LAMIST as dave said, I'm just highlighting something that people were not talking about to get people to discuss it.
then a wagon formed on Rask - I think we will find opportunistic scum in there, but I'm just popping by on my lunch break so I'll check the VC later.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
This might be where I’ve miscommunicated and might be something to do with where people struggle to read me but your opinion matters more than mine thereIn post 173, HeWhoSwims wrote:Inferno... meet Gus.
I think Profii took the entire ordeal way too serious but I don't hold that as scummy, but NAI - and I doubt scum!profii would try to gain town cred by coming off as scum because as we see some people scumread him more often even when he's town.
TW is amazing and you can expect a lot of fluff and I have a feeling I might have a bad read on scumduck at times
I’m not sure why Gus said self voting is anti win con - of course it is
Also no voting is anti town win con - you can’t remove scum any other practical way
To answer your question about Rask though, Whilst I think the “play” is a bad idea, it’s not NAI, it just makes us over think that slot. As I said earlier, one of the voters will use that as an oppurtunity to get on the wagon so I’ll take a look after footy tonight
*note I’m a few pages behind rn- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
To be fair I’d agree in a weird way. I usually get an awesome day 1 gut read or 2 but when it gets to LyLo I have no idea how to convince the last player I’m the town option so I’d prefer not to have that responsibility for the rest of the team - however I think scum pick up on this and keep me alive - if you wiki me, I have a good survival rate (imo) and I am fully aware that isn’t necessarily a good thingIn post 182, brassherald wrote:Mid game is too late to wait, if no one has a strong read by day 2, he's the day 2 lynch, I think.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Ok out of interest what does it stand forIn post 239, Gustavo wrote:
Refer to post 236. Classic example. You make wordy posts to appear like you are doing something but when I reach the end I don’t see you actually doing anythingIn post 237, profii wrote:Gus called me iioa - I dunno what that means- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Still catching up (via phone) missed that sorry dudeIn post 243, brassherald wrote:
Am I even here? Is this a sixth sense scenario?In post 241, profii wrote:
Ok out of interest what does it stand forIn post 239, Gustavo wrote:
Refer to post 236. Classic example. You make wordy posts to appear like you are doing something but when I reach the end I don’t see you actually doing anythingIn post 237, profii wrote:Gus called me iioa - I dunno what that means- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
I did say in the post that I would analyse the wagon later. I see the vote count but it felt like there was other voters who may have moved. If not I’d be looking at those 3 currently voting for the scummiest but I haven’t had a chance to iso properly yetIn post 248, Gustavo wrote:
For me it is. So I’d appreciate if you just accept that going forward. Thank youIn post 242, brassherald wrote:
Use post tags, it's really not that hard.In post 239, Gustavo wrote:
Refer to post 236. Classic example. You make wordy posts to appear like you are doing something but when I reach the end I don’t see you actually doing anythingIn post 237, profii wrote:Gus called me iioa - I dunno what that means
So that is my analysis so far - scum likely to use this scenario to wagon Rask opportunistically - further analysis on specific voters to follow and my first serious vote to be placed
I think that constitutes something nearer analysis than info and I’d point out I’ve already said everything there but thanks for the feedback- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Also this post counts as a term I liked in another game “political”In post 180, Flubbernugget wrote:
I don't think rask has done anything shady but would still entertain him as scum coastingIn post 115, Skygazer wrote:Agreed. In my onion I think the first reaction test (elbirn) is fine but the second one (rask) a bit LAMIST especially considering he never really followed up on it other than his read on inferno.
VOTE: rask
Ready for some “I told you so” after a flip but not committed to voting
I see why votes seem to be heading this way - I’ll be measuring this up against the other 3 players even though there is no vote as such- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
This is basically my pointIn post 304, Ausuka wrote:That makes sense to me though w/profii? nolynching d1 definitely doesn't help the town. Like, I agree Rask's actions weren't scummy but I feel profii's actions weren't either.
I feel like I don’t really understand where Gus is coming from so I’m happy to just leave it and draw a line under it but if Gus wants to explain more I’m happy to listen- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
My logic was simply if we no lynch then we cannot remove scum from the game (exception vig)
Therefore it’s bad
Whilst that sounds bad for Rask I’m more interested in seeing how the 3 voters plus flubber get on - it’s easy for scum to say “bad play we must lynch it” so I’d say odds are 1 of those 4 are probably scum- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
I would 100% say this any game any alignment. (Well any normal without weird rules)In post 312, Gustavo wrote:Yes I understand all of that. But to say no lynching is against your win condition is ridiculous. (I’d use a much stronger word but you guys are too sensitive).
I refuse to believe town profli believes that. I tbink he’s scum trying to throw dirt on an easy target.
It’s NAI
I’d rather take a x% chance of hitting a scum vs a guaranteed 0% chance
It’s just a statistic
Anyway, point made, we are out of RVS - I’m not voting Rask for it because there hasnt been much else there. I’m moving on
I think it’s fair to say we just play the game differently - it’s not a criticism, variety is just the spice of life- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Lol I’m doing the same thing and you were one of the people but I think I’m towning you for doing thatIn post 353, the worst wrote:pretty sure we have two obvscum already. I'm intentionally withholding my vote until I'm satisfied with a couple of things- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Nah the content he provided was town, I just couldn’t be bothered to pick anything out... I’m interpreting being chill as an excuse to be lazy hahaIn post 357, Gustavo wrote:
Why does content = town?In post 342, profii wrote:Ok so now we have Rask content... easily town- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
so how do you feel about the Rask slot?In post 385, Gustavo wrote:
Well then you are mistake. 1. Profli wasn’t clear. 2. Now he’s clarified, I disagree. The posts rask made don’t make him obv town.In post 383, brassherald wrote:
By the way, this is a perfect example of what I just said.In post 382, profii wrote:
Nah the content he provided was town, I just couldn’t be bothered to pick anything out... I’m interpreting being chill as an excuse to be lazy hahaIn post 357, Gustavo wrote:
Why does content = town?In post 342, profii wrote:Ok so now we have Rask content... easily town
I feel like anyone could have read Profii's post and figured out what he meant, but not Gus, who apparently only speaks English.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
I’ll post a bit more tonight if I get time after the World Cup. I have a couple of scum reads to share shortly
Interesting that Gus is still being discussed - someone made the point earlier that it’s tricky to be that bizarre and be scum because keeping all the lies in line with each other would be tough.
However - if you think about it, it’s an easy meta to reproduce, you can just be flip floppy on everything and accuse everyone else of being against you for unclear reasons
I am leaning the former not the latter but I intend to largely disregard Gus’ existence- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
I have a bit of time before the kick off
The Worst - you wanted to know some things from me, phone posting so can’t remeber the exact questions so if you want to know more just ask.
Anyway, see 309
I didn’t really do this on purpose, but it occurred to me I called an action bad (Rask no lynch vote) and a minor wagon started - you / Sky / Xyzzy / flubber posturing around it.
So it occurred to me that maybe scum would use my calling Rask bad as an oppurtunity to get on a Rask wagon because I had provided a reason for them.
So I was waiting to see how these players moved off that wagon to see who looked most scummy.
- the worst, I don’t think I’ve played your scum game so I’m not sure but your moving around wagons is something I’ve seen you do as town
- xyzzy, I’m not a great fan of that post with all the post links as it didn’t really go anywhere
- sky- I didn’t like that unvote but I appreciate not everyone has loads of time - I certainly avoid games any bigger than this because I am not sharp enough to keep up properly so I’d like to say to sky please provide 3 scum reads and why
flubber, seems more bothered that he is mixed up in his than really scum hunting, it’s he most off for me and I’m pretty sure scum is in these 4 players
VOTE: Flubber
I’m just going to re read sky a bit as this wagon has appeared - I’ve been heavily focussed on the Rask thing so far- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Stop arguing with the mod!In post 542, Ausuka wrote:sorry if I did something wrong. I was just trying to redirect the focus of the thread.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
missed this earlier sorryIn post 539, Flubbernugget wrote:Also, profii, of everyone that "wagoned" rask,why did you vote me?
I will be amazed if we aren't finding a scum in {The worst / flubber / xyzzy / sky } so i've been monitoring you lot more than any other group of players tbh.
i dont think it's tw so ive ruled him out.
Sky has pressure and in the spirit of being chill, I'm waiting for her to overcome the IRL things making her lurk. but idk, maybe I'm being mod manipulated into not death tunnelling there.
i dont like your posturing post that got mentioned, i know it was really early but it bugged me a lot. You then also got into Gus and Ausuka - i think gus doesn't like day 1 at all, so he's just nai for day1 tbh. I also think Ausuka will become easily sortable later in the game, idk how well you know her scum game? But seemed a weird read. My gut is just telling me you are using highly conflicting logic to me
i dont like xyzzys post in 180 either. It has random reads mixed with non-relevant content, almost sent to confuse or make it look like there is more content than there really is.
I guess the timing was wrong because that sky wagon sucked all the pressure off you so my vote alone isnt really going to pressure anything out of you. I could vote sky but I've asked what her scum reads are and I'm chilling so I'm being less forthright with my vote but i also wanted to move off RVS on to something more real
Notably, you agreed with my 309 post - who would you say is the scum involved in rask wagoning
'?- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
hang on hang on hang on.
Flubber posturers over that mini Rask wagon.
Ausuka then votes for Rask,
if you look at the Ausuka ISO, from my POV there is a bit of buddying, agreeing with my point about the Rask No lynch. Also, she states she has played my scum game 3x, we've also played scum together so she knows I know her scum game.
Then Ausuka gets on 5th place of the Sky wagon - a handy way to get off that town-cred bus flubber vote.
The only reason I went back to look at that is Dave pointed out the lack of opinion on sky, which dave is correct to highlight.
no way is that 2 scum in day 1 but lol if it is.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
I guess I just haven't played with you before and I'm getting familiar with your playstyle.
you often see people think they have spotted something scummy and go 'look guys - look at this, this must be scum!' - the first list post was your first significant contribution after a bit of a gap/catchup and I didn't really see that push in any particular direction, so I was a bit like eh.
I kinda look for scum to be arranging certain things for long game town cred - so like my post about ausuka/flubber voting in a particular pattern but I guess I don't see that from you either, so I guess it make sense if this is your style and it kinda helps me ratify my position that flubber was more scummy than you in the Rask wagon.
I'll look at skygazer again now...- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Not sure “thus town” was explicitly stated, however I am not sure what conclusion we are supposed to draw other than thatIn post 606, dramonic wrote:Im not saying it aint genuine, im saying it's a lot of word that means very little and have nothing to do with the game.
The whole line of "Im bad at lying and am thus town" is such an easy cop-out- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
I thought he was right but in a shade casty way when he didn’t need to be. Idk thought it was weirdIn post 661, Ausuka wrote:
Why did you post this?In post 612, profii wrote:
Not sure “thus town” was explicitly stated, however I am not sure what conclusion we are supposed to draw other than thatIn post 606, dramonic wrote:Im not saying it aint genuine, im saying it's a lot of word that means very little and have nothing to do with the game.
The whole line of "Im bad at lying and am thus town" is such an easy cop-out- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
your posts are hard to quote, so excuse the formatting...In post 688, Taly wrote:In post 305, profii wrote:
In post 304, Ausuka wrote:
That makes sense to me though w/profii? nolynching d1 definitely doesn't help the town. Like, I agree Rask's actions weren't scummy but I feel profii's actions weren't either.
This is basically my point
I feel like I don’t really understand where Gus is coming from so I’m happy to just leave it and draw a line under it but if Gus wants to explain more I’m happy to listen
Yeah, I'm not a fan of this post.
Why don't you continue to try and understand? I don't like the "don't like it, but bye" mentality here... especially since your vote's still on him. You're just parking your vote without doing anything else.
530 is the only reason I'm not voting you atm - because you actually did something with your vote since 13
But I do want to know why you feel Flubb is scum. Or elaborate on what you've stated on him?
At that point, my vote was RVS so it didnt carry much weight tbh.
anyway, my logic to day 1 so far is that Rask RVS No lynched. I called it bad and a mini wagon formed.
Whilst this wasn't really my intention it got me thinking, it made me think that someone on that mini wagon is scum.
I include Flubber because he all but voted - posturing - so to speak.
If you look at my interactions with The Worst, I was waiting for 'something' to happen. I was looking at the wagon'eers and how they were going to leave the flubber wagon.
I considered Sky for just unvoting, but she said she was a bit vla so in the spirit of being chill, I figured Flubber was the most scummy remaining whilst I gave Sky a chance to contribute.
I was actually going to re-assess my vote as the 2 prevailing wagons were Sky and you, so i was going to get on to one as Sky was also fairly scummy in just sneaking off Rask imo and people seem to have some legit concerns over dave/you. I figured adding to these wagons might drive the day towards something, such as a counter wagon, which might be telling, however flubber is picking up so im going to hang there.
to go more into gus specifically - he get's triggered if you simply dont agree with him, you can both be town and he says 'lynch A' whilst i say 'lynch B' and he creates a conflict. He is quite frankly, a lunatic who i will not play with again, which is why i took that approach with him.
explain this? It's day 1. Whilst we are all scum hunting, it's never super successful on day 1, so i'm not sure what you are getting at hereIn post 690, Taly wrote:Conclusion: Scum is either very strong, or town is very weak. No middle ground. I feel like there's been much more town-wagons and town-suspected in this game than anything else.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
out of interest what do you think of dramonic and taly together, dramonic seems to get involved in the dave ending so idk I don't think I'd see that as SvS bus on day 1?In post 722, brassherald wrote:Elbirn's stock definitely goes up in my book this weekend, and he was already pretty good. Taly's down. I still think dramonic is the best lynch, though.
So, I'm going back to dramonic, since it seems no one is working with anyone, might as well set off on my own like everyone seems to be doing.
VOTE: dramonic- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
someone who has played with me enough to say that. Interesting - because I've only played a dozen or so games here.In post 793, HitAlt wrote:
This is such a profii way to make an astute observation.In post 792, profii wrote:But it looks like the entire wagon comprises of people who didn’t vote flubber. Interesting
I had a good feeling we had played before though.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
OooIn post 827, Raskolnikov wrote:Though noted dramonic also counts towards the people who were going to vote flub and went to hitalt group
I was surprised when I looked at the Flubber votes and found no one on the HitAlt wagon that was from the flubber wagon but I was lazy and just iso’d pine for the last VC so I must have missed that
I’d join that wagon !- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Hmmm I think HitAlt on Sky is more like it’s day 1 and I want to lynch a new player, these 2 factors mean I can’t be sureIn post 841, Inferno390 wrote:The point dramonic is trying to make is that HitAlt is not taking a hard stance on anything in the game, which is scummy in his opinion.
I agree, and furthermore find it scummy that he refuses to take a hard stance on anything while aggressively trying to push his way through everyone to a position of town authority.
Rather than something like I am scum trying to lynch town and I’m posturing for when I know it will go wrong
But maybe I’m biased because Sky is in my Rask wagon pool of people I would likely lynch today- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
But if scum!dramonic thinks that, he can just PT his buddies... why is that of all things AI and not just bad townIn post 948, HitAlt wrote:
If you ever thought I was a town-PR, you should never say something like this out loud..!In post 946, dramonic wrote:We have a competing wagon in flubs,HA could be a good PR, TW might just be bad at scum.
Those are three valid reasons (albeit the third might not be I dont know the guy besides site chat)
VOTE: dramonic - my mind is actually made at this point I think.- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
For that 82 quote
If someone is reaction testing by post 82 maybe it could have been scum perpetrating as “I’m so obviously trying to scum hunt, look at me catching them out here” - I don’t think anyone is going to slip from it particularly so early in the game
Elbirns gone completely off my radar so tbh I’d forgotten. He should post more- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
I am probably going to vote Dram but I prefer flubber so just waiting for the VC to see if it’s worth sticking or will dram be the way we are going
Someone said plenty of time but I disagree as it’s hard to get everyone going in a specific direction quickly, particularly at weekend so just making my intentions known for now- profii
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- profii
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
Noting this. It’s almost like Inferno knows Taly will flip town here :-/In post 1074, Inferno390 wrote:@MoI: I think Taly’s problem is not that his slot was being scumread before he replaced in and it hasn’t disappeared, as much as it is dramonic tagged the slot as scum and then has followed up with “I’m gonna ignore everything that Taly does because it’s a scum slot.” Which is incredibly confbias and horrendously bad play.
It’s stuff like post 1068 above that really show this. And it’s really, really stupid. If someone replaces out after being scummy, sure those reads don’t stand. But you don’t go around ignoring the replacements read because their play doesn’t fit your read/you’re confbiased/whatever. You at least give the player a chance to post before you go noosing him.
Because there’s this thing. It’s called being wrong on a read. And it happens. And that fact of life needs to be sucked up and gotten over. - profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii
- profii