A Story Revisited (Anything uPick): Day 6
Forum rules
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
What slot could be scum? And why not present your own case instead of waiting for others to create the scumread for you?In post 552, Invisibility wrote:wheme that slot could be scum but i'd like to hear a case- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
In post 337, Ginngie wrote:chick and jjh are the best votes right nowAre all these reads still accurate to you?
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
This does not make logical sense. A townie having a gladiator modifier may make your claim legit but it on no way confirms you as town. The stretch here to clear yourself increases my suspicion.In post 780, mastina wrote:You, as town. Having a modifier that helps you when gladiated.
Is evidence corroborating my claim. Of being unable to gladiate anyone except for town.
Because if you are town.
And I am town.
I could only succeed when using it on you.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Wh4t?In post 781, Randomnamechange wrote:
what does this post and a medieval weapon consisting of a spiky metal ball attached to a handle by a chain have in common?In post 779, Wh4t wrote:How can a read "change drastically" when you never had a read on me initially mastina?
I'm wolf af atm and you're the only one who's taken the bait so thanks for outting. Please do explain your newly compiled readslist so I don't mislockscum you.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Wtf are you talking about?In post 783, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I was scumreading you too thanks too mastina making me think about you but I didn’t get a chance to say it thanks to SOMEONE.In post 779, Wh4t wrote:How can a read "change drastically" when you never had a read on me initially mastina?
I'm wolf af atm and you're the only one who's taken the bait so thanks for outting. Please do explain your newly compiled readslist so I don't mislockscum you.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Oh ok. How does the fake dayvig impact you voicing your read?In post 788, Gamma Emerald wrote:You’re claiming to have done Slayer’s Gambit and are saying mastina took the bait right? Well I also scumread you. It’s just thanks to the fake dayvig I couldn’t say so.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
It's implicit when you say your role only works if you're both town.In post 793, mastina wrote:
I don't recall stating it confirmed me as town.In post 782, Wh4t wrote:
A townie having a gladiator modifier may make your claim legit but it on no way confirms you as town.In post 780, mastina wrote:You, as town. Having a modifier that helps you when gladiated.
Is evidence corroborating my claim. Of being unable to gladiate anyone except for town.
Because if you are town.
And I am town.
I could only succeed when using it on you.
I said it confirmed my role is what I claimed it to be.
Who's the one stretching now, mate?
I read your wall and it's pretty meh. I still don't understand how your read has "drastically changed"?- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Why is that scummy to you?In post 796, Invisibility wrote:for slayers gambit claim- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Because I like where my vote is currently, on you no less. And I'm dramatic in my pushing but I am more concerned with determining her alignment before changing my vote.In post 800, Nero Cain wrote:W4at-If Mastina is outted scum then why isn't your vote there?- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Yes...that's how the gambit works...In post 816, Invisibility wrote:mastina is scummy because she called you scummy and you're doing slayer's gambit- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
So gamma you scumread me for low posting right?In post 814, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Because it’s a fucking retconIn post 812, Wh4t wrote:
Why is that scummy to you?In post 796, Invisibility wrote:for slayers gambit claim- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Hence the follow up push...In post 821, Invisibility wrote:someone seeing something scummy and then disliking something scummy is just as likely to be town or scum- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
I'm lost in such a big game so figured it was easier to wait for people to interact with me to get reads. It's fine I think you might be genuine in your push on me. Currently ISOing people.
Mastina is pretty borderline nullscum so far in that the majority of her posts are fluffy, teach-y, lamisty and discuss her role. Her one post with content - the readslist wall is nothing great either. I really dislike how her chick scumread started as a passing comment to someone else scumreading them which was then followed up by chick being her biggest scumread in her list. When you consider the climate was ripe for a chick quickwagon it looks worse. I noticed IC pointed out the lack of resistance to the chick wagon so I give them slight town points for that.
When we look at mastina's role it would be quite a powerful role as scum in that it ensures a town lynch when used - what confuses this is mastina clarifying that town can no-lynch and use the role as investigative. I don't see why town would be given a gladiate role that ensures a town lynch (or no-lynch) unless the set-up were bastard? So overall the role claim gives me the null-scum lean. When she can explain her read change on me I'll be able to update this.
Chick seems fine? As mentioned her wagon was the first to pop up with little resistance however she hasn't done herself many favours to get town read (which usually points to town imo). I like her confidence in her read on Vax and someone else I can't remember.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Oh christ Vax is scum.
VOTE: Vaxkiller
I thought it wouldn't make sense with mastina as SvS as he keeps calling her claim fake but then he goes on about how chick is obv scum and was the best vig. Usually when someone calls a claim fake they are implying that player is scum - half sitting on the fence about mastina's alignment whilst egging her on to use a pro-scum ability does not prevent vax and mastina from being SvS. It's feasible distancing imo.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Just saw this. Hi. I think you're scummy.In post 703, Innocent Children wrote:
Yes. And wt actual f is “nonsensical” about them? Is this even a serious thought?In post 700, Wh4t wrote:Is it bad that I want to vote IC for his nonsensical walls?
I wonder if I voted you, would FA consider that a scummy omgus? Lol
Because seriously, you really do look like you’re trying to solve based on little to none content.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Feel free to comment on my hard efforting todayIn post 712, Innocent Children wrote:
Please tell the class aboutIn post 553, Wh4t wrote:
What slot could be scum? And why not present your own case instead of waiting for others to create the scumread for you?In post 552, Invisibility wrote:wheme that slot could be scum but i'd like to hear a caseyourcases.
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
What? I don't think you understand the meaning of omgus. Can you show me where nero commented on my behaviour and how that relates to your definition of omgus?In post 860, Innocent Children wrote:In post 843, Wh4t wrote:
Just saw this. Hi. I think you're scummy.In post 703, Innocent Children wrote:
Yes. And wt actual f is “nonsensical” about them? Is this even a serious thought?In post 700, Wh4t wrote:Is it bad that I want to vote IC for his nonsensical walls?
I wonder if I voted you, would FA consider that a scummy omgus? Lol
Because seriously, you really do look like you’re trying to solve based on little to none content.
These omgussy type of posts, really do you no favours. Do you seriously disagree with this? Nero also noticed it.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
If you're sheeping her you need to move your vote onto me.
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
So you like me until I say you're scummy but you tell me I'm omgusing? Saying I think you're scummy != saying I scumread you.In post 861, Innocent Children wrote:I was liking your posting today better but then you ruined it by sr me for calling you out on your yesterday null content posts. So you sr me and then you want props? What?- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Oh so we're misunderstanding each other. I meant I find you scummy in general as I was going through your ISO when I found that quote I responded to. I saw you were online and thought it'd be a fine way to gauge a reaction. I don't disagree that my posting before recently was bad - gamma, invis, mastina and I have discussed my lynchbait gambit or whatever they call it. I'm not asking for props - in that quote you asked me for "cases" so I cheekily said read my latest thoughts (if you're looking for a way to sort me).In post 868, Innocent Children wrote:I was sussing you for your null content posts and even mentioned possibly voting you and you respond to that by calling me “scummy” for that. How is it scummy, when it’s true? Your posts yesterday did in fact lack content. Nero also commented on them being “meatless”, so you sr me for that makes 0 sense And why would you ask for props for stepping it up today?
I'd put you at least a tier above vax, alongside mastina who's sitting at nullscum as I'm not that confident yet. You being two people makes it somewhat harder.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
He has the shortest ISO it's not hard to see what I mean.In post 871, Innocent Children wrote:Please link or quote the post where he does this, kthanx.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
So there's 4 scum right? So far gamma and IC are the worst votes. Nero makes no sense as I've been pretty clear about how much I've read prior to isoing people so my delayed reads make perfect sense. I am going to shoot out of either IC or Gamma. Town opinions on how off the mark I am would be appreciated.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
On my first skim your catch ups looked like scum catch ups - where you respond to random cherry picked posts. Consider it my RVS vote.In post 923, Nero Cain wrote:
ok. Why were you scum reading me?In post 918, Wh4t wrote:ero makes no sense as I've been pretty clear about how much I've read prior to isoing people so my delayed reads make perfect sense.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
No I can't now I've outted as a 1s desperado I don't want to give scum time to counter.In post 924, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Wow this is badIn post 918, Wh4t wrote:So there's 4 scum right? So far gamma and IC are the worst votes. Nero makes no sense as I've been pretty clear about how much I've read prior to isoing people so my delayed reads make perfect sense. I am going to shoot out of either IC or Gamma. Town opinions on how off the mark I am would be appreciated.
Fucking hold your candy ass- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
You were shading me all day and only when a few votes piled on did you feel comfortable enough to share that I'm your strongest scumread and vote me.In post 933, Gamma Emerald wrote:And like how is my vote bad?- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
In post 312, Ginngie wrote:mastina just fucking gladiates any guilties that are claimed by someone.
Best way to check them
Ginngie likely town.- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
Nos likely town?In post 959, Nosferatu wrote:shooting vax would be nice
algthough i wouldnt know who to lynch then
titus is an ok shot- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
TownIn post 615, Rylai and Lina wrote:As I also said that night, I don't like how mastina was fighting against people who were saying her role is towny by pushing the "Role != alignment" narrative at all. it feels forced and over the top.
~Sora- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
In post 490, Titus wrote:VOTE: Stargazer
RC is not likely to include a flavor ascetic.
He'd say something like
On a Plane to Brazil:You cannot be targeted by X abilities.
There could be a restriction in Chickadee's PM but I find it more likely that you're just scum Stargazer as you automatically accepted Chickadee's claim as true.
Hmm mafia ascetic? Why would he volunteer to be desperado'd if hes possibly immune to the shot?- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t
- Wh4t
-
Wh4t Goon
- Wh4t
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 986
- Joined: August 10, 2017
- Location: NZ
How pretty! Maybe you can go off the list.In post 1014, Porkens wrote:14) Vecna
8) Skygazer
17) Wh4t
13) Whemestar
7) Chickadee
6) Gamma Emerald
1) Rylai and Lina (Frozen Angel & Shiro)
2) Innocent Children (Nancy Drew 39 & Disquieted)
12) Porkens
5) Mastina
18) Ginngie
11) Invisibility
16) Vaxkiller
19) Nero Cain
20) Nosferatu
22) randomidget
21) jjh927
3) Maid Cafe (MariaR & Beeboy)
4) Nicorobin
9) Titus
10) KuroiXHF
15) Lady Angel - Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t
- Wh4t