What do y'all think the chances are of there being a serial killer in a game called
Oh and
I agree with the rest of your reasoning but I still think this ^^ was stupid.I want to hear how they think town should approach achieving their win condition because I think it'll help me discern whether that vote was one of complexity (an actual reflexive action against votes on them) or on a less serious note.
This isn't particularly helpful and really just sounds like someone who doesn't want to be meta'd. Your last post was #13 and it was a joke post, you have no comments on Mewtaph's chain of questioning and reasoning that occurred between then and now? Do you agree with one person in particular? Why did you decide not to comment at all and instead focus on yourself, when the focus has been on Mewtaph and lolwagons for the last page?In post 29, Doughboy wrote:I’m not sure anyone can meta me. I’m evolving my play each game as I adjust to this site.
Is the OMGUS the only reason you singled out lolwagons for this questioning? Why not Doughboy who also engaged in joking OMGUS? Why not any of the other RVS votes that could be deemed similarly "unproductive?"In post 36, Mewtaph wrote:The shading and discrediting of my slot from being effectively listened for questioning two opening posts devoid of content is not appreciated in any case.
I usually categorize self focus as a scum tell, I don't know what reason town would have to focus on themselves early on unless it's a habit of the player as you say.In post 46, Doughboy wrote:I always focus on myself first, then I worry about everyone else.
You're right, I was being too general. I meant to imply that the more content/opinions generated the more town has to work with. Obviously everything can't be out in the open, but there's a reason sharing reads (by all players) is helpful to the town.In post 58, podoboq wrote:This is just explicitly wrong. The logical conclusion of this statement is that town should all claim immediately, because the more information town has the better. Concealing information from scum is also a factor, and Mewtaph's intro into this game is extremely sloppy if it's town play.
I really really hate this post the more I look at it.
In post 58, podoboq wrote:Mewtaph's intro into this game is extremely sloppy if it's town play.
These both read as incredibly confident that Mewtaph's play is scummy, though I echo Mewtaph's question on what the Turing test comment means exactly. Yet, he immediately backs off as soon as he realizes he accidentally put Mewtaph at L-1? If podoboq believes Mewtaph's play is "extremely sloppy" at best and scummy at worst, what is the harm in applying even more pressure to him and seeing how he reacts? Where's the negative? This reads as scum realizing they made a mistake, and being scared of town seeing them as too brazen or gungho about a lynch that will flip town—not wanting to beIn post 59, podoboq wrote:Mewtaph's posts do not pass a Turing test.
This is his initial vote in case you were thinking post #60 was lolwagons not counted vote on MewtaphIn post 30, LolWagons wrote:Initial read is that Dann is town.
I don’t like Mewtaph’s questioning, I think it was pretty obviously a joke and that the line of questioning comes from someone wanting to look like they’re doing something rather and logically thinking through to the conclusion Dann reached (about giving the answers away before a response). My intent was to get us out of RVS early and it seems to be working.
Vote Mewtaph
That’s L-2 I believe.
I think the order is incredibly important. You intention was to bring the wagon to L-2, but you afterwards realized it had been the vote to bring the wagon to L-1 instead. The distinction of whose vote actually put Mewtaph at L-1 is important imo, and from your perspective, it was yours accidentally.In post 79, podoboq wrote: When placing my vote, the intention was to bring the wagon to L-2. lolwagon's vote brings the wagon to L-1, regardless of the order in which our two votes were placed. I didn't want the wagon sitting on L-1.
By placing a vote at L-2, the intention is to get reactions from not only Mewtaph, but other players, without the immediate risk of lolhammers or Mewtaph claiming as a surprise town pr. If directly after my vote, the wagon is at L-1, whether it's because another person immediately followed me by voting or the previous L-2 was missed, my vote is no longer accomplishing its goal.
This is my first game on site for over three years, but aren't both these things still incredibly taboo? Especially considering we aren't in a newbie game? What town player is gonna quick hammer with the knowledge they'd be the next lynch target if Mewtaph flips town?In post 84, podoboq wrote:Oh, by the way, yes. I've seen lolhammers happen before, and I doubt that you haven't. Lolclaims are also a problem, where an inexperienced, frustrated, or simply bad player sees themselves at L-1 and just claims because lol. I don't think either is a positive result with this little progress into the game.In post 72, Dannflor wrote:Podoboq, do you seriously believe someone is going to quick hammer 3 pages in and with 10 days left on the clock?
But whyIn post 101, Xtoxm wrote:Podoboq unvoting is a town instinct. I like it
In post 102, LolWagons wrote:OMGUSing twice on people who have players on their bandwagons within four pages is scummy. Yes. Player specifics do not matter. It shows a focus on lynching those that suspect you and those that are also vulnerable to a lynch which is literally the cookie cutter way to play as mafia.
Oh this is BAD. As I said before, I read the previous lolwagons vs. Mewtaph exchange as town, even the subsequent unvote is fine IMO. Felt like town willing to admit they might've been wrong. But uh.... This vote sheeping me
well that's DUMBIn post 104, podoboq wrote:I remember lolhammers still happened. lolclaims are more common
Mewtaph, can you also answer why lolwagons thinking OMGUSing is scummy is not satisfactory to you? What was the point of your whole intro to the game if you don't think OMGUS is scummy or at the very least useless?In post 100, Mewtaph wrote:Well, now I see you're suggesting OMGUSing twice is scum-indicative, for when asked to elaborate, you referred back to the timing; when asked to elaborate onthat, you referred back to my votes following when another player has voted me (essentially just saying OMGUS is scummy). Is there a more player-specifc reason why you're scum reading me?
I reckon I'm pretty shit as scum.In post 116, mbaki wrote:Dannflor, how competent of a scum player do you reckon you are? Can you link your most recent 2 scum games please?
Okay... This still doesn't really answer any of my questions on why exactly you are voting podoboq. If you must, remove yourself from the recent "attack on player over play" and go back to when you first made the vote. Why did you do that? And why then without any further elaboration?In post 142, Mewtaph wrote:podoboq? Was waiting for the AI content after our initial exchange but the underhanded attack on player over play makes me difficult to make objective commentary wrt his alignment currently.In post 140, Dannflor wrote:Also Mewtaph, I still want to hear thoughts on podoboq + your vote on him
How the fuck did that interaction look possibly game-impacting at the start? Please, be specific.In post 149, Gamma Emerald wrote:despite looking possibly game-impacting at the start
This doesn't track with the timeline. You voted for podoboqIn post 148, Mewtaph wrote:I thought that their thoughts overall (on me and bristep123) leading up to the vote was a bit jarring in some sense soI was fine with voting there to see how they would respond wrt them looking towards themselves to explain the L-1/L-2 vote philosophy and unvote.
I am actually on board with calling this revisionist history. If you read the exchange you see Xtoxm initiated the discussion about his alignment and asked mbaki what he thought. How does mbaki answering "Scum, I would guess." come close to looking like "he was taking an actual interest in the meta information that could be gained?"In post 154, Gamma Emerald wrote:Anyway, it seemed relevant because at one point mbaki asked Xtoxm’s alignment in the other game, which looked like he was taking an actual interest in the meta information that could be gained.
What all this really means is that your only valid reason for post #132 is that the interaction between the two wasn't adding anything to the game. That's self evident. Both players—mbaki more so than Xtoxm—have added more to the game than you have anyways. The extra meaning you're taking from the words of mbaki's explanation is also terrible.In post 149, Gamma Emerald wrote:I like shitposting sometimes butso I was wondering where it was going.it wasn’t adding anythingdespite looking possibly game-impacting at the start
His position that what? What is his position? mbaki straight up admitted that the 3 post interaction didn't add to the game, here you are trying to pull something... I'm not even exactly sure what, out of it. This is so desperate, and currently bothering me more than anything else in this game.In post 157, Gamma Emerald wrote:That actuallyworsensyour position as you took no interest in any sort of meta prodding.
My first instinct when Gamma posted #132 was that he just made a mistake as town. A shitty, not helpful post, but not necessarily alignment indicative. His followup andIn post 164, podoboq wrote:Would scum openly misrep something so easy to just go back and check? Like, there's no way scum Gamma is intentionally misrepping this, knowing it takes 10 seconds to find out that it's not accurate. Using this as justification that Gamme is scum rather than he just mixed things up seems like a leap.
Gamma, do you have a good answer for this? Or even an answer?His position that what? What is his position? mbaki straight up admitted that the 3 post interaction didn't add to the game, here you are trying to pull something... I'm not even exactly sure what, out of it.In post 157, Gamma Emerald wrote:That actually worsens your position as you took no interest in any sort of meta prodding.
Why do see mbaki as scummier than Mewtaph now?In post 168, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is true. That wasn't what I was thinking when I posted that. Doesn't change the current impact.
It's an interesting theory, but not sure it makes a ton of sense considering Gamma Emerald put Mewtaph at L-1 a page before and nothing super impactful happened between that vote and his post calling out the mbaki/Xtoxm interaction—unless he changed his mind about bussing suddenly. Which, might be possible? but not sure why he would have voted for Mewtaph so easily to begin with then.In post 166, mbaki wrote:I believe it is most likely he was desperate to distract for some reason, meaning his partner was probably one of the two wagons (Podoboq and Mewtaph, more likely the latter who's wagon is more significant). This is more just a pocket theory than something I'm seriously pushing, though.
That's a pretty big swing, no? I'm confused why you switched your vote to mbaki based on "disliking some of his play" when you still have/had a scumread on Mewtaph.In post 195, Gamma Emerald wrote:mbaki while I dislike some of his play seems to be engaging with people in a towny way, especially podoboq.
You mean bristep instead of mbaki here, right? What do you think about the rest of podoboq's ISO?In post 195, Gamma Emerald wrote:podoboq I’m pretty clearly scumreading, I think he thought I’d be glad to have a whiteknight at my side but he overstepped by pushing mbaki for something I did too when he never once expressed that sort of feeling with me.
Town reading this because I don't think scum admits that one of their reads was reactionary, I think they try to justify it better. Additionally, I'm not seeing a reason for the desperation play I named Gamma's entrance as, given I don't think it makes sense for Gamma to be distracting from the Mewtaph wagon the way he did, and podoboq's wagon only had 2 people on it.In post 197, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like a little of that earlier scum read might have just been reactionary.
That's awful. I wish him a speedy recovery.In post 203, Thespio wrote:I feel its appropriate to let you know he informed me that he was in a car accident and will be in the hospital for a while. Send him some love if you have time.
I really like this post in particular. The reasoning for questioning bristep comes from a very town place, a place that wants to get accurate reads on people. Rethinking the Mewtaph scum read also gets townie points in my book.In post 187, podoboq wrote:I moved on from him now because I had enough to feel satisfied at this point in the game. bristep happens to be voting one of my scumreads, one I've been rethinking. Then bristep comes in to provide a shred of analysis on something irrelevant to me, when I'm interested in an opinion on the person they're not only scumreading but voting. I'm not getting that, and it's frustrating.In post 184, mbaki wrote:It just seems odd that you'd choose to expand on bristep123 but pass Gamma Emerald as bad town and move on.
I also can't fail to mention that podoboq got to the conclusion I eventually got to on Gamma Emerald much faster, one that I think is fully accurate. I think Gamma is town, and I think scum!podoboq pushes Gamma more than he does for making such a stupid move.In post 169, podoboq wrote:I was going to paraphrase how I feel about Gamma, which is that it seems like he lazily came to a bad conclusion and is just sticking to it despite the fact that it's pretty clearly a bad conclusion, but you wrote it better than I could.
I hadn't considered this before. I'll have to keep that in mind for the future, it's a good point.In post 214, podoboq wrote:I don't like color coding my reads lists, because someone accused me in my first game on site of trying to subliminally affect others' perceptions.
Yea. At this point in the game the read lists are good, but they aren't enough content-wise given we're still in the thick of D1. With 3 of the 9 slots in this game not really participating it's very hard for the rest of us to move forward.In post 214, podoboq wrote:I'm worried this means that scum!mbaki is happy with us voting for xtoxm, but for now, I want to pressure that slot regardless.
In post 167, mbaki wrote:Right now I am working from Xtoxm, Lolwagons, and Dannflor as townies. I have waffled mentally a lot between Podoboq and Mewtaph, I do not believe it is theater though so if one is scum and flips there's that at least. bristep123 and Doughboy have not posted that I remember since I became involved in the game.
What happened between these two posts? Why did you read Xtoxm as town initially and why did you remove him from your working town list in favor of yourself despite Xtoxm not posting at all between that change. What changed your mind?In post 213, mbaki wrote:Dannflor, Lolwagons, and mbaki is the town core I am working with.
Could you answer this, mbaki?In post 220, Dannflor wrote:In post 167, mbaki wrote:Right now I am working from Xtoxm, Lolwagons, and Dannflor as townies. I have waffled mentally a lot between Podoboq and Mewtaph, I do not believe it is theater though so if one is scum and flips there's that at least. bristep123 and Doughboy have not posted that I remember since I became involved in the game.What happened between these two posts? Why did you read Xtoxm as town initially and why did you remove him from your working town list in favor of yourself despite Xtoxm not posting at all between that change. What changed your mind?In post 213, mbaki wrote:Dannflor, Lolwagons, and mbaki is the town core I am working with.
Agree with Trekkie town read. There are way easier scum reads to push than mbaki and LolWagons.In post 239, LolWagons wrote:I think Trekkie is probably town for going after someone most people thought was town but Podo hopping off his read of me quickly is a bit disconcerting.
I wouldn't personally view someone "seeing my argument" as jumping off their read
Unless I'm missing something, Podoboq is L-2, not L-1. mbaki, Mewtaph, and Gamma Emerald are currently voting for him. This is easily verifiable and the deliberate way in which mbaki did this makes me think it was an experiment to see who would try to hammer or express intent to hammer. Does scum do that?In post 298, Trekkie99 wrote:Those two things in the same sentence in the manner in which you've so plainly stated them makes me uneasy.
In post 156, mbaki wrote:I have glazed over almost every Mewtaph post this game. Just the way he types I guess.
In the two latter instances, mbaki is the first vote on individuals that relatively little suspicion had been directed towards yet during the game. Particularly with his vote on me, there were two healthy wagons in Mewtaph and Podoboq that—even if he didn't want to himself hammer the L-1 Mewtaph—he could have at least pushed towards vaguely. Instead he went for different directions. It's a more opaque style of play but it reads town. I don't see it as a delay or confusion tactic either as I don't think we were—or are—far enough along in the day for scum to need that. (unless mbaki is scum team with Mewtaph?)In post 116, mbaki wrote:VOTE: Dannflor
I have no solid reads yet in either direction. If anybody wants to inquire as to why I'm voting Dannflor despite my only comments towards his slot being partially agreeing with his case, come to that conclusion yourself.
Dannflor, how competent of a scum player do you reckon you are? Can you link your most recent 2 scum games please?
I think initial impressions from our replacements will be pretty important. They'll give a fresh perspective and probably see the obvious things that we've either been too entrenched to notice or have dismissed because we've made things too convoluted. Either way I'm looking forward to what Sheep thinks when he's caught up.In post 299, Dannflor wrote:Oh one last thing
In post 302, mbaki wrote:However, the whole game can't just be town.
Yup, which is why I know I need to look this over again.In post 299, Dannflor wrote:Fucking hell I need some scum reads everyone can't be town
Thus, I understand Podoboq's reactionary vote because LolWagons continuing to push this point is weird. You can maybe call it preparation for a shift in opinion at worst but Podoboq literallyIn post 239, LolWagons wrote:I think Trekkie is probably town for going after someone most people thought was town butPodo hopping off his read of me quicklyis a bit disconcerting.
Bad post. I revoke my earlier Trekkie town read.In post 275, Trekkie99 wrote:Wow don't know what to make of this. LolWagons has made some pretty good points.
This is not great either. I really don't like how Trekkie just sits on the sidelines this whole debate and casually encourages it. This post doesn't really say anything but plant a little bit of doubt about Podoboq without actually committing to anything.In post 282, Trekkie99 wrote:I understand you changed your mind about lolwagons not because I said his contributions were lacking but because he took offense to you seeing my point, but I do feel you were a little bit quick to change your mind about him.
Why? Could you explain this in more detail?In post 271, Trekkie99 wrote:and your contributions in the exchange between you and Mewtaph are lacking IMO
In post 317, Trekkie99 wrote:All I was trying to do was make sense of the whole situation for myself as well as lolwagons and podoboq who I felt were like two dogs running in a circle chasing after each others tail.
Which is it? Did you think the argument was circular and pointless or did you think one of them was making "pretty good points?"In post 275, Trekkie99 wrote:Wow don't know what to make of this. LolWagons has made some pretty good points.
Except LolWagon's case wasn't that podoboq changed his opinion or that he did so quickly, but that he did so in response to your read on him and did so without committing to the change, which I don't think is valid. Just because podoboq changes his read later doesn't mean "he had a point all along."In post 336, Trekkie99 wrote:Both I guess. However I wasn't implying I thought the argument was pointless. Circular yes, but pointless? No.
I think podoboq's opinion change of lolwagons was justified because of lolwagons's behavior, but in turn podoboq sort of proved lolwagons's claim that podoboq changed his read rather quickly to be true. Naturally podoboq's change of view of lolwagons took place after lolwagons seemingly overreacted, but at the same time I can't help but feel that maybe lolwagons had a point all along.
Why was his interaction with Mewtaph lacking? Do you think the case against Mewtaph was bad?In post 312, Dannflor wrote:Why? Could you explain this in more detail?In post 271, Trekkie99 wrote:and your contributions in the exchange between you and Mewtaph are lacking IMO
In post 208, LolWagons wrote:Does scum say this? I don’t think mafia tends to say shit like this.In post 156, mbaki wrote:I have glazed over almost every Mewtaph post this game. Just the way he types I guess.
In post 209, LolWagons wrote:I think Mbaki, Podo, and Bri are town.
I think Dann leans town.
No clue on Gamma. Thought I knew how to read him and a game just wonder where I was wrong.
I’m hanging up the Mewtaph hat for now, I genuinely can’t tell if it’s a play style difference or I’m onto something but I’m willing to look elsewhere.
Bri made a good point about Xtom and I’m not parking my vote on a slot that needs replaced so
VOTE: Xtotm
Obviously there's not a ton of LolWagons posts sans Mewtaph, but do these not count as being involved with the game? What is your read on LolWagons now, after he "made some good points" against Podoboq?In post 222, LolWagons wrote:Damn might have been wrong on one of my town reads.
Danny can have the slot.
what
Mewtaph has not been involved in any real noteworthy discussions outside of his initial spats with podoboq and LolWagons. Nor has he offered many/any real reads of his own thus far in the game. Why is he on your town list if I could make the same case on him that you made on LolWagons?In post 347, Trekkie99 wrote:No I think Lolwagons case against Mewtaph was fine, I was just under the opinion that lolwagons intention in having the discussion with mewtaph was to give the appearance of being involved in a semi-noteworthy discussion so he wouldn't look like a scum trying to stay out of heated discussions.
Which do you think is more likely? I don't like this fence-sitting.In post 347, Trekkie99 wrote:Mixed. The fact that he was willing to challenge Podoboq could mean my initial opinion of lolwagons was incorrect, or lolwagons felt the the need to step up his game since the discussion of his activity had been brought up.
Are we just accepting Gamma doing the same thing thenIn post 352, LolWagons wrote:I don’t really like how Mewtaph comes in and just asks Trekkie to explain after Dann is clearly already pressuring him.
I want to explain this better. Usually mixed reads occur because a player has done both towny and scummy things. Trekkie's "mixed" read here on LolWagons is just saying that something he did "could be either towny or scummy." It looks like it offers up an opinion without actually offering up anything.Which do you think is more likely? I don't like this fence-sitting.In post 347, Trekkie99 wrote:Mixed. The fact that he was willing to challenge Podoboq could mean my initial opinion of lolwagons was incorrect, or lolwagons felt the the need to step up his game since the discussion of his activity had been brought up.
You also said he's one of your scum reads in post #234. If you've changed your mind about LolWagons, why not vote mbaki? In fact, why aren't you votingIn post 360, Trekkie99 wrote:Mbaki said he was baiting which sounded legit
I ask again, why aren't you voting? You should at least be pressuring one of your mixed reads to get a better feel for them. Right now, you're doing... Nothing.In post 365, Trekkie99 wrote:Town: dannflor, mewtaph, podoboq, lolwagons
Mixed: gamma emerald, mbaki
Null: ofrhz, sheepsaysmeep
Literally just look at the post and then how he fixed it two posts later. He was trying to quote me and failed. Do you have anything useful to offer the game? I mean I townread you earlier but your ISO has improved 0%.In post 367, Gamma Emerald wrote:I didn’t see any broken tags though...
I think it's reasonable for scum to fake nuance, and may even overdo it to see like they put a lot of thought into their reads,In post 394, sheepsaysmeep wrote:that trekkie read is just detailed and unique to a poitn where idt it was made up but like thats one post and barely impactful on my overall read
Who do you thinkIn post 373, Trekkie99 wrote:I get the inkling that Gamma Emerald isn't scum but just a townie being dead weight. Hopefully this will wake him up.
In post 381, Trekkie99 wrote:I think he's town
Like, I know I'm pressuring him to choose someone as scum, but these two sentences directly contradict each other. It implies he thinks everyone in this game is town. I still like Trekkie best as scum today.In post 398, Trekkie99 wrote:Gamma Emerald is most likely to flip scum.
Meh. Fits with the theory that this is a town controlled game.
Yes, we've had an overabundance of town reads this game, but "I can't get a good scum read one anyone" sets off red flags for me. Reads like scum who is having a hard time finding anyone that they can make a good case against or have proper "justification" to push on. In my experience scum cares a lot more about getting "good" reads and making sure they're pushing for the right reasons. His initial scum reads on LolWagons and mbaki support this with just how easily he switched them back up to town (or realized his cases against them weren't as good as he initially thought).In post 426, Trekkie99 wrote:I'm townreading everyone at the moment. Unfortunately I can't get a good scum read on anyone. Gamma Emerald is my best bet at the moment, but I'm hardly satisfied with it. In all fairness though it's only day one.In post 425, ofrhz wrote:It's more that he said he was townreading you and then said you were most likely to flip scum. The read doesn't feel real.
Also, he didn't really push your slot. He scum read you and mbaki sure, and included some vague reasons why. But he didn't vote and he didn't really elaborate until pressured. In fact he seemed quite content with the debate that followed between you and Podoboq. It seems to me like he was waiting to see if anyone else backed up his scum reads before he actually pushed, like he was trying to play it safe. When it looked like the tides were turning on Podoboq and no one wanted to go after LolWagons, Trekkie comes out with posts like these:In post 427, LolWagons wrote:I just don’t see scum-Trekkie taking on the task of pushing my slot unless there was something fairly large to be gained from it.
In post 275, Trekkie99 wrote:Wow don't know what to make of this.LolWagons has made some pretty good points.
And then sort of tries to take the middle ground when I call him out on it:In post 282, Trekkie99 wrote:I understand you changed your mind about lolwagons not because I said his contributions were lacking but because he took offense to you seeing my point,but I do feel you were a little bit quick to change your mind about him.
In post 336, Trekkie99 wrote:Both I guess. However I wasn't implying I thought the argument was pointless. Circular yes, but pointless? No.
I think podoboq's opinion change of lolwagons was justified because of lolwagons's behavior, but in turn podoboq sort of proved lolwagons's claim that podoboq changed his read rather quickly to be true. Naturally podoboq's change of view of lolwagons took place after lolwagons seemingly overreacted, but at the same time I can't help but feel that maybe lolwagons had a point all along.
Ok last post but the subtle mixed/middling read on Trekkie is another point towards the Mew/Trekkie scum team theory if Trekkie flips red.In post 361, Mewtaph wrote:{Dannflor, LolWagons, mbaki}
{Gamma, Trekkie}
{podopoq, ofrhz, Sheepsaysmeep}
Mew you're really not helping your own case hereIn post 538, Mewtaph wrote:Posturing.In post 537, sheepsaysmeep wrote:mew
if you really want me lynched at some point
put your actual reasons for w reading me into one post
i dare you