I’m town so you must be scum to vote me
VOTE: Doughboy
I’m town so you must be scum to vote me
I was curious how DB would react. We’ve played together but I’m still getting used to his meta.In post 15, Mewtaph wrote:Why engage in OMGUS this early? What are your thoughts on how someone should go about achieving their town win condition?
Wasn’t the easy push you thought I’d be huh
In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=10612320#p10612320]post 68[/url], Thespio wrote:I have decided not to count your vote as it doesn’t meet the requirements. Please use ‘Vote:’ to make it official
Oh it’s not really who it’s on that’s the issue here. It’s the timing.In post 94, Mewtaph wrote:Do you think there's an objectively better place to put my vote at this stage given who has been actively posting so far?In post 93, LolWagons wrote:That’s two L-2 OMGUS votes from Mewtaph now and we are on page 4.
What do you even mean by that?In post 98, Mewtaph wrote:Ok, so now what do you think it means for the future of this game?
In post 100, Mewtaph wrote:Well, now I see you're suggesting OMGUSing twice is scum-indicative, for when asked to elaborate, you referred back to the timing; when asked to elaborate onthat, you referred back to my votes following when another player has voted me (essentially just saying OMGUS is scummy). Is there a more player-specifc reason why you're scum reading me?
Oh, gross. I’ve been on to you since page 1. You can’t act like you haven’t been in my sights until the wagon lmfaoIn post 131, Mewtaph wrote:Feel free to feign interest the moment 4/9 players are willing to lolwagon me for bad reasons. You're going to end up short changed.
So you’re just not going to address me anymore? I don’t feel like I’ve been particularly abrasive or stubborn.In post 135, Mewtaph wrote:You definitely aren't interested in what I have to say. So don't expect cooperation from me if you're going to pop the old "I can't wait to see their thoughts so I can blow them out of the thread".In post 134, LolWagons wrote:Oh, gross. I’ve been on to you since page 1. You can’t act like you haven’t been in my sights until the wagon lmfaoIn post 131, Mewtaph wrote:Feel free to feign interest the moment 4/9 players are willing to lolwagon me for bad reasons. You're going to end up short changed.
Bri’s apathy is a bit annoying but that a fairly Townie thought processIn post 170, bristep123 wrote:I'm not feeling the Gamma push, need to keep an eye on that. Especially Xtotm who only said 'Gamma is scumposting' but didn't vote. That's my thought anyway.
Does scum say this? I don’t think mafia tends to say shit like this.In post 156, mbaki wrote:I have glazed over almost every Mewtaph post this game. Just the way he types I guess.
You literally said this. It’s the exact opposite of what Trekkie stated.In post 214, podoboq wrote:Alright, let's do this. I don't like color coding my reads lists, because someone accused me in my first game on site of trying to subliminally affect others' perceptions. So in order to make this readable, I'm just gonna use my mod color for everyone!
Towny
LolWagons
LolWagons entire iso is trying to interact and sort players. I don't think there's anything specific I need to cite. At this point, LolWagons is playing a lot, and appears
to not be afraid to disagree with people. I like this slot a lot.
Noooo you’re trying to reframe switching a position as offering an olive branch to a player. You specifically say I’m interacting with players. Players. Plural. Not just Mew. Now you’re trying to say my only meaningful interaction was with Mew. It is not semantics. Because I’d have a hard time believing that you would townread someone who you thought was only interacting with Mew. This is a position change and you’re not owning it.In post 254, podoboq wrote:I read a lot of disagreement from you with regards to Mewtaph. That made me like your slot.In post 252, LolWagons wrote:You literally said this. It’s the exact opposite of what Trekkie stated.
Then Trekkie comes in and discounts it. He says you're not getting too involved, and I thought you were getting pretty involved with Mewtaph. So I find common ground, and ask him to elaborate, because it'll help me figure out what I think of Trekkie. Doesn't mean I agree with him. Just that I want to cooperate with him.
The fact that you're not comfortable with that is fascinating to me, though. Please continue.
For the last time, the direction of the read doesn’t matter. Truly it does not. It’s that one person said I was lacking contributions and you completely 180’d on what you were SAYING about me. If I wanted to OMGUS or throw shade on people just for suspecting me I definitely wouldn’t have townread Trekkie.In post 280, podoboq wrote:I'd color that with more nuance and detail if I were you, but that's a reasonable perspective. I don't believe "I can see what you're saying" = "I agree with you," so I don't see any contradiction. If you do, and if LolWagons does, maybe that's just a misunderstanding.In post 278, Trekkie99 wrote:I say lolwagons contributions have been lacking, podoboq says he can see my point, lolwagon says that podoboq is contradicting himself, podoboq says he isn't but that lolwagon's current behavior is scummy.
Ew. No.
As I’ve said I just got burned by Gamma-town. Thought for sure he was scum because literally 2/3 of his posts were active lurking or defensive. Flipped town.In post 354, Dannflor wrote:Are we just accepting Gamma doing the same thing thenIn post 352, LolWagons wrote:I don’t really like how Mewtaph comes in and just asks Trekkie to explain after Dann is clearly already pressuring him.
If you’re wrong about me and feel uneasy about him is there any reason you’re not actively pressuring this slot more than the above post? Or voting him?In post 298, Trekkie99 wrote:Those two things in the same sentence in the manner in which you've so plainly stated them makes me uneasy.
Well, I don’t think it’s totally valid, no, because although I didn’t interact that much with others there were people higher up on his reads list that interacted less. But it had merits, most of my activity was with mewtaph.In post 422, ofrhz wrote:Did you think trekkie's read on you was valid?In post 239, LolWagons wrote:I think Trekkie is probably town for going after someone most people thought was town but Podo hopping off his read of me quickly is a bit disconcerting.
--
You don't have to vote someone to push or scumread them. I'm not sure what this was trying to proveIn post 258, mbaki wrote:Except I'mIn post 214, podoboq wrote:I can't tell if mbaki's push on GE is scummy or not, but it's garbage either way. The fact that he came to the same conclusion, "I don't believe Gamma Emerald read the game and came to the conclusion his current nitpick is how he's going to find scum," but his next step was "therefore he's scum," doesn't make sense to me when that reads as extremely towny to me. Either mbaki is mistaking bad play for scummy play, or mbaki is just trying to justify his scumread without any real supporting evidence.not voting Gamma Emerald?
--
I think pod is town. I'd be fairly surprised if 269 came from scum
If you truly believe what you just said, call my bluff and vote him then.In post 439, Trekkie99 wrote:LolWagons has stated he thinks that if I flip scum then Mew must be scum as well. If lolwagons is scum, he knows I'll flip town thereby making his claim that Mew must be scum as well seem less likely.
If lolwagons is scum, then my next thought is that mew could be his scum mate, and lolwagons has been going after mew this whole game using weak suspicions to distance himself from his teammate without risking accidentally getting his scum mate lynched.
Along comes me saying mew is town and lolwagons is scum. Seeing later on there's a chance I could be lynched, lolwagons says this.In lolwagons ideal situation, I get lynched, and then the next day lolwagons says something in the vain ofMy thought is that if Trekkie is scum, then he went after me because I was on to someone. Obviously the most likely candidate would be Mew, but I don’t want to frame my whole reference around Mew-scum. I just don’t see scum-Trekkie taking on the task of pushing my slot unless there was something fairly large to be gained from it."whoops! guess mew must be town as well"and gets away with it.
Hmmmmm...
Nope, it looks like a pathetic attempt at distancing tbh. It fits perfectly consistently in with you and Trekkie being scum.In post 434, Mewtaph wrote:That's actually supposed to be a scum case on me... mhm... ok. If you think saying "in this moment" is scum indicative then you're sticking your head so far out that you could reach your ass.
And if we're talking "exceptionally manufactured", or "clunky", that'd be your 10+ week saga against my posts. Let's take a look at this gem:
This is actually awful considering you're trying to push me and Trekkie at the same time. Then, optically you're suggesting that you are trying not to make your frame of reference around me being scum, which is a complete joke at this point. (I don't see it at all.)In post 352, LolWagons wrote:I don’t really like how Mewtaph comes in and just asks Trekkie to explain after Dann is clearly already pressuring him.
So if you actually think that you are "not trying to make your frame of reference around mew-scum", then mate that's a massive obstacle to walk around considering that's complete bullshit lmao.
Liked the tenacity and wrote it down as town at the beginning but for ages now you've been wandering around like a lost puppy. I have no idea why your thoughts have been pretty empty, maybe at the start for a little bit, but even now, it seems like you're going nowhere new.
That was on page 5... are you seriously implying what I said on page 5 is still what I currently believe?In post 435, Mewtaph wrote:You said last time to get a raincheck on your thoughts that I was going to get lynched, flip red and you were going to get NKed. Bold statement, except you're proving that you don't actually believe in it as much as that should 100% imply because at this point you aren't even the main effort pushing it forward, I've felt more pressure from Sheep than I have from you the entire game, low key.
For someone that suggests boldness, I am not getting any of it from you. Reconsideration, no. So then what the fuck are you pushing? Your Trekkie approach is easily fakeable. Your approach to me is sus as fuck. I definitely need more than this before I just completely leave it and move on.
It's sketchy as; I need a good explanation or you can take my vote and run with it straight into the lynching noose.
@Trekkie: How do you feel about how LolWagons has interacted with you?
My bad it was page four. Here’s the “bold push” Mewtaph is referencing.In post 99, LolWagons wrote:What do you even mean by that?In post 98, Mewtaph wrote:Ok, so now what do you think it means for the future of this game?
You flip red, I probably die N1. That’s the current trajectory I feel this game is on.
But it’s page four. So who knows.
LOLIn post 446, Trekkie99 wrote:Why him and not you?In post 440, LolWagons wrote:If you truly believe what you just said, call my bluff and vote him then.
I’ve been pushing Mew since page 2, what makes you think you-town would abandon my read of him?In post 452, Trekkie99 wrote:If I hadn't said it first, I don't think you'd be saying that in the morning.In post 449, LolWagons wrote:And, for the record, if you do happen to flip town, that doesn’t mean that Mew is suddenly town.
Do you want to address any of my points or just throw vague shade at me?In post 451, Mewtaph wrote:No, but your response isn't very good either.In post 442, LolWagons wrote:That was on page 5... are you seriously implying what I said on page 5 is still what I currently believe?In post 435, Mewtaph wrote:You said last time to get a raincheck on your thoughts that I was going to get lynched, flip red and you were going to get NKed. Bold statement, except you're proving that you don't actually believe in it as much as that should 100% imply because at this point you aren't even the main effort pushing it forward, I've felt more pressure from Sheep than I have from you the entire game, low key.
For someone that suggests boldness, I am not getting any of it from you. Reconsideration, no. So then what the fuck are you pushing? Your Trekkie approach is easily fakeable. Your approach to me is sus as fuck. I definitely need more than this before I just completely leave it and move on.
It's sketchy as; I need a good explanation or you can take my vote and run with it straight into the lynching noose.
@Trekkie: How do you feel about how LolWagons has interacted with you?
And why leave out the part where I said that it was only page 5 and who knows what will change? Why frame it like I was being bold?
This is a clumsy push.
So if I understand correctly, you think Mew and I are scum together. Mew has 1-2 votes (replacements are making it hard to count these votes) on him and you’re at L-1. Instead of going onto his wagon you go onto mine, which as far as I can tell, is empty. You don’t directly engage with Mew but you engage with me.In post 455, Trekkie99 wrote:Well I won't say my claim isn't far fetched, but I like it so I'm sticking with it.
VOTE: lolwagons