Mini Normal 2050: Serial Killers - Game Over
Forum rules
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Okay so quick read on everyone.
Town: dannflor, mewtaph, podoboq,
Mixed: gamma emerald
Null: bristep123, xtomx,
Scum: mbaki, lolwagons
The discussion between my three town reads feels very townie while my two scum reads feels like they're participating in the discussion but aren't getting to involved and are letting my three town reads do most of the discussing.
Bristep123 and obviously xtomx are on my null list due to inactivity and gamma emerald is mixed to me because he complained about some chit chat, but then says he's not interested in discussing anything cause this game is boring. Would a scum say this though? Probably not so that's why he's mixed to me- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I wouldn't personally view someone "seeing my argument" as jumping off their readIn post 239, LolWagons wrote:Podo hopping off his read of me quickly is a bit disconcerting.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Personally I've found very little of your "engagement with other players" not including your ongoing activity with podoboq, and your contributions in the exchange between you and Mewtaph are lacking IMO.In post 242, LolWagons wrote:It’s more the fact you checked my ISO this morning and now that someone is suspecting me you’re suddenly shifting to an opinion that I’ve only contributed in regards to the Mewtaph exchange, which is probably partially true but I’ve engaged with other players and have reads on them, so it’s more of a relative comparison (I came in very engaged and hopped off when things got less interesting).- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I understand you changed your mind about lolwagons not because I said his contributions were lacking but because he took offense to you seeing my point, but I do feel you were a little bit quick to change your mind about him.In post 277, podoboq wrote:
HA!In post 275, Trekkie99 wrote:Wow don't know what to make of this. LolWagons has made some pretty good points.
LolWagons misrepping me openly and loudly = making some pretty good points?
I'm gonna spell out this timeline.- I read LolWagon's ISO and see transparent arguments with Mewtaph and decent thoughts about the game and put him at the top of my town reads.
- You don't think he's interacting with players enough.
- I notice alright, there's less interaction that I originally noticed. Still don't think it's scummy. Ask you to elaborate.
- Before you can respond, LolWagons accuses me of completely abandoning my read.
- I explain that I was just trying to see your perspective.
- LolWagons continues to misrep that I now scumread their previous interactions in the game, despite the fact that I'm transparent about that not being the case.
- I vote LolWagons.
- "LolWagons has made some pretty good points." - Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Apologies. It was a quick post mainly for myself so I could keep everything straight in my head lol.In post 280, podoboq wrote:
I'd color that with more nuance and detail if I were you, but that's a reasonable perspective. I don't believe "I can see what you're saying" = "I agree with you," so I don't see any contradiction. If you do, and if LolWagons does, maybe that's just a misunderstanding.In post 278, Trekkie99 wrote:I say lolwagons contributions have been lacking, podoboq says he can see my point, lolwagon says that podoboq is contradicting himself, podoboq says he isn't but that lolwagon's current behavior is scummy.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
In post 285, podoboq wrote:
I feel like I've got more in these last two pages than I did in the rest of the game combined.In post 282, Trekkie99 wrote:I do feel you were a little bit quick to change your mind about him.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Those two things in the same sentence in the manner in which you've so plainly stated them makes me uneasy.
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Oh, duh. Doughboy. I'll also unvote.In post 306, Thespio wrote:In post 305, Trekkie99 wrote:@Thespio I didn't vote lolwagonsSorry, your slot has been on him, I just switched the names, I will unvote him for you!
Unvote- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
This is not great either. I really don't like how Trekkie just sits on the sidelines this whole debate and casually encourages it. This post doesn't really say anything but plant a little bit of doubt about Podoboq without actually committing to anything.In post 282, Trekkie99 wrote:I understand you changed your mind about lolwagons not because I said his contributions were lacking but because he took offense to you seeing my point, but I do feel you were a little bit quick to change your mind about him.
Does seem as if I was sitting on the sidelines when you look at it the right way, however I really wasn't part of the discussion. All I was trying to do was make sense of the whole situation for myself as well as lolwagons and podoboq who I felt were like two dogs running in a circle chasing after each others tail.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Does seem as if I was sitting on the sidelines when you look at it the right way, however I really wasn't part of the discussion. All I was trying to do was make sense of the whole situation for myself as well as lolwagons and podoboq who I felt were like two dogs running in a circle chasing after each others tail.This is not great either. I really don't like how Trekkie just sits on the sidelines this whole debate and casually encourages it. This post doesn't really say anything but plant a little bit of doubt about Podoboq without actually committing to anything.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Both I guess. However I wasn't implying I thought the argument was pointless. Circular yes, but pointless? No.Which is it? Did you think the argument was circular and pointless or did you think one of them was making "pretty good points?"
I think podoboq's opinion change of lolwagons was justified because of lolwagons's behavior, but in turn podoboq sort of proved lolwagons's claim that podoboq changed his read rather quickly to be true. Naturally podoboq's change of view of lolwagons took place after lolwagons seemingly overreacted, but at the same time I can't help but feel that maybe lolwagons had a point all along.
My read on lolwagons was based on his activity which IMO when not looked at more closely gave the appearance of being active andAlso, I like how the whole argument allowed you to sidestep Podoboq asking you for more justification on your LolWagons read—which is why I'd specifically like you to go into that more.involved. His discussion with mewtaph on page four post numbers 93-99 was the only somewhat serious discussion he'd had with anyone in the day so far at the time of me posting my read and even that was lacking.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
No I think Lolwagons case against Mewtaph was fine, I was just under the opinion that lolwagons intention in having the discussion with mewtaph was to give the appearance of being involved in a semi-noteworthy discussion so he wouldn't look like a scum trying to stay out of heated discussions.I dislike how you're still dodging my initial question:
Why was his interaction with Mewtaph lacking? Do you think the case against Mewtaph was bad?Why? Could you explain this in more detail?
Not definitely. First and third one's kind of random. However his read is fine.Obviously there's not a ton of LolWagons posts sans Mewtaph, but do these not count as being involved with the game?
Mixed. The fact that he was willing to challenge Podoboq could mean my initial opinion of lolwagons was incorrect, or lolwagons felt the the need to step up his game since the discussion of his activity had been brought up.What is your read on LolWagons now, after he "made some good points" against Podoboq?- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Because IMO mewtaph has been active, involved, has asked reasonable questions, and has handled himself well under criticism.Mewtaph has not been involved in any real noteworthy discussions outside of his initial spats with podoboq and LolWagons. Nor has he offered many/any real reads of his own thus far in the game.Why is he on your town list if I could make the same case on him that you made on LolWagons?
Based on his more recent activity, I'd say my initial opinion of him was wrong.Which do you think is more likely? I don't like this fence-sitting.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Mbaki said he was baiting which sounded legit.In post 358, LolWagons wrote:
If you’re wrong about me and feel uneasy about him is there any reason you’re not actively pressuring this slot more than the above post? Or voting him.In post 298, Trekkie99 wrote:Those two things in the same sentence in the manner in which you've so plainly stated them makes me uneasy.
In post 313, mbaki wrote:It is explained. It was bait. If I'm voting Podo anyways (which is a real vote), might as well throw in that. Never know.
The "absolute necessary" is everything I have to offer. I can't think of anything else to say.In post 358, LolWagons wrote:I really didn’t think someone would come in and scumread me like that, honestly thought it was really ballsy to do as scum butthe way you’re only offering what seems to be absolutely necessary to get through Dann’s questions is eroding that initial instinct I had to call you town.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
My scum read on LolWagons was fairly strong at the time while mbaki could have probably fit into a mixed category due to his activity level and behavior which I viewed as comparable but not equal or greater to lolwagons's. However this post by lolwagons pinged me as possible scum helping a mate which pushed mbaki into the position of possibly being a scum mate.In post 362, Dannflor wrote:You also said he's one of your scum reads in post #234. If you've changed your mind about LolWagons, why not vote mbaki? In fact, why aren't you votinganyone? You come in with these two scum reads and the only thing you do is UNVOTE LolWagons. And now it doesn't even seem like either of those reads were particularly strong.
With my opinion of lolwagons changed, I've mostly forgotten about mbaki putting him in a mixed category next to Gamma Emerald who speaking of which is mixed to me only because of his post where he criticized some chitchat but then later said he wasn't interested in discussing anything. Ignore that little debacle and he basically becomes null sitting next to ofrhz and sheepsaysmeep.In post 208, LolWagons wrote:
Does scum say this? I don’t think mafia tends to say shit like this.In post 156, mbaki wrote:I have glazed over almost every Mewtaph post this game. Just the way he types I guess.
My town reads on dannflor, mewtaph, and podoboq are still strong however. I feel pretty confident in adding lolwagons to my town reads.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Like Dannflor said, I messed up while trying to quote.In post 367, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I didn’t see any broken tags though...In post 344, Dannflor wrote:He messed up his quote tags. I don't think there is a story there.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I voted for Gamma Emerald because I wanted to hear more from him.In post 375, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
why would you.. vote someone you dont think is scumIn post 373, Trekkie99 wrote:I get the inkling that Gamma Emerald isn't scum but just a townie being dead weight. Hopefully this will wake him up.
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
can you talk about why you would think soemone who feels like dead weight to you is villager instead of scum?
I think he's town because I don't think scum wouldn't behave like the way he is. Of course it could be WIFOM though...- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Like I said in post #381:In post 396, Dannflor wrote:
Who do you thinkIn post 373, Trekkie99 wrote:I get the inkling that Gamma Emerald isn't scum but just a townie being dead weight. Hopefully this will wake him up.isscum? Even if you have a lot of mixed or null reads, who do you think is most likely to flip red?
I don't know how likely a WIFOM play could be, but it's a possibility so I would have to say that Gamma Emerald is most likely to flip scum.In post 381, Trekkie99 wrote:I think he's town because I don't think scum would behave like the way he is. Of course it could be WIFOM though...- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Little correction here. I meant to say "would". Not "wouldn't" .In post 381, Trekkie99 wrote:I think he's town because I don't think scumbehave like the way he is. Of course it could be WIFOM though...wouldn't- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Same.In post 406, mbaki wrote:I don't need an extension personally, but I will approve for others who do.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I'm townreading everyone at the moment. Unfortunately I can't get a good scum read on anyone. Gamma Emerald is my best bet at the moment, but I'm hardly satisfied with it. In all fairness though it's only day one.In post 425, ofrhz wrote:It's more that he said he was townreading you and then said you were most likely to flip scum. The read doesn't feel real.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
LolWagons has stated he thinks that if I flip scum then Mew must be scum as well. If lolwagons is scum, he knows I'll flip town thereby making his claim that Mew must be scum as well seem less likely.
If lolwagons is scum, then my next thought is that mew could be his scum mate, and lolwagons has been going after mew this whole game using weak suspicions to distance himself from his teammate without risking accidentally getting his scum mate lynched.
Along comes me saying mew is town and lolwagons is scum. Seeing later on there's a chance I could be lynched, lolwagons says this.
In lolwagons ideal situation, I get lynched, and then the next day lolwagons says something in the vain ofMy thought is that if Trekkie is scum, then he went after me because I was on to someone. Obviously the most likely candidate would be Mew, but I don’t want to frame my whole reference around Mew-scum. I just don’t see scum-Trekkie taking on the task of pushing my slot unless there was something fairly large to be gained from it."whoops! guess mew must be town as well"and gets away with it.
Hmmmmm...- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Why him and not you?In post 440, LolWagons wrote:If you truly believe what you just said, call my bluff and vote him then.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
If I hadn't said it first, I don't think you'd be saying that in the morning.In post 449, LolWagons wrote:And, for the record, if you do happen to flip town, that doesn’t mean that Mew is suddenly town.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Maybe you wouldn't. Maybe you'd keep up your charades all while knowing that people might take your claim less seriously.In post 453, LolWagons wrote:
I’ve been pushing Mew since page 2, what makes you think you-town would abandon my read of him?In post 452, Trekkie99 wrote:
If I hadn't said it first, I don't think you'd be saying that in the morning.In post 449, LolWagons wrote:And, for the record, if you do happen to flip town, that doesn’t mean that Mew is suddenly town.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
That's not a question that's a threat.In post 464, mbaki wrote:Why should I not hammer you?- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Depends on your definition of baseless.In post 462, LolWagons wrote:So there’s almost 500postsworth of content and your case for both scum is baseless speculation?- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I fail to see how I could be more transparent. Lolwagons and mew are scummies, lolwagons was keeping his distance, I come in and say mew is town and lolwagons is scum, when it looks like i'm going to get lynched lolwagons comes in and says if I flip scum it could mean I was protecting my potential scum mate mew by calling lolwagons scum. I get lynched, flip town, lolwagons says he was wrong about mew. My claim is complete.In post 476, LolWagons wrote:If Trekkie was more transparent about how he got to where he was I would maybe buy that.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
In post 521, Mewtaph wrote:
noone is listening to your reads, delete this, goodbyeIn post 519, Trekkie99 wrote:Town: dannflor, podoboq
Mixed: gamma emerald, mbaki
Null: ofrhz, sheepsaysmeep
Scum: lolwagons, mewtaph- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Me too.In post 527, LolWagons wrote:I feel like I’m looking up at a blue sky and everyone is insisting it’s red and made of cheese- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Someones in a hurry now that dannflor has shown up.In post 553, LolWagons wrote:I know I’ve been on Mews case but I’m over it. Trekkie disappearing is the final straw. I don’t need to wait for his claim.
UNVOTE: Mewtaph
VOTE: Vote Trekkie
Hammer. Done with this shit.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Me is confused.In post 569, LolWagons wrote:
Nice scumclaim. Glad I was right.In post 568, Trekkie99 wrote:
Someones in a hurry now that dannflor has shown up.In post 553, LolWagons wrote:I know I’ve been on Mews case but I’m over it. Trekkie disappearing is the final straw. I don’t need to wait for his claim.
UNVOTE: Mewtaph
VOTE: Vote Trekkie
Hammer. Done with this shit.
Am I hammered? Oh well. If I end up being right about lolwagons and mew I'm going to feel like such a boss.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
In post 571, Dannflor wrote:I feel like the parent to a bunch of squabbling kids.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I'm still L-1? Sweet.In post 573, LolWagons wrote:Meh he’s still at L-1 and I think he knew that.
I was hoping for a towntell of some sort.
The good news Dann, is now he can answer your question. Right Trekkie?- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
My initial post which detailed my sudden revalation explains everything.In post 566, Dannflor wrote:Well, I was gonna ask how Trekkie's read on Mewtaph got from top town read to top scum read in a manner of pages, but I guess that's moot now.
In post 439, Trekkie99 wrote:LolWagons has stated he thinks that if I flip scum then Mew must be scum as well. If lolwagons is scum, he knows I'll flip town thereby making his claim that Mew must be scum as well seem less likely.
If lolwagons is scum, then my next thought is that mew could be his scum mate, and lolwagons has been going after mew this whole game using weak suspicions to distance himself from his teammate without risking accidentally getting his scum mate lynched.
Along comes me saying mew is town and lolwagons is scum. Seeing later on there's a chance I could be lynched, lolwagons says this.
In lolwagons ideal situation, I get lynched, and then the next day lolwagons says something in the vain ofMy thought is that if Trekkie is scum, then he went after me because I was on to someone. Obviously the most likely candidate would be Mew, but I don’t want to frame my whole reference around Mew-scum. I just don’t see scum-Trekkie taking on the task of pushing my slot unless there was something fairly large to be gained from it."whoops! guess mew must be town as well"and gets away with it.
Hmmmmm...- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Yeah what was with that? Very rude.In post 646, LolWagons wrote:and the other was the obvious distancing thing I pointed out where Mew said no one was listening to his reads.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
No I'm not that was a serious question.In post 651, LolWagons wrote:
I mean... he’s just mocking me at this point.In post 649, Trekkie99 wrote:
Yeah what was with that? Very rude.In post 646, LolWagons wrote:and the other was the obvious distancing thing I pointed out where Mew said no one was listening to his reads.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I can't tell who this is directed at.In post 654, Gamma Emerald wrote:That just feels a little too hardened of a saying for any newb, town or scum.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I'm new to mafia here. I've played on Eurobricks. It's a um...Lego forum.In post 657, mbaki wrote:Meta is likely the best overall tool, but I don't think meta is usable when Trekkie has no completed town games. His play here is a step up from his first game ever... doesn't that apply to almost everyone?- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
I tend to give up when I'm scum or town if I'm about to be lynched. If I was a town pr I would put up a fight.In post 664, mbaki wrote:
Lego was pretty dope when I was younger, no hate.In post 660, Trekkie99 wrote:
I'm new to mafia here. I've played on Eurobricks. It's a um...Lego forum.In post 657, mbaki wrote:Meta is likely the best overall tool, but I don't think meta is usable when Trekkie has no completed town games. His play here is a step up from his first game ever... doesn't that apply to almost everyone?
It looks like you've given up on this game which is scum indicative, and unfortunate regardless of your alignment.- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
- Trekkie99
-
Trekkie99 Goon
- Trekkie99
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 399
- Joined: November 17, 2018
Learn to answer my question.In post 695, podoboq wrote:
Learn how to do quote tags, please.In post 693, Trekkie99 wrote:
When was that?It's very cute that this is posted after Dannflor independently came to the same conclusion. - Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99
- Trekkie99