Mini Normal 2050: Serial Killers - Game Over
Forum rules
- mbaki
-
mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
If the game was stagnant I would attempt to create content, but the game is active enough for a 9 player lobby on this site. I am just not interested in any of the content so far, nor does any of it really help me generate reads. No point shutting down activity that's helping you guys, even if I can't engage in it.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
But I will say, I love your flavor.In post 55, Thespio wrote:- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
It isn't though. Lots of games would be a greater estimated victory for the town with a day 1 mass claim; however, because of the games where it is not, and because it decreases overall skill and increases overall luck of a given game, it is typically viewed as an unfavorable strategy.In post 58, podoboq wrote:This is just explicitly wrong. The logical conclusion of this statement is that town should all claim immediately, because the more information town has the better. Concealing information from scum is also a factor, and Mewtaph's intro into this game is extremely sloppy if it's town play.
The "extremely sloppy" part doesn't track with me. What?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
One could also argue strategic talk is the easiest for scum to post because it doesn't take critical thinking as one can just say their true thoughts. I don't believe this is a valid reason to townread somebodyIn post 64, podoboq wrote:
Decent scum could have just stayed quiet and let them continue to spin out.In post 61, mbaki wrote:Townreading a strategic discussion comment that is completely separate of the game, Podo?
Yes, I could. No, I don't feel like it. I don't believe its relevant.In post 68, Mewtaph wrote:
Can you explain why:In post 54, mbaki wrote:If the game was stagnant I would attempt to create content, but the game is active enough for a 9 player lobby on this site. I am just not interested in any of the content so far, nor does any of it really help me generate reads. No point shutting down activity that's helping you guys, even if I can't engage in it.
a) you aren't interested in the content
b) why it doesn't help you generate reads
c) why you can't engage with it
I don't think the fact he revoted when I moved my vote is overly indicative, but otherwise, I agree with this post.In post 72, Dannflor wrote:This whole issue is exacerbated by the fact of him jumping right back on the wagon when mbaki unvotes. Clearly he wants to push the wagon, he just doesn't want to be the one who puts him at L-1 because that draws too much attention.
I agree with this and bristep's prior post as well.In post 75, bristep123 wrote:Not the point, his vote was to put mewtaph to L2, once Lolwagons put them to L1 then podoboq was clear that they didn't want it at L1. For me, there's a difference.
I didn't find Podoboq's post before this awful, but this quoted one is not good.In post 84, podoboq wrote:
Oh, by the way, yes. I've seen lolhammers happen before, and I doubt that you haven't. Lolclaims are also a problem, where an inexperienced, frustrated, or simply bad player sees themselves at L-1 and just claims because lol. I don't think either is a positive result with this little progress into the game.In post 72, Dannflor wrote:Podoboq, do you seriously believe someone is going to quick hammer 3 pages in and with 10 days left on the clock?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
VOTE: Dannflor
I have no solid reads yet in either direction. If anybody wants to inquire as to why I'm voting Dannflor despite my only comments towards his slot being partially agreeing with his case, come to that conclusion yourself.
Dannflor, how competent of a scum player do you reckon you are? Can you link your most recent 2 scum games please?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
Oof.
If it makes you feel better Gorkington (and his alt accounts) has been carried in I believe all minus one of the games I have seen them as town in.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
What about 2 town games?In post 121, Dannflor wrote:
I reckon I'm pretty shit as scum.In post 116, mbaki wrote:Dannflor, how competent of a scum player do you reckon you are? Can you link your most recent 2 scum games please?
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=24421
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=24395
Not very recent unfortunately but these are my last scum games
The first one looked pretty pathetic, though you probably already knew this as you resulted in being the day 1 lynch.
The second wasn't bad though, a lengthy iso with lots of content, the standard day 3 bus resulting in a scum win. Granted, I didn't readtooin-depth, but your iso seemed relatively fine. Nothing like your Mewtaph case in it that I saw.
I agree.In post 125, Xtoxm wrote:Gork is cool. I felt like it was said in jest at the time (He was legit scumreading me) and he apologised after. I sigged it in endearing manner- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Let's discuss this then.
7 posts in your iso.
1) rvs; irrelevant
2) theory post; irrelevant (queue the "why are we discussing this")
3) agree with someone else; relevant, though not starting discussion nor scumhunting
4) random 1-liner; irrelevant
5) agree with someone; relevant, as this post l-1s someone
6) random takeaway; irrelevant
7) "why are we discussing this"; irrelevant
In conclusion, there are exactly two posts relevant to the game in your iso. One of them puts a player at l-1, and one of them agrees with something another player says. Neither advances discussion, provides insight, or affects the game-state... other than bringing a wagon to l-1.
Why aren'tyoudiscussinganything, and why is #124 the thing you choose to comment on when there is game relevant content around and after it including from me?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
In post 137, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m not discussing because this game is honestly rather boring rn. I’m curious why you poked at Xtoxm’s sig and why you spent so much time discussing such frivolity though.
It was a random aside in a post that also gave a read (Xtoxm as town) (giving a read being more than you've contributed in your iso combined). Xtoxm chose to continue that chain of discussion and it continued for exactly 3 posts, I apologize that 3 posts of out of game discussion is frivolous to you.In post 118, mbaki wrote:I love the Gorkington quote in your sig.
Ironically, I give town points to 118.
Your turn: how is #137 helping you game solve? If you're poking at me because you think I shouldn't post irrelevant content but it doesn't help you sort me, it isn't advancing the game state, and I reckon Gamma Emerald would never partake in such frivolty.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
I added it on to a post that professed something game related, and he chose to reply to it starting the tangent. IE, why was this a me question and not an Xtoxm question.In post 149, Gamma Emerald wrote:I find the way you phrased things a bit shady, specifically saying Xtoxm continued it the way you did.
To be concerned about being blameless there would have to be something to be "blamed" for.Looks overly concerned with looking blameless.
Revisionist history.at one point mbaki asked Xtoxm’s alignment in the other game
Yes, I did guess Xtoxm's alignment in that game... after this post:In post 119, Xtoxm wrote:What alignment do you think I was in that game- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
So do you think Gamma Emerald is posting good, townie thoughts?In post 164, podoboq wrote:
Would scum openly misrep something so easy to just go back and check? Like, there's no way scum Gamma is intentionally misrepping this, knowing it takes 10 seconds to find out that it's not accurate. Using this as justification that Gamme is scum rather than he just mixed things up seems like a leap.In post 160, Dannflor wrote:I am actually on board with calling this revisionist history. If you read the exchange you see Xtoxm initiated the discussion about his alignment and asked mbaki what he thought. How does mbaki answering "Scum, I would guess." come close to looking like "he was taking an actual interest in the meta information that could be gained?"
Using something that didn't actually happen to support the reason you cherry-picked this interaction does look like revisionist history, because it's not just you mixing up who said what, it's you mixing up the whole chain of events and thinking it means something it doesn't.
I am not Dannflor and my gripe with Gamma Emerald is that his full iso is nothing, calling someone else out who's doing nothing, even though that someone did something, finding a weird way to push them on something outright false, said thing gets proven false, and Gamma doubles down and says that's even scummier!
This is not a townie thought process. And now, one person has explicitly agreed with me and another has called Gamma Emerald's posting scumposting, but Gamma's vote remains despite it being disapproved by multiple people. This is after Gamma chose only to comment on the not relevant thing in the first place. He still has not answered why he questioned myself over Xtoxm either even thoughXtoxm is the one who started the "scummy" tangent.
To reword again because the above reads awkwardly: I don't believe Gamma Emerald read the game and came to the conclusion his current nitpick is how he's going to find scum. It is unviable. He has still not commented on anybody else.
I believe it is most likely he was desperate to distract for some reason, meaning his partner was probably one of the two wagons (Podoboq and Mewtaph, more likely the latter who's wagon is more significant). This is more just a pocket theory than something I'm seriously pushing, though.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
Mod, Dannflor is voting for Gamma Emerald as of #160.
And this appeal to emotion:did not make me townread Gamma Emerald more.
Right now I am working from Xtoxm, Lolwagons, and Dannflor as townies. I have waffled mentally a lot between Podoboq and Mewtaph, I do not believe it is theater though so if one is scum and flips there's that at least. bristep123 and Doughboy have not posted that I remember since I became involved in the game.- mbaki
-
mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
I mean, you're right, but I don't think that means anything?In post 179, podoboq wrote:In post 176, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Isn’t that what I did lolIn post 172, podoboq wrote:
This pinged me too.In post 171, Mewtaph wrote:Is there any particular reason why you're willing to comment on the Gamma push here specifically over anything else that has happened in the game? Do you have any sort of stance towards me v LolWagons or me v podopoq?
bristep is very low activity, and has cherry picked a topic to comment on. I would like to know why that topic is relevant to them.
Fair. The difference for me is that bristep's commenting on something legitimately relevant to the game, while Gamma never did. Deciding that you're going to provide an opinion on some content in this game, but just explicitly ignore other important content, especially when asked directly about it, doesn't look good.In post 177, mbaki wrote:Indeed it is.
Gamma Emerald chose to comment on one specific thing. That thing wasn't relevant to the gamestate.
bristep123 chose to comment on one specific thing. That thing was the main topic of discussion at the time.
Is deciding not to provide an opinion on some content but not all of itworsethan only providing an opinion on no content? I don't understand your argument here.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
I do usually include myself in reads lists. It helps for factoring numbers, games can be solved by having the majority of the player list as town reads.In post 214, podoboq wrote:Writing your own name instead of "myself" is a common and successful trick. On Survivor, there's an understanding that once your name is in people's mouths, it'll never leave. If you've been talked about being voted out, you will never truly be safe again, because it's a name people know has some kind of traction. In mafia, the same thing is true. "____, ____, and mbaki is the town core I am working with," makes other people see that people are talking about mbaki as part of a town core when they're skimming. It makes it look like mbaki is considered a part of town, but it's artificial, because you're the one putting yourself in that town core. It's like including yourself in your own readslist.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
Outright false.In post 214, podoboq wrote:A less arcane problem is that this post just displays zero scumhunting, and is just coasting off of the town pool that Dannflor laid out. There is no controversy in mbaki's posts. There's no real thought. No action was taken to move the game forward, which, if he's scum, indicates he's happy with the current flow of the game. I'm worried this means that scum!mbaki is happy with us voting for xtoxm, but for now, I want to pressure that slot regardless.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
Except I'mIn post 214, podoboq wrote:I can't tell if mbaki's push on GE is scummy or not, but it's garbage either way. The fact that he came to the same conclusion, "I don't believe Gamma Emerald read the game and came to the conclusion his current nitpick is how he's going to find scum," but his next step was "therefore he's scum," doesn't make sense to me when that reads as extremely towny to me. Either mbaki is mistaking bad play for scummy play, or mbaki is just trying to justify his scumread without any real supporting evidence.not voting Gamma Emerald?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
IIn post 261, podoboq wrote:
I mean, youIn post 136, mbaki wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Let's discuss this then.
7 posts in your iso.
1) rvs; irrelevant
2) theory post; irrelevant (queue the "why are we discussing this")
3) agree with someone else; relevant, though not starting discussion nor scumhunting
4) random 1-liner; irrelevant
5) agree with someone; relevant, as this post l-1s someone
6) random takeaway; irrelevant
7) "why are we discussing this"; irrelevant
In conclusion, there are exactly two posts relevant to the game in your iso. One of them puts a player at l-1, and one of them agrees with something another player says. Neither advances discussion, provides insight, or affects the game-state... other than bringing a wagon to l-1.
Why aren'tyoudiscussinganything, and why is #124 the thing you choose to comment on when there is game relevant content around and after it including from me?DIDvote for him, and you're still pushing the narrative that he's scum even though your vote is parked on someone who just replaced for the time being.DIDscumread him, but his play improved. He is closer to null now.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
In post 279, podoboq wrote:Not sure if I townread Gamma Emerald.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
In post 295, LolWagons wrote:Wait is he even at L-1?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
My Gamma read shifting. Theoretically, a town!gamma makes town!xtoxm a lot less likely. But, more than that, the Xtoxm read was at a stage of the game where there was almost no content I cared about so a throwaway comment having town pings was enough to be in my town category. There was a lot more thread but not a lot more Xtoxm.In post 299, Dannflor wrote:Could you answer this, mbaki?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
However, the whole game can't just be town.In post 299, Dannflor wrote:Getting town vs. town vibes from this initially- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
Hence why I am playing like I am.In post 307, LolWagons wrote:I have a lot of town or null reads but I’m having trouble with scum reads.
Still working with my confident town reads being Dann and LolWagons.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
It is explained. It was bait. If I'm voting Podo anyways (which is a real vote), might as well throw in that. Never know.In post 312, Dannflor wrote:Are you planning on explaining your L-1 bait?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
Its implied I am not new. This is not my main site. I'd rather leave it at that.In post 330, podoboq wrote:
An answer on this would be nice. I'm not asking you to tell us your main. I just want to know if you have one, or if you're legitimately new to mafiascum.In post 264, podoboq wrote:mbaki, are you an alt? Because if you're just new to forum mafia, that can explain away some stuff.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
your quoted example is a valid question. going against the status quo requires expansion.In post 391, ofrhz wrote:
Hmm, I don’t think pod said gamma was posting good, townie thoughts anywhere?In post 166, mbaki wrote:
So do you think Gamma Emerald is posting good, townie thoughts?In post 164, podoboq wrote:Would scum openly misrep something so easy to just go back and check? Like, there's no way scum Gamma is intentionally misrepping this, knowing it takes 10 seconds to find out that it's not accurate. Using this as justification that Gamme is scum rather than he just mixed things up seems like a leap.
The bolded is a fallacy and kind of appeals to the majority, e.g. “Other people think this as well, so why don’t you?”I am not Dannflor and my gripe with Gamma Emerald is that his full iso is nothing, calling someone else out who's doing nothing, even though that someone did something, finding a weird way to push them on something outright false, said thing gets proven false, and Gamma doubles down and says that's even scummier!
This is not a townie thought process.And now, one person has explicitly agreed with me and another has called Gamma Emerald's posting scumposting, but Gamma's vote remains despite it being disapproved by multiple people.This is after Gamma chose only to comment on the not relevant thing in the first place. He still has not answered why he questioned myself over Xtoxm either even thoughXtoxm is the one who started the "scummy" tangent.- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
Agreeing with me on Gamma at a time I thought Gamma was likely scum, and the random town ping earlier.In post 392, ofrhz wrote:In post 167, mbaki wrote: Right now I am working from Xtoxm, Lolwagons, and Dannflor as townies. I have waffled mentally a lot between Podoboq and Mewtaph, I do not believe it is theater though so if one is scum and flips there's that at least. bristep123 and Doughboy have not posted that I remember since I became involved in the game.mbaki, why the townread on Xtoxm?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
That's a leap.In post 439, Trekkie99 wrote:LolWagons has stated he thinks that if I flip scum then Mew must be scum as well. If lolwagons is scum, he knows I'll flip town thereby making his claim that Mew must be scum as well seem less likely.
If lolwagons is scum, then my next thought is that mew could be his scum mate, and lolwagons has been going after mew this whole game using weak suspicions to distance himself from his teammate without risking accidentally getting his scum mate lynched.
Along comes me saying mew is town and lolwagons is scum. Seeing later on there's a chance I could be lynched, lolwagons says this.
In lolwagons ideal situation, I get lynched, and then the next day lolwagons says something in the vain ofMy thought is that if Trekkie is scum, then he went after me because I was on to someone. Obviously the most likely candidate would be Mew, but I don’t want to frame my whole reference around Mew-scum. I just don’t see scum-Trekkie taking on the task of pushing my slot unless there was something fairly large to be gained from it."whoops! guess mew must be town as well"and gets away with it.
Hmmmmm...
Why should I not hammer you?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
Not really. You're a scum read and pushing a town read, and at l-1 near deadline.In post 465, Trekkie99 wrote:
That's not a question that's a threat.In post 464, mbaki wrote:Why should I not hammer you?- mbaki
-
mbaki Mafia Scum
- mbaki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: December 2, 2018
In post 411, sheepsaysmeep wrote:sheep
mbaki, dann
lolwagons
--
ofrhz, podo
--
trekkie/doughboy, gamma
mew
Which of the 16 posts between these caused me to slide so much in your reads?In post 428, sheepsaysmeep wrote:sheep/dann/lolwagons
podo
mbaki/ofhrz
--
mew/gamma/trekkie
im actually somewhat confident on everyone at this point and would have no idea where to look if all three of my bottom pool flipped town rn - mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki
- mbaki