hello all!
VOTE: nibbui
this feels a little bit like you think a guilty on you wouldn't be the wrong result?In post 11, Nibbui wrote:You shouldn't suddenly wagon me like that because I almost thought someone already had a Night 0 guilty on me!
idk i looked at the pl and your name caught my eye so i voted for youIn post 14, Nibbui wrote:Hmmm, it's early but I'm a bit curious why skitter started voting me though
yeah but that tends to happen later, not necessarily on like page1In post 26, Nibbui wrote:You guys actually have a history of accurately reading each other and played a considerable amount of games together.
i think you thought about what i did a lot more than i did lolIn post 26, Nibbui wrote:I had some expectation that she would start by voting you, or maybe Pink Ball since they were playing in Newbie 1903 that just ended, or maybe NSG.
i mean i would argue that my post was basically random and kinda irrelevant (until you made a thing about it)In post 36, Nibbui wrote:I needed to look at something that wasn't entirely random or with non relevant reasons (what was the case of all the other posts and votes until that time), and so I got interested in skitter.
i waas in this one and i think you played very well there!In post 49, Nibbui wrote:viewtopic.php?f=51&t=76232 (scum me throwing a fit, and later in the game actually not knowing how to respond to people for real)
huh that's not the sense i got from my one game with scum!him; he repped in and came in like a wrecking ball and tried ot strong-arm a lynch (for reasons that i found incredibly dubious)In post 56, sheepsaysmeep wrote:nibbui as scum is the laying low/super tense type
his confidence in thread and lamist ish attitude/how much he's engaging with me is really prominent in all his v games and it feels exactly like this
idk i kinda feel like you thought about this a lot more than i didIn post 57, Nibbui wrote:The reason I asked skitter why she had voted me instead of anyone else is because:
yes, do tellIn post 59, Nibbui wrote:Actually I re:read skitter's post some parts of it feels too cheeky and it was made before sheep had changed their read on me and I probably looked like a good prey to throw shade at since both TW and Sheep were wolfleaning me
VOTE: skitter
I'll point out what I'm talking about specifically later but yeah
that's fair, i didn't think about it in that contextIn post 65, Nibbui wrote:However Skitter also has a point, but it's kind of shaky because the game I played with Skitter was a multiball and I thought for real that Espeonage was scum for a certain time (and that was why I tried to strongarm him).
that you're overreacting to an rvs vote on you and making it into a *much* bigger deal than it actually isIn post 66, Nibbui wrote:I mean, yes, as either alignment you didn't think much about it, I definitely thought a lot more than you.In post 63, skitter30 wrote:idk i kinda feel like you thought about this a lot more than i didIn post 57, Nibbui wrote:The reason I asked skitter why she had voted me instead of anyone else is because:
But...what's your point skitter?
This feels like smart shade throwing for me, you seem to be implying something but instead of straightly saying what you think you leave it in the open like this.
(the entirety of this post kinda overthinks the nature of rvs posting)In post 14, Nibbui wrote:Hmmm, it's early but I'm a bit curious why skitter started voting me though
(expected - you thought about where i was going to rvs vote?)In post 14, Nibbui wrote:Although I have played with Skitter before, I don't know, it was a bit unexpected for her first vote to be on me honestly. I expected she going for TW.
^^^^ i felt like you were looking for reasoning that didn't like, existIn post 42, Nibbui wrote:somewhat yes. I can explain my logic after skitter answer me even.
also idk if 'coimbative' is the right word here; i'm trying to explain that idk why you cared so much - i get that you wanted to know why i voted you instead of like tw but there wasn't really much reasoning for it beyond looking at the pl and picking someone at randomIn post 70, Nibbui wrote:The fact that you seem to be combative against me for this instead of actually understanding what I meant right when I called you out is something I don't really appreciate.
it had some tinges of - hey they're already wagoning me so i better do something to defuse it; i'll joke about them having caught me already it was specifically the 'already' that felt a little weird to me, it gave the sentence a bit of a connotation of like surprise/annoyance that people were wagoning you already. like the 'already' kinda connoted validation almost - that it happened already. i think i'm doing a bad job explaining thisIn post 73, Nibbui wrote:"it felt a little defensive"
What defensive has anything to do what you said honestly?
You said that it sounded like I was saying "they got a guilty on me" as if it was natural for me to consider that a cop check on me would result on a guilty.
What you said had nothing to do with me being defensive, rather, you were saying as if I was kind of scum slipping in a post where I was joking about being scum.
It makes no sense this far and the fact that you just tried to paint what you said with a different color is again something I don't find positive.
You're free to point out if you think I'm misrepping you or something and why.
^^^^ the already gives off the connotation that a guilty wouldn't be the wrong result, that you kinda think that there's a possibility that this may happen in the futureIn post 11, Nibbui wrote:You shouldn't suddenly wagon me like that because I almost thought someonealreadyhad a Night 0 guilty on me!
(i dont post as fast as you, sorry)In post 74, Nibbui wrote:Like, and here you are questioning me about things I already talked about?
I already explained why RVS isn't entirely random.
I already explained as well my "reasoning" about questioning your vote.
Instead of arguing about my explanations you bring out those questions already answered again.
also i think you're fineIn post 76, Nibbui wrote:I don't think we crossed the lines, no. I'm just feeling like my tone is too aggressive (not yours) but I don't know how to tone it down without losing impact on my push like what happened in Open 741.
i intiially had the vibe that you felt like a guilty wouldn't be wrong, but i didn't figure out why until i went back to figure out where i was getting that fromIn post 52, skitter30 wrote:this feels a little bit like you think a guilty on you wouldn't be the wrong result?
i mean i thought i was saying that the entire time, and was feeling like you weren't understanding me throughoutIn post 84, Nibbui wrote:I somewhat like this part.In post 78, skitter30 wrote: you're saying that i'm getting defensive by drawing attention to the fact that you're waiting for some sort of explanation, whereas i feel like i'm not really getting across my response to your point of: 'i don't think rvs is truly random' - i'm saying that for me, this vote was
I would like it way more if you had said so from the begin though.
I'll mull over this 1v1 if you don't have anything to say about it anymore but yeah, although I can see your approach here as we just misunderstanding each other, right now I feel like your thought process (specially about the joke post) was unnatural and done when the game state seemed against me, but now that it somewhat changed, you had trouble explaining it properly.
I'm not going to tunnel, but that is my feeling right now.
that's the vibe i gotIn post 86, Nibbui wrote:Yes, but the point that you tried to read a scum claiming post as some kind of unconscious scum slip is weird. I don't think you can ever claim that.
if i was scum this conv wouldn't have happened; i would have avoided having it in real-time without perfectly being able to explain myself and to make sure what i was saying made sense; i don't think i can think of a scum exampleIn post 86, Nibbui wrote:Yeah, I'm mulling over this. Still would be good if you showed me a town game where you did something similar.
Also, have you ever done something similar to that as scum? (spicy question huh)
i have an appontment that i gotta go to; i'll be around later thoskitter30 wrote:
I'll concede that it might look like I'm 'fumbling' a bit because it's gut and I try to articulate my gut instead of just proclaiming 'this is bad' without any further explanation, and sometimes it takes a bit to find the words I want. I disagree that I'm grasping at straws that your posts feel fake.
oh sorry, i misunderstood what you wantedIn post 88, Nibbui wrote:Understood.
That's not really what I was looking for (I was looking for a case where you tried to grasp something on a joke post of someone) but I'll see it later.
why am i there?
i was also thinking that this was +town for himIn post 98, northsidegal wrote:i would say the towniest thing in your ISO is probably how much you're posting already, although there is the argument that much of your posting has been back and forth conversations or direct questions that aren't exactly easy for you to ignore.
so you think i bit the bait?In post 103, Nibbui wrote:If I need to be completely honest, I deliberately did that joke scum claim to get some suspicious on me and move the game forward because I was excited to play with this playerlist and wanted as soon as possible.
happy holidays!In post 106, Pink Ball wrote:wtf is this activity during our lord's birthday
i actually tend to townread thatIn post 112, Nibbui wrote:Don't you think it's scummy for me to argue with you that I'm not as townie as I am?
It's pretty LAMIST.
just like this post.
ngl this readslist is kinda ??? for me and i'm not really vibing like any of itIn post 114, mastina wrote:northsidegal
Pink Ball
Nibbui
InfiniteSoda
sheepsaysmeep
skitter30
podoboq
the worst
In post 130, sheepsaysmeep wrote:you think we spent our holidays acting an argument with each other for 2 pages?In post 121, skitter30 wrote:i low-key get partner-y vibes between sheep and nibbui
can you talk more about what gives you this feeling
In post 44, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i want to wait for other people to check in and let me know what they think because it's at this stage of arguing with someone that i usually start confbiasing and tunneling but yeah
VOTE: nibbui
can you link me some past wolf and village games of yours
In post 55, sheepsaysmeep wrote:ok so i think i want to v read nibbui after going through meta
and like v read very strongly
^^^^ these ones gave me taht pingIn post 101, sheepsaysmeep wrote:UNVOTE:
forgot to do this
at this point
anyone who wolfreads nibbui hasnt done a quick meta check
anyone who hasnt done a quick meta check should do a quick meta check
im slightly slightly paranoid that he would do better but very unlikely that there would be such a significant difference
can you say this again? i don't follow what you're saying in the boldedIn post 134, the worst wrote:In post 77, skitter30 wrote:^^^^ the already gives off the connotation that a guilty wouldn't be the wrong result, that you kinda think that there's a possibility that this may happen in the future
i'm aware that i'm reading into connotations but that's the vibe that it gave off to me and i'm trying to articulate what exactly was bothering me about itwolves (Nibbui's scumstyle being a classic example) edit around stuff like this in opening postsas a major rvs junkie this post is like, NAI / maybe 1% town indicative
are you saying you think sheep or mastina is town here?
i feel like you're purposefully not answering questions or trying to help people understand what you're thinkingIn post 147, mastina wrote:Sure do, but frankly I play so many games that I honestly just...don't remember what happened in which games for the most part pretty much. If I spent time to :effort: in this I could probably track down at least ten such links. But it would in fact be effort.In post 142, sheepsaysmeep wrote:mastina do you have any past v games/can you link me to them if you do where you act in this way like "idc what you think im going to blatantly not answer your question" or smtg like that
Not helping is that pretty much the only times I've been town have been either replacements or on alts (actually even the alts are mostly replacements), so this is literally the first game where I've been town from the start in over a year. Maybe even MORE than over a year. (Also not helping? There is absolutely nothing that scumastinacan'tdo. There are things she won't do, but overall, HUGE number of past games + LARGE number of scumgames--especially recently-- = most of what you'd see is pretty worthless.)
I just feel like playing this way, because it's just.
Kinda loose. And I like it.
ah okIn post 166, the worst wrote:sheepy
it's on his end, not your endIn post 168, Nibbui wrote:Ok skitter I can see you having a problem with some sheep posts but from where that association came from anyway?
I hate bussing and I think the first thing I always say in the scum PT when I roll scum is "don't buss, act naturally". I would be mad for his earlier push at me and even more mad on how strongly he is town reading me right now if we were partners.
Idk if there is daychat though.
fair enough, fair enough; i didn't get at first that you say that literally first thing in every scum ptIn post 172, Nibbui wrote:Skitter my argument is that he would know beforehand that he shouldn't act this way around me if we were partners because the first, and I really mean the first, thing I say in scum PT is to not buss or not interact weirdly. If it's not serious and just a suspicious it's ok though. Also it's apparently him and not me anyway.
I read the recent posts and I don't feel like there was as much to it as I imagined.
This game feels like will be a spicy read though.
can you elaborate a bit?In post 174, sheepsaysmeep wrote:eh i can see where youre coming from with disliking the 180In post 161, skitter30 wrote:^^^^ these ones gave me taht ping
the first feels a little bit like you're leaving room for people to talk you out of your vote
and the meta-read felt like a pretty big 180 from where you were pushing earlier - i guess i don't understand the strength of the read here; it feels almost too strong to me
generally i just put a lot of trust in meta and my original read on him was never actually that strong or off of very much,but the few things i disliked about him seemed to appear in his village game and not in his wolfing
i've never played with herIn post 180, the worst wrote:she's shiptoasting which is cliche scum indicative but it's also something she does as town but she's like uniquely less serious as she is as either alignment and she's a little wolfy which is slightly town indicative but she's not wolfy in her usual wolfy way so I'm not really happy putting stock in thatIn post 169, skitter30 wrote:ah okIn post 166, the worst wrote:sheepy
what are you thinking wrt mastina?
yeah when i saw that my first thought was kinda like:In post 190, Nibbui wrote:I think Mastina saying "TW is scum, 100% of the time here" is more alignment indicative than her whole attitude about explaining it or not tbh.
eh fair enoughIn post 221, mastina wrote:Of course I'm not answering questions.
If I felt like answering questions, I would be answering questions.
If I wanted people to understand what I was thinking, I would make effort to make them understand what I am thinking.
But I don't want to make that effort, for a specific reason.
This is actually the most serious thing I've said.
I've been messing around a lot, I've been just talking, having some fun, being casual, while dropping hints, while giving some semblance of an idea of what I mean, but to be dead serious and drop the jokiness altogether.
I'm wanting people to do a few particular things, mostly related (I almost said "one particular thing" before realizing it's not actually just one), but which take time and this strategy to go about with.
this is kinda a bad reaction to nibbui's vote tbhIn post 245, Pink Ball wrote:Why are you scumreading a slot that has done nothing to be either town or scumread? Your vote is awful and you know it, Nibbui
how often does he say it in his scumgames?In post 248, Pink Ball wrote:Hey NSG, I was doing a metadive on Nibbui for the same reason (he uses the word "honestly" and "to be honest" way too much"), but on Open 741 he used the word "honest" 15 times and he was alive for only one day, so I think we are working with town!Nibbui here.
you do actually feel different to that game - a little more abrasive/aggressive here than there? idk if that's ai or a function of the fact that there you repped into a nearly doomed slot and you needed to ingratiate yourself with the other players to prolong your existance (and it worked for me), going aggressive would prob have been the wrong approach to take thereIn post 253, Pink Ball wrote:Sheep says he metadives people as town; I have only ONE finished game, were surprise surprise, I was scum! If someone can tell me that I'm scum here analyzing that game, go on; you're wrong.
uh i haven't gotten that vibe like at all tbhIn post 253, Pink Ball wrote:the worst is pocketing Nibbui, and it's not even hard to see.
or this either?In post 253, Pink Ball wrote:the worst and sheep's interactions between them are pretty wolfy imo.
??? i feel like other things happened this game and you're like handwaving it all away to highlight the notion that nsg's push on nibbui is 'one of the most solid points' in the game?In post 256, Pink Ball wrote:The rest of the thread is basically "sheep's meta is this" or "this is town lol" or "hmmmm". But you're the one saying "notably towny",
like this was kinda brought up in reference to the fact that sheep had said he metadives people in general and nibbui in particular, but nobody was really bringing up metadiving pink ball - it felt a little to me like he wanted to use that game to say 'hey look i'm playing super differently from that game so you shouldn't scumread me here!!!1!'In post 253, Pink Ball wrote:Sheep says he metadives people as town; I have only ONE finished game, were surprise surprise, I was scum! If someone can tell me that I'm scum here analyzing that game, go on; you're wrong.
i mean i'm not sure if pnk ball literally said that, but that was definitely what he was trying to imply with the quote i pulled in the post aboveIn post 308, Nibbui wrote:He constantly say "Pink you are pointing to your scum game and telling me that I should town read you because of it" when Pink never said that. Most of we read first Pink's post about meta that way but it was something more interpretative/implied.
ok that's kinda what i thought you meant wrt hysteric, or something along those linesIn post 300, Nibbui wrote:sheep you're making my life harder here but it's ok I guess
I'm surprised by your play a bit though, I expected you be more memey (and I like the fact you're not).
I vaguely remember seeing a game of you where you were spamming "meep" a lot and not engaging. (although I think it was funny)
your playstyle here is a good surprise.
am i getting this right?In post 317, Nibbui wrote:You can read this as "If you look at my completed game you can see why I'm not scum here"
but you can read this as "If you try to use that game to say that I'm scum here, you're wrong". (basically saying that you shouldn't scum read him using the completed game as reference)
idk, htat's def not how i read it the frist time, and i didn't really get the distinction you were drawing till like nowIn post 322, Nibbui wrote:'m surprised skitter didn't seem to realize that
and it's a negative surprise
i viewed his whole argument holistically as:In post 328, Nibbui wrote:It seems you guys weren't paying much attention to Pink's posts, and I would expect you to do so if you wanted to read him.
uh right hereIn post 268, Pink Ball wrote:Haven't said that I'm obviously meta v here either, I said that if you meta scumread me you would be wrong,which is true since I'm playing different hereandthere's no enough information to compare since I only have one finished game.
i read it as the bolded.In post 336, Nibbui wrote:I can somewhat agree with this but it's a bit more complex than that.In post 330, skitter30 wrote:i also don't know if the distinction is actually that important? either way bringing up meta was kinda ouit of the blue and felt a little strange
It's more about if he only brought up meta because it had genuine correlation with his read on sheepor if he only used sheep as an excuse to bring out his completed scum game and sneakly point out that he is playing differently.
I'm still on nulltown for now though.
you're not like actively scummy but like idk if i townread you either if that makes senseIn post 343, the worst wrote:kinda hoping this has both wolvesIn post 273, sheepsaysmeep wrote:nsg is wolfy, pink ball is wolfy, infinite soda's popin kinda bothered me with it's timing but subject to change a lot in either direction once they start posting actual content
outside chance of skitter but she's also like very slightly towntelling too
this post pings me the wrong wayIn post 346, the worst wrote:kinda half caught up
willing to policy {bunk bill, infinitesoda} because i cbf reading thru bill's irritating bravado and rhetoric
think wolves are more like {nsg, ???}
VOTE: nsg
eh okIn post 352, Pink Ball wrote:Reading page 13: skitter, I didn't defend myself talking about meta. I said that sheep was scumreading me and he didn't specified why, and since he said he usually metadived people, I said that if he was scumreading me because of meta, he would be wrong. So I didn't bring up meta to defend myself, rather saying that if that's why sheep was pushing me, it would be wrong. It was an assumption.
i still think this btw; your response to the nibbui's initial vote against you was weirdly bravado-y / over-confident-y, as was how you responded to sheep continuing to push youIn post 354, Pink Ball wrote:and then says I responded poorly to votes which I don't agree:
idk you want to talk about it?In post 360, Pink Ball wrote:Ok, good explanation. I'm moving sheep up to a solid null read where gut says "LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH" and mind says "hey, chill, skitter has been scummier than this fella".
also i thought you were player A, but your tone/annoyance/defensivenss doesn't match player A's towngame, which was throwing me off and making me low-key scumread you, but i'm beginning to think you aren't actually player A so i kinda need to re-evaluate out; that's why i think it might be a personality thing and not actually a scum thing like i was orignally; i'm still thinking about thisIn post 365, skitter30 wrote:right now i'm trying to sort you and your tone/aggression/responses to votes on you feel bad but i'm starting to get the vibe that it might be a personality thing so idk
this post kinda feels like you're saying - his frequency of using 'honestly' matches his towngame so he might be town here?In post 248, Pink Ball wrote:Hey NSG, I was doing a metadive on Nibbui for the same reason (he uses the word "honestly" and "to be honest" way too much"), but on Open 741 he used the word "honest" 15 times and he was alive for only one day, so I think we are working with town!Nibbui here. I'm trying to sor now what's up with the word "feel" with Nibbui, since town!Nibbui usually "feels" things, and his discussion with Skitter seemed to be much more logical, but I'm inclined to believe this is town!Nibbui.In post 93, northsidegal wrote:word choice / toneread
i know normally i might get annoyed at this kind of reasoning if it was used against myself but even still i couldn't help but notice it: you used the word "hmmm" three times in your first three posts (with two in the third), and seven times so far in your 33 post ISO
obviously the word "hmmm" on its own isn't scum indicative (.... i think), but i think that kind of verbal tic is something worth looking at, especially in comparison to your other games.
again, i kind of hate this reasoning when it's used against me so sorry about that, but i can't just ignore it.
objectively i don't think i look/feel like town!me rnIn post 373, Nibbui wrote:I don't think I like this post tbhIn post 371, skitter30 wrote:it's ok i have almost no idea why i'd be townread here either
you said you had done things you wouldn't do as scum before so how you don't see why you would be town read?
@Pink I don't know about other words, but I wouldn't look on "shrug" because I use it a lot albeit on discord
I've been somewhat avoiding using it in games though for something sort of dumb and personal but I may change that
yeah like i said i've been kinda nit-picky and i'm aware it's not solve-y and idk why i got into those arguments. i guess i was just trying to make myself understood because i felt at times like nibbui's wasn't really *getting* what i was trying to say, although what i was saying wasn't actually that important; i'm very aware i'm not being my usual game-solve-y self; and no, i'm not at all afraid of being read hereIn post 379, Pink Ball wrote:I'm still townleaning you. You're interacting in real time when the gamestate is perfect for scum to not post that much (we have two players who are not playing at all and other two who I assume they don't have that much time? the duck and mastina I mean). You've pushed two players with enough confidence to make me believe you're not afraid of being read. What pings me is that I believe you have been focusing on minor things about those two (Nibbui and me) instead of having reads as a whole, but the way you're approaching people comes more often as town than scum. Also, knowing that you're aware that you're not being solvey is pretty much what I expect coming from town!you and not from scum!you.In post 365, skitter30 wrote:i could see why you think i might be fence-sitting, although i'm not really doing it on purpose
i'm feeling a little out-of-sync and i don't feel like i've found anything to really like *dig* into yet, and i'm noticing that i'm getting caught up in arguments for the sake of arguments which i don't really like doing and it isn't really helping me solve the game so i'm a little ???? and not sure where to go now; this isn't usually how i approach the game and i'm not sure where the disconnect is (i figured out i was feeling this like this afternoon and while i was writing the above post; at the same time i realized that i think i'm a little burnt out and that i might need a bit of a break from mafia after this). like i'm kinda reading the game and most of what i'm reading doesn't feel remarkable to me? or like i feel like i don't really have much to comment on? or that everything i'm reading just kinda is? idk
right now i'm trying to sort you and your tone/aggression/responses to votes on you feel bad but i'm starting to get the vibe that it might be a personality thing so idk
i don't really feel like i'm being careful with my votes, so much as i don't strongly scumread anyone yet
i like town!sheep and town!nibbui rn and those are the main reads i feel good about
why are/were you townleaning me?
(i know secret-alt etc but i wish i knew who you were so i knew where your impression of my game stems from)
About how you feel: I feel like that all the time lol this game is too intense for me, I'm not as smart as I would like to be I think. But I have fun trying, so maybe... have fun? And don't worry that much about it.
that's pretty much exactly what that means in this contextIn post 381, Nibbui wrote:ok, I've just learned that I'm using the word "projecting" a bit wrongly.
I had got the original meaning right but I was as well using it with a somewhat different meaning in context
when I told duckling for example that he was "projecting" or that I as town "project" myself a lot, I was using it as meaning something more like "consciously presenting yourself in a certain way even though it doesn't reflect your real thoughts or persona".
i guess my problem was more like: if he only checked your towngame how does he know what you do as scum at all - it's hard to know if it's irrelevant or not without knowing how you do it as scumIn post 385, Nibbui wrote:If I took some of my past games, even recently, as serious and logically as I'm taking this game, I think I would have done a lot better.I don't think that was his argument at allIn post 380, skitter30 wrote:
i understand that he's saying that he thinks scum may be paranoid about using it too often so may not use it at all but i'm not entirely following his logic for why the frequency of the word 'honestly' in your towngames means it's something you don't/wouldn't do as scum
it's more that if I do it both as town and scum it's irrelevant to try to read me by that