In post 991, skitter30 wrote: In post 885, podoboq wrote:As a person who hasn't played on site in a long time, and doesn't usually play more than one game at a time, all this talk of meta is going from mildly annoying to seriously frustrating.
it's ok it's beginning to frustrate me too
+ some people's playstyles in this game are beginning to annoy me as well
==
i don't like any of the podoboq votes
==
In post 904, sheepsaysmeep wrote:@tw wrt the skitter meta you linked
i think her villagery type of posting walls is better than i'd expected from her and i was kinda? underestimating her w game
but i think here theres a lot mroe genuine interacging/engaging with people and solving and she's still lean v after skimming that it's just a bit weaker
ye i know how to write things that sound townie; being townie in like a generically townie way doesn't mean much for me
==
why do you think he's incorrectly reading you?
(reminder, you don't have to quote this entire post to answer this)
==
i don't understand why you're townreading me so hard
==
In post 918, podoboq wrote: In post 872, mastina wrote: In post 4, skitter30 wrote:first! hello all!
@mod: regular vla on fridays/saturdays
VOTE: nibbui
This was an entirely clinical RVS entrance--it is constructed, rather than organic. There was an overall lack of whimsy to it, and no real lighthearted touch. However, skitter is a more logical-type player, so while I wasn't fond of it, I recognized that because of who made the post, it wasn't as scum-indicative as I'd otherwise be inclined to think. This still earned skitter a low place on my readslist, below the nulline, but only just.
And it's not just her read on me. This is useless too. These
tone reads
are nothing, and are based on literally one post, and mastina's clearly flawed
assumptions
about other players.
yeah i didn't like it either because it's how i start prob ~half my games, depending on if there's content when i make my first post
it's not constructed, and for me, i would argue that it's whimsical and lighthearted in comparison to my regular posting style (hello walls!)
and i don't dont' like her saying 'it wasn't *as* scum-indicative' as i'd otherwise be inclined to think' because i literally pulled four examples of me doing that in my towngames (i didn't check my scumgames); i don't think it's scum-indicative at all for me (and she's applying this standard to me in particular)
==
why are you voting sheep here?
==
In post 943, mastina wrote:Btw, skitter's
722 is the first post of skitter's which I've had any feeling on at all, pretty much--and it was positive. I liked it; it wasn't something stellar, but it made me feel loosely town there.
724 actually gives me similarly good vibes, too.
the fact that the two posts of mine that give you a 'postive feeling' are ones where i'm suspicious of your biggest scumread is a little disturbing
==
In post 953, mastina wrote:Well I don't know how to help because I don't understand the confusion to be had. Nibbui is playing this game precisely how I'd expect Nibbui to play as town. I don't know how that'd be in any way subjective or ambiguous. It's exactly what it says.
yeah but that doesn't actually mean anything to me
that would be like me saying: the sky is blue because blue is the color of the sky
which may be true but isn't helpful to explain why the sky is blue
==
In post 958, mastina wrote:His reads closely mirror those of the worst, in a way that no other players' reads have,
and then when you did the sheep scumread, the reactions of podoboq and the worst were atrocious to it.
i mean how often do scum actually do this? i can't remember an example of one scum-member literally exactly mimicing the reads of their partner and then having their partner lampshade it
i really don'tt hink this is partner-indicative; like i don't think scum are as blatant about working together and having the same agenda as you seem to be portraying the pod/tw team