Mini 2059: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Over]
Forum rules
- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I'm apparently blind; I can't find it?In post 2034, Brigitte wrote:ISO Ankamius, she gave a decentish summary a few pages back to a few of the recent joiners.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Oh, that one. Skimmed it, but it didn't seem like a summary.In post 2056, Ankamius wrote:I assume tris is referring to this post? It's the only one I've posted that includes a rough idea of where the game is at even though we've had developments since thenSpoiler:
Is the game really "some slots townread each other, almost lynched NMSA together", nothing more?
If so, who were all the NMSA voters?
Enough of those're superior to having scumreads.In post 2051, Nimueh wrote:I should have a confident sr by now but I only have confident townreads.
Name them.
Not convinced on Nimueh, but skitter-town/Brigitte-scum, can see.In post 2058, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Not much time to post, but skitter is a strong townread, and it should be easier for everyone else to see now why Nim and Brig are scum.
Experience says odds're slot's scum.In post 2063, Ankamius wrote:Like I remember he was in my scum pool but fucked if I know why anymore
Agreed.In post 2118, Ankamius wrote:I like my company on the Brigitte wagon way more than the tris wagon, it looks suspicious as hell to me
Creature>skitter30 > tris = Ankamius>Nimueh >Xtoxm = xRECKONERx = NotMySpamAccount = Elbirn = Chara>(need more on all of these)Flubbernugget = Brigitte
Barring further info.
VOTE: Brigitte- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Not to my knowledge.
- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Correct.In post 2168, skitter30 wrote:p-edit and succinct was enter right?
Agreed, but is it a town reaction?In post 2169, skitter30 wrote:
like this isn't a scummy reaction imoIn post 2166, Brigitte wrote:That is L-1. I will self hammer tomorrow.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Creature's scumgame's not this good.In post 2171, skitter30 wrote:boy am i interested in hearing more about these (specifically: me, creature, chara, nimueh, and tris)
You said it yourself:
tris's content's fine and the wagon's suspect.In post 2168, skitter30 wrote:given that i'm quite good at obvtowning when i'm, like, town
Nimueh's stances vaguely look town.
Chara I lack sufficient data right now.
Will update these as appropriate.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Not my intention. My meaning was Brigitte's suspicious; one post not being scummy's not enough to change that, unless it's sufficiently strongly town-indicative, thus my question; was it a town reaction? If it's nai, then it doesn't change prior scumminess.In post 2180, skitter30 wrote:or, that's not quite wha tyou pushed, sorry, but pushing someone on the basis of their actions not being townie (when it's agreed tehy also aren't scummy) is awful imo
In post 2177, Ankamius wrote:Succinct what are your overall thoughts atm?
Reasons for non-grayed reads already given; grayed reads = need more info.In post 2165, Succinct wrote:Is the game really "some slots townread each other, almost lynched NMSA together", nothing more?
If so, who were all the NMSA voters?
Creature>skitter30 > tris = Ankamius>Nimueh >Xtoxm = xRECKONERx = NotMySpamAccount = Elbirn = Chara>(need more on all of these)Flubbernugget = Brigitte
Barring further info.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
In post 2184, Brigitte wrote:
Expand.In post 2182, Succinct wrote:tris's content's fine and the wagon's suspect.
The only names town here're skitter/Creature; Elbirn's null; wagon formed quickly; wagon has both Flubbernugget/Brigitte on it (my scumreads).In post 2117, northsidegal wrote:
tris's content hasn't been suspect; burden of proof lies on accusers and I've not seen any convincing arguments. (Or any, but I admit I may have missed them.)- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Opportunistic hop-on to your counterwagon, response about Chara's stance was suspect, posts don't seem to be advancing gamestate, description of your play from others.In post 2188, Brigitte wrote:
Expand.In post 2187, Succinct wrote:then it doesn't change prior scumminess.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I have experience with you.In post 2189, skitter30 wrote:that quote about me is literally from a sentence where i said that i'm good at looking townie as scum so that's also a bad reason to townread me
i also have no idea how well you know my playstyle but like if you don't know me trusting my word on that also seems like a bad idea
You're good at obvtowning as town.
You're good at "obvtowning" as scum, but this isn't that; it's the former, not latter.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
If it helps, me synching with you's why I'm townreading you.In post 2192, Ankamius wrote:I'm a bit concerned with the amount of people that have managed to sync with me this game so far, this doesn't feel like the kind of game where that should be happening this early
This doesn't surprise me.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
At the risk of outing my identity, synchronizing with you's not uncommon when we share alignments.In post 2215, Succinct wrote:
If it helps, me synching with you's why I'm townreading you.In post 2192, Ankamius wrote:I'm a bit concerned with the amount of people that have managed to sync with me this game so far, this doesn't feel like the kind of game where that should be happening this early
This doesn't surprise me.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
In post 2221, Ankamius wrote:What are you referring to when you say "this" doesn't surprise you?
At the risk of outing my identity, synchronizing with you's not uncommon when we share alignments.[/quote]In post 2219, Succinct wrote:This doesn't surprise me.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Er.In post 2221, Ankamius wrote:What are you referring to when you say "this" doesn't surprise you?In post 2219, Succinct wrote:At the risk of outing my identity, synchronizing with you's not uncommon when we share alignments.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Switch tris<->Elbirn and we're on same page.In post 2271, Creature wrote:and scum should be there:
Xtoxm u r a person 2
Chara
xRECKONERx
NotMySpamAccount
Flubbernugget
tris
Because people wrongly think the Brigitte wagon was countering a wagon on 'scum'-tris.In post 2297, Ankamius wrote:Btw why are we doing a tris wagon
I personally didn't know day started; was expecting mod to message me.In post 2319, Elbirn wrote:This games been really quiet, which is weird after getting a flip and a new day start..
In post 2329, Flubbernugget wrote:Succinct, why did you scum read Brigitte?In post 2205, Succinct wrote:
Opportunistic hop-on to your counterwagon, response about Chara's stance was suspect, posts don't seem to be advancing gamestate, description of your play from others.In post 2188, Brigitte wrote:
Expand.In post 2187, Succinct wrote:then it doesn't change prior scumminess.
Apologies. I do what I can, but succinctness does not foster activity.In post 2357, skitter30 wrote:like i was townreading enter but i don't really classify succint as being an active poster
VOTE: Flubbernugget
Still a scumread.
Vaguely lean Xtoxm/Chara town, but those're gut; I have no evidence backing reads up.
Think remaining two're in xRECKONERx/NotMySpamAccount/Elbirn.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Perhaps emphasis'll help meaning.In post 2395, Ankamius wrote:
huh? it felt like the counterwagon was trisIn post 2394, Succinct wrote:Because peoplewronglythink the Brigitte wagon was countering a wagon on 'scum'-tris.
triswasthe counterwagon; people wrongly think Brigitte was.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Elbirn read's complicated.In post 2404, skitter30 wrote:
i'm pretty sure elbirn is town and why do you want tris taken out of the poe?In post 2394, Succinct wrote:Switch trisElbirn and we're on same page.
He looks different from last time where he was town, but I'm also cautious; I misread him as being scum last time.
tris:
Remains true. I haven't noticed any case; if there was one, certainly wasn't compelling.In post 2196, Succinct wrote:In post 2184, Brigitte wrote:
Expand.In post 2182, Succinct wrote:tris's content's fine and the wagon's suspect.
The only names town here're skitter/Creature; Elbirn's null; wagon formed quickly; wagon has both Flubbernugget/Brigitte on it (my scumreads).In post 2117, northsidegal wrote:
tris's content hasn't been suspect; burden of proof lies on accusers and I've not seen any convincing arguments. (Or any, but I admit I may have missed them.)- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Ill-suited to answer sufficiently.In post 2424, Ankamius wrote:Succinct: gamestate read? Idr if I asked you yet or not
I lack grounding.
Loosely feel active slots're town, but my definition of active may not match yours. Nimueh, skitter30, Chara, tris, Creature, yourself.
Xtoxm's only townlean outside of there.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I developed my reads independently of you. Matching up was coincidental. When this is evident, your paranoia'll fade.In post 2425, Ankamius wrote:What do you think about me believing you are trying to pocket me this game
Mostly, experience. I lack it with NMSA; I have it with Flubbernugget. I know Flubbernugget's contribution's scummy. I don't have meta on NMSA that'd let me know if his play's alignment-indicative.In post 2434, Nimueh wrote:Why is Flubber scummier to you than NMSA?- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Proper understanding of the game.In post 2442, Ankamius wrote:what grounding do you need
I've heard there was an L-1 on NMSA, but I know nothing about it, when that seems to be a key discussion point.
I've heard there was a townbloc formed on NMSA, but I don't know who it was comprised of.
I asked for these things, but was not given them.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Specifically, how it went prior to my entrance, if that wasn't clear.In post 2445, Succinct wrote:
Proper understanding of the game.In post 2442, Ankamius wrote:what grounding do you need- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
In post 2448, Nimueh wrote:What specifically is scummy to you about Flubber’s “contribution”?
+In post 2165, Succinct wrote:
Experience says odds're slot's scum.In post 2063, Ankamius wrote:Like I remember he was in my scum pool but fucked if I know why anymore
+ Knowing Flubbernugget's meta.In post 2196, Succinct wrote:
The only names town here're skitter/Creature; Elbirn's null; wagon formed quickly; wagon has both Flubbernugget/Brigitte on it (my scumreads).In post 2117, northsidegal wrote:
His contribution's lackluster; as town I'd expect it not to be.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
For the record Nimueh if you wish to avoid outing your identity, don't use phrases exclusively used by your main. There's only one scummer I know who uses that term, and knowing this I can confidently deduce you're town.In post 2584, Nimueh wrote:Ank is being a WOAT in this game and I’m really this close to losing it on her rn.
I'd aim to pocket Ank before you, respectfully.In post 2491, skitter30 wrote:ngl i'm paranoid about succinct doing that to me here too
You do whatever you feel you need to.In post 2540, Ankamius wrote:Idk whether to be upset or disappointed that you don't understand how I approach the game yet
I'm somewhat baffled you felt the need to act like my main.
Equally as baffling:Knowing who I am and having me as a low-priority sort. I'd think I'd be your highest. However, speaking of 2570:
Since I've seen xRECKONERx content, this I can now agree on.
Why.In post 2552, xRECKONERx wrote:actually fuck flubber is town so i need to bump him way up and then figure out who else goes in the scumpile
To clarify, I needn't have a game summary to generate reads/content. However, I was specifically asked for thoughts on the gamestate; to give said feedback, I needed that info, and had desired that angle since replacing in.In post 2560, xRECKONERx wrote: (specifically, the indignation at not being spoonfed a game summary + the entirety of the case on flubb being 'meta')
My read's more complex than that. It's actually closer to this:In post 2557, Flubbernugget wrote:Scum reading me bc "meta" and that's it.In post 2628, Ankamius wrote:It's a gamestate read, his alignment holds a pretty big key to solving it I think. His actions indicate a scum agenda that I suspect is in play this game and him flipping scum would go a long way towards proving that.
It's a high information high scum equity lynch
This perfectly fits with scum letting town self-destruct.In post 2452, Ankamius wrote:2. NMSA got the overall town's eye and was pushed up to L-2 or L-1 with very little counterpushing other than Reck wanting to push lurkers
3. I replaced back in on this account (Branson is an alt of mine) and started scumming up on purpose to try to move the pressure around and to get more info to work with
4. At some point tris fakehammered (I think NMSA?). I started pushing Brigitte very shortly after this point (I'm still purposely scumming up at this point)
5. Tictac-slot gets somewhat wagoned as a lurker slot. It doesn't get too far iirc
6. Eventually Brigitte and I 1v1 and the wagon on her starts to take off from there. Note that a wagon on me was pretty much constant up to this point since I was on Branson.
7. tictac remains a wagon until Brigitte provokes Reck and he starts hard-pushing her
8. Replacement spam throughout this; lady angel flakes out and urap2 gets replaced at the same time not too long after the fakehammer I believe, tictac flakes a bit after that, then Enter leaves a bit after that
9. a tris counterwagon sprouts up when the Brigitte pressure starts to let up (primarily me backing off the push despite revoting her very shortly after unvoting)
10. When both are at L-3, we push the Brigitte wagon through
11. THE GAME DIES
Which I believe we have, given unfolding events.
If scum were influential in the events described, I'd expect there to be clear evidence, but those events all look like they originate from town.
To wit, this is scum sitting on the sidelines, letting the fight play out without a meaningful contribution.In post 2530, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
Entirely regardless of Ank's case, this is just ridiculous. Even on the off chance that Nim is town, which I highly doubt, one misread doesn't mean you can never claim to read someone accurately again.In post 2479, Nimueh wrote:I still don’t understand why you are even sr me at this point. I am not dping anything similar to what you have sr me before. All I do know if that your read on me is dead wrong here. If you flip me, you have to promise that you will never claimed to be able to accurately read me ever again. Deal?
As is this.In post 2532, Flubbernugget wrote:Skitter's new vote is even more bizarre than their previous one
I'd also say the NMSA wagon was likely entirely town. There's aIn post 2590, Ankamius wrote:In post 300, northsidegal wrote:@Mod: This VC is incorrect; Lady Angel is still voting Brigitte at this point and you have my slot as voting skitter30 and not voting at the same time.smalloutside chance Xtoxm's scum, but the other names're solidly town. In other words:
I got the exact opposite impression; the other wagons're scum scrambling for a counterwagon to their scumbuddy.In post 2591, Ankamius wrote:Interesting note A: The NMSA wagon gained steam and the amount of other 'wagons' drastically increased (and additionally the strength of wagons decreased) over time while NMSA was in the spotlight. This makes me think NMSA is town and scum are either helping push that wagon or looking to reduce the information gained from that flip.
Creature = Nimueh>skitter30 = Ankamius = xRECKONERx = Chara = tris> Xtoxm > Elbirn > NotMySpamAccount>Flubbernugget
Where I'm at.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I don't understand the skitter scumread. To me, skitter's play here's hitting every note I'd expect of her as town, with no warning signs of being scum. Regrettably, I currently can't figure out how to vocalize this; I'll let you know when I have.In post 2653, Ankamius wrote:I don't understand the skitter townread
Your push against Nimueh's akin to a push I'd normally make: pushing someone you know won't be lynched, but will give more information to poe the scum. Your analysis of Nimueh being the eddie cane of the game was spot-on.In post 2654, Ankamius wrote:
I'm legitimately confused by both of these commentsIn post 2652, Succinct wrote:
You do whatever you feel you need to.In post 2540, Ankamius wrote:Idk whether to be upset or disappointed that you don't understand how I approach the game yet
I'm somewhat baffled you felt the need to act like my main.
Equally as baffling:Knowing who I am and having me as a low-priority sort. I'd think I'd be your highest.
Like there's a hint here that I have your identity pegged correctly, but both of these comments to me don't reflect how we generally interact with each other
I should clarify it's not so much that I'm always a high-priority sort. It's more referring to:
This is a genuine threat; given your paranoia and the amount of time/effort to counteract scum!Succinct, I'd think I'd be a higher priority, so you'd be able to (depending on your conclusion) either have peace of mind at not needing this, or enough time to shift gears and do this.In post 2651, Ankamius wrote:I'm only worrying about that slot because if I'm wrong, I think I have to spend too much time proving it to be able to take the proper precautions if they're scum- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I disagree on Xtoxm, but wouldn't fight that read.In post 2659, Ankamius wrote:So I'm assuming you would be content with a Flubber + NMSA + Xtoxm solve currently?
In other words: almost everyone's null.In post 2668, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Elbirn idk, not enough to sort yet. null
Succinct, not sure, but a mild tr here bc of Enter
Xtoxm, same as above, slightly stronger tr bc of urap2 who I can maybe read slightly better from experience
skitter, was a tr, sheeped someone on a sr cause I was demotivated, null.
Chara, I have no clue, don't ask, I can't read the slot to save my life, null
reck, slight tr for tone, not much here
flubbernugget, not sure, I could see either, more involved interaction will help the read
tris, maaaayyybe a tiny sr for weird gut reasons, can't explain it
Creature, same as Elbirn
No.In post 2677, Chara wrote:is Flubber very calculating as scum?
Only if the Flubber wagon falls apart.In post 2750, Xtoxm wrote:i predict a scum stomp
How so?In post 2786, Flubbernugget wrote:I need to respond to succinct but the way he quoted stuff makes that hard to do on mobile
Obvious bus vote's obvious.In post 2801, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I've completely lost my will to win this game, it died after the D1 lynch, and now it feels like diving into a pool of molasses just reading the thread. I'm perfectly willing to sheep Ank or skitter or someone if it will just get this game to the end or at least to a point where the game is moving fast than 2 posts a day. If Ank is scum taking advantage to lead town astray, then screw it the scumteam deserves the win because I just don't care enough anymore. VOTE: Flubber, I hope it's not L-1 or a hammer cause I'm sure not checking.
Xtoxm's a scum candidate, but my fear's that if he's town, lynching him causes a town self-destruct.In post 2809, Nimueh wrote:@Succint, @Tris, thoughts?
Flubber, I've no such worries.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
In post 2856, skitter30 wrote:succinct, why are you townreading creature?
Hasn't changed.In post 2182, Succinct wrote:Creature's scumgame's not this good.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Still hasn't.
So you agree with my solve?In post 2883, Ankamius wrote:I think this is scum #3
Explain?In post 2901, skitter30 wrote:i kinda think elbirn is town tbh
Not me?In post 2917, Nimueh wrote:I’m townlocking Creature, Ank and Chara. Thanks Elbirn. <3
Your solve's compatible with mine, if you'd add NMSA in.In post 2922, Nimueh wrote:I’m actually thinking now that everyone save Xtoxm, Elbirn and Flubber are town. Flubber at least in part due to associatives.
What about Flubber/Elbirn/NMSA?In post 2928, Chara wrote:i really don't think Flubber/Elbirn/Xtoxm is ever a team here.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Most since replacing in; prominent offenders: 2273, 2668, 2801.In post 3002, NotMySpamAccount wrote:What posts are your scumread on me based on?
Since then, 3065 as well.
Can we please agree to speedlynch Flubber tomorrow when this is inevitably shown false?
Pretty sure we all know it's bs, but we're all going to let him prove it regardless.
VOTE: NotMySpamAccount- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
It's more conductive worrying I'm town, scum kill you, then my lack of charisma leads to loss.In post 3404, Ankamius wrote: I'd much rather not hit a situation where they're scum and end the day before I really look at them and just kill me, then charisma through to victory
Nor I.In post 3409, Ankamius wrote:I wouldn't even call pushing on Flubber after the IC thing town indicative
Noteworthy: I replaced into this game, wasn't here from start. You should check if Enter's mastermind-worthy.In post 3477, Ankamius wrote:I'm actually not entirely sure about whether there's a mastermind in this game or not. I think only Succinct would fit the qualifications necessary for it to be possible.
I'm also no mastermind on this account. I've the qualifications if on my main, but lack them here.
I too am of the opinion this game lacks a mastermind.
I feel then that looking at Flubber's interactions with others/others' interactions with Flubber is a mistake.
Scum knew they'd be sending someone away, and at least on D2 knew it'd be Flubber.
What we should focus on is individual play.
E.g.:In post 3452, xRECKONERx wrote:i have been very clearly off the mark and got got by flubber's random play
i need to reevaluate this game. i still think tris is a good lynch but after the flub flip i dont feel so great about my ability to read anyone.
I know scumIn post 3453, xRECKONERx wrote:like i can't even argue with people wanting to lynch me. my defense of flubber looks really really bad and i cannot defend it because it was shit based on gut. and couple that with me leading the brigitte charge d1 and yeah, i get the desire to lynch me. im not even sure i particularly have it in me to fight the lynch because it's deserved.canpost this.
I don't think scum-Reckdoes.
That's too easy, but what about NMSA/Elbirn?In post 3465, xRECKONERx wrote:NMSA/tris are my top two scumreads but that feels too fucking easy. with this setup there's no way this is a slam dunk
Given Reck's a likely mislynch, this is scum opportunism.In post 3474, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Well then. This changes a lot. Given the aforementioned case on why tris is town, and the fact that I know I'm town, reck almost certainly scumreads two town players. Even if I'm not obvtown, tris is because Flubber and scum in general wouldn't be that suicidal. This means reck is more likely than average to be scum. VOTE: reck- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Succinctly trying to lynch scum.In post 3482, xRECKONERx wrote:i really need to get a better feel for what succinct is doing.
Easiest way: iso me. My post count's deliberately low enough to be a manageable read, so it's not hard.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
They aren't entirely linked.In post 3485, Ankamius wrote:
why does this necessarily follow and/or correlate?In post 3483, Succinct wrote:I feel then that looking at Flubber's interactions with others/others' interactions with Flubber is a mistake.
Scum knew they'd be sending someone away, and at least on D2 knew it'd be Flubber.
What we should focus on is individual play.
I've read people's analysis of Flubber's iso + analysis of others' interactions with Flubber.
The entire time I've felt those analyses are off-base; given that, I'd feel it were a mistake even if not for what I said.
Yet, isn't it logical? Scum sent Flubber away. They knew Flubber would be sent away at least on D2. Wouldn't they tailor their actions so Flubber's flip wouldn't point directly to them? That doesn't require a mastermind; it's something they'd do individually: put distance between themselves and Flubber, to not be caught when he's shown scum. (Most scum show strong self-preservation instincts without leadership.)
However, no matter how well-hidden their interactions with Flubber, they can't change the quality of their play.
So hunting off of individual play feels like the route to take.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I know it's your strongest tool.In post 3494, Ankamius wrote:THIS is saying that my strongest tool for scumhunting is not going to be useful here.
It's usually one of mine.
But given the setup, unfortunately, it's what I think; lacking a mastermind, scum were going to show high self-preservation, masking interactions with scumbuddies.
This applies toIn post 3494, Ankamius wrote:1. NMSA thinks that sheeping me throughout d2 is his best odds at surviving, even far enough to be willing to bus Flubber and conftown all but FOUR towns in the process.allFlubber voters; voting him risked conftowning all but four town. Do you think every Flubber voter was town? I don't.
Which are you more weary of: someone opposing you, or someone sheeping you? Experience says the latter; Elbirn could know that. I wouldn't expect that knowledge from NMSA, or for it to be shared.In post 3494, Ankamius wrote:2. Elbirn thinks that tearing down my case at the core is his best odds at surviving, and most likely decided that the time he posted his rebuttal to me was the time to do it.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I am.In post 3690, tris wrote:Who besides Nimueh was/is townreading creature?
It'd be lying to say townread's same strength, but experience tells menotto let paranoia dictate my read there, to trust my townread.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
The opportunism's unreal, here.In post 3734, NotMySpamAccount wrote:add reck and take me out and I'm with you 100%. Also I think Elbirn is right here, and it goes with my current gut read so VOTE: Nimueh
When people suspected Reck, he voted Reck.
When people chased after a "scumslip", he votes Nimueh. In spite of what he said earlierthat page:
I admit I could be wrong on Elbirn, but I'mIn post 3731, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I see only two general possibilities. Scumteam is flubber/reck/(Elbirn or an inactive), or it's flubber/Ank/irrelevant cause the IC claim was planned and Ank really is the mastermind we haven't been looking for and this post was distancing to help conftown Ank and town has no chance. Obviously the second is a long shot, but it's possible. Discuss.notwrong on NMSA.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
It was never the case.In post 3786, xRECKONERx wrote:i thought NMSA was clear because he almost hammered flub
is that not the case anymore
You already know my answer.In post 3883, Creature wrote:Elbirn
Succint
Chara
NotMySpamAccount
tris
It's 5p LyLo, two of you are scum, the rest of us are treestumps. If you lynch someone wrong, you lose (not in practice, but let's do like this).
Good question.In post 3861, Tohru wrote:How is NMSA still alive over Brigitte and Xtoxm who were miles townier?
You seem to think I'm a double-busser.
I generally avoid bussing altogether.
I take offense to that.In post 3874, xRECKONERx wrote:I hate alts.
I do question the point in playing on an alt if you're playing identically to your main. (My gimmick's in my name. Speaking of...)
You're scumreading playstyle. Look at my name. It's my approach; deliberately minimalistic. I'm also a late-D1 replacement. I average 1 post/day. My game solving's in all my posts; I mostly only quote pertinent content. (Almost)In post 3884, Tohru wrote:Sure. Apart from his abysmally low postcount, post quality, and thereby remarkably poor contribution to the game, I also have not been able to find a single reason to townread him in a 150-pager. Looking at his ISO, it's scummily-barren, he isn't trying to gamesolve or have the conviction that town would.Everythingholds relevance.
You apparently missed a few posts pushing Flubber significantly.In post 3886, Tohru wrote:But, I observed his lack of emotion and/or conviction in those posts [compare to NMSA], hinting that it may be indicative of a distancing attempt on a scumpartner who was already under fire (and therefore also the prime candidate to escape the game).
Of 29 posts, I pushed him in 9+ of them.
The ones not pushing him, most're establishing/defending/explaining townreads, or pushing NMSA, or pushing Elbirn.
I never let up on Flubber; my push on NMSA's been the same since D2.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
You'll never find me active, least of all not now. (Knowing my main'd help know why I'm particularly inactive now.) My gamesolving's in establishing townreads more than establishing scumreads, but I've done both.In post 3888, Tohru wrote:1. Flying under the radar, and 2. Lack of gamesolving.
I'm aided by people engaging me, but them not doing so's out of my control. If people don't interact with what I post, then I don't have anything to follow through on.
You're making me miss Ank, because she's one of the few whowouldengage me.
Question my reasons for NMSA, question my reasons for Elbirn, question my townreads.
What about it's wrong?In post 3891, Tohru wrote:^This post is also a pretty bad look.
The only possible scum mastermind's me, and Iknowthat's not right.
Knowing this, scum didn't have one.
Knowing they didn't have one, scum're going to play more as individuals.
The average individual scum player shows high levels of self-preservation, more interested in personal survival than survival of scumteam.
I think given this setup, that trait's amplified.
Voting Flubber risked five players becoming conftown. Flubber had ~7 different voters at different time. They aren't all town. As a result, scum at some point did cast a bus vote, and I think they did it for precisely the reason I outlined above: an increased sense of self-preservation, leading to a decreased interest of survival of the scumteam.
In post 3898, tris wrote:Never NMSA who I think is town.
Remind me why.In post 3899, Chara wrote:NMSA also has good reasons to be town (that i've actually looked at)- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I can't go harder than I do.In post 3903, Chara wrote:considering this is Succinct's only scumread, i wonder why they didn't go harder on it,
You expect me to bs reasons?
I made my points.
They held.
Nobody engaged those points.
No new points were raised; nothing changed existing points.
What morecouldI have done?
Honest question, because I genuinely could use the feedback from the answer.
What you sawwasme trying.
If my trying wasn't good enough, tell me what needed to be better.
I was tired, I was exhausted, I was dejected. It wasn't worth the effort. I knew he wasn't getting lynched. I wasn't happy he wasn't getting lynched, but nothing I said or did would change it. I couldn't argue we should lynch him in spite of the claim, because from a theory standpoint weIn post 3903, Chara wrote: or considerwhyscum Flubber decides to try and live another day for seemingly no reason.should'velet him live, and Iknewthat theory.
How would you feel knowing the correct theoretical play's to let your scumread live, in spite of a bs claim?
Actually, this time you're mistaken.In post 3919, Tohru wrote:Enter has only been in the game for a fraction of its duration
Enter was in the game for 75 pages.
I've been in the game for 78 pages.
Page-wise, we've been around an equal amount.
For those who know my identity:In post 3919, Tohru wrote:Succinct is extraordinarily scummy and therefore we can infer that he is arguably a lot worse at hiding his alignment than Enter.
I would really appreciate it if you dropped your one incorrect read to push the correct NMSA/Elbirn combo.In post 3918, Tohru wrote:I would really appreciate it if you helped me with the Succinct push.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
By that metric, you'd be reading Enter, becauseIn post 3929, Tohru wrote:in a replacement situation you should always aim to read the easier and more transparent slot, not the one which is better at scum.Iam the slot that's better at scum.
And yet the thought didn't occur to you you're biased against mine?In post 3931, Tohru wrote:As for Elbirn I acknowledged that I am biased against his way of playing.
Show them.In post 3931, Tohru wrote:NMSA has demonstrated strong town flashes during the course of the game.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I can.In post 3947, Chara wrote:
can you convince me on Reck being town?In post 3941, Tohru wrote:How is it townie? Enter is shadethrowing and discrediting Reck who is one of my top townreads currently.
Read 2551. The analysis there was solid.
While he reversed his read on Flubber, the way he did so indicates they're not scumbuddies. 2552 wouldn't be town without 2551 prior, but with it, it shows a strong indication he's not scum. Why would scum start to set up for a distance with their scumbuddy, only to immediately hard-reverse it into defense?
Stances in 2560 were original, and not sheeping the thread consensus.
Plus this:
Still holds.In post 3483, Succinct wrote:In post 3452, xRECKONERx wrote:i have been very clearly off the mark and got got by flubber's random play
i need to reevaluate this game. i still think tris is a good lynch but after the flub flip i dont feel so great about my ability to read anyone.
I know scumIn post 3453, xRECKONERx wrote:like i can't even argue with people wanting to lynch me. my defense of flubber looks really really bad and i cannot defend it because it was shit based on gut. and couple that with me leading the brigitte charge d1 and yeah, i get the desire to lynch me. im not even sure i particularly have it in me to fight the lynch because it's deserved.canpost this.
I don't think scum-Reckdoes.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Naturally, becauseIn post 3962, Tohru wrote:Succinct is only ever replying to peoplethat's my playstyle.
Especially as a replacement who didn't read content prior to replacing in.
All Ihadwas replying to people to generate content.
Naturally, becauseIn post 3962, Tohru wrote:Does nobody actually see the problem with being only reactive rather than proactive?there is none.
Just because arguments pushed are in walls doesn't mean they aren't there.In post 3962, Tohru wrote:and never putting forth his own pushes and arguments.
It's inIn post 3965, Tohru wrote:Has Succinct ever explained his Flubber scumread?the very post you quoted:
Ank was talking about Flubber.In post 2165, Succinct wrote:
Experience says odds're slot's scum.In post 2063, Ankamius wrote:Like I remember he was in my scum pool but fucked if I know why anymore
Someone who's in the scum pool yet you don't remember why is usually scum; doubly so when said someone's a player like Flubber.
If anyone hadaskedme about this at the time, I'd happily have said as much.
Nobody did, but I can't control that, can I?
The Brigitte read was also explained:In post 3966, Tohru wrote:No explanation was ever given for Flubbernugget and Brigitte scumread.
Context: skitter made this post after I replaced in:In post 2165, Succinct wrote:
Not convinced on Nimueh, but skitter-town/Brigitte-scum, can see.In post 2058, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Not much time to post, but skitter is a strong townread, and it should be easier for everyone else to see now why Nim and Brig are scum.
My post was saying, "I think Nimueh's town, and the scum on Elbirn was Brigitte".In post 2037, skitter30 wrote:the elbirn wagon was: brigitte, chara, xtoxm, nimueh
my gut says that there's prob scum in the elbirn voters, probably in this order of likeliness: nimueh >brigitte= chara > xtoxm
Succinct explanations != no explanations.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I should also emphasize: how would you feel, as a person who prides themselves on theory, that the correct theoretical play's to let your largest scumread live, in spite of a bs claim?In post 3989, Succinct wrote:How would you feel knowing the correct theoretical play's to let your scumread live, in spite of a bs claim?
I knew the correct theoretical play was letting him live.
And I was feeling defeated because of it.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
On this note, Tohru, I'm hoping you're not on the blacklist of any player in the game (as you might be if you're who you obviously are), because no offense, I'd rather any of them than you.In post 3987, Succinct wrote:
I do question the point in playing on an alt if you're playing identically to your main.In post 3874, xRECKONERx wrote:I hate alts.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
For reference, I've three completed games; all as a replacement; in all, I'm bottom post-wise.In post 3992, Succinct wrote:
Naturally, becauseIn post 3962, Tohru wrote:Succinct is only ever replying to peoplethat's my playstyle.
Especially as a replacement who didn't read content prior to replacing in.
All Ihadwas replying to people to generate content.
Replying's how I scumhunt.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
When responding to lots of content, can only trim so much down.In post 3996, xRECKONERx wrote:that wasn't very succinct
Especially when responses involve extrapolating out existing thoughts. Statements're easily succinct, detailing how thoughts got from A to B aren't.
Then do you think every Flubber voter was town?In post 4001, Nimueh wrote:I disagree with the bolded. In this setup, I think that’s reversed. In your typical game, scum can bus and still win. In this setup,the ENTIRE scumteam must survive or they ALL lose. Iow,in THIS setup, self-preservation=ultimately protecting your team. No, this is faulty reasoning here, becauseself-preservation=survival of the scumteam in THIS setup.
Sorry, but no.In post 4006, Nimueh wrote:I don’t understand this. Why is it the “correct theoretical play”? the correct theoretical play, is always pushing your strongest sr, no matter what.
Correct theoretical play for a D3 IC claim's to let the IC claim live to D3. Chance of conftown > anything else. Correct theoretical play'salwaysletting the IC claim live to prove it; that's why the obviously-BS claim was so defeating. I knew I couldn't do anything, becauseI myselfknew the correct theory wasn't doing anything.
Where did you get the impression I wasn't willing to vote Elbirn?In post 4006, Nimueh wrote:Both you and NMSA have Elbirn in your POE but neither of you, are willing to vote him.
My NMSA scumread's stronger.
That doesn't make me unwilling to vote Elbirn, just more confident in NMSA.
Pardon? Where'd you ask? I saw nothing of this sort until D2.In post 4007, skitter30 wrote:yeah iirc at the end of day1 they had a fairly strong fairly mysterious scumread on flubber (like, way before it was popular) and like i asked about it but it never got explained
Correct. Half my reason for voting Brigitte was Brigitte > tris as a wagon, and both were the lead wagons.In post 4007, skitter30 wrote:tbf that was *fairly* close to eod so there might not have been time to actually push flubber there
You'll also not remember me interacting with most players this game, because few have engaged me. Flubber's nothing special in that regard.In post 4007, skitter30 wrote:but i don't remember the two of them interacting like *at all*
In post 4008, skitter30 wrote:and there's like no mention of flubber in their iso before this besides for the like the afore-mentioned scumread which is mehIn post 3992, Succinct wrote:
It's inIn post 3965, Tohru wrote:Has Succinct ever explained his Flubber scumread?the very post you quoted:
Ank was talking about Flubber.In post 2165, Succinct wrote:
Experience says odds're slot's scum.In post 2063, Ankamius wrote:Like I remember he was in my scum pool but fucked if I know why anymore
Someone who's in the scum pool yet you don't remember why is usually scum; doubly so when said someone's a player like Flubber.
If anyone hadaskedme about this at the time, I'd happily have said as much.Tohru:It should sendmassivered flags to you that thepeople you've partnered with meare the ones voting me.
Your solve's wrong.
Fix it.
VOTE: Elbirn- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Repeat: The players you called my scumbuddies are the onesIn post 4017, Succinct wrote:Tohru:It should sendmassivered flags to you that thepeople you've partnered with meare the ones voting me.
Your solve's wrong.
Fix it.
VOTE: Elbirnbacking you up.
If I was scum, I'd have a scumbuddy; who'd it be?- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Alternatively, it's because I'm not scum andIn post 4023, Tohru wrote:I actually don't know. Your scumteam actually played a pretty strong game to obscure that last scumbuddy, I'll say. Credit to your partner.actualscum're taking advantage.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
And I'll requote this until you answer them.In post 4022, Succinct wrote:For that matter, no, you don't get to ignore these, either:Spoiler: Quotewall- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I'm referring to my main when it's pertinent, and to myself otherwise.In post 4026, Tohru wrote:Why do you keep referring to your main when you're on an alt? Is your main public? If not, why use it as a crutch when you're caught scum?
There's things which change on alts, things which don't change on alts, and things which people might think don't change even if they do.
I address each appropriately.
My main's not public, but many in the game know it by deduction. (Not hard to figure out.)
I talk accordingly.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Forgot to add something:In post 4025, Succinct wrote:
And I'll requote this until you answer them.In post 4022, Succinct wrote:For that matter, no, you don't get to ignore these, either:Spoiler: Quotewall
This I also want addressed.In post 3995, Succinct wrote:
For reference, I've three completed games; all as a replacement; in all, I'm bottom post-wise.In post 3992, Succinct wrote:
Naturally, becauseIn post 3962, Tohru wrote:Succinct is only ever replying to peoplethat's my playstyle.
Especially as a replacement who didn't read content prior to replacing in.
All Ihadwas replying to people to generate content.
Replying's how I scumhunt.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Need I remind you: until Elbirn cast this vote, he was the lead wagon.
Prior to this point, he's shown zero scumread of me.
It's survivalism/opportunism at its finest.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
It's also noteworthy: Elbirn's the only player in this game to have played with me on this account in a past game.
He makes no reference to it at all, no mention of me, no engagement, not even a "succinct was wrong last time and is wrong yet again". Nothing, in spite of being the one player best positioned to have commentary on my play.- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
Saying they're fake doesn't make them so.
I can explain everything I've posted.
Something I'm adverse to as scum, but care little for as town, because low-hanging fruit can and do draw scum.In post 4032, Tohru wrote:[*]You are going after low-hanging fruit.
Alternatively: this is my playstyle. I've done nothing to fly under the radar. People calling me town because of Enter's their choice, not mine. It's actually annoyed me the whole game; I've wanted to be townread because ofIn post 4032, Tohru wrote:[*]You've been flying under the radar, deliberately avoiding drawing attention.mycontribution, not his. I can't force people to pay attention to me.
I can't answer for these and you know it.In post 4032, Tohru wrote:[*]Your predecessor has been guilty of all of the above.
[*]Your predecessor is guilty of shadethrowing town.
I voted at first available opportunity. I don't often move votes, to a fault. Moving my vote's a big deal.In post 4032, Tohru wrote:[*]Your position on Flubber is the perfect position that scum would have loved being in.
Nice to see the line of people bragging they "caught" me only to be wrong grows by one more game. Why am I not surprised.In post 4032, Tohru wrote:I think you've made a sizable number of mistakes in this game. That's not to say you've been playing poorly, in fact, I think you've played well, because town didn't manage to catch you. So it is just your poor luck that Tohru replaced in and managed to identify your sneaky plans almost immediately, and ruining your narratives and your strong control over the game.
My gimmick makes it harder to play town, but more rewarding; it has zero effect on my scumplay.In post 4034, Tohru wrote:1. It's clear that even if the statement is true, it is clear you are unable to play as optimally as you would be able to on your main, because of the gimmick being a handicap/additional complexity. Maybe it makes you more transparent (This is not necessarily bad!). Or maybe it does impede both your town and scum games, I don't know!
You've no intention to think; were you to, you'd realize the frustration's from the obvtown player I most trust to read me and work with me was replaced by the antithesis of that. Even if you didn't scumread me, I doubt you'd work with me.In post 4034, Tohru wrote:I myself understand the frustration when a perfectly smooth scumgame is ruined by an over-the-top late-game replacement which threatens to destroy the narratives that you have been working over the course of a whole month to build up. It really does suck that I am taking the win away from you.
I... think I need to think about this.
Of course not. I avoid replacing into scum slots deliberately. I'd get no challenge from them.In post 4036, Nimueh wrote:@Succinct, do you not have a scumgame anywhere?
My point's that the view "not everyone voting Flubber was town" and the view "scum protected their scumbuddy knowing they needed to escape" are mutually exclusive. If someone voted Flubber was scum, they were inherently not protecting their scumbuddy.In post 4039, Nimueh wrote:Anyway, No, I don’t consider every Flubber voter to be town. My point was that you’re reasoning wrt to self-preservation in this game vs. protecting the scumteam don’t apply in this game, because if even one scum fails to escape, it’s essentially game over.
Actually, yes; after 4017, I went back to my first post, isoed you from that point, searched Flubber, and checked; I found 2171 immediately. For the reason you mentioned (you didn't mention Flubber), I deemed it not worth mentioning. (Anything you don't see me address falls in this category. Since I only quote about 1/20 posts, you can assume I find 19/20 not worth mentioning.)
...So?In post 4042, skitter30 wrote:like i shouldn't look askance at the fact that you haven't engaged with flubber (your biggest scumread!) because you haven't engaged with *anyone* because they haven't engaged with you? that's like shifting your responsibility for sorting people off of your shoulders and onto everyone else's
I don't see the problem with letting others do the work, as long as the work's getting done. It's more succinct to let others handle it than to hash it out myself, yes?
I still want a reminder why.In post 4045, skitter30 wrote:elbirn's still town- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
In post 4064, Chara wrote:okay i'll agree with that.
Enter's replace out and the leadup to it was really towny and i should just concentrate on that regardless of how i feel about Succinct.Chara:Did you read this?In post 3989, Succinct wrote:
I can't go harder than I do.In post 3903, Chara wrote:considering this is Succinct's only scumread, i wonder why they didn't go harder on it,
You expect me to bs reasons?
I made my points.
They held.
Nobody engaged those points.
No new points were raised; nothing changed existing points.
What morecouldI have done?
Honest question, because I genuinely could use the feedback from the answer.
What you sawwasme trying.
If my trying wasn't good enough, tell me what needed to be better.
I was tired, I was exhausted, I was dejected. It wasn't worth the effort. I knew he wasn't getting lynched. I wasn't happy he wasn't getting lynched, but nothing I said or did would change it. I couldn't argue we should lynch him in spite of the claim, because from a theory standpoint weIn post 3903, Chara wrote: or considerwhyscum Flubber decides to try and live another day for seemingly no reason.should'velet him live, and Iknewthat theory.
How would you feel knowing the correct theoretical play's to let your scumread live, in spite of a bs claim?The fact Elbirn and NMSA are my scumreads should tell you which person's town.
- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
You absolutely do, and I'm not surprised.In post 4137, xRECKONERx wrote:i think i know who both nim & tohru are and tbh im exhausted by it
Can vouch for. You're who I had in mind for 3994. (Don't remember if Tohru's actually on it, but I know you had issues with him previously at least.)In post 4154, xRECKONERx wrote:you, specifically, tohru ive had an issue with in the past, i think
It was a good case, but I had nothing to say for it beyond believing it was a good case. My bad. <3In post 4155, xRECKONERx wrote:i posted a fucking mammoth readcase on elbirn earlier and 0 people have commented on it or had a reaction to it- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I know it happened, but I don't recall which game. Best guess without research.In post 4173, xRECKONERx wrote:@succinct: very quickly, can you just link to a game that you think gives you reason to think i have negativity with tohru's main acct?- Succinct
-
Succinct Goon
- Succinct
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: January 2, 2019
I thought RC.In post 4180, xRECKONERx wrote: Succinct: who do you think Tohru is?
Nice try to rewrite history, butIn post 4234, Elbirn wrote:Oh cool I'm the counterwagonIam the counterwagon toyou, not vice-versa:In post 3986, northsidegal wrote:
This is literally a scumclaim.In post 4236, NotMySpamAccount wrote:screw it, this game is toxic, I don't even care anymore, VOTE: succinct to get out of this game
Who gets out of the game on a town lynch? - Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct
- Succinct