Mini Normal 2066: Catloaves [Game Over!]
Forum rules
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
In post 26, Alacrity wrote:Good morning! I look forward to playing with all of you today. =)
VOTE: insomniaLike half the players in this game had already voted at this point and neither of you voted on someone with a vote already on them. Just why?
Seriously, more wagons with more than 1 vote please, need to turn up the heat in here
In post 50, nomnomnom wrote:It's like "out of all the people you could vote you pick that one person you know! Why???"
HmmmmIn post 54, nomnomnom wrote: Well, I like your logic and questions so far. It feels genuine. I think what you're asking is good for town in general, and it's putting me at ease to have someone ask me what I think since it's my first game in here. I'm feeling strong town vibes from you.
Do you usually ask for permission to join a wagon?In post 56, u r a person 2 wrote: Should I jump on locke with you?- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Fair enoughIn post 76, u r a person 2 wrote: It is possible that I have asked a similar question before, but I can't think of one, so let's go with No.
Permission is not the word I would use though. I asked PP for his opinion on where my vote should be.
Read-relatedIn post 77, nomnomnom wrote: Did you join my wagon simply to increase its size or do you have read-related reasons? You have reacted to my posts after voting me.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I feel the funniest way to get out of RVS and get some more solid reads is to getting a few people to L-2/L-1 if you don't have a renowned quickhammerer in your gameIn post 119, Alacrity wrote: Why do we need more wagons?In post 121, PenguinPower wrote:Noting the timing of the insomnia unvote though.
Same thoIn post 123, PenguinPower wrote:While also joining insomnia on my wagon.In post 157, insomnia wrote:Ok, so nomnomnom looks like newbscum to me at the moment, yet I think if we keep her alive for a bit maybe her game progresses and she will change my read or she's going to give us her scum buds through her actions. I do believe newbies are good to keep around since they usually improve their game later on and you can figure them out more easily.
VOTE: Insomnia Believe this is L-2- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
People disagreeing with you isn't the same as being ignoredIn post 189, insomnia wrote:Like, look at this, I've already explained my vote yet my answer's being ignored.
I'm done.
@Mod, please replace me
It's NAI whether he does or doesn't replace out, both scum and town can get frustrated, especially when they're playing like 4 games at onceIn post 195, u r a person 2 wrote:UNVOTE:
initial impression is insomnia likely gets frustrated enough to replace out as town way more often than as scum.
That said, if he ends up not replacing out, it's NAI at best- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I'd imagine it could get stressful??? Like its not a hard concept to understand, like I'm in one other game than this and just the two has my head fried, can't imagine 4 at onceIn post 213, u r a person 2 wrote:
I guess we disagree. I'm not sure that I like the push back, either. What does the 4 games at once part have to do with it?In post 207, Locke113 wrote:It's NAI whether he does or doesn't replace out, both scum and town can get frustrated, especially when they're playing like 4 games at once- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Why is that a stretch?In post 220, u r a person 2 wrote:
oh, gotcha. That's a stretch to apply that to Insomnia, I think.In post 219, Locke113 wrote: I'd imagine it could get stressful??? Like its not a hard concept to understand, like I'm in one other game than this and just the two has my head fried, can't imagine 4 at once- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
What makes you think this wagon is led by town, if anything this feels like scum making use of the replace out to get votes of their partnerIn post 264, Alacrity wrote:
I do not think you are understanding what I am doing here. I am unvoting PenguinPower because the game is likely going to shift soon, not because the read itself.In post 222, nomnomnom wrote:
That's not the point of my question. You are unvoting your scum read because of an element that doesn't and shouldn't even affect your scum read.In post 221, Alacrity wrote:
As a counter question, would you say my PenguinPower vote helped move the game forward?In post 218, nomnomnom wrote:What is that supposed to mean? I thought you read PP as scum?
Besides, how does your unvote "help move the game forward" more than your PP vote?
No, it doesn't. However, there is one thing that it does do. It shows that I'm less willing to want PenguinPower lynched at the moment!
I just woke up to start a brand new day about twenty minutes ago. I've been asleep this whole time =)In post 231, nomnomnom wrote:That timing on her not answering and vanishing all of a sudden is also something that makes me confident about this. I honestly don't care if this is a new wagon. She's scum.
Guys! I found the scum vote on the wagon!
VOTE: GrandWazoo
I wouldn't say it was a bad wagon. It actually makes me pretty sure it's led by town and followed up with by scum. Now even if I get lynched, it still is a net benefit to town. =)
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
In post 230, nomnomnom wrote:Because I'm fairly confident she's scum. She was already in my reads list but that unvote screws with my mind too much.In post 231, nomnomnom wrote:That timing on her not answering and vanishing all of a sudden is also something that makes me confident about this. I honestly don't care if this is a new wagon. She's scum.Don't like this exchange, questions nom's vote in a way that suggests disapproval, nom gives because she's already on my scumlist and she didn't answer me quick enough basically and that's enough?
The worst part about this wagon is that Alacrity is def a scumlean for me but this wagon has manifested in a way that makes me feel uneasy about putting my vote there now- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Well I scumread nom soooooo. Though if you do flip scum then that probably clears her as it would be weird being the one to literally start a wagon by yourself on your partner just to bus them.In post 268, Alacrity wrote:Which slot do you believe is doing this?
I have the impression that nomnomnom is an overeager town looking to start a push. PenguinPower can go either way, but I could see town hopping on the way he had!
Unless there is a reason you have to suspect it beyond that, I do not think there is much more to it!
We will have to agree to disagree on PP there, especially since he had his vote on Insomnia/Eragon whose wagon was the biggest and seemed to at least scumlean that slot from what I can tell from his posts. It doesn't even make since to me if he scumreads you too because why switch from one scum to another when you already have the other scumread at L-2?- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Well what else can I say but it ain't paranoia if they're really out to get you. Also its not like its that out there of a thought process, replace outs can stall the progress on a wagon on that slot for multiple reasons. Firstly, people might respond like urap and feel this is a alignment indicative move and find it townie. Secondly, with the player now gone they can no longer shoot themselves in the foot by saying more incriminating things and their replacement has to be given a certain amount of leeway at first because they have to catch up. This means all the stuff to point out the person is scum has already been said and the more time that people on the wagon have to wait, the more likely they are to doubt whether this stuff is actually scummy at all or whether they were just imagining shit.In post 281, nomnomnom wrote:This post confuses me. Conspiracy theory levels right there.
This serves as a perfect opportunity for a scum partner to either A. Prepare to bus the living fuck out of their partner, possibly going so far as hammering their partner before their replacement even catches up or B. Start a completely new wagon/start pushing a much smaller wagon to draw attention away from their scum partner. It's not really conspiracy theory levels, at least not on the level of reptilians, which are totally real- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Didn't mean it in the sense the player who replaces out did it on purpose, more it was a legit ragequit and their partners take advantage of the opportunityIn post 300, themilkcartonkid wrote:What Locke just described is frowned upon and banned in many games I've played. The rules will say something like "do not replace out for strategy"
Yes, you aren't the only one I'm looking at funny in regards to this wagonIn post 301, nomnomnom wrote:@Locke if anyone else than me started a new wagon as Eragon was coming in this game, would you have scumread them for that reason too?- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Went into it a bit in 269 though I don't think I mentioned that the speed of the wagon is also alarming to me, it manifested from no votes on alacrity to L-2 within the space of 24 hours on grounds that are shaky at best in my opinion. Ironically while you are my strongest scumread apart from insomnia/eragon, your creation of the wagon feels more genuine than the rest joining who either gave no reason(n_m) or very little(PP,GW). Also if I'm wrong and this ain't a scum driven wagon and alacrity is scum, I feel that would reverse my read on youIn post 304, nomnomnom wrote:
I'm curious, care to detail? I want to know your thoughts on the Alac wagon as a whole.In post 302, Locke113 wrote:
Yes, you aren't the only one I'm looking at funny in regards to this wagonIn post 301, nomnomnom wrote:@Locke if anyone else than me started a new wagon as Eragon was coming in this game, would you have scumread them for that reason too?- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
She is certainly still a possibility, and ironically I feel that if she does get hammered, it will help me solidify my reads on most of the active players in this game so far, though since the wagon gives the feeling of being scum-driven and I don't see a scum motivation to bus their partner when their partner wasn't even being voted by anyone or was only be voted by 1/2 people, I currently feel she's more likely to flip town. And I don't like the idea of letting a townie get lynched just to help my reads/In post 308, nomnomnom wrote:About Alacrity herself, you said in 266 that she was a scumlean for you. Do you still think that? I think I need this to understand your whole mindset here.
Well by nature of the fact nom initiated it would mean it couldn't be just a hop on, and I was already scumreading nom to begin with. This doesn't mean I don't suspect PP/GW just I have but one vote and with this many people there can only be 2/3 scum maximumIn post 309, themilkcartonkid wrote:I mean, what was it about noms initiation that made you think scum-lead rather than opportunistic scum hop on?- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
My mention of already scumreading nom was in response to which slot I believed might be doing the pushing, I probably should have provided my feelings about their actual initiation of the wagon more clearly and properly explained them in the same post but I usually mention these things when asked rather unsolicited, though I see now that such a question was implied even if you didn't implicitly ask for further explanation.In post 314, Alacrity wrote:This actually does not answer my question. An existing scumread on a slot is not actually a reason by itself to suspect any specific action, each action must be judged either by itself or compared to the entire game whether it is a scummy move or not. I had a preexisting scumread on nomnomnom before that initial vote, but I believe that the push itself is more likely to come from a town mindset than a scum mindset. Therefore, my read on them is now leaning more towards town than scum. To be exact, they are actually a reasonably strong townread. I hope this better explains what I mean with that question. =)
As for your point about your own experience with chat mafia and nom's play, I will have to defer to your expertise there as I have no experience myself in that regard. I will also grant that as I have said, nom's initiation of the wagon is the only part that feels at all genuine to me about the wagon so I shall take another look through her ISO and keep an open mind. No guarantees I'll change my mind though, I am a stubborn bastard.
Also I also only mentioned not_mafia in regards to his lack of giving a reason to vote, I do not pretend to have a clue about his alignment as his apparent quick-hammering habits clearly suggest a style of play that just makes no sense to me at all- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I wonder indeed, maybe someone, probably a very intelligentIn post 328, nomnomnom wrote:Like, sure, some people proposed that for example GW had little reasons to jump on this, but at the same time, why would scum jump on this brand new wagon?andvery handsome fellow, has already suggested a reason for such behaviour?- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
@PP bolded for emphasisIn post 296, Locke113 wrote:
Well what else can I say but it ain't paranoia if they're really out to get you. Also its not like its that out there of a thought process, replace outs can stall the progress on a wagon on that slot for multiple reasons. Firstly, people might respond like urap and feel this is a alignment indicative move and find it townie. Secondly, with the player now gone they can no longer shoot themselves in the foot by saying more incriminating things and their replacement has to be given a certain amount of leeway at first because they have to catch up. This means all the stuff to point out the person is scum has already been said and the more time that people on the wagon have to wait, the more likely they are to doubt whether this stuff is actually scummy at all or whether they were just imagining shit.In post 281, nomnomnom wrote:This post confuses me. Conspiracy theory levels right there.
This serves as a perfect opportunity for a scum partner to either A. Prepare to bus the living fuck out of their partner, possibly going so far as hammering their partner before their replacement even catches up or B.Start a completely new wagon/start pushing a much smaller wagon to draw attention away from their scum partner.It's not really conspiracy theory levels, at least not on the level of reptilians, which are totally real- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
If you're not scum then I would say scum is either more likely to be found in one of PP and GW than n_m. n_m doesn't seem active enough to fit the bill for the kind of scum to pull that sort of trickIn post 334, nomnomnom wrote:I guess you're right though, that's a possibility. But even if we go with that theory, you could argue that the three people joining my Alacrity wagon could have that intention, so it does not really solve my problem here.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
In post 337, nomnomnom wrote:You are talking about a player that has not said a single game-relevant thing since the beginning. That's honestly mind boggling you'd say something like this. And if you say "this is how he plays", you are highlighting exactly why he drives me insane
Based it off the fact he doesn't post often and when he does, it doesn't say much and even when voting alac, he didn't add any reasoning at all, doesn't seem like he's actually trying to persuade anyone to join the wagon, which is what I'd imagine scum would be doing. Not sure whether this falls under playstyle or activeness?
Because waiting for it to dissipate is more risky, once a replace out happens, people seem a lot more susceptible to joining new wagons that appear so its any easy way to get attention off your partner. In comparison if you wait, what if your partner's replacement says something further incriminating while everyone's focusing on them, pushing town to just lynch them.In post 338, PenguinPower wrote:
At the time, weren't there only vanity wagons otherwise? I mean, yes these are two opportunities for scum. These aren't the only opportunities...why not just stay on the wagon and wait for it to possibly dissipate? We're 7 days out from the deadline.In post 335, Locke113 wrote:This serves as a perfect opportunity for a scum partner to either A. Prepare to bus the living fuck out of their partner, possibly going so far as hammering their partner before their replacement even catches up or B. Start a completely new wagon/start pushing a much smaller wagon to draw attention away from their scum partner. It's not really conspiracy theory levels, at least not on the level of reptilians, which are totally real- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
In post 346, GrandWazoo wrote:By keeping your main a secret you are denying us the chance to compare your present play with your town/scum meta. A town player would welcome such scrutiny.
Transparency is only counter-productive to scum.@NomNow this, this right here is conspiracy theory levels- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Its not even you wanting to know that's the problem though, I myself am interested in what her main is but I haven't mentioned itIn post 360, GrandWazoo wrote:
You can't enter the game proudly declaring your alt, daring ppl to guess who it is, then complain because someone actually wants to know.In post 355, nomnomnom wrote:
I wouldn't say it's conspiracy theory levels, I'd say it's more unnecessary invasive questioning.In post 354, Locke113 wrote:In post 346, GrandWazoo wrote:By keeping your main a secret you are denying us the chance to compare your present play with your town/scum meta. A town player would welcome such scrutiny.
Transparency is only counter-productive to scum.@NomNow this, this right here is conspiracy theory levels
Like, I can think of a lot of reasons why you would want to start an alt or in general start a new account and remain secret, that are not related to the game at all. Clearly she does not want to be recognized, so why press the issue for this long?
Like honestly I can't say if he's being invasive because he MUST know who Alacrity are so he will press the issue ad infinitum, or if there's something more to it.because it isn't any of my business. Curiosity isn't the problem here, its how you're expressing your curiosity.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
VOTE: Grand WazooIn post 371, GrandWazoo wrote:
No I wasn't afraid of a quickhammer. Yes I was SR Insom, but as mentioned Insom wasn't the only SR.In post 369, u r a person 2 wrote:
So you weren't afraid of a quick hammerIn post 367, GrandWazoo wrote:Again, I was riffing on Penguin's remark. Not a great riff maybe. I certainly didn't worry about a quickhammer by NM or anyone else since I was already SR Insomnia.
And you actually scum read insomnia
And you were actually supportive of the wagon, which you thought was about to collapse
So you riffed on Penguin's remark instead of voting because you thought that was the best way to stop the wagon from breaking apart?
Seriously bro, you're obsessing over what I didn't do, why I didn't do it and when. This is basically what you accuse me of doing with Alacrity - making a big deal over nothing.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
His actions don't make sense to me from a town perspective, especially with his lack of fearing a quickhammer and the fact he was properly scumreading Insomnia. Like this explanation just seems fishy asf to me
Nom, this post hurts me deeply...when I say the same thing about the Alac wagon, I'm spinning conspiracy theories, then you turn around and use the same reasoning on a different wagon. I see how it is...In post 375, nomnomnom wrote:Well, here's the thing.
GW does seem like kind of a prick and this whole thing about announcing intent on Eragon's slot yet voting Alacrity afterwards is definitely scummy.
But at the same time, urap jumping on this wagon is an enormous alarm sign to me, especially with the circumstances of that vote. I can't help but feel urap is trying to deflect the Alacrity wagon.
I'm conflicted here.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
What is it about that post opposed to the rest of his that made you put him on L-1? I didn't like it either but its more of being overly pushy about someone's personal privacy rather than scumIn post 386, rosterfoster wrote:
VOTE: GrandwazooIn post 346, GrandWazoo wrote:@Alacrity:
By keeping your main a secret you are denying us the chance to compare your present play with your town/scum meta. A town player would welcome such scrutiny.I don't understand why scum specifically would engage that point the way I did, but town would not. I thought that entire engagement was self-evident, so it is entirely possible that something got lost in translation.
I did not answer your question because there really is not any reason to. Revealing why I want this alt to be secret would be counter-productive, as it would drastically reduce the amount of players that it can apply to. I quite like this alt, I would like to keep using it. =)
Transparency is only counter-productive to scum.
L-1- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Was more making a joke about the similarities between our reponses to Alac's and GW's wagons. Not SRing urap myself but see where you're coming fromIn post 388, nomnomnom wrote:
Is it really a conspiracy when he admits to doing it?In post 387, Locke113 wrote: Nom, this post hurts me deeply...when I say the same thing about the Alac wagon, I'm spinning conspiracy theories, then you turn around and use the same reasoning on a different wagon. I see how it is...- Locke113
-
Locke113
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
UNVOTE: GrandWazooIn post 392, rosterfoster wrote:It's such a bs reason to start pushing someone.
There's standard bs reasons, and there's that.
Yeah, I'm not comfortable with GW at L-1 for a reason this weak, it's like the least scum-indicative thing about GW- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Why doesn't it sit right with you? Do you have experience playing with eragon? Or is this a non-meta based feeling?In post 618, u r a person 2 wrote:gw still scummy, btw
but eragon reps in to a quiet game and is like, ok this works for me. doesn't sit right
Also sorry for the lack of activity everybody, was busy finishing off DMC5 then this game kinda just slipped my mind- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Why?In post 627, themilkcartonkid wrote:This wagon is ick- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I'm sorry, what?In post 635, u r a person 2 wrote:PP, I am not actually scum reading Insomnia, and my data set for him has increased significantly since the basis for that read. I think that slot is town regardless of eragon's shit.
Seriously, the fuck? "Oh I'm actually townreading the slot whose wagon I started up again" and "they weren't here so they were an easy target", how is this not pinging anyone?In post 643, u r a person 2 wrote:eragon was an easy wagon target, right? He's basically not here. so i placed a vote, and hey look what happened
this exchange did not look good imo
Spoiler:
What in particular about Eragon's posts have made you completely unwilling to vote him now?In post 669, PenguinPower wrote:It's almost like Eragon did stuff between those two posts that affected my read on the slot...- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
How very detailed and informative, thanksIn post 685, PenguinPower wrote:The stuff he said.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Yes, NotMaf started a new wagon, in order to jump onto a wagon, when he could have voted on any other wagon to fulfill that goalIn post 695, themilkcartonkid wrote:I think it's clear they're just doing it to be able to jump on a wagon- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
See this right here NotMaf? Why would you ever want to lynch this absolute genius? You should be ashamed of yourself for even considering itIn post 701, Elsa Jay wrote:so lynch elsawhere plz.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I know his reputation for quickhammering, but he has joined wagons below L-1 multiple times in this game, why would he choose to start an entirely new wagon, and actually quote a post to show at least some reasoning this time if he's just waiting to quickhammer? I don't doubt he will quickhammer if the opportunity presents itself, but he doesn't need to start a new wagon to do that- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Scum is either Eragon or milk or both. Despite claiming intent to join the wagon multiple times and saying he scumread GW, Eragon didn't put GW at L-1 nor did he hammer. Seen scum pull this trick before were they claimed intent to hammer without much time left on the clock to try and wait out the timer. And the whole GW pushing the alac wagon as an alternative to Eragon's with some piss poor reasoning, even though he claimed he still scumread Insomnia/Eragon.
Milk did join the wagon, multiple times, but kept trying to undermine it or start different wagons to draw attention away, such as trying to vote up Alac and The Penguin of all people. Also even when it was clear there was no way GW wasn't getting out of day 1 alive no matter what he claimed, he still tried to use the excuse of waiting for the claim to not hammer, which if he had been let off for, GW could have just never claimed as there wasn't much time left.
VOTE: Eragon- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I'm not sure I entirely understand the reasoning behind most of your pairs tbh. Though yes based off D1, I agree scum!Alacrity wouldn't NK urap.In post 824, themilkcartonkid wrote:Alacrity conftown. I noticed that town split into pairs. Lock and roster, me and nom, urap and alac, pp and Elsa. N-m grandwazoo and eragon never really had anyone they gelled with. I dont think alac kills the only one who was agreeing with their reads
How? This was part of the whole me scumreading basically everyone on the wagon who wasn't n_mIn post 832, rosterfoster wrote:
Feels like a soft-defense to me.In post 265, Locke113 wrote:What makes you think this wagon is led by town, if anything this feels like scum making use of the replace out to get votes of their partner
Why does it seem untrue when I literally only started looking for other scum besides Insomnia based off the idea that they acted like they might be his scum partner?In post 835, rosterfoster wrote:
‘My read is based on being Insomnia’s scum partner’ seems untrue to me.In post 625, Locke113 wrote:Well then I'm fine with helping start the Insomnia/Eragon wagon back up again, after all my read on GW is mainly based off the possibility of him being Insomnia's scum partner so why not find out whether Insomnia/Eragon is scum first
VOTE: Eragon- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Also I absolutely agree with this, though obviously not for the reason you thinkIn post 833, rosterfoster wrote:Also means Locke/Eragon isn’t a team.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
How does that dispute me saying IIn post 844, rosterfoster wrote:In post 837, Locke113 wrote:Why does it seem untrue when I literally only started looking for other scum besides Insomnia based off the idea that they acted like they might be his scum partner?
Tells me that you had independent from being Insomnia's partner.In post 387, Locke113 wrote:His actions don't make sense to me from a town perspective, especially with his lack of fearing a quickhammer and the fact he was properly scumreading Insomnia. Like this explanation just seems fishy asf to memainlybased my scumread of him off of the idea he was Insomnia/Eragon's scum parter- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
In post 506, ChibiBear wrote:Apologies, I very slightly misinterpreted one of the setup rules:
Correction: The Mafiadohave daytalk.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Then join me on the Eragon wagon, we've got cookiesIn post 870, rosterfoster wrote:Also true.
I’m kind of 50/50 over Milk or Elsa, but Eragon makes sense to be scum off the wagon.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
But why aren't you ready my dude? When you find scum theres nothing wrong with ending the day a bit early, stops them weaseling their way out of thisIn post 897, rosterfoster wrote:Ok I don’t actually object to this lynch but I’m not ready to end the day yet. You’re right.In post 903, themilkcartonkid wrote:Town odd night disloyal roleblocker. I'm not going to be useful tonight anyway. Peace.In post 904, Alacrity wrote:Who did you block?
What the fuck am I witnessing rn?In post 906, themilkcartonkid wrote:Elsa
Seriously, wtf is going on rn? Never seen such a blatant scumslip before. Also mechanically speaking his claim isn't unlikely just because its disloyal, the downside is the odd night part to balance it which I don't believe either Elsa or urap had so if the claim is true, then it does fit mechanically and isn't that OPIn post 922, Eragon wrote:Frankly, i dont trust that claim at all. Its a very safe claim, because "disloyal roleblocker" literally just means that he can only roleblock scum. In game, thats ridiculously overpowered with no risk. I feel it just has too much power, along with a LOYAL NEIGHBORIZER(Which is both a full cop and a neighborizer) and Elsa's claim, so Im probably gonna keep my Your in pretty good standing rn, your associations look pretty good and just dont lolhammer, and you should do fine tbhote on TMCK- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
In post 956, PenguinPower wrote:He took the L-1 vote.
No, we've already seen plenty of reactions, no need to give time for a wagon on scum to die out, again, like what happened twice D1In post 960, themilkcartonkid wrote:Can we wait a bit longer. Seeing reactions plus trying to figure out the partner will be useful and I'd like to play as long as possible
Its okay Pengu, I appreciate youIn post 966, PenguinPower wrote:Like...people are somewhat not remembering that I brought the dwindling lynch on GW back to GW and he flipped scum and that irritates me.
lol "It was just a reaction test guys I swear"In post 969, Eragon wrote:Well, that was excessively boring
I liked the reactions from nom, first of all for calling it out and bringing it up, after multiple people missed/ignored it. It shows good attention to detail and actual drive to figure out motives.
I didn't like TMCK's reaction, it felt very very wish-washy, which i would expect from scum that knows its 100% fake. He starts off asking like, "wut" and then realizes and is like "ooooh" then he comes back and says, "but is it, idk, but it probably just is, but are you sure???"
Roster's reaction was kinda the same at first, but they realized it and they stuck with it strong, so thats slight town points
Notmafia didn't respond except vote lol
PP's reaction actually isn't that great. It doesnt really feel like he believed that i "slipped" with the quotations marks expressing doubt.
Elsa's reaction is fakeable as either alignment- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
There isn't anything inherently wrong with quicklynching, esp since in such a short time we got a lot of info to work with already, if we take too much time I guarantee this wagon will stall, which I get you don't want but you're scum so sorry but that would be a bad thing. Also just generally I don't see this need to use up the whole day unnecessarilyIn post 1004, Eragon wrote:they happen.
but they aren't something to expect.
anyone advocating for a quicklynch at this point is wolfy af.
pedit: also gl with all that Alac, its a interesting read- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
This game is comedy gold, honestly I don't even care if we catch scum anymore, its all been worth it for the events over the last few pagesIn post 1012, nomnomnom wrote:Eragon this game:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RktX4lbe_g4[/youtube]
Eragon last page:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuNhTLVgV2Y[/youtube]
We have the AtE-god among us.
What the actual fuck is this game by the way, I can't even at this point- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
Even if he did crumb shit, and it was a "reaction test", it still wouldn't make him town
@Roster:I know, more interesting stuff happened after the post I quoted but thats kinda my point, the day is gonna drag out now and the wagon is gonna dissolve cause more people are gonna look back at his "reaction test" excuse and think well I didn't believe it at the time but maybe because the momentum is gone, my general point still stands- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I highly doubt Pengu is scum, simply believing its a reaction test doesn't make PP scum with Eragon. Pengu has a process and it worked D1 plus milk is also scummy asf so if he prefers a milk lynch today that okayIn post 1026, rosterfoster wrote:Locke, that post was about hammering Milk no? Now I think it’s Eragon/Penguin. So we seem to have averted a mislynch if I’m right. Sometimes it’s not so bad for things to drag on.- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I mean I suppose in theory its possible but Pengu's playstyle this game doesn't suggest to me he'd allow his partner to coach him, feels more like the coacher to me in that scenarioIn post 1032, rosterfoster wrote:Because Penguin was voting Milk at the time of the slip, which mentioned buddy voting Milk.
Also sidenote: I called PP Pengu the first time as a joke and now I can't stop please send help - Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113
- Locke113