Newbie 1926: Baseball (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Lavender
-
Lavender
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Hm, atm they just seem like they are gathering reactions, so I don't feel anything particularIn post 17, u r a person 2 wrote:ya rvs
lot's of people don't like it
I get a lot of my best reads from it
How do you feel about voting marcus or shoshin rn?- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
It didn't seem all that suspicious to me, since the self-vote was slightly strange to me. That just might be my lack of experience though.In post 41, Shoshin wrote: I'm also going to be explaining my reasoning a bit more than usual for everyone's sake. I'm serious when I said U2's scum. His suggestion that I'm scum while voting someone else was awful, & I'm skeptical that he'd completely ignore my self-vote as town. I'd appreciate if all of you responded to this read with your thoughts.- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
First question, well I'm not sure how to do rvs well or in a way that is good. Basically, I don't want to get in the way.In post 61, the worst wrote:UNVOTE:
@Lavender, mind if I quiz you on this?
Firstly thanks for having a look a the theory brass posted--hope it was insightful!In post 16, Lavender wrote:Oh, never mind I saw RVS.
Did you not feel the need to participate in rvs? Why/why not? Did you trust what shoshin, whig, urap2 and I were doing?
Did you like any of our reactions more than others? what were your reactions towards:In post 39, Lavender wrote:
Hm, atm they just seem like they are gathering reactions, so I don't feel anything particularIn post 17, u r a person 2 wrote:ya rvs
lot's of people don't like it
I get a lot of my best reads from it
How do you feel about voting marcus or shoshin rn?
- Shoshin's self-vote?
- urap2 considering me town but being less sure on shoshin?
- whig's contributions so far?
- Marcus' opening post?
If you don't have feelings on some of these that's fine. Even if it's just a gut feeling or a question, every bit helps!
My reactions for those are:
Shoshin-Slightly weird for self-voting but it might just have been to get things started.
Urap2-Seems ok atm
Whig-Is new like me so it seems like he is simply trying I think.
Marcus-It was strange and seemed to suggest the worst was scum, I'm not sure if I should take this like a simple rvs.- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
That's true I guess, I am also new at this, so let's try our best and learn right?In post 82, Marcus325 wrote:
I dont believe scum would want to put themselves in the spotlight like that otherwise but i don't know im only new at this lolIn post 80, Lavender wrote:If I made a guess, then Whig, since they seem okay and trying to contribute. Imo Shoshin is slightly scummy only because of the self-vote, I don't think town would self-vote, but I might be wrong.- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
I didn't really find anything suspicious at that time, looking back, they're are some posts I had no clue why they asked or for what reason and seemed weird, maybe to get more responses I guess? I skimmed part of it when Urap2 and Shoshin were debating.In post 89, Robotnick2 wrote:Man you are literallythe worst
@Lavendar,
You gave three slightly reasoned arguments for your reads here but nothing for urap2 - why?In post 77, Lavender wrote: My reactions for those are:
Shoshin-Slightly weird for self-voting but it might just have been to get things started.
Urap2-Seems ok atm
Whig-Is new like me so it seems like he is simply trying I think.
Marcus-It was strange and seemed to suggest the worst was scum, I'm not sure if I should take this like a simple rvs.
Now that I'm more awake I read it more thoroughly though.- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Godmid, The reason why I don’t seem like I’m actively scum-hunting, is because I do not want to make someone stray from a correct read with my unsure reads.
And Ryno, My eager to please thing you have of me, is it because of my answering questions? If so I am simply trying to be helpful. If not and it’s something else like my reads, then you can make an assumption that I want to please. If it’s neither of those then can you tell me what made you think that of me?- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Ok, but can you to tell me where you get this feeling from? Of how I want to seem like I’m helping?In post 120, Ryno56 wrote:
It might be that you genuinely want to help, but I get the feeling that you want to seem like you want to help.In post 118, Lavender wrote:Godmid, The reason why I don’t seem like I’m actively scum-hunting, is because I do not want to make someone stray from a correct read with my unsure reads.
And Ryno, My eager to please thing you have of me, is it because of my answering questions? If so I am simply trying to be helpful. If not and it’s something else like my reads, then you can make an assumption that I want to please. If it’s neither of those then can you tell me what made you think that of me?- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
That's quite bold, can you tell me where I have been scummy, this will also help yourself in persecuting me, and perhaps let myself resolve your misunderstanding about me being scummy.In post 124, Ryno56 wrote:
I can't tell you without potentially helping you, SCUM!In post 122, Lavender wrote:
Ok, but can you to tell me where you get this feeling from? Of how I want to seem like I’m helping?In post 120, Ryno56 wrote:
It might be that you genuinely want to help, but I get the feeling that you want to seem like you want to help.In post 118, Lavender wrote:Godmid, The reason why I don’t seem like I’m actively scum-hunting, is because I do not want to make someone stray from a correct read with my unsure reads.
And Ryno, My eager to please thing you have of me, is it because of my answering questions? If so I am simply trying to be helpful. If not and it’s something else like my reads, then you can make an assumption that I want to please. If it’s neither of those then can you tell me what made you think that of me?- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
It is how my mind makes of it, I not saying swaying heavily, just leading to the wrong path. I will give more opinions now and be more assertive with people saying I should as it helps with reads and can make me have a bit more tell.In post 147, Godmid wrote:
To be clear, the fact that you are new to forum mafia and are therefore going to be less certain in your reads is something that I am very much taking into account. However, the issue I have isn't so much that you aren't being active enough in scum-hunting, since you are answering questions when asked. It's that when you have been answering those questions and giving opinions, your opinions seem to have a "not suspicious" bias towards them.In post 118, Lavender wrote:Godmid, The reason why I don’t seem like I’m actively scum-hunting, is because I do not want to make someone stray from a correct read with my unsure reads.
And Ryno, My eager to please thing you have of me, is it because of my answering questions? If so I am simply trying to be helpful. If not and it’s something else like my reads, then you can make an assumption that I want to please. If it’s neither of those then can you tell me what made you think that of me?
The answer that you gave to this is that you are worried about leading people away from a correct read. However, are you really that worried about swaying people that heavily just by giving an opinion?In post 77, Lavender wrote: First question, well I'm not sure how to do rvs well or in a way that is good. Basically, I don't want to get in the way.
My reactions for those are:
Shoshin-Slightly weird for self-voting but it might just have been to get things started.
Urap2-Seems ok atm
Whig-Is new like me so it seems like he is simply trying I think.
Marcus-It was strange and seemed to suggest the worst was scum, I'm not sure if I should take this like a simple rvs.
Active scum-hunting, how should I do this? Ask questions and accuse? If so then I will try my best.- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Well I really want to ask why Ryno has any big evidence for voting me and such. But they seem very inclined not to give that information.
Godmid has stated why they have voted me, so I won't ask why they have voted me.
Shoshin seems to just testing my reaction, though I am unsure if that's the case.
Hey, Ryno, if you may, what are your reads at this moment?- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Welcome, Denmon o/
Ryno, if you're worried about lack of chat, then how about ask some questions? Also to be completely honest, I don't understand your logic that well.Ryno56 wrote:Don't want to tell you atm. I doubt I can convince the group for to do a D1 lynch so it doesn't help to spill the beans. Just - see if you can read it yourself and let me know
If they do find your read and let you know. Then they will tell others too. So why say, let others read their take and show everyone else, and not just let yourself reveal your read?Ryno56 wrote:Why should I tell you NOW? As opposed to later?- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
"A townie would be much more focussed on making their own reads."In post 198, Ryno56 wrote:*ahem*
RYNO'S MASTER PLAN:
My aim was to push a scum into frustration by accusing them with little/no reason. Lavender was the victim, and I think it payed off. They very quickly became fixated on WHY I was reading them as scum, which comes across to me as the 'scum newbie annoyed they got caught out early in the game' and they wanted to know if I genuinely was reading them (and if so, HOW ON EARTH) or the self-assuring knowledge that I was bullshitting. All of which seems like scum-thinking to me. Plus the lynch votes probably made them nervous/backed into a corner. There's a tendency to run away with worry - 'oh no, i'm suspected from the start, i'm going to get lynched'. A townie would be much more focussed on making their own reads. See the following...
'Ryno, My eager to please thing you have of me, is it because of my answering questions?'
'Can you tell me what made you think that of me?'
'Ok, but can you to tell me where you get this feeling from?'
'That's quite bold, can you tell me where I have been scummy?'
'Well I really want to ask why Ryno has any big evidence for voting me and such. But they seem very inclined not to give that information.'
'So why say, let others read their take and show everyone else, and not just let yourself reveal your read?
I hereby rest my case against Lavender. Although, I would suggest that with only 2 scum, we don't need to lynch until F5.
Therefore, UNVOTE: Lavender
Sure, I suppose so right? But obviously a townie will also ask why they are being accused for little to nothing. Of course I would be confused why somebody just suddenly says I'm scummy. Since you have finally revealed the plan, it seems you were actually trying to Scum-hunt though.
It is rather different to anything I have seen but it is pretty interesting. Right now to me, you are null atm.
If you can provide more content it might get to town-lean. (such as other reads)- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Spoiler:
It's mostly these posts, obviously they can actually be good and I'm making a mistake Orz. if I have to be honest, I was wavering between voting Godmid and Marcus, but Marcus had no votes if I can recall? So I wanted a slight reaction just to get something and actually vote someone. What about you and your stuff?- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Let's see Denmon, Ryno, and Urist is null right now atm.In post 305, the worst wrote:Don't worry about it It's hard even for experienced players haha.
Do you townread everyone outside of those 2? I'm finding myself in a spot where I townread most of the list.- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
The first one just seems like a fun thing, not too scummy, not townie either.In post 308, the worst wrote:In post 280, PvtUrist wrote:
!bet DENMON Town bread 5In post 278, u r a person 2 wrote:
I'd put money on it*In post 277, u r a person 2 wrote:yeah, mate, that slot got a red pm. I'd put moneyIn post 281, PvtUrist wrote:
I agree with this statement, but not what came afterwards. I feel it comes from more newb!town than scum with agenda. If the latter is what we're going to talk about, this ain't the only case for this game.In post 274, the worst wrote:I actually do think it's +discord -sorting
@Lav do you read these posts as town or scum?In post 283, PvtUrist wrote:re-readlist;
{the worst, Lavender} town
{u r a person 2, Shoshin, DENMON, Godmid} probably town
{Ryno56, Marcus325} scam
There's not much to explain. Reads are tonal, with Ryno and Marcus having the most pings (forced/unnatural reactions, non-town alligned agendas,).
Teh wus gives that genuine 1905 IC vibe, and not the choo choo vibe.
Lavender/DENMON/Godmid have town vibes (ie, not Ryno/Marcus vibes), and their "anti-town" actions don't fall off newb!town range for me.
Urap town vibe, but I don't agree with his reads or too much emphasis on intro-tells.
Shosho's a bit mixed, but I'll talk about that later.
Besides tone-reads, I just feel that the current wagons are half RVS, half halfarsed (Lavender/Godmid) and that D1 has been TvT with scum sitting on the sidelines, with people's scumreads developing from newb!town mistakes, rather than genuine scum motives.
The second one I didn't really understand, what's the statement about? "I agree with this statement, but not the latter", what's the latter here?
Ok, finally the third one. I'm not sure what 1905 IC vibe and choo choo vibe are. The amount of misspellings confused me. But, It didn't feel too scummy, but I wouldn't say too much town either.- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Urap2 your case on Godmid seems solid, I want Godmid to respond first on the claims before I change completely to get their opinions first.
Shoshin, can you tell us your most recent reads before you get more inactive?Is this a town lean or scum lean?
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
- Lavender
-
Lavender
- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Sure!~In post 770, the worst wrote:does anyone want any post-game feedback btw? I used to do huge write-ups when I was Inexperience Challenged (IC) in games but it feels a little weird doing it unprompted now- Lavender
-
Lavender Goon
- Lavender
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 574
- Joined: April 3, 2019
Thank you for your feedback XDIn post 790, the worst wrote:alright i got this
sorry for the delay, got a bit busy on friday + yesterday
i'll probably be a bit less verbose because i'm exhausted but hope some of this helps.
@lavender
Spoiler:
i failed "less verbose" - Lavender
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender
- Lavender