Large Theme Moderator Signups and Design Primer

[Titus]

1. Game name
   - PookyTheMagicalBear Versus Flavor Leaf
   
2. Flavor
   - WIFOM City (unless changed by scum) [This is a Versus setup, like Titus v Alisae]
   
3. Number of players
   - 17 + PookyTheMagicalBear and Flavor Leaf
   
4. Are hydras allowed (Yes/No)
   - No
   
5. Your modding experience
   - Extensive
   
6. Current modding commitments
   - None
   
7. Reviewers
   - Versus Setups have been playtested
   
8. Reviewers agreed to FINAL version? (Yes/No)
   - Similar to a Upick, this will be completed after signups.
   
9. Backup or co-mod
   - N/A
   
10. Backup or co-mod's experience
    - N/A
    
11. Backup or co-mod's commitments
    - N/A
    
12. Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults, mid-game alignment changes, moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not), secret win conditions, un-divulged non-randomness in player role/alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
    
    No moderator lies that cannot be anticipated. No secret win conditions. No alignment changes. Confirmed no third parties. -

[Titus]

1. Game name
   - Friends, Enemies and That Other Person
   
2. Flavor
   - Mod Designed, Made Up Universs
   
3. Number of players
   - 21
   
4. Are hydras allowed (Yes/No)
   - Yes, Two Heads, Must Disclose to the Mod
   
5. Your modding experience
   - A lot, my Main is Titus
   
6. Current modding commitments
   - None
   
7. Reviewers
   - Morning Tweet and MathBlade
   
8. Reviewers agreed to FINAL version? (Yes/No)
   - Yes
   
9. Backup or co-mod
   - Morning Tweet
   
10. Backup or co-mod's experience
    - Just Recently Radio Buzz
    
11. Backup or co-mod's commitments
    - None
    
12. Is it possible your game has any of the following: cults,

    mid-game alignment changes,

    moderator lies that cannot be reasonably anticipated (for example, Godfather, Tailor, Miller, Ninja, and mechanics like that are generally fine. Telling someone they are a reflexive doctor when they're actually a PGO is not),

    secret win conditions,

    un-divulged

    non

    -randomness in player role/

    alignment generation, direct moderator influence during the game? (Yes/No)
    - Underlined are possible. Detailed in Spoiler below. I will answer questions about what is possible but not how it could be implemented in the game.

Spoiler: Here's what you know

1. There are five group-scum in the game. They are known as the Enemies of Justice.
   
2. Scum have daytalk and multi-task.
   
3. Scum cannot assign their roles.
   
4. Third parties may or may not be present.
   
5. There is one player who is investigation immune and is unaware of it. All investigations on that player that succeed will come back as "The Unknown", even if a player name is not a valid feedback for the investigation or if the player is not normally an eligible target. (Ex: An investigative result that would come back with a yes/no result would get "The Unknown" instead.)
   
6. The identity of The Unknown may change throughout the game with no choice of The Unknowns past, present or future.
   
7. There is one explicitly random element in the game. Any action is not impacted by this "randomness" in any way unless warned of the possibility of such either by this post or in their role PM.
   
8. No roles have "sanities" such as paranoid, insane, etc.
   
9. No Godparents or the like exist aside from The Unknown.
   
10. The Moderator hates town winning by night play, so you expect some misleading results that are not moderator lies. This includes guilty or innocents that change or are misleading.
    
11. Alignment changes are not possible unless explicitly mentioned in your PM. There is no cult or anything like it.
    
12. Alignment changes that do not violate the above are possible.
    
13. You can rely on anything the moderator says to be true at the point in time that I say it.
    
14. There are no other bastard elements other than what is described here.
    
15. You may ask
    privately
    if something is bastard and out of bounds. I will answer privately. If I feel it is necessary to announce, I will.
    
16. I will not likely announce unless it gets asked multiple times or its an oversight to be included here.
    
17. The goal of this setup is novel fun.
    
18. This setup is swingy and impossible to test perfectly for balance. You've been warned.

[/list]

Please do not enter my game into signups until December unless I bold here stating otherwise. I expect to be in trial during November and passing on duties to Morning Tweet is unfair.

I'd like to enter signups when there's an opening. My homicide trial is getting delayed until January at the earliest.

I'd like to re-enter this into signups come May 9th.