Thank you. I spent so long deciding on a profile picIrrelephant11 wrote:VOTE: cinnamon i have been waiting for this game to start so I could tell you your name and profile picture are very cute
VOTE: menalque I'm not much of a fan of jam
Forgive me if I'm missing something meta, but do you seriously have a specific read on thenavneet to make you think they're scummy?In post 33, Irrelephant11 wrote:I, as an SE, think it was very towny. I got a wagon going quick, which is always good!In post 31, Menalque wrote:I thought it seemed a little scummy but wanted to wait and see what the SEs were reading from it, because it came so early onIn post 27, Irrelephant11 wrote:Not sure what to do with the complete lack of a response to my self vote
but uh
I guess your reactions are NAI since you all ignored it
:/
Speaking of, wanna vote thenavneet? They're currently my strongest scumread
In post 71, Flavor Leaf wrote:VOTE: Menalque
Navneet’snprobably town who got ran up, and scum is on that wagon.
In post 104, Eggs wrote:
Nav, Voted - Reading both similarly. In their favour they doesn't feel forced at all (except that jam sequence but gonna ignore that). Reading tone as town on a post by post basis. (It's only 24h in but) on the other hand ISOs are pretty much empty of actual content, though nav gets some credit for #68.
In post 118, Irrelephant11 wrote:That is to say, I townread menalque/Eggs/navneet and don’t yet have reasons to scumlean FL or teacher, but unless the team is 2/3 of cinnamon/Bob/Voted I agree that SEs should get a closer look
I thought that the straightforwardness and blunt nature of his post was townyIn post 283, teacher wrote:What about Bob's post here read towny to you?In post 54, Cinnamon wrote:I like the tone of his post, it reads towny to me. As for the vote, I don't have a read on it yet.
What do you (or anybody else) think?
The way you word this post, it sounds like you are suggesting that trying to discuss SEs can only be a mistake if I'm town. Could you elaborate on that? Why is shifting the discussion towards SEs a mistake?In post 314, Eggs wrote:Do you think it's a problem in 167 that he's going after SEs? Mistake or scum motivation? What do you think of the secondg half of that post?
I haven't really talked about this at all yet, but you've been constantly bringing up the idea that I seem scummy. Is there anything in particular that makes you feel this way? It seems really odd that you've been focusing on me so much with statements like this that aren't talking about what I've been doing in this game that is indicative of scum.In post 333, Irrelephant11 wrote:I mean I’m not just unvoting because i think he’s mislynch bait
He doesn’t show survivalism
I’m really struggling to nail down any strong scumreads
Navneet might be scum and I’d compromise there
Someone sell me on town!cinnamon because their participation in marathons showed me they are skilled as scum
Another question for you Menalque - I notice that here, you state that you were comfortable with the SEs because they were all reading similarly and they had yet to call each other out. In your reads list, you also have all three SEs at the top of your town list. Has recent discussion from them done anything to change your opinion on this?In post 161, Menalque wrote:Brief thoughts from mobile:
I don’t have much faith in tone as a way of reading things and I still think eggs has done the scummiest thing so far objectively. That said, I’m aware that he’s being mostly read as town who made a genuine slip. For now, I’m leaving my vote where it is, but I’ll change if (a) someone does something I think is objectively more scummy or (b) we start getting closer to the deadline and there’s still no appetite for an eggs wagon.
Regarding SEs: I’m encouraged by the fact they’re reading similarly. If there were only two, I’d be a lot more concerned that they were mafia backing each other. In the current situation I feel like the third would have called them.
If we’re not going for eggs then I’d be okay with getting on voted or cinnamon. I honestly don’t see why Bob is being scumread. I’ll try to post something longer tomorrow.
In post 338, Menalque wrote: The thing is that I think that if we lynched cinnamon and he flipped scum then it throws off a lot. So I kinda wanna lynch him for that reason. But if we lynch voted and he flips scum then that'd leave me feeling good about an eggs/nav!slot Lynch D2.
To me this literally states that your reason for lynching me is primarily for information. I don't believe I misrepresented anything you were saying.In post 348, Menalque wrote: Either way, I don't think I'm pushing you that hard right now, but I'm open to getting on you because I think lynching you would be one of the best options in terms of overall information, see #338.
If you think it's something worth pushing, by all means you should do it.In post 356, Voted wrote:Can I heavy push this, please?
Frankly, I'm starting to become a bit frustrated that flimsy arguments like this have been pushed against me for the whole game. Irrelephant has been doing it this whole time and now other people are jumping in on it. I can't see how you see just purely early game tone as 'playing it a bit safe' - I've been posting this whole time with all my opinions out there and I think that this particular argument should not hold water. When I unvoted I was unvoting flavor, who I was townreading. I was not unvoting irrelephant. There was no backpedal there at all, just me pointing out something I thought was peculiar from irrelephant but also recognizing that it is a weak read.In post 363, Raya36 wrote:I'm not liking Cinnamon near the start. I find he's playing it a bit safe. Especially around 154. I don't like how after Irrelephant challenges what he said he still posts that he thinks irrelephant is scummy but then after seems to backpedal a bit by saying he's not that scummy though and removing his vote. Also some of his wording in 154 seemed safe to me. (Small inconsistencies instead of just inconsistencies, saying it could just be this but I see it more of this makes backpedaling after easier.)
I like eggs for town. Mainly because of 102 (But I like his posts in general). If he were scum he's really not attempting to keep his options open and even when he found some minor things he didn't like he wasn't actively trying to push it which reads as town to me.
What made you change your mind about cinnamon?In post 189, Flavor Leaf wrote:Eggs and Cinnamon are my stronger town reads right now.
I think I like menalque. His entrance while being fluff came off as natural. I don't like his push on eggs but he does make some good points that seem like they could come from a town scumhunting pov even though they are a bit of a stretch as someone mentioned. I do like his points made against voted though. His scumhunting appears to be natural to me.
Also related to above, I didn't feel Voted's defense to Menalque's push was sufficient. Self-meta especially is never a good argument in my opinion.
Irrelephant is a strong townlean.
Can you elaborate on this?In post 344, Cinnamon wrote:I am also starting to like Eggs less, I previously had a null read on them but their last few posts have seemed somewhat scummy to me.
As of now I would be most willing to lynch cinnamon or Voted but I would much rather vote on cinnamon for now.
VOTE: cinnamon
1) this was in response to Bob asking if I had an explanation for Flavor's reasoning, I think that's why I interjected in this way.In post 373, Irrelephant11 wrote:I can't decide why I dislike this post. I think just the way cinnamon intercedes on Flavor's behalf feels unnecessary. Like he's helping for the sake of helping? This might be confbias.In post 195, Cinnamon wrote:Bob, I think what Flavor is trying to say is that he believes as town he acts towny enough that a two person wagon formed against him early like we did is generally not going to be two other town.
Do you understand menalque's push on you now, cinnamon?In post 345, Cinnamon wrote:Irrelephant then Menalque pushed me there for reasons that don't make a large amount of sense to me, which I find pretty suspicious.
Cinnamon what made you say the bolded?In post 350, Cinnamon wrote:Lynching for information is a terrible play (in this scenario). Saying you want to lynch me then Voted (since I'll flip town), completely ignoring the possibility that literally anybody else is mafia doesn't make any sense to me and I'm not sure why you're trying to push this. I really struggle to see why you aren't really considering the possibility thatthe mafia team looks something like (Irrelephant, Eggs) and Irrelephant has been doing a great job of making sure the discussion is off of Eggsor really any other number of possibilities here. Just because the SEs are talking doesn't mean they're advancing the game in a way that helps town.
Sorry but I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. Are you suggesting that pressuring somebody who's slot has only contributed one post with real meaningful content in the past week will not provide useful information?In post 385, Voted wrote:For example? I could pretty much bus him. Sameone who TRed him could try to help him. Sameone who didn't mention him at all could be happy that he is not being pushed right now...In post 384, Cinnamon wrote:Voted for me was a good wagon because I found him hard to read and thought his actions and posts were not really trying to help town. I'm still not sold on him, but I think it would be useful to switch my vote to naya because that intro along with the actions of thenavneet look quite suspiciousand this wagon could provide a lot of useful information.
VOTE: Raya
I think so? Most of my mafia experience comes from IRL gameplay however so things like tells and meta are different here; that would be one area where I feel less confident.In post 464, Irrelephant11 wrote:@cinnamonIn post 443, Irrelephant11 wrote:Cinnamon I think you’re a very capable mafia player. Do you agree?
which is quite inconsistent with earlier logic that he agreed with.In post 621, Irrelephant11 wrote: In a world where Raya slot is town and FL is town I think there’s a 0% chance {teacher, cinnamon} has 0 scum.
The way you word this suggests that teacher and/or I are part of the scum team, but from the logic that you've previously agreed with it would be unlikely that I am mafia and not on a team with teacher, as I could have pushed on teacher using arguments that I've been pushing the entire day.In post 621, Irrelephant11 wrote: In a world where Raya slot is town and FL is town I think there’s a 0% chance {teacher, cinnamon} has 0 scum.
The tone of what you are saying makes me want to believe that you're town but when you say stuff like this that just isn't true at all I have trouble doing so. The only times you could even think I was sheeping somebody else's read was on Voted earlier and maybe you now although the arguments that I brought were outside of Flavor's. I haven't been sheeping at all this game and I'm not sure how you come to that conclusion.In post 663, Irrelephant11 wrote:Im making my wife mad because I’ve been staring at my phone for too long on vacation but this wagon is F’ing crap and it’s pissing me off
If Raya isnt scum Cinnamon probably is for always sheeping the scumread most strongly held by either of me/Flavor
To be fair to Irrelephant, part of his argument is that he thinks I am a 'capable mafia player' based on other games that I have played, so I think that he is not considering me to be a true newbie to the game.In post 673, Pine wrote:That said, holy shit this post.In post 663, Irrelephant11 wrote:Im making my wife mad because I’ve been staring at my phone for too long on vacation but this wagon is F’ing crap and it’s pissing me off
If Raya isnt scum Cinnamon probably is for always sheeping the scumread most strongly held by either of me/Flavor
The wife thing (while probably legit) is classic appeal to emotion.
Then the waffling and keeping options open for whomever is weakest, and for a really shite reason. Oh gee willikers, a newish player is sheeping experienced players? How perfectly ordinary. Your job as a Town IC/SE would be to correct/explain/teach why that's not good play, not eviscerate them for it. Will definitely be reading Irrelephant with a critical eye.