In post 17, Weiss Schnee wrote:Spoiler:
HEAL: Weiss Schnee, Blake Belladonna, Skygazer, Northsidegal, implosion
VOTE: sashaddin
Hello everyone! I'm looking forward to playing with you all in this game that I have clearly already solved and in which you can all sheep me without hesitation.
This is a really interesting question.In post 30, Tim Goodman wrote:That's an odd read to have. I believe 7 players has posted up to this point and I know that I'm town, so I guess the real question here is how did you know that Quest was scum?In post 27, Blake Belladonna wrote:That said, I think a maximum of one scum has posted so far.
HEAL: Blake Belladonna, northsidegal, Implosion, Weiss Schnee, Sashaddin
Then why add onto that at all?In post 39, Tim Goodman wrote:I don't know how you got that read at all, which is why I asked you about it!
In post 42, implosion wrote:Where, precisely, did you get that read from?In post 37, Blake Belladonna wrote:Why do you believe that I got that read from scumreading a slot that hadn't posted yet?
?In post 30, Tim Goodman wrote:That's an odd read to have. I believe 7 players has posted up to this point and I know that I'm town,In post 27, Blake Belladonna wrote:That said, I think a maximum of one scum has posted so far.
HEAL: Blake Belladonna, northsidegal, Implosion, Weiss Schnee, Sashaddinso I guess the real question here is how did you know that Quest was scum?
Oh, I misunderstood what you meant with that question.In post 44, implosion wrote:i do not understand why you are responding to my question with a quote from a different player and a question mark, rather than answering my question that is entirely unrelated to tim goodman's post.
I don't see any particular reason to townread either of these slots.In post 47, Quest wrote:Implosion and Tim the Good Man are both great additions to anyone's coalition lists, for the record.
I'm sure they'll be able to show it if they are (:In post 57, Blake Belladonna wrote:Oh, I misunderstood what you meant with that question.In post 44, implosion wrote:i do not understand why you are responding to my question with a quote from a different player and a question mark, rather than answering my question that is entirely unrelated to tim goodman's post.
That statement was a bait, there was no actual read there.
I wanted to see how the slots that hadn't posted yet responded.In post 66, implosion wrote:What kind of reactions were you trying to bait with it?In post 57, Blake Belladonna wrote:That statement was a bait, there was no actual read there.
It should already be apparent if you're paying attention to what I'm posting.In post 67, Quest wrote:Blake, you dodged my question.
Speak fast.In post 46, Quest wrote:Blake, why am I not in your list? Is it because you're trying to distance yourself away from me? If so, it's not gonna work.
I'm pushing anything?In post 74, Skygazer wrote:blake i get what ur getting at but
its not making me TR you at all if this is a serious push
On the contrary, actually.In post 98, Quest wrote:'cause it's who you are. You know that's a sub-optimal play in every way, you're not stupid.
I'm mostly just looking to make sure that both scum aren't in the coalition, because a scumflip outside of it is far more informative than a scumflip inside of it.In post 112, implosion wrote:i do really want an answer to that question though
what do you mean that the town wasn't properly prepared? Do you mean that towns lost by forming coalitions in such a way that if they failed, they wouldn't get sufficient information to then solve the game? How, exactly, do you think we ought to form a coalition so as to get that information?
What exactly is the problem here?In post 124, Quest wrote:I mean.In post 123, Blake Belladonna wrote:I think people are confusing me planning around the coalition failing with me being pessimistic about it failing?
This is a high enough caliber playerlist that I think my approach wouldn't really affect the odds of the coalition succeeding in the first place, but it would have an effect on town's win chances if the coalition does fail.In post 142, Quest wrote:and if it fails, then it's whatever, this player list is more than capable of winning during mountainous.
Quest is not out of her scumrange as of yet.In post 167, Skygazer wrote:blake how r u reading quest rn
What was town about this approach? I got the impression that he was TMIspewing with how he phrased this.In post 30, Tim Goodman wrote:That's an odd read to have. I believe 7 players has posted up to this point and I know that I'm town, so I guess the real question here is how did you know that Quest was scum?In post 27, Blake Belladonna wrote:That said, I think a maximum of one scum has posted so far.
HEAL: Blake Belladonna, northsidegal, Implosion, Weiss Schnee, Sashaddin
Are you understanding what I'm saying here?In post 188, Quest wrote:Not really. Saying "I think a maximum of one scum has posted so far" is an odd read; it's incredibly vague, and something that I would've questioned too. You gave no evidence that you actually believed this, and if you want to go with the "reaction bait" argument, then I still think what I said holds true. It's not a great opener, especially when you follow it up with 28.
In post 187, Tim Goodman wrote:I'm competent enough to not TMIspew in the way that you think that I did.
I was just asking where that read came from.
I really don't like these posts either.In post 190, Tim Goodman wrote:If you think that I'm scum with Quest and I slipped that information by saying that you 'knew' that she was also scum you're assuming that I'm a fairly incompetent scum player.
I'm too tired for this shitIn post 242, Ankamius wrote:There's an undertone to your thoughts that make me think you're looking to prevent me from poisoning your spot in the townblock more than actually trying to sort the game.In post 239, Tim Goodman wrote:What exactly is it that I'm doing that's making you scumread me?
Would you do me a favor and sort through the two marathons I played on this site recently and tell me if you scumread me there as well?
