[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 11161638 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null mini 2093, the search - an interminable period of darkness. - Mafiascum.net
In post 32, Pine wrote:Channel Fireball...hydra of CDB and Firebringer? Someone else?
We are a secret hydra. We do not wish to reveal ourselves.
I forgot to ask my partner what part of the name they wish to choose however. Let us say that all the posts posted above were posted by Fireball, if that helps you in any way.
Now if the scum really wanted to start some gambling, what they should do is whichever one of them has an alternate wincon that can be fulfilled post-lynch, they should claim scum, claim their alternate wincon, and we'll see if we can't get their alternate wincon done after we lynch them. Sure they get lynched but they don't need to be alive to fulfill their alternate wincon. Right? This sounds like a good plan for the scum, they should take us up on it.
Anyway, regardless of this alternate win condition business...
I happen to have an extremely good scumtell for Chennisden and he fulfilled it this game. VOTE: Acute Right Obtuse therefore should be a good lynch.
In post 49, Channel Fireball wrote:Anyway, regardless of this alternate win condition business...
I happen to have an extremely good scumtell for Chennisden and he fulfilled it this game. VOTE: Acute Right Obtuse therefore should be a good lynch.
Actually, let's do it this way--who wants to bet on whether Chenni is town or scum? My head bets a m20 forest on town chenni, fireball bets a 2019 banefire that chenni's scum, who wants to take us up?
In post 43, Channel Fireball wrote:Now if the scum really wanted to start some gambling, what they should do is whichever one of them has an alternate wincon that can be fulfilled post-lynch, they should claim scum, claim their alternate wincon, and we'll see if we can't get their alternate wincon done after we lynch them. Sure they get lynched but they don't need to be alive to fulfill their alternate wincon. Right? This sounds like a good plan for the scum, they should take us up on it.
-Chanel
I think only scum would think this way
Why does 42 sound like flavor leaf but 46 sound like baezu
I'm assuming it's only one head posting so which one am I wrong on?
As the wagon on his hydra is fairly populated I feel no need to explore this at the moment. Revealing this would mean harder games in the future to solve Chennis' alignment, as he would be aware of that tell. I will only reveal this if needed. I hope you understand my position.
If only you knew, my dear Chennis. If only you knew.
You actually do seem to be aware of what I am implying however. Still very happy with this vote.
- Fireball.
If not for the meta tell, your reaction to all of this is not representative of your town game. This frustration and the way you phrased it comes from you when you roll scum. I feel fairly certain about that. This reaction is clearly a response coming from frustrated scum that wants to know how they got caught, or perhaps being able to rectify their mistake mid-way, which is unfortunately for you not going to happen.
In post 114, Elements wrote:VOTE: fireball your post have just been rubbing me the wrong way
Which post are you referring to?
By all means, feel free to elaborate on that.
- Fireball.
The sentiment behind all of the "I'm not going to reveal the obvious tell because it'll ruin future games" feel very have blind faith in me because I know best.
Don't like it
I can understand not liking the move. As numbers stated they found it distateful. However I would like to know if that sentiment translates to me being scummy. What scummy intent do you think I hold by saying such things?
I would also like to know your thoughts on the ACO hydra, if possible, and what they have posted so far. Thank you.
In post 120, Elements wrote:I don't see anything of much substance in their posts. The only interesting one was the rant about your read. Seems genuine but if the parts about ability at this game are true I can easily see it being fabricated.
I'm not a big fan of day one. I'm normally one of the lynch options at the end of the day and in my experience the only useful stuff that happens is the voting towards the end of the day which almost always ends in a town lynch. I don't think anyone can have any certainty about anyone else's alignment at this point in the game unless they are scum and know everyone else it town.
I understand your position. However this tell is pretty strong, and the response to it makes me think that this tell is also applicable this game. If not for the tell itself, perhaps Chennis' response to it should be fairly telling that he seems particularly annoyed by my vote in particular, while having 4 other players on the wagon. The other reason why I have not revealed the tell, is to see what the slot would do about it, and they seem fairly obsessed with it to the point of only generating discussion about it, and not the game itself. Disregarding the tell, this is fairly scummy.
I'm annoyed because you're pretending to have a real reason for doing so
- Acute
I do. This is perhaps the most obvious scumtell I have seen in any game of mafia, and I am frankly quite surprised nobody pointed it out in the last scum game you played in Gay Dance. Consider yourself lucky.
My presence in those games is a non-relevant point of discussion, considering anyone can delve in the games you have played at any time. And if they do, they will certainly notice the same thing that I have notice, and will promptly join your wagon.
What made you think that our alt-condition is the one of a Lyncher? And what made you think that over the possibility of me being scum?
In post 135, Acute Right Obtuse wrote:i don't think you'd read my games just for funzies, and you really can't pick up on meta-tells without playing with a player
You're correct. The reason I took the time to take a quick look at your recent games is because something felt quite off this game regarding your slot and in terms of your posts. A quick investigation led me to the conclusion that you did something that is very specific to your scumgame, so I pointed it out. Channel felt your slot was relatively townie prior to this, for all that's worth.
I still don't understand why your mind jumped first to "you are a lyncher!" rather than "you are scum!". I find that pretty interesting.
I will admit that all of these people need some glasses because quite frankly, between you and I, I still don't understand how you got away with that particular thing for so long.
Oh trust me, dear. It exists. It's as clear as day. And the fact you insist about it for so long while trying to discredit my slot in particular, while having no discussion about the game in general, is very telling. It's also very amusing to see that you actually noticed your own tell as well. I know you have.
In fact, I invite all players here to do the same about your recent games. They can just have a cursory look and I can guarantee you that they will notice it as well.
In post 146, Channel Fireball wrote:Oh trust me, dear. It exists. It's as clear as day. And the fact you insist about it for so long while trying to discredit my slot in particular, while having no discussion about the game in general, is very telling. It's also very amusing to see that you actually noticed your own tell as well. I know you have.
In fact, I invite all players here to do the same about your recent games. They can just have a cursory look and I can guarantee you that they will notice it as well.
- Fireball.
then what excuse do you have for not outing it?
exactly.
I wouldn't describe it as an excuse. Rather I would describe it as a way to show people your true alignment, without having to out the tell itself. Your reaction is quite invaluable to show to other players that you are scum, and the subconscious slip that you think I have a lyncher alt-con, rather than me simply being scum. This should be enough to prove your alignment to other town players.
I will admit that what I am doing is quite overkill, given a lot of players were already inclined to push ACO. Although, I would much rather ensure a lynch on scum today, it would not be the first time I see some wagons losing momentum without any rhyme or reason, especially an early day wagon. This is just insurance that we lynch scum today.
If you want to make sure you understand what I am referencing, I invite you to take a very quick look at Chennis' recent games, then look at this one. You will probably have a "oh!" moment, and vote with us and the 4 others on this wagon.
you probably think it's weird because i would be livid at this bullshit as
both alignments
.
you do agree that he's probably lying about his meta tell?
Idk, i have to check your game in gay dance to see if i see what hr says he sees
I invite you to also iso his towngames to have a pretty stark comparison. You could notice it in 2 minutes, top.
Here's a tip: what's being written is actually completely irrelevant.
I think holding my tell has generated enough results in regards to reaction and won't produce anything new, so I might as well share it with the rest of the playerlist.
In the majority of games that chennis has played as town, his typing style is fairly loose. "this is how chennis would type most of his sentences". It is fairly congruent with his stream-of-consciousness style of posting, with no regards to grammar. Notice in particular that his sentences, more often than not, start with a lowercase letter.
On the contrary, in Gay Dance, all of his posts were written starting with an uppercase and fairly well written. My style of posting would be comparable to Chennis' Gay Dance game, for example. It's a subconscious tell when people try to get taken more seriously, such as people try to show a professional facade when applying for jobs. This is fairly telling when it comes to mafia, as it indicates that Chennis as town does not necessarily desire to be taken seriously, but very much does so when playing as scum, hence the clean posting style, and the incongruence between stating he does not care about this game, and vehemently arguing against my reason for voting him.
You may think it is completely absurd, but this is the kind of thing that people do on a subconscious level that gives them away textually. It is akin to someone smiling when they are lying in face-to-face mafia, for example. This is why it is quite a serious scumtell in my eyes.
Another subconscious tell would be assuming that our slot has a lyncher win-condition as a justification of us pushing there, instead of simply we are scum trying to score a mislynch. It's a subconsious tell that we are town, and that Chennis therefore subconsciously came up with an explanation that would make sense in his point of view. Those things are quite important.
I have a question, however. Why would you assume in that case that we would be that player, instead of all the other players that voted you prior? Does that player holding that wincondition know your identity?
specifically i'd think the person is town because if they were scum they could just NK me to manipulate their condition into fulfilling and that's too boring/bad
I think that train of thought is fairly townie and that you're not lying about that piece of information. Perhaps scum is elsewhere. Do you have any reads?
I think that train of thought is fairly townie and that you're not lying about that piece of information. Perhaps scum is elsewhere. Do you have any reads?
- Fireball.
i think gobble is probably my most likely scum candidate.
If you suspect him of being your presumed Lyncher doesn't that mean he is town more often than not? That seemed to be your reasoning.
Number's defense of Cyrus feels quite out of place. In fact a lot of stances that Numbers has taken this game feel quite detached. They do ask a lot of questions but don't have a lot of reads of their own. I think Cyrus and Numbers are equally good lynches here, perhaps.
In post 239, 123456789 wrote:There aren't many stances to take so far in this game.
Frankly I find that hard to believe. On a very basis level, every read you have is a stance in itself. Saying you don't have many stances to take in this game, would imply that you have very little to no reads. I find that to not be possible from a player that actually has been participating in some discussion already. This is a part of why I am suspicious of your slot, as I would imagine someone like you to have generated more thoughts and reads than mediating, say, our push against ACO earlier on.
That sounds really great. What about Cyrus makes you think he is townie, though? If you think all of the people you mentioned are town, then where should we be pushing, in your opinion?
In post 243, 123456789 wrote:Maybe gobble; he hasn't really given me a town vibe from his posts, and he's definitely been around.
Is there anything that strikes you as scummy from Gobble, or is it just the fact that you can't find a town vibe in all of his posts? If it's the latter, what's the difference between him and say, someone like Penguin, or Baezu Leaf?
A) i feel like ur tying cyrus to numbers (or vice versa)
B) you feel very stilted and not very natural, but i suppose that can be a product of trying to write formally, and not necessarily of your alignment
Point A is a fairly precise observation. There was the possibility that Numbers and Cyrus could be scum together given Numbers' sudden defense of Cyrus, which is why I asked questions to see if there was anything beyond that. I feel the connection to be quite less present than I first thought. I would like to say that Numbers feel much more townie with how they handled the subsequent conversation with me, although that might be a simple reaction to the points I raised earlier. Probably a slot I'd call Null here.
I am very much aware of point B. If I need to precise our discussion from earlier about it, this posting style is not a style that is designed to obscure my posting style, or my identity. Rather, it is a posting style forcing me to speak in such a way as to promote discussion and foster it, and make my thoughts quite known. Consider it a thought experiment of forcing myself to use a certain paradigm of posting, in which I am forced to convey my thoughts in a certain way, at the loss of authenticity. It may not make much sense to you, and may appear quite scummy, but I hold a lot of importance to this for personal reasons.
In post 262, skitter30 wrote:I feel like if one of them is scum you're setting up a lynch on the other next
Okay. What gave you this impression rather than the impression of a townie that sees a potential connection between two players given the odd defense of one of them on the other?
Would it be safe to assume that you think I could be setting up town!numbers' mislynch, or do you believe that there is a world where I am doing this, and that cyrus is town, and numbers is scum?
In post 262, skitter30 wrote:I feel like if one of them is scum you're setting up a lynch on the other next
Okay. What gave you this impression rather than the impression of a townie that sees a potential connection between two players given the odd defense of one of them on the other?
Would it be safe to assume that you think I could be setting up town!numbers' mislynch, or do you believe that there is a world where I am doing this, and that cyrus is town, and numbers is scum?
Because that requires you, as town, to be concerned that the game will not re-evaluate after a redflip on day 1 or that no investigative actions will take place.
You're acting like it's a mountainous or that we would stand to have some great benefit from lynching numbers, when those are idiotic conclusions to us simply observing the two slots could both be scum and already have bad associatives.
If you think a scum's top priority on day 1 is setting up the day 2 mislynch after bussing day 1 then you're diving down ridiculous rabbit holes that town you has no reason to dive down this far.
In post 280, skitter30 wrote:is this something you think *i* wouldn't think as town, or something that you think a townie in general wouldn't think
Both
In post 280, skitter30 wrote:i don't know how you (your slot) got to 'cyrus and numbers are equally good lynches today', when i don't think that is at all the case, and i think that cyrus has been leagues scummier, and numbers' main crime is not scumreading him.
Funny how we just voted with you on Cyrus and didn't vote numbers, it's almost like this head agreed that cyrus has been acting fishieer.
In post 280, skitter30 wrote:i dont't hink that makes them equally good lynches; it's entirely possible for cyrus to be scum and numbers to be mistaken!town, say; i very much dislike that you're equating cyrus' play with numbers and making it seem like they're both equally scummy
Or numbers is spewing lazy!Cyrus town. Observing that number's defense of Cyrus seemed questionable can mean a number of things. Acting like we're informed that Cyrus is scum and are bussing him is the least logical conclusion to reach.
In post 280, skitter30 wrote:i think your slot is trying to introduce numbers to the poe pool, and i'm objecting to that
You're welcome to towncase him if you want but you jumping in here in the way that you did is nagl. I don't see why you're so confident in town numbers that you feel the need to white knight him, I don't get why you would imagine only one very illogical scenario for us making a simple observation that their interactions aren't great, and I really dislike you trying to control the PoE.
@Skitter My head was townreading you for a while but I totally understand why my head voted you on that spot, given the specific set of responses you gave.
In post 280, skitter30 wrote:i think your slot is trying to introduce numbers to the poe pool, and i'm objecting to that
I don't think you actually have addressed that matter once. Perhaps you could explain why it's such a problem to you? Thanks.