Micro 887: the coaLITion [game over]
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 9:16 pm
man im really trying something new with this formatting huh All Role PMs have been sent out! agggh this was so close to being micro 888, that would've been so cool !! The game will start when eight of the nine players confirm. i wish there was a way to make the black background stretch across the entire post If you don't confirm within 36 hours you will be replaced! if you uh have trouble reading this formatting let me know !! 9/9 players have confirmed. |
Lil Uzi Vert replaces AzoriusSenate, Gamma Emerald replaces Cyan Talon and Hectic replaces eth0s. All three of the replaced players failed to open their role PM. Forwarding Role PMs now, and hopefully the game can get started soon! |
Day one has begun! With 9 players alive, it takes 5 to reach a majority. Day one ends in (expired on 2019-09-08 18:00:00). |
VC 1.00 Coalitions: RC most awesomest (0): Hectic (0): Gamma Emerald (0): EspressoPatronum (0): NC 39 (0): Clemency (0): Lil Uzi Vert (0): Spangled (0): Alchemist21 (0): Lynch: Not Voting (9): RC most awesomest, Hectic, Gamma Emerald, EspressoPatronum, NC 39, Clemency, Lil Uzi Vert, Spangled, Alchemist21 With 9 players alive, it takes 5 to reach a majority. Day one ends in (expired on 2019-09-08 18:00:00). |
can I, without giving a long winded explanation of why these kinds of posts even made ironically throw me off and make me dislike the game, ask everyone who wants to win as town to not do this
this is already a game i have no desire to play.In post 10, Alchemist21 wrote:if the Coalition fails we know there’s a deep wolf in a group where we might not otherwise suspect scum to be.
Having played this setup twice, I agree with thisIn post 10, Alchemist21 wrote:I think the Coalition should be the 5 strongest/Towniest players not just for the obvious reasons of the D1 wincon but also as a weak investigational tool if it fails - if the Coalition fails we know there’s a deep wolf in a group where we might not otherwise suspect scum to be.
A-fucking-men!In post 12, RC most awesomest wrote:can I, without giving a long winded explanation of why these kinds of posts even made ironically throw me off and make me dislike the game, ask everyone who wants to win as town to not do this
what's wrong with me doing this? it's essentially equivalent to throwing out a random vote during RVS, it's not like i actually intend for those 5 to go throughIn post 12, RC most awesomest wrote:can I, without giving a long winded explanation of why these kinds of posts even made ironically throw me off and make me dislike the game, ask everyone who wants to win as town to not do this
is it considered a deep wolf if they're just in the top 5 town reads?In post 10, Alchemist21 wrote:HEAL: Alchemist, RC most awesomest, NC 39, Gamma Emerald, EspressoPatronum
That’s myself plus the 3 slots I believe to be the strongest slots coming into the game plus Espresso since I liked their entrance.
I think the Coalition should be the 5 strongest/Towniest players not just for the obvious reasons of the D1 wincon but also as a weak investigational tool if it fails - if the Coalition fails we know there’s a deep wolf in a group where we might not otherwise suspect scum to be.
i think it's still good go throw around votes to show who we suspect and intend to lynch after we decide on the coalition, it'll be useful later on as well when we look back at wagons and potential bussingIn post 11, Alchemist21 wrote:I don’t even know if throwing around lynch votes will be useful until the Coalition is decided on since we can’t lynch before the Coalition is decided.
Why
Okay this feels like an overreactionIn post 23, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Could you maybe try playing the game and stop following the solve the setup philosophy?