ok.
Give this a slight town read, idk why. Maybe its because its too dirty to be scum. idk.
VOTE: Hetic
Then unvote.In post 14, skitter30 wrote:also that's l-1
Im Fine with this too.
Don't care, not a fan.In post 24, Elements wrote:If you look up memeing on the mafiascum wiki you get redirected to Hectic's profileIn post 20, skitter30 wrote:elements have you played with hectic before? does he usually post like that ?
Id rather have more than 1 person wagoned. Unfortunately I only have 1 vote, and others already voted you.reaper wrote:Auzre comes in voting Hectic and shading skitter and me. Then on being corrected just me. I find this scummy. If you think I should be voted vote me, don't nudge others in that direction while you park on someone else.
roster? gave me a bad vibe, but Idr why.
What reaper said of you seems to be true.TChill wrote:VOTE: NotMySpamAccount
I believe reaper for now. Besides that's a terrible argument to make as scum to try and save yourself d1. Surely scum would come up with something better.
1. I'm sorry that I find Elements/Hectic unbearable up to now. I find it annoying, I don't want to partake in it. Its not apathetic.Aaron wrote:They seem apathetic to everything that's happened so far and I think this post (un)intentionally started the Reaper wagon.
So Aaron is voting me in defense of reaper.Elements wrote:I'm liking Aaron, Skitter, and Hectic
What? My Apathy? I'm guessing this has something to do with my mistake bringing up skitter. I got nothing.In post 113, AaronFrost wrote:Except that's not at all why I'm voting for you. My vote was done as a reaction test based off of a post of yours that pinged me.
I'm not voting Reaper for his spot on the wagon. There's only 9 people in this game, i doubt he know elements was L-1. His vote still looks bad regardless.In post 113, AaronFrost wrote: I dislike the Reaper wagon because of the weak reasoning for it. Given how fast the game started off, it's pretty likely that Reaper didn't realize he was putting Elements as L-1 and I think most of us would unvote in that situation when it's pointed out that you put someone at L-1 during RVS.
It did, or atleast looks like it did tbh. Youre not wrong though.hectic wrote:Did it look like I was memeing when I said I scumread Reaper? Did I stutter or look like I was fucking joking around?
My read on Reaper is 100% serious, and frankly, I'm not sure if I buy his excuses.
Literally one line after the quote:In post 117, Elements wrote:What is the point of this?In post 112, Azuresky wrote:So Aaron is voting me in defense of reaper.Elements wrote:I'm liking Aaron, Skitter, and Hectic
Skitter stated hes not a fan of the reaper wagon.
Hectic is voting reaper, but he is your butt-buddy this game.
I was hoping for a link, but I dont think I'm getting one yet.
This is bad. Vote me then.reaper wrote:Annoyance. I do.
I like the use of the word "apathy" used in this. Its the same thing Aaron said earlier in regards to me. To me, it sounds like an excuse for elements to hop on. Anyone else, or am I reaching?In post 121, Elements wrote:I don't think it's necessarily scum indicative, but indicates an apathy I don't like so I wanted to move my vote to get them to interact more and contribute.In post 120, Hectic wrote:Why is that scum-indicative, my self-voter friend?
So much so that you are voting me for the exact reason.In post 123, Elements wrote:I think you're town. I like your reasoning behind the vote and your assessment of reaper and hectic.In post 122, AaronFrost wrote:Elements why are you sheeping me?
In post 107, skitter30 wrote:I'm not really feeling the reaper wagon rn
In post 132, skitter30 wrote:I really dont get the reaper wagon
*insert reasoning/proof/conjectures/usefulness here*NotMySpamAccount wrote:ok azuresky's entire iso is bad. my page 5 solve is reaper/azu.
You've been pretty opportunistic with your vote dude, what do you want?In post 133, Tchill13 wrote:Reaper, azure and NotMySpamAccountIn post 131, Elements wrote:Which three?In post 130, Tchill13 wrote:So far 3 ppl have thrown shade at me without acting on it.
In post 103, AaronFrost wrote:I'll place my vote on someone who I think has a decent chance of being scum
VOTE: Azuresky
In post 108, Elements wrote:Yea , I just ISO'd azuresky I think my vote is better on them.
VOTE: Azuresky
In post 110, AaronFrost wrote:They seemIn post 104, Elements wrote:Why do you think they have a decent chance of being scum?In post 103, AaronFrost wrote:I'll place my vote on someone who I think has a decent chance of being scum
VOTE: Azureskyapatheticto everything that's happened so far and I think this post (un)intentionally started the Reaper wagon.In post 55, Azuresky wrote:You know, with people meta-reading Hetic as town, I like my vote even more.
Skitter and Reaper need votes too. Skitter left a vote on at L-1 and reaper's opening vote was terrible too.
Elements annoys me. I don't feel like listening to him/her at this point.
In post 116, Elements wrote:ComplaintsIn post 115, Hectic wrote:And? What'd you find?In post 108, Elements wrote:Yea , I just ISO'd azuresky I think my vote is better on them.
VOTE: Azuresky
In post 121, Elements wrote:I don't think it's necessarily scum indicative, but indicates anIn post 120, Hectic wrote:Why is that scum-indicative, my self-voter friend?apathyI don't like so I wanted to move my vote to get them to interact more and contribute.
VOTE: ElementsIn post 123, Elements wrote:I think you're town. I like your reasoning behind the vote and your assessment of reaper and hectic.In post 122, AaronFrost wrote:Elements why are you sheeping me?
I'm sure there's some way of doing it.In post 136, Tchill13 wrote:Azure you're not wrong I have been opportunistic. I'd like to know how I'm supposed to develop reads without applying pressure though. Do I sit back and not post at all?
I was trying to find a comparison to your 3 town reads. Haven't found one yet.Elements wrote:I still don't understandIn post 134, Azuresky wrote: Literally one line after the quote:I was hoping for a link, but I dont think I'm getting one yet.
1. In your words, what was bad about my iso?Elements wrote:My reasoning is Aaron's reasoning. I agree with him. After I spelt his name wrong I wanted to change my vote and he gave a reasonable argument for voting you so I checked your ISO and agreed with him. I have effectively said I'm sheeping him on this so I don't see why it's such a big problem to you.In post 135, Azuresky wrote:I don't think Elements had a real reason of voting me (per 108 and 116) and just copied Aarons reasoning (Bolded in 110 and 121)
In post 104, Elements wrote:Why do you think they have a decent chance of being scum?In post 103, AaronFrost wrote:I'll place my vote on someone who I think has a decent chance of being scum
VOTE: Azuresky
Better yet, Aaron doesnt even answer between these two posts.In post 108, Elements wrote:Yea , I just ISO'd azuresky I think my vote is better on them.
VOTE: Azuresky
Actually that question goes for Spam too:In post 126, NotMySpamAccount wrote:ok azuresky's entire iso is bad. my page 5 solve is reaper/azu.
What did you see in my ISO that screams scum? Or are you just blindly following aaron?
You forgot Opportunistic.In post 163, Tchill13 wrote:To create a tchill you add a pinch of scummy, a dash of reaction testing and then you lightly sprinkle salt of the bitch variety... Apparently. I'm just reading the ingredients.In post 160, skitter30 wrote:meh tchill is kinda scummy
i think azure has a townie-ish reaction to getting wagoned (specifically 141 and 144)
Why are you answering for him?In post 164, Tchill13 wrote:I feel like this is just his style. Probably bumps heads with a lot of people. He's also made it abundantly clear he's OK with an azure lynch this early.In post 161, skitter30 wrote:elements are you usually this antagonistic?
Youre voting me though. Are you just that salty that you just grudgevoted me or what?In post 166, Tchill13 wrote:2 wagons at L-1 before page 8. Doesn't surprise me that neither has went through, I highly doubt this one does. Other than frost azure can't pinpoint a reason for any vote. Can't really look too much into RVS votes imo,I mean I don't think either wagon has had good reason tbh because reapers and azures blew up for little to no reason.
Die.elements wrote:At no point have I said I think you are scum.
See Above Comment.In post 171, Elements wrote:I'm not town reading her.In post 170, AaronFrost wrote:Then why are you voting for her?In post 168, Elements wrote:At no point have I said I think you are scum.In post 156, Azuresky wrote:What did you see in my ISO that screams scum? Or are you just blindly following aaron?
Why are you voting me again? Also you didnt answer my question of why youre answering elements in 164In post 187, Tchill13 wrote:Azure I have nothing to be salty about? If so I missed it.
And once again what you call opportunistic I call, reaction testing.
Now did elements remove his vote because skitter started leaning scum on him? Or was it something else?
This is weak.Elements wrote:I unvoted to prevent roster from lolhammeringIn post 187, Tchill13 wrote:Now did elements remove his vote because skitter started leaning scum on him? Or was it something else?
In post 178, rosterfoster wrote:I would be funny if I hammered...
Elements what about this screams “lolhammer?”In post 179, rosterfoster wrote:But I don’t really get the scum case.
Sarcasm will get you nowhere.In post 195, Tchill13 wrote:I'm voting you to see what happens.
I answered for elements because I'm scum with him and I need to hold his hand for us to win this game... Smh
Reaper townslipped. Elements is scum.In post 206, AaronFrost wrote:You voting Elements contradicts the statement above. You bussing?In post 203, Tchill13 wrote: Could be town frustrated at bad townies, but could also be scum frustrated at being pressured and using "bad townies" as an excuse.
Fuck Meta. Dont use it.skitter30 wrote:i know but it's the only game that i have a reference for that i was in soIn post 188, Elements wrote:The search, as you'll agree was not a stereotypical game. My only scum game is the themed undertale can't by popsofctown if you want to check that out. I'd link it but I'm on my phone.
This is the 3rd L-1 you've forced.Tchill13 wrote:VOTE: Elements
That's L-1. Yeah I'm being a pretty salty bitch rn.
Just FYI.
reaper wrote: tchill/roster/notspamwolvesare in there.
Because your neutral statment gives me the assumption that you dont think im town. Yet you vote the wagon im leading.In post 218, AaronFrost wrote:How so?In post 213, Azuresky wrote:You voting Elements contradicts the statement above. You bussing?In post 206, AaronFrost wrote: Could be town frustrated at bad townies, but could also be scum frustrated at being pressured and using "bad townies" as an excuse.
Because the active players are voting elements, Hectic disappeared, and Elements is VLA.In post 223, skitter30 wrote:Why did this game stall ... ?
Nope, its enough of the dumbtell that I'm giving reaper another day to live. Your (scum?)buddy Elements is dying today. Your meta defense of the dude isn't helping.In post 230, Hectic wrote:Nah. If he comes from a place which use "wolves" rather than "mafia", that'll be something ingrained into his head. Doesn't matter if he rolled mafia, when he starts talking about hypothetical baddies, he could still use the term "wolves" if that's the one he's used to.In post 213, Azuresky wrote: Reaper townslipped. Elements is scum.
That's all the time I'm willing to spare this thread tonight. The aneurysms are building up, and I don't want to risk a V/LA that isn't within my control.
Fuck, I forgot Aaron was in this game, wanted to ISO him from last time.
Hey Azure, remind me why Aaron's real fucking scummy?
Hey elements.In post 227, Hectic wrote:Alright, I'm back to kickstart this fucking dead game. Time for some scumhunting.
So remember my promise to go through Element's scum game earlier? Well, I'm a man of my fucking word, so I went right ahead and did that.
I REALLY looked for contrasts/similarities in his play to this game, and you know fucking what: I found both.
Elements asks a LOT of questions as scum. E.g: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11210320
Elements doesn't do a lot of scumhunting as scum.
Elements is a LOT less erratic there.
Overall: His play is different enough here. The lack of scumhunting is a constant, but his erratic nature and his reduction in spamming questions is a significant enough difference.
Mainly due to how fucking all over the place he is with his votes and reads this game.
Put him down as a resentful townread.
God I hope I get killed tonight.In post 256, AaronFrost wrote:I don't see this flipping scum tbh. If it flips town, then at least one of the last three on the wagon {Spam, Elements, Azure} are probably scum.
Theres like 4 players that are active and the rest are lurking, being useless, or getting replaced.In post 253, Elements wrote:Waiting for what?In post 252, Azuresky wrote:"I don't feel like waiting"
In post 266, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Welp that wasn't what I expected. I kinda wanted to, you know, generate discussion, not A QUICKHAMMER.
Yes voting a blank spot is the best idea to generate discussion.In post 247, NotMySpamAccount wrote:@mod, error in the vc, I'm the only one voting Azu but it says 2 votes.
It doesn't look like I'll get Azu today, so let's try going back to VOTE: reaper('s replacement)
Unless you know a “motivated player” is coming in, idk what youre talking about.In post 274, NotMySpamAccount wrote:So tell me, since your one whole week of experience on the site has given you knowledge on how to create activity that nobody else has figured out yet, why does a wagon on a motivated player about to join the game actually hurt the activity level?In post 273, Azuresky wrote:I like how your response to making more activity hinges on a replacement and not the other 8 players in thread.
