In post 1586, Lady Eventide wrote:Posts #90, #447, #468, #515, #583, #979, #1021, #1029, #1031, #1058, #1061 all mention bitmap before my first mention of them to you in #1110. You had mentioned them a LOT in multiple other posts, and you seem to both scum and town read them in this period. You start by voting them, then shift to a town read, then shift back to "Idk I guess" when I question you on it. It's frankly weird how often you mention them without ever actually engaging with them.
Spoiler:
Idk what you consider "mentioning bitmap" but this is him talking to bitmap?In post 447, Dannflor wrote:This is essentially why I voted here as I was skimming the thread earlier.In post 298, Bitmap wrote:I don't feel like Lady Eventide's posts have been that from town lately. Too mechanical and no scumhunting.
VOTE: Lady Eventide
Basically, the slot had continued making fluff posts while actual content was being produced between Titus and gameplay, then her first "real post" was purely mechanical. She throws down a vote on Titus in #242 that's not attached to anything and seems to be just voting for the sake of putting a vote down on a wagon. The OMGUS vote in #271 shows there wasn't really any strong reasoning attached to the previous vote.
Nothing since then has improved the slot for me. The hop onto Pops is reads very awkward.
I guess this is kind of a mention but he's talking about Gamma.In post 468, Dannflor wrote:Yeah, Gamma's push on Bitmap is bad, but I think it's the town sort of bad.
Wasnt this refering to Krazy's push on our slot?In post 515, Dannflor wrote:What on earth makes this a worthy pushIn post 508, Sailor Senshi wrote:unless I feel like Bitmap or pops is actually worth a push.
Inquiring about your read on bitmap... I guess this is kind of a mention.In post 583, Dannflor wrote:Did your feelings on Bitmap change at all?In post 573, popsofctown wrote:I like the reasoning against Senshi, yet it's also several slots that might townspew if there's town to spew, which leaves me somewhat torn.
This is related to 4 names someone had mentioned? didnt go check exactly who mentioned what.In post 979, Dannflor wrote:I just don't know what makes DDL more deserving over Bitmap, HH, or Chaos Wind who she claimed to also not have a read on / or needed to contribute more
This is just information.In post 1021, Dannflor wrote:Wagons have been attempted on Sailor and Bitmap
Ok this is a mention and somewhat of an stance.In post 1029, Dannflor wrote:You think Sailor is Bitmap's partner?In post 1025, RCEnigma wrote:I think a partner, or sailor, intentionally used the conflict with Ephraim to divert pressure from your wagon.
I'm not really sure how this theory makes sense honestly
Inquiring.In post 1031, Dannflor wrote:What exactly about that conflict made you think it was manufactured to draw pressure away from Bitmap?
Inquiring again.In post 1058, Dannflor wrote:How is this distraction orchestrated if that's not what you believeIn post 1049, RCEnigma wrote:C.) I've been exploring a hypothetical why the distraction would occur and Dann narrowed it into "RCE thinks Sailor is bits partner." Which is not what I said.
Sailor as town purposefully tries to distract from the Bitmap wagon?
I'm not following
Inquiring yet again.In post 1061, Dannflor wrote:Oh okayIn post 1055, RCEnigma wrote:Playing devil's advocate the case can be made that scum took advantage of you vs Ephraim as the catalyst. Which is what I was getting at when I alluded to the implication on LE's slot.
I'm still not sure how that gets you to Bitmap is scum
Like I don't know what exactly about the conflict is tipping you off that it was either a distraction or utilized as a distraction
Fact checking, did you just iso and ctrl+f bitmap
-Tana
