Large Normal 223 | New Beginnings | GAME OVER
Forum rules
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 2054, profii wrote:I am not a fan of Bob. He initially voted for Elements for reasons 'setup spec'ing very early' etc
He then left the wagon, but came back when the lynch actually went through and when he put his vote on he said he didn't believe the macho/one shot claim.
My concern is that if I am casing a slot for being scummy I'd be like "woah guys I'm voting elements because he was setup speccing over in this post, plus now look at this macho claim it's gotta be BS" - i.e. case the whole ISO for a scum evidence - Bob didnt mention his initial setup spec concern when he votes due to his claim concern, which makes me believe he is looking for a reason to be on the wagon rather than actual scum hunting properly.
VOTE: Bob3141
Obviously I will hear him out but I'm just going to vote there for now.
I've looked at Tchill's ISO and someone is going to have to take me through the case here, he doesn't come across super town of the players I've looked at so far but I dont think he is the most scummy either at this point unless I've missed something of course.In post 1739, bob3141 wrote:I was leaning toward elementis being town before his roleclaim. Due to his responses to my questions. So i am won't be voting tehre today
The "I won't be voting there today" followed by a vote there caught my eye. I see Bob's explanation of not believing the role modifiers and it makes sense, and if Elements had flipped scum I would be pursuing Bob for his last minute bus, but I can't see why a scum!Bob would flip like this on a town wagon.In post 1876, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: Elementis
Dont beleive teh macho and one shot thing. Why even tell us?- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
LOL. I've skimmed a little bit. If there's something important I should read in Day 1, could you point it out to me?In post 2078, Alonzo wrote:Had a chance to read through yet texcat?
Warm and cozy in pocket, but are you sure it was you who caught me? I thought it was Cliff Booth, your stunt double, because I'm sure it was a stunt.In post 2087, Rick Dalton wrote:Who is texcat? I like texcat, I’ve played with her many a times, I’ve hard caught a texcat in a game I didn’t play at all until dy 4, then I caught like 3 scum.
I like texcat.
Pocketed.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
VOTE: Garmr
It feels like Carca caught him in a lie, and now he's backtracking as fast as he can. I didn't understand why he claimed in the first place, and I really don't understand why he claimed and lied about his result. It feels a lot more like scum fake claiming when they thought they had a good shot.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Scum!Garmr claimed voyeur because it uses the exactly the information that they had. When Gamma turned up dead, it would be easy to assume that the doc was on Carca. But they don't know who the doc is. Partly it's the timing of the claim for me. I don't think town!Garmr would have claimed. How likely is it that town has a watcher and a voyeur?In post 2286, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:Yes, because Scum would claim Voyeur of all the roles on the wiki. COME ON!- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Wait. Is this coming from the person who just claimed to have lynched claimed town masons? When you were town?In post 2329, Garmr wrote:How to win mafia scum.
Lynch texcat
Did she flip scum
if yes congrats you lynched scum.
If no lynch lynch her town reads you'll have lynched scum congrats you won.
VOTE: Texcat- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I don't mind.In post 2391, Hopkirk wrote:We should solve the game together sometime. I'm sure we're thinking along the same lines here.
Anyone mind if we start just posting from our hydra account and not signing the posts?
-Hop
-Tex- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I don't mind either.In post 2391, Hopkirk wrote:We should solve the game together sometime. I'm sure we're thinking along the same lines here.
Anyone mind if we start just posting from our hydra account and not signing the posts?
-Hop
-Cat- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Vanilla cop is certainly what I thought Cliff was hinting at. Cliff, are you now claiming something else?In post 2421, Rick Dalton wrote:
Follow the pattern of the bold, and it shows I thought you were a Neapolitan.In post 2260, Rick Dalton wrote:In post 2201, Cliff Booth wrote:Richard my old friend, do you know what my role is based on the post I made about my role potentially being useless this game if it's role madnessNo,even as people only look into the atmospheric nature, do you think I would know this from the beginning?
I give the hint when I say the beginning.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I'm YouAreGreat's sub. And Rick Dalton has already tried to pocket me; you might have to try harder than this if you want me to move over to your pocket.In post 2395, Hectic wrote:Who's this? You new? I like you.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
+1In post 2615, Carcalilly wrote:
this makes 0 sense.In post 2611, EeveeLution Army wrote:In post 2609, Carcalilly wrote:What do you think of Billy's VT claim?
I can see it as an opportunistic claim from mafia but it would put them in an extremely bad situation unless scum has a way to stop nea. If he is vt idt we should lynch him but its a tough call
VOTE: Eevee
And Hopkirk has earned a FOS for his suggestion about lynching Billy, followed by a quick reversal.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
And we will eventually have to start testing some of those claims, like Garmr's, because I think scum is in that mix.In post 2612, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I'm glad there enough players in the game that my claim doesn't narrow down prs too much for scum, but the pros have been doing a decent job of that themselves by claiming w/o needing to.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Painfully slow....
In post 2631, Hopkirk wrote:Looks like Tex and Aaron are straight up scumclaiming.
Either that or very selectively reading and misrepresenting.
I said I have 3 scumreads. These are the three people I'd vote for today. You're presenting me saying I'd prefer to vote for tchill (who I'm voting now) and Aaron (who I voted earlier) as saying I backtracked. I'd prefer to vote Billy over anyone except Tchill/Aaron as is absolutely clear from my words and vote history. Texcat, I'd like you to reread then substantially expand on what you thought I meant because I'm struggling to see how town could reach that conclusion legitimately.
Yeah, reversal is the wrong word there. What earned you the fos was that you had Billy in your list of 3 when he's a definite town read for me because of the vt claim. When Carca asked about the VT claim, I would have expected a townie to say something like oh yeah I forgot about it; I'm taking Billy off the list. Instead you saidIn post 2618, texcat wrote: And Hopkirk has earned a FOS for his suggestion about lynching Billy, followed by a quick reversal.
And you never answered Billy's question about how exactly we were going to test that theory. You backtracked by saying that you don't want him to eat rope today, but you seem to still be open to lynching him and that seems scummy to me.In post 2613, Hopkirk wrote:I don't want you to eat rope today since it's worth testing that theory, and Aaron/Tchill were bigger independent scumreads than you today. I've voted/ want to lynch Tchill/Aaron today.
NO.In post 2635, Cliff Booth wrote:
is it not obvious?In post 2628, davesaz wrote:Still have that question on why you think it's beneficial to discuss your role possibly being neg util or useless.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I can confirm that I did not do anything on N1.In post 2677, Tchill13 wrote:
I tracked this slot n1. They didnt do anything.In post 2152, Tchill13 wrote:lets see... texcat has done nothing. should we policy them? jk lol
i'll be more active today. not a fan of a PL push right after a ML then a nk'd mason.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 2710, texcat wrote:
I can confirm that I did not do anything on N1.In post 2677, Tchill13 wrote:
I tracked this slot n1. They didnt do anything.In post 2152, Tchill13 wrote:lets see... texcat has done nothing. should we policy them? jk lol
i'll be more active today. not a fan of a PL push right after a ML then a nk'd mason.@profiiNice to know who's reading and who's not. TChill claims to have tracked me.- texcat
-
texcat
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I started the day with a vote on Garmr (2285), just going back to it. I think his recent posts have solidified my view of him as scum.
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
No, I don't believe you're a voyeur.In post 2811, Garmr wrote:
So you don't believe I targeted the masons?In post 2810, texcat wrote:I started the day with a vote on Garmr (2285), just going back to it. I think his recent posts have solidified my view of him as scum.
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I don't understand this. Are you saying he is smart enough as town? The scum have an entire team to help work out fake claims. Do you not think any of them are smart enough?In post 2854, profii wrote:I would enjoy a garmr lynch
But I dont think he is smart enough to do those wacky claims as scum- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 2859, profii wrote:I mean if you are town you can say what you mean and be like lol fake claim guys I'm so cRaZy
But as scum if you give a result that catches you out you're probably getting lynched and when you are on the minority team if you die the stakes are higher - taking such a risk would be dumb imo
But what was the risk, really? Who was going to catch scum!Garmr out? The doc was the only one, and that would be assuming that the doc exists and did not actually protect Carca. And generally trading a scum for the doc is not that bad a trade. Scum!Garmr just got really unlucky when Carca claimed ascetic on D2. Most might have thought that she would have at least hinted at it, if not outright claimed on D1. Plus he's still relying on the fall back position of cRaZy town, and so getting caught out seems like it was no risk at all.- texcat
-
texcat
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Why wouldn't there be? Did Eevee do something to change their minds? I'm still willing to
hoper, jump back on her. And I noticed while doing the VCs that she has never voted toDay.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Took me 3 reads to figure out that it is SingleBall and MultiBall.In post 3159, gobbledygook wrote:What is SB, Dave?
Huh? Rick's vote has been stuck on Eevee all day. How many different people have you voted for today? I don't get how you can be calling him noncommittal. And why should he have been voting for you exactly?In post 3163, Alonzo wrote:The living embodiment of floaty and non committal, and whos vote should have been on me since I joined (and yesterday should have been all over Sharon Tate)- texcat
-
texcat
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
My coffee is still brewing, so things may clear up after I have some, but right now I don't understand a damn thing.
Are we supposed to know what this is? Cause I'm clueless.In post 3354, Carcalilly wrote:If they are framing you, then maybe they left me alive because they knew I'd be in your ass for this.
Are you just assuming that Cliff is in the neighborhood?In post 3356, Hopkirk wrote:How big is the neighbourhood cliff? Probably looking at some town in there.
Kop can you give a reads list with enough detail that I can have any confidence you've caught up?
I'll post sometime after work.
-hop
The traitor knows who the scum are, doesn't he? He shouldn't have toIn post 3362, bob3141 wrote:the traitor certainly though eve was scum no doubt
When he said i dont have PT with eve. As in being traitor not in teh main threadthinkanything.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
This was pretty clearly a crumb. I'm surprised no one seemed to catch it.In post 2143, gobbledygook wrote:
YOU KNOW WHAT YOU DID YOU FREELOADING BENEDICT ARNOLDIn post 2137, Rick Dalton wrote:
People say this, but the majority of games I do shenanigans I end up solving.In post 2115, gobbledygook wrote:If this town let’s them continue with that nonsense it will result in a loss.
You can ask A50/Garmr about my trololol’ing all game as an IC.
You can ask Vorkuta/Alchemist/Una about my trollloling fake claim day 3 IC into Vig.
I ain't trusting you as far as I can throw you.
I don't know what this means, but is it possible that Tchill was Gook's rolecop target?
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Perhaps it was my lack of coffee, but I didn't see what Bob was implying. But now that I've had half a cup, I think I can see what Bob was getting at. Bob thinks that Gook knew that Eevee was scum and was quick to disassociate himself from her. Is that it?In post 3373, Garmr wrote:
This is daft since it's word play. It's easy to see what Bob is implying and the point of his case is the traitor knows who scum are. So why act like he doesn't know that?In post 3369, texcat wrote:
The traitor knows who the scum are, doesn't he? He shouldn't have toIn post 3362, bob3141 wrote:the traitor certainly though eve was scum no doubt
When he said i dont have PT with eve. As in being traitor not in teh main threadthinkanything.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I'm pretty sure that scum didn't know about the traitor or they surely would have caught Gook's crumb.In post 3375, EeveeLution Army wrote:In post 3365, bob3141 wrote:See how he voted for titus then never realy did anything after that.
Makes me think he wanted to avoid lynching alonzo as he migth thought he was teh traitor. see how teh entire time he was probbing set ups rather than scum hunting
what are you talking about...? idt scum would know a traitor even exists. also ela is an easier way to shorten my name. (sidenote the "teh" procs my ocd. idk why you always type the like that)- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Sorry, I don't get this. Do you have a different wincon than I do?In post 3382, EeveeLution Army wrote:wait. i just realized carcalilly is alive. our wincon is pure- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Is it possible then that Gook was vigged?In post 3460, Rick Dalton wrote:
Why wouldn’t scum know?In post 3375, EeveeLution Army wrote:In post 3365, bob3141 wrote:See how he voted for titus then never realy did anything after that.
Makes me think he wanted to avoid lynching alonzo as he migth thought he was teh traitor. see how teh entire time he was probbing set ups rather than scum hunting
what are you talking about...? idt scum would know a traitor even exists. also ela is an easier way to shorten my name. (sidenote the "teh" procs my ocd. idk why you always type the like that)
Actually, this is a normal. Scum ten billion percent know there was a traitor, and the traitor ten billion percent knew all the scum.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Just a dead watcher. And since there's a backup tracker claimed, there might be a backup watcher too. But no reason for them to claim if they don't have a scum for us.In post 3408, Hopkirk wrote:
There's no claimed watchers for one thing.In post 3406, Hectic wrote:What's the reason for claimed watcher/voyeurs to not reveal results?
-Kork
Why are you still trying to out the doc????
VOTE: Garmr- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Huh? Can you explain this?In post 3443, Hopkirk wrote:Not killing the Mason = Garmr town imo.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Huh??? Why on earth would a scum doc target a mason?In post 3485, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:
I am guessing this was after Garmr claimed but before Carca outed she was Ascetic? Cuz it looks like an attempt to push the Doctor who was expected to claim so as to confirm Garmr.In post 3396, profii wrote:He also says it's confirmed a scum doctor targetted a mason,
P.S. How does that make Garmr look? I am not sure myself, as I could see it both ways.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Mostly there and not here.In post 3523, EeveeLution Army wrote: Tbh who knows when he actually asked. The hosts been a bit here and there if you catch my drift- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- texcat
-
texcat
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I am fruitless.In post 4106, Cliff Booth wrote:i dont think it's healthy for the game. Like I said I lied.
Anyone out there get fruit on night one? looks like we are doing this again
They might have a backup rolecop?In post 4112, Cliff Booth wrote:oh shit I just realized something. I'm like 90% sure scum has a rolecop- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Davesaz and Carcalilly are mod-confirmed to be town.
Profii is town because he was Gobble's neighbor.
Billy is town because he claimed VT early on and I believed him.
If Cliff flips town, we then can confirm both Billy and Bob.
Rick has claimed doctor, but he's an actor so I don't put much stock in it.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Huh? I did park my vote on Garmr while waiting to vote for Cliff until everyone had a chance to post. I would hardly characterize that as redirecting the lynch.In post 4227, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I feel like scum is fine with Cliff being the lynch. I thi k that's either because he was determined to be able to be sacrificed, which is consistent with what happened yesterday, or it's because he is going to flip town. If he flips scum, then texcat is probably leading scum candidate tomorrow for trying to redirect the lynch. If he flips town I dont know where that leads us. I'd like a a swer from hopkirk on his progression vis-a-vis me and I think we're still waiting on answers from Rick and Lilly about fruit.
VOTE: Cliff L-2 I think
Cliff, if you are town, can you confirm that you sent fruit to Kop on N1? He said he did not receive any fruit.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
What do you mean move votes? Where exactly am I supposed to have moved votes?In post 4235, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
Eeeew. Really bad post. Tries to act like they didnt move votes, is trying to get Cliff to out the purpose of this before we have all the answers in (we're still waiting on Rick and Lilly)In post 4234, texcat wrote:
Huh? I did park my vote on Garmr while waiting to vote for Cliff until everyone had a chance to post. I would hardly characterize that as redirecting the lynch.In post 4227, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I feel like scum is fine with Cliff being the lynch. I thi k that's either because he was determined to be able to be sacrificed, which is consistent with what happened yesterday, or it's because he is going to flip town. If he flips scum, then texcat is probably leading scum candidate tomorrow for trying to redirect the lynch. If he flips town I dont know where that leads us. I'd like a a swer from hopkirk on his progression vis-a-vis me and I think we're still waiting on answers from Rick and Lilly about fruit.
VOTE: Cliff L-2 I think
Cliff, if you are town, can you confirm that you sent fruit to Kop on N1? He said he did not receive any fruit.
Cliff already implied that he sent fruit to Kop. I just wanted him to confirm.
Rick & Lilly have both had adequate chances to tell us about fruit. Rick seems to be avoiding the question for some reason, and who cares about Carcalilly? No one would send fruit to a mason.Cliff Booth wrote:Getting really impatient for an answer. As in I want to just out what actually happened. I dont want to self hammer. In fact I would really rather not even be at L-2 right now. Scum are the only ones that know I'm telling the truth about being town and I think the cat is trying to get rid of me before I can hurt their team.
Did you miss Kop's reply in 4215?
Yes, I'm happy for the day to end. And I agree, just like I did about 20 pages ago, that Cliff should be the lynch.In post 4236, Hopkirk wrote:@Tex: Cliff should 100% be the lynch. Cliff likely just self hammers at L1. Are you voting him because you're happy for the day to end?
ROFLIn post 4246, Hopkirk wrote:Let's not hammer until we've forced Kop to actually exist.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 4261, profii wrote: Tex why do you think cliff implied fruit went to kop?
When he made the post I assume you are referring to, rick hadn't (still hasn't confirmed) but kop has, as you quote
So you've jumped to kop when it actually looks like it's going to be rickIn post 4191, Cliff Booth wrote:Since I've basically exposed the entire reason I'm wanting an answer for this anyway, I should clarify that the person that I actually sent fruit to on night one hasnt answered yet.
These posts were before Kop answered.In post 4192, Cliff Booth wrote:Is kop even in this game still- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Isn't this the same claim you made 30 pages ago? I thought you had some new secret info you were going to reveal.In post 4282, Cliff Booth wrote:I'm a simple loyal fruit vendor. I sent fruit to jjd on n1, billy n2, and bob n3.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Are you all forgetting that JJD had a guilty on Cliff? Are we forgetting that Cliff did nothing about JJD until he got pressed? I also don't like Cliff's tactic today of wait, wait don't lynch me yet, I've got something important to say, I'll tell you what really happened ...... oh, it's the same thing I already told you. I think he's scum, but even if he's town, he needs to go so that we can confirm Billy and Bob.In post 4310, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Actually let me match this a second, then I probably won't post for at least 12 hours.
Assuming 5 scum, we have today and tomorrow to mislynch. I'm basically considering 5 people as conf!town. So theres 4 more townies in that pool of 9 I identified earlier. So we're probably to the point that scum is not gonna kill in that pool unless we give them a reason to, like 1 of them claims a PR. And we have at least 1 town or that can investigate the claimed prs and 1 1 town pr that can investigate the claimed VTs. If we keep Cliff alive, he can investigate at least one of the VT claims.
Assuming we mislynch, scum kill a conf!townie and Cliff gets an inno, then we're at 5 conf!townies and the lynch pool is down to 7 with all five scum there.
If we mislynch, and Cliff gets a guilty, we only have 4 conf!townies, but we have a guaranteed kill for LYLO or we could lynch that that day.
Look, if we trust Cliff (which I do) town can basically PoE this for a win. If we force a mass claim now, i think it enhances our chances.
I think we should mass claim. I already claimed, so did Profii, Cliff, and Garmr. If I have a choice, i want to popcorn to texcat.
On a side note, did Garmr claim n3 target?- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I think we should postpone the claim until Day 5, but am willing to start if our conf town (Dave, Profii, Carca) think it's better to claim now.In post 4321, AaronFrost wrote:I'm cool with popcorn style mass claim.
tex is next Billy popcorned them, then tex picks someone and we keep on going.
I'm almost certain we don't have a vig.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Spoiler: Aaron does not like anything I do
First he doesn't like my vote on Garmr because he thinks I'm redirecting the lynch(!). Then he doesn't like my vote on Cliff. Now he's characterizing me as being overly eager to lynch Cliff. Something stinks. It might be some weird confirmation bias, but I don't like it.
Aaron, I don't think I am over-eager, but I am ready for day to end. I don't see what more we can hope to accomplish today and I think that things will be clearer when we've resolved Cliff.
I will continue to argue that we should lynch Cliff and I don't like that Billy seems to be arguing against lynching him. And I don't like that Billy says that Profii and Dave agree with him.- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 4384, Hopkirk wrote:I'm intending to vote Cliff. I'm not going to be doing this before Kop gets replaced.
Has Kop asked for replacement? Has he even been prodded?- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 4395, Hopkirk wrote:
In the last month he's made no meaningful posts. A couple of comments on setup stuff but no actual content, no comments about players.In post 4393, texcat wrote:In post 4384, Hopkirk wrote:I'm intending to vote Cliff. I'm not going to be doing this before Kop gets replaced.
Has Kop asked for replacement? Has he even been prodded?
Last we heard was 2-3 days ago where it was unclear whether he'd keep playing. He's due a prod again.@mod- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Why? What use would it be?In post 4413, EeveeLution Army wrote:But texcats claim would be useful- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
We already have Garmr's fake claim, and I think Eevee claimed VT.In post 4774, Hopkirk wrote:Eevee flips scum, we're just waiting for his fakeclaim.
Who did you watch last night? Are you avoiding that question?In post 4782, Garmr wrote:Rick your avoiding answering who you doctored?- texcat
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- texcat
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
What does this mean? Did Gamma Emerald send Garmr mail on N1? Are you sure the mail went through or did Gamma Emerald die before he mailed it? Can you tell us what the mail said?In post 4888, Carcalilly wrote:
I'm buying this with a grain of salt all due to Gamma's mail. Gamma thought he had you figured out so I'd assume you knew we were legit once we contacted you. So I fully understand why you would've done that.In post 4869, Garmr wrote:Sigh I didn't know if doctor existed back then it could of been a jailkeeper ect. I wanted scum to hunt a imaginary doctor and not shoot the mason it's fucking simple. I didn't expect the actual real doctor/protective role to be fucking stupid. - texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat
- texcat