Whether or not you do one thing is irrelevant...
Not if I have two votes based on it!
the question is here is the tendency among players, and I remain convinced that players have more of a tendency to kill/protect/investigate players they know than players they don't.
Maybe some do. Maybe they don't. Let's look at some facts, shall we? If we're going to look at out of game things anyway.
Mini 1 - cubestudent (not from GL, unlike the Mafia)
Mini 2 - mith (could back your theory, except one of the Mafia accidentally told me they were Mafia, forgetting I was in the game, so they had to kill me)
Mini 3 - SK, Polotet (SK fairly well known I suppose, I don't think Polotet was well known to Mentat)
Mini 4 - Polotet (again, not from GL, unlike the Mafia)
Mini 6 - mith (backs up your claim, it was IS)
Mini 7 - Puddn'head Wilson (newbie)
Mini 8 - MiriYami, quercitron (I don't think either was particularly well known to Sooth (SK), MiriYami I'm unsure of)
Mini 9 - Polotet (apparently a popular first night kill, but again, not the most well known IMO, compared to IS and Mackay, for example)
Mini 10 - Big Fella (newbie, I think, not very well known either way)
Mini 11 - verge_of_taboo, Corsato (no, yes)
Mini 12 - Glpenguin (no)
Mini 13 - jesternl (sorta in-between, really, but none of the Mafia were GLers, so I'd tend toward less-well-known to them)
Bored now.
My point? I think you're wrong. *~shrug~* I don't think many people do kill like that, and I think there are a similar number that kill unknowns.
Also, I never said you played mafia on the GL...perhaps you're talking to someone else.
I was talking to Orbiting and Leo, who are actually voting for me, but you obviously saw that that was her theory was "mith is on the GL, I get killed there, vote mith", and took it to the next step of "Leo *plays* on the GL, right? vote: Leo". Seems kinda assumed that I play too, since you were agreeing with her theory. Perhaps you wanted to avoid bandwagoning too early, I dunno.
- Role-claiming is stupid.
- Forcing role-claims are stupid.
On their own, yes. A role-claim as a last defense is fine, as is "well, prove it if you're innocent, you're about to die". The problem I have is that it gets taken to the extreme of "Ok, he gave a role-claim, it may not be plausible at all, but let's jump on someone else anyway! Whee."
Out-of-game reasoning is stupid.
I don't think *all* out-of-game reasoning is stupid. I believe it's against the spirit of the game. But I think it's clear that I don't think it's all unfounded, since I specified between the ordinary version, and the Crap version.
- No lynch is stupid.
Yes.
And, frankly, if you have played Mafia this long without figuring out an alternative to those four things... play some more, or something. There's the random voting, people start talking, say stuff in odd ways, start bandwagoning (maybe too early, maybe they avoid it for too long), see if anyone comes out with any information, contradictions, etc., see who comes up with a bizarre/silly first day strategy that they're *sure* is better than what we've been doing all along, which they see only as random, but which has way more to it that they should've picked up on by now...
It's a psychological game. If you have to rely so much on role claims and out-of-game stuff, why play? I'd rather rely on my instincts and be wrong some times than rely on something else and... still be wrong some times.
Maybe if we all played perfectly, we would need such things just to avoid random all the time, but last I checked, we don't.
We're not in an IRL setting, so we can't look into each other's eyes and find the truth there.
Speech patterns are the equivalent. Sure, they aren't as obvious, but they're there.
You're perfectly content with random votes, yet any attempt at doing better is mocked.
I've seen this argument so many times, it's just so silly and completely unfounded. Please tell me, when have I ever said that I was content with random votes? I rarely vote randomly myself. Where on earth do you get the idea that I am happy with random votes, *which is not the only way people play on the first day*? I know I bash your ideas alot, but that's because *I don't agree with them*. If you *do* come up with another valid first day strategy, sure, go for it. But I reserve the right to call things moronic when I see them that way, and trying to make my stance out to something it isn't just convinces me you're actually suspicious.
La, la, la, etc.