Newbie 1961 | Trees II | Over
Forum rules
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
chill out i’m just figured out that there was more than one page in this threadIn post 64, FancyPants wrote: Please answer my question.
I’ll answer it in less than 30 min i promise
Yeah played a lot of live chat mafia so i’m familiar with the game but just not what to do here on d1tictac wrote:@january any exp in other formats then?
also i just found out that trying to read on mobile is near impossible but i will attempt this as best I can- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
I was a bit uncomfy with how fast the votes went onto Suspicious, but I feel like his response to the votes seemed very kneejerk-y with the thing about there being a mafia who voted him. It doesn't seem like a real "read" that comes from actually looking for mafia.
[god i'm so incoherent right now sorry]
Basically to me there's nothing really that makes Bailey's first vote scummy, so this part:
seems like he's just trying to justify something. Basically: Bailey voted that way as a random vote, so saying that Bailey is somehow responsible for the wagon doesn't seem like it's a genuine attempt to find maf. seems like he's just trying to fos everyone who votedIn post 23, Suspicious wrote: Bailey basing the RVS off of my name is also an easy route to go for maf to cloak themselves
i think this makes sense please tell me if it doesn't- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
guess i'm a coward
what exactly don't you want me to do?
@Suspicious, went back and saw that but my reasoning still stands. Might just be you using a different approach than me but I don't see how anything Bailey has done seems particularly scummy - the unvote seemed like a very natural time and what I would expect them to do as town, so I'd like to see how that seems scummy to you. What would you have expected them to do as town?- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
understood, but I still FoS you mostly for calling Bailey out in #23 for an obviously random vote.In post 92, Suspicious wrote:@Jan I would have expected what Fancy did: unvoted, said why, and moved on with further questioning to examine players/the wagon. Bailey's post in comparison comes across as much more of a grandstanding moment to grab town credibility. Their reasoning for the unvote in the first place after being pressured was odd and I'm still waiting on clarification there.
also, what exactly is wrong about trying to grab credibility? couldn't town try to be credible too?
-still seems like a perfectly normal action from Bailey, but maybe i'm missing something?
anyways, I have a habit of tunneling onto one person so i'll step back and read the other peeps- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
weird take maybe but I feel like Zenith's silent vote on Suspicious at the beginning of the game is a town move because mafia would be more worried about justifying their vote somehow
but also I can't really see them silent voting as town either so I guess it's just something that doesn't make sense in general- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
@tictac thanks for pointing out the thing in #30 from Bailey, I must have missed it
@GeorgeBailey I was pretty sure from everything else you said that you had unvoted because it was too close to lynch. I’m curious what you expected from leaving it at L-1 if you believed nobody noticed
Also, you must have seen Fancy’s post before yours since it seems like you get notified before submitting if there’s any new messages. Why not change your message or your approach after Fancy had unvoted?
-Knowing that Fancy unvoted, why not at least edit the explanation a little bit, because it’s not like we were at L-1 anymore when you posted- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
I just realized that I was combining Zenith and Vorkuta into one spot in my brain and I thought they were the same person (same number of letters and starts with letter near the end of the alphabet lol)
Vorkuta, what’s the point of putting a vote on me and telling me you’re looking for a reaction? Wouldn’t that just ruin the reaction test? And I asked this before but it’s probably buried: which of my lines made you mark me as nervous?
Vorkuta’s lines feel really jumpy, like he’s just reacting to random posts but not really contributing anything. Not sure if that’s just a normal playstyle for them or a sign of nervous mafia. Is there a way to review previous games that someone has played to compare and is that allowed?- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
well it just seemed to me like it was a vote with no real purpose to meIn post 190, Vorkuta wrote: -your point being?
A vote on you is still pressure, regardless of the pretext under which I justify it
if others join then others join. If not then....
-I can't be bothered to comb through your ISO, find a quote which pings you as vulnerable for me, and proceed to have a back-and-forth. Suffice to say your opening (hi, I'm new, please be nice) and the next few afterwards left that impression on me and that's it.
sad you don’t want to have a back and forth, that’s usually the easiest way for me to develop reads on other people by forcing them to interact with me until i townread them or decide i can’t townread them- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
@GeorgeBailey i think my wording was a little unclear but I meant to ask why would you want to leave it at L-1 if people didn’t notice? if that is the question that you’re answering... why would you want an early mislynch on someone who hasn’t even spoken yet... what if they were a power role
also can u answer this part tooIn post 142, january wrote: Also, you must have seen Fancy’s post before yours since it seems like you get notified before submitting if there’s any new messages. Why not change your message or your approach after Fancy had unvoted?
-Knowing that Fancy unvoted, why not at least edit the explanation a little bit, because it’s not like we were at L-1 anymore when you posted- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
out of curiosity, how much “coaching” between mafia members usually occurs in the mafia chat?
when I played live chat mafia, mafia couldn’t speak to each other during the day so there wasn’t really any way for partners to coach each other.
-don’t think this is that relevant right now, but if coaching is common or likely then it might be easier to figure out partner/team reads later on. (for example a newbie with really bad plays that flips maf probably has a newbie partner)
-i know this has way too much meta to ever back up a full read, but it might help with pointing us in the right direction later on, just felt like asking now because it came to mind and i didn’t want to forget- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
was really busy this weekend so i’ve been following along but didn’t really have time to post much sorry
also meant to post this comment about tictac’s scumread on Jamelia last night but fell asleep at my computer instead oops
ihatevery strongly dislike how much meta tictac used in the read on jamelia, but i do think it came from a town perspective. basically, i don’t think mafia would be putting this much effort into digging for meta to build reads because their reads are fake anyways. i highly doubt a scum tictac would be putting this much effort into lynching a town unless his partner was in danger of getting lynched
i think i’m about 60/30 for Jamelia being scum. his response to tictac feels to me to be really reactive. it felt like he just attacked tictac’s use of meta just because it was meta, rather than attempting to disprove it. meta is a part of the game, so I don’t really see a problem with including it in a read. you are playing a lot differently than it seems from that quote. however, i think there is a somewhat reasonable meta-based defense of jamelia since newer players tend to respond more reactively from my experience- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
lol 60/40** sorry can’t do math
i’d be willing to join the wagon on jamelia because i think it’ll still give us a lot of information even if he flips town. gonna hold my vote for now just cuz i’m wary of putting anyone in L-1 right now - or maybe i’m just scared of voting idk
i’m feeling slightly less sure on vork and i don’t feel like lynching him would add anything to the conversation if he flips town
i‘ve been trying to following the interactions between suspicious and zenith but trying to read it kinda hurts my head lol. probably a ridiculous idea but i’m actually considering the possibility of it being a scum-scum distancing strategy because it just seems so unnecessarily extended. very unlikely because it seems like a useless expenditure of energy but it‘s be funny if it was.- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
kinda explained it compared to vorkuta - vorkuta has barely been involved in any interactions with people besides me, so i don’t think him dying would help anything with my reads
Jamelia has been interacting a lot with a lot of players
-fancy and jamelia (interaction quoted in #105 and #120: almost 100% sure they’re not scum partners
-jamelia and tictac (basically everything recently): if jamelia flips maf then tictac alamo’s confirmed town imo
-jamelia and zenith: if jam flips town, gonna fos zenith for how quickly they joined tictac’s vote
just realized almost all of these rely on jamelia being scum but uhhh...
there’ll probably be more based on whoever else casts the vote and reactions tomorrow which i can’t really predict- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
i’m assuming suspy is talking about you (talking about yourself in 3rd person?)
i think it’s normal to believe that leave room for the fact that my read could be incorrect that early... but yeah in general i do have weaker reads until much later in the game (a lot of my reads usually come from interactions and previous flips
in early reads i’d rather have people give me feedback based on my reads to generate discussion and forcing people to interact. people just sending their reads and not interacting makes it harder to read
also, i feel like my read on jamelia has been the most confident so far (i know.. 60/40 isn’t confident by any standard) but it’s accompanied with an almost-intention to vote so it’s at more confident than before
re: #153, yeah it was filler but nobody was there and i was constantly checking back for the whole 4+ hours. guess i’m just not used to waiting that long and i’m impatient- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
In post 30, GeorgeBailey wrote: Anyways, the reason I didn't do an immediate unvote, isbecause I don't think the others realized we were putting Suspicious at L-1/L-2.
still confused - i'm guessing there's some misunderstanding here - can you please clarify?In post 205, GeorgeBailey wrote:I don't want people being held at L-1 without people noticing. I don't want an early mislynch, and I don't want people to be voted out early even if they're a power role. Did I insinuate that in some of my earlier posts?- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
btw my computer's ip address has been blacklisted from posting for some reason - going to be doing all my posts from my phone until i can figure out a vpn or how to get un-blacklisted
please excuse all weird typos and formatting and i will probably be less active until i figure this out, it's really hard to post from mobile- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
ok i think i understand thanks - very messy misunderstanding there lol
i think i’m just convinced jamelia is scum and trying to justify the lynch to myself tbh. if the alternative to lynching jamelia is lynching ceejay, then my point about getting reads from the flip is even more valid because ceejay hasn’t don’t anything... but the reason i want to vote jamelia isn’t that they might flip town, it’s that i think they’re scum. BUT if they flip town i’ll be ok
anyways j think i’ve stalled this for too long just gonna put the vote up since i don’t see myself changing my mind
VOTE: Jamelia- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
i don’t want to lynch zenith because i don’t scum read them? it’s not like i’m going out of my way to lynch town lol... jamelia is my strongest scumread i thought i made that clear
what’s wrong with accepting that i might be wrong? everyone is a potential mislynch it’s not like anyone is confirmed maf. i’m voting the person who i think is least likely to be a mislynch- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
In post 274, Suspicious wrote:There's a difference between accepting a potential incorrect route vs. being okay with a mislynch, which #268 comes across as. (snip)
My point being that if you find it likely Jam is town here to a decent degree, and you have demonstrated you're comfortable with a mislynch, why not then flip someone who has also had interactions/could have info with their flip?
not sure how you're interpreting this as me thinking that jamelia is town... of all the players in this table right now, I think that jamelia is the most likely to flip scum, therefore i want to vote themjanuary wrote: i think i’m just convinced jamelia is scum and trying to justify the lynch to myself tbh. (snip) but the reason i want to vote jamelia isn’t that they might flip town, it’s that i think they’re scum. BUT if they flip town i’ll be ok
re: zenith - first, the reason I'm not voting zenith is that I do not scumread them as much as I do jamelia
second, I did townread zenith earlier. it was a slightly unorthodox read, since i basically townread him for acting way too obviously scummy. I really don't think your interaction with zenith is as alignment indicative as you think, mostly reads to me as two people being annoyed with each other. if anything, i scumread you more for the zenith-suspicious interaction.
so no, i do not scumread zenith. i do scumread jamelia. therefore, i vote jamelia- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
#284 reads to me as frustration with being meta tunneled by tictac - and honestly i agree it’s a very bad reasoning to fully base a lynch on. at best it’s NAI (just frustration) but it kinda leans to me as mafia frustrated at being scumread for some dumb reason
might be my confirmation bias or something, don’t feel like it was at all towny though- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
you're clearly misunderstanding what i'm saying... ceejay was completely null. they weren't particularly towny or scummy. the reason people were voting them is because they weren't contributing. so what i'm saying is to take the votes off the new player so we give them a chance to contribute, and then determine whether they're town or not. I'm not giving them any more of a pass than I'm giving any of my other nullreads.In post 302, Suspicious wrote:Well, Cee didn't do particularly anything period. There shouldn't be any passes given to slots; let them speak for themselves.
do you think this is towny then? or is it just null?GeorgeBailey wrote: my opinion on Jamelia still stands, I don't think he's scummy. The "egg on your face" quote makes it seems like he gave up from being bombarded with meta questions- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
well if they get lynched they can't contribute can theyIn post 306, Zenith wrote: Since when does voting for someone prevent them from contributing?
i'd assume a vote at this point in time is a vote to lynch, so i'd rather not lynch someone who's at best null?
is there any reason you're voting me or is it just an "i don't like what you said" vote- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
thought they were voting for the inactive players because they're a "liability" - isn't what Bailey literally claimed to be doing? (too much effort to find the post he said that but I'm pretty sure he did). in the games of mafia I've played offsite, it's common for people to use mislynch on players who seem like they're not going to contribute or towntell. and usually at this point of the day i don't think voting to pressure is as effective anymore. direct questioning is probably more effective now
also can you respond to the other half of my post toois there any reason you're voting me or is it just an "i don't like what you said" vote- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
@Zenith hey can you stop only reading half my post its annoying :((In post 332, january wrote: also can you respond to the other half of my post toojanuary wrote:is there any reason you're voting me or is it just an "i don't like what you said" vote- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
just noticed this post
ok this is how i read this post from Jamelia:In post 284, Jamelia wrote:Honestly I’m so frustrated with your reasoning about why I’m scum that I’d honestly feel more satisfied being lynched and flipping green, with you with an egg on your face than me trying to beg and please about why I’m town.
Jamelia is basically assuming that tictac is town with bad reasoning in sentence 1, right? Jamelia wouldn't say they're "frustrated" with mafia's reasoning, he'd just go straight to calling out tictac as mafia.
honestly have no idea what "an egg on your face" is even supposed to imply... is it saying that tictac would be implicating himself as mafia? but Jamelia assumes they're town, so is it just saying that tictac will look stupid - as town?
and then this part:
once again seems to assume that tictac is town who has flawed analysis. also - what exactly does "you know it" even mean? clearly tictac does not believe his analysis is wrong, so are you calling tictac mafia or not??In post 284, Jamelia wrote:If you think my lynch is helpful, then go for it. If I’m lynched on D1 or D4, as long as town wins I win. You’ll just be sparing me having to deal with yourpure analysis that is flawed, and you know it.
Also, "as long as town wins I win" literally reads as "i am town so you should know i'm town" which is completely unnecessary and just... scummy. this part just feels wrong to me
i don't think Jamelia indicated anywhere that they thought tictac was town before this post (if anything, he seemed to imply a scumread). #284 feels like a scumslip calling tictac town- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
so much to read ahhh i have a midterm tomorrow to study for but i promise i'll do more tomorrow hopefully the day isn't over by then
i skimmed and got most of the content
meh on everyone backing off of jamelia - don't feel like they've towntold to warrant the backing-off besides the very AtE post in response to tictac. feel like new players are more than capable of faking indignant posts as a way to "towntell" (@whoever said new players probably wouldn't fake that)
dunno who else i'd be willing to vote atm but i'll figure that out tomorrow sorry- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
i felt like it was strange for jamelia to be giving tictac a townpass there without even explaining it - like i would have expected it accompanied with an "i hate you tunneling me but i think you're town" type of message. i would think normally if i got tunneled really hard by someone i wouldn't just assume they were town. i'm aware that "bad look" can also apply to mafia but the way Jamelia was saying it didn't sound like they were calling tictac mafia ever.In post 403, Suspicious wrote: Jamelia never presented reads outside of being uneasy regarding your slot being new yet speaking as a veteran--which was cleared up when you clarified your prior experience--and scum-leaning Zen. Per their own admission, they didn't have many reads to give on any situations and the tunnel by tictac dissuaded them from pursuing anything; they became locked in on trying to defend themselves.
It looks more like, in #338, you're digging to make things crop up so Jamelia is locked as the lynch today. They haven't implied tic as scum or town previously, and if anything the implication here is that Jamelia is giving them a town pass; they claim tic's arguments are off-base, even though they could be coming from a town POV, and they'll look poor in hindsight for following through. Town/mafia alike can get bad looks for lynches that go poorly, so I don't know why you seem to imply it's a scum-exclusive remark to make.
i said this already -if jamelia thought tictac was mafia they would have said that explicitly
^that's why i'm pretty sure jamelia thinks tictac is town from that post^
and yeah i kind of am trying to dig for things to get Jamelia lynched - because i scumread them? i genuinely think jamelia is the best lynch here right now and i'm trying to convince everyone else (which i guess isn't working lol)- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
-"exits the site" part is NAIIn post 403, Suspicious wrote: w/r/t #284, the ending bit there probably refers to tic's login time argument, which Jamelia has been vocally against. It's shaky ground to stand on and I agree it's poor basis for an argument, and it noticeably brings a lot of frustration out of Jam. I don't think scum collapses this easily, basically taunts town by saying they'll look stupid, then exits the site.
-don't think this is as much of scum collapsing as it is trying to sound like frustrated town and overcompensating and now sounding like they're mad at tictac for having that reasoning instead of being mad at tictac for scumreading them
i've seen this before, where scum gets mad at being caught/fossed/lynched for a stupid reason when they think they've been towny. (usually with more experienced players, sure but i think its possible with a tiny bit of coaching from scumpartner)
um did i call out someone for not having confident reads and forgot about doing it or somethingIn post 403, Suspicious wrote: And I understand that this is still nitpicky, but every time you make these disclaimers it pings me the wrong way. I don't think you can call out anyone for not confidently stating a read when all of yours come with safeguards attached.- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
I think you’re misreading every single thing i’ve said lolIn post 443, Suspicious wrote:Part of your push on Jam is that they haven't passed any reads/did not confidently read tic as either scum or town.
i’m not pushing on jamelia for not having reads
i’m pushing on jamelia for seemingly townreading tictac - we both agree that jamelia was giving tictac a “townpass” in that one post, right?
i’m saying jamelia is scum because they townread tictac for no reason.
i brought up jamelia having no previous reads to support my argument that Jamelia has no reason to townread tictac
jamelia assumes the person with “bad logic” tunneling her is town - why? because he’s mafia
does this finally make sense to you or are you just trying to sound dense- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
sorry wrong pronoun
** jamelia assumes the person with “bad logic” tunnelinghimis town - why? because he’s mafia
is that what you thought i was doing the whole time lolIn post 443, Suspicious wrote: You also did much the same at the start of the game in #83 when you questioned Suspy's vote on Bailey, stating it was a weak/baseless read, which ignored the actual reasoning provided.
i wasn’t questioning your vote for being wishy-washy weak (like what you’re saying my reads are)
i was questioning it for beingbadweak - as in it has bad logic to support the read
good for you! you guessed my reads congrats! do you want a bunny as a reward?And, for what it's worth, all I can gather from your own reads are a scumlean on Suspy, townlean on Zenith, and scumread on Jam, with a potential side of Vork.
it’s not like you’ve made your reads that much stronger lol
the only one that matters right now is that i clearly scumread jamelia - the rest are subject to change but hey let’s vote jamelia and figure it out later- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
lolIn post 441, Vorkuta wrote:
Yeah- posts like these.In post 439, january wrote:does either person voting me have any reason behind the vote or are they both still votes for pressure even though we're at a point where we should be actually voting to lynch
I'll consolidate when/if necessary, but no
any posts before that? or did you just forget why and you’re just making up stuff now- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
zzz
good luck with that vote lol
so are you an arrogant town or mafia trying to pretend to be arrogant town- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
so if the people voting me right now
-vorkuta is too lazy to actually give real reads and when i ask him why he’s voting me he answers it’s because i asked him why he’s voting me??
-zenith refuses to answer anything i say but he’s sick so i’ll give him a pass - but can you Please answer before the end of the day thank u
-auspicious is either trying to ego lynch me or he’s mafia
nice wagon y’all- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
ok hey maybe you’re just really bad at responding to pressure lolIn post 463, Jamelia wrote:
When did I townread Tictac and give them a pass? I said they’re going to have an egg on their face when I get lynched and flip green. Whether they’re town/mafia doesn’t matter in this scenario. If they’re town, they’re going to look dumb for hard lynching someone who isn’t mafia. If THEY’RE mafia, they’re going to look bad for hard lynching me and an unnecessary target on their back.In post 456, january wrote:
I think you’re misreading every single thing i’ve said lolIn post 443, Suspicious wrote:Part of your push on Jam is that they haven't passed any reads/did not confidently read tic as either scum or town.
i’m not pushing on jamelia for not having reads
i’m pushing on jamelia for seemingly townreading tictac - we both agree that jamelia was giving tictac a “townpass” in that one post, right?
i’m saying jamelia is scum because they townread tictac for no reason.
i brought up jamelia having no previous reads to support my argument that Jamelia has no reason to townread tictac
jamelia assumes the person with “bad logic” tunneling her is town - why? because he’s mafia
does this finally make sense to you or are you just trying to sound dense
Regardless. If they’re town and I get lynched, they’re gonna blame ME for “not being a cooperative town”, and won’t see why their analysis of me is dreadfully flawed. At this point nothing is going to change in my opinion.
I’m still trying to figure out who I’m personally leaning toward. I need to analyze this more
so can you clarify your stance on tictac? because if you were getting pushed by someone who you think is mafia, do you think you’d respond like you did?
cuz i definitely wouldn’t. if i was getting tunneled by mafia (see example: suspicious) i wouldn’t be going and telling him that he has bad logic and not even say i scumread him
how bout u be a little less reactive and tell us who you’d be willing to lynch right now- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
eh ok i’ll stop pretending i’m misunderstanding your argument lol
it’s just annoying as fk and i’m annoyed
sure i acknowledge that mafia is often aware of and concerned about a wagon on them but that’s usually more significant earlier in the day when votes are more for pressure
right now any vote that’s up SHOULD be for the sake of lynching. and i really really don’t think i’m the scummiest player at this table so i’m a bit confused why you want to flip me first even if you agree that other people are scummy- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
wow isn’t it great rightIn post 509, Suspicious wrote:I play these games specifically to be ignored and insulted, makes the experience very entertaining.
you should try live chat mafia if you haven’t before
it’s even worse- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
and you seem like you’re actually able to be reasoned with
so even if you’re scum i can reason with you
and if you refuse to listen to my logo (which in my completely unbiased opinion is very Sound Logic) then i can challenge you for it
whereas Zenith isn’t responding at all, so there isn’t anything i can do to challenge him atm until he comes back
and suspicious is playing off his lynch as an ego lynch which means he’s gonna refuse to listen to logic whether he’s town or maf- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
- january
-
january Goon
- january
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 587
- Joined: October 14, 2019
- Location: United States
clarifying #517:
vorkuta seems reasonable. i’m trying to appeal to him and if i feel like he’s blatantly ignoring my appeal and not considering it at all, i’m going to say he’s mafia. i’m not saying he’s maf if he doesn’t agree with my appeal but if he’s clearly making no effort to listen then he’s not genuinely looking for mafia
so far feels like he’s actually responding - january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january
- january