okay anyway right now it's 6:30 am I'm pulling an all-nighter AND I've got a class in like 2 hours yall know what that means
it's reread time
pedit: FF you're goddamn right
Can you please elaborate on this?In post 199, bugspray wrote:but at the end of the reading for some reason my gut made me think that fish and gardenia are maf...
We let them grow. But not to L-1 when a) we've seen a couple of players who seem to not give a toss either way, b) ending the day would leave us in a very crap position tomorrow reads-wise.In post 214, Formerfish wrote:Ok, so how do you suggest we gain enough pressure on one wagon over another if we never let them grow and see what people do around it?
When do we push one to l-1 and go for a claim and then decide what to do?
Yeah cheers he's a scumlean on page 8 in a game where the only interesting thing has been a toxic mud-flinging match between two players and where I'm SLing/nullreading 3/4 of the playerlist. That read is barely above random at best. No shit I don't want the lynch to go through.In post 215, Formerfish wrote:You have him as a scum read so in your view someone hammering him would be a good thing, pulling your vote off makes it seem like you actually dont want the lynch to go through.In post 213, Datisi wrote:Certain players here strike me as having an itchy trigger finger, regardless of alignment. Would rather not.
Code: Select all
[post]134[/post]
I say they're contradictory because you mention that you think she's new and trying to be helpful - which I'd take as a Towny trait, then placing her in your null pile.In post 226, Uncrowned wrote:#134/#187 (Gardenia Thoughts): I thought they were rather clear. I think she's new and trying to be helpful, but I didn't think Teacher's read of her FF Vote necessarily makes her Town. Like I mentioned in #187, Fish at that point was the easiest vote to make for anyone, as he had the most polarizing playstyle and had drew the attention to himself.
Care to elaborate on this?In post 226, Uncrowned wrote:#119: Yes, I'll admit I'm fence-sitting on FF. I'm cautious around these types of playstyles. More on this in a bit.
Okay, who's next.FF
Gardenia
Uncrowned
---
teacher
JacksonVirgo
Gyro
---
bugspray
Marionette
Word of advice, don't look for teams yet. Look for individual scumminess. Associate-hunting happens either post-flip or as a Town's last resort. We're not there yet.In post 206, Datisi wrote:Can you please elaborate on this?In post 199, bugspray wrote:but at the end of the reading for some reason my gut made me think that fish and gardenia are maf...
Appreciate the sentiment Gyro. Tho I do find it weird that you're not calling me a bullshit-reacher since I have not one, but two posts laying out reads.In post 246, Datisi wrote:Plus you're making a read on him this early. Is that read bollox too?
Can you please show me where Uncrowned reacted to heat in a way you scumread? I thought his replies to my pressuring were quite Towny.In post 289, bugspray wrote:L-2 VOTE:uncrowned
apparently wagons are good? also this player (who should set a pronoun so I can refer to this player more easily) seems to react weirdly to having "heat" in a way i slightly scumread
In post 251, Datisi wrote:In post 206, Datisi wrote:Can you please elaborate on this?In post 199, bugspray wrote:but at the end of the reading for some reason my gut made me think that fish and gardenia are maf...
So, how serious were the "accusations" in 79, 102, 116, 127? And what do you make of gardenia's vote?In post 264, teacher wrote:This is very true. I know Fish well, which is why I voted him -- I thought he would be easy to wagon and I wanted to give people looking for lhf some "cover", being willing to scumread those who joined without independent reasons. Thats not how it played out, with only Gardenia joining. I got some tweaks from how Gyro kept his options open on the apparent leading wagons of Fish and me (even pairing us), but no other biters.In post 187, Uncrowned wrote:but I feel like the vote on Fish is the easiest one to make at the moment, since he's been the most aggressive player thus far.
Anyways, now that I have outed the semi-reaction test, its time to
VOTE: Gyro
from its results, and for general lack of advancing content.
Yeah sure, not being associated together is good for the scum. But unless those interactions are done extremely poorly, you likely won't correctly spot them on Day 1 - and I know it sounds a bit sarcastic/offensive maybe, but s'just how it is.In post 296, bugspray wrote:seeing people try to not be associated is something i'd sort of expect mafias to do to help setup for a later game situation where its lylo (lynch correctly or lose?)
@dai "MARIO-nette"
oops, I missed this on the first readthrough. And whoooo boy I do not like it.In post 296, bugspray wrote:Can you please show me where Uncrowned reacted to heat in a way you scumread? I thought his replies to my pressuring were quite Towny.
i'd rather not give anything specific so that he knows what not to do again
It's in quotes because I couldn't think of what other word to use but knew that "accusations" is wrong.In post 324, teacher wrote:I’m glad accusations was in quotes - none of those called FF scummy, and all were about only one post of his. I didn’t (and don’t) understand why he outted how I use the rqs questions. To me it’s a bit lamisty (look ma, I do meta) in a way that doesn’t benefit. So I was asking him about it. Those were genuine, but not “accusations” at least to my understanding.
The way I look at it is:In post 332, bugspray wrote:But mafia getting lynched is a LOT worse and I feel like they have a tendency to heavily overreact any defend hard.
In post 307, bugspray wrote:I'm not gonna bother defending myself because I've never really been successful at it.A day 1 mislynch is common on d1 and I don't mind being thee player who is dies like that.
How serious was this part of 332?In post 332, bugspray wrote:But I don't think I feel confident that this town could win if I'm mislychedso I'll try to defend myself for now.
No. No, it's not.In post 343, bugspray wrote:I think the best way to move to game forward is wait
Usually I'd call this downright impossible, but I've had this exact same thing happening to me in my last scum game a couple of weeks ago... so I'll just call it very unlikely.In post 345, bugspray wrote:It's possible a newbie maf could post with partner in the private thread and think oh I'm posting that's good and accidentally neglect posting here
What exactly do you mean by metareachy?In post 346, bugspray wrote:Ofc my last point is kinda metareachy
Fun first game, eh?In post 359, gardenia wrote::OOOOOIn post 330, Formerfish wrote:1. Yes slave.In post 329, teacher wrote:1. ?only if I can call you master?
JV, I don't get this part? How does this equate to a Gard TL?In post 373, JacksonVirgo wrote:Gardenia - They seemed to be reluctant to vote at all at first, which doesn't inherently mean anything but then teacher stated that they wrote that out as scum.
We've had people voting together earlier too. When did this thought occur?In post 378, bugspray wrote:Sort of siding me me and trying to get on my good side when I'm a scummier looking town is a smart move as scum because it would mean that you just NK someone who is super town and then use that rapport in future days for more ML's
Is that why you haven't done a tierlist yourself?In post 378, bugspray wrote:p.s. if JV is maf then I think the tierlist would be a good nit to pick for clues about partner
Jackson can you please answer this for me ty tyIn post 389, Datisi wrote:JV, I don't get this part? How does this equate to a Gard TL?In post 373, JacksonVirgo wrote:Gardenia - They seemed to be reluctant to vote at all at first, which doesn't inherently mean anything but then teacher stated that they wrote that out as scum.
Unless scum!Gyro truly honestly does not give a single toss about this game he's not gonna bus his partner like that Day 1. That naked vote gets no Towncred.In post 398, JacksonVirgo wrote:I feel Gyro/Fish are a SvS and this might be a way of Gyro getting towncred but I also think Teacher/Fish is a TvS.
So currently my reads are FF and Gyro being scum. I left that wagon because I don't want it to be lynched yet.
Have I given you a reason not to TL me?In post 404, JacksonVirgo wrote:However, I TL them because they really haven't given me a reason not too.
Jackson, I'm also thnking you're wrong on FF. If not, I'll figure it out soon. But I really don't think FF is getting lynched today.In post 373, JacksonVirgo wrote:Datisi | Saladman27 - Salad seemed townie andDatisi seems somewhat null currentlyso I am townleaning that
What do you mean Gyro/Teacher?In post 406, JacksonVirgo wrote:Since I am set on TvS {Teacher, FF}. It's either SvS {FF, Gyro}(meaning it could be Gyro/Teacher)or SvS {FF, bug}
Okay, genuinely no idea what this means.In post 413, JacksonVirgo wrote:I mean originally that if FF flips scum. All my SvS reads with FF were now with Teacher but I don't think that anymore
The only way I can make sense of 413 is if you'd meant to write "meant originally that if FF flips Town". Is that right?In post 417, JacksonVirgo wrote:Words aren't helpful for me when I am half asleep, apologiesIn post 415, Datisi wrote:Okay, genuinely no idea what this means.In post 413, JacksonVirgo wrote:I mean originally that if FF flips scum. All my SvS reads with FF were now with Teacher but I don't think that anymore
And yes. By default, each page has 25 posts. So posts number 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 etc. are pagetoppers.
Do you mind answering this? (And maybe commenting on my other thoughts from 390.)In post 390, Datisi wrote:We've had people voting together earlier too. When did this thought occur?
A lot of my posts (like 390) and my vote suggest that I think you're scum. Is that "good scumhinting"?In post 438, bugspray wrote:Datisi: pretty solid town to me tbh, doinga lot of good scumhuntingthat makes up the foundation of effective townplay
The only thing he's done is 1) said he doesn't like Uncrowned, 2) said that if I flip Mafia he's Mafia too, 3) naked voted people. He's joined the hunt how?In post 438, bugspray wrote:Gyro: seems to have made same earlier mistakes as me but even soonerand now has effectively joined the scumunt(cant wait till figure out how I do this).
So she's doing the same mistakes you are, and you're... SLing her for it?In post 438, bugspray wrote:Gardenia: still not fully sure, scumlean on her for sure because a lot of the same newb mistakes I'm making
Where exactly is JV "digging a hole"? What does that even mean?In post 438, bugspray wrote:JV: scumlean because might be bad town like earlier gyro and then me seems to be sort of digging a hole like i was earlier but way more spectacularly
Do you mind linking me that article?In post 442, bugspray wrote:I read on the wiki that often mafia won't night kill scummy town to make future lynches easier. I'm saying that it would be beneficial to get on the good side of townies who appear scummy so that they are easier to persuade in future days. I was trying to say that it's possible that JV was doing thisIn post 440, Datisi wrote:Ohh boy. Okay, let's see here.
Do you mind answering this? (And maybe commenting on my other thoughts from 390.)In post 390, Datisi wrote:We've had people voting together earlier too. When did this thought occur?
Alright then, please show me where? Because I'm quite liking Jackson's recent posts. I think they're dead wrong, but I feel like they come with good intentions.In post 443, bugspray wrote:its like that dril tweet "i will face god and step backwards into hell" or something. basically i feel like they're buckling under pressure and getting ever more contorted from that pristine townesque form into a mafia figure
You're gonna have to help me out a bit here, for I have no idea what you mean.In post 443, bugspray wrote:Yes. Also I think it's sus that she hasn't excused her brief absence with the excuse from earlier on the earlier pages of the thread about exams. Restating something like that seems really town but if it's just an early lie a noobmafia would be more likely to forget that (although maybe an early lie like that isn't so noobish?)
In post 450, Micc wrote:yoink