Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Try hanging around Solar.In post 14, Lady 3 wrote:I wanna feel the heat with somebody
Also well said, Harry.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Very funny, haha.In post 33, Gentleman 3 wrote:I was intimidated at first, but eventually I realized that you were all just as odd as I am- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Oh, is that how she looks in the Sun and Moon series? That art style really bothers me actually.In post 41, Lady 3 wrote:Hi I'm Misty nice to meet youIn post 41, Lady 3 wrote:Hi I'm Misty nice to meet you
May I just call you Salad?In post 48, Lady 4 wrote:I am now Woman Laughing Alone With Salad.
Unless Gentleman 7 does something similar I might just call Lady 7 Jackpot.In post 62, Lady 4 wrote:Not sure if I lack reads because I'm distracted -- having a weird af day today friends -- or because of the nonmemorable names.
Gentleman 3 is now Crowman. I can do Dawn and Misty. Is Lady 9's avatar Celeste? Lady 2 can be... Eyes? 7 will just have to be 7, hope no one else is a number.
Valid point. I don't know why I posted that.In post 59, Lady 7 wrote:In post 52, Lady 4 wrote:
Let's let the lady speak without supplying her with answers.In post 51, Gentleman 3 wrote:
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?In post 50, Lady 7 wrote:Me. It hit me wrong.
Is this a real thoight?
Do you think people routinely point out a post that bugged them and need an answer supplied to them?
I mean posts do bug me sometimes and I don’t know why, but still this reaction feels weird.
I have a bad habit of butting into conversations. I'll try to stop.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I’m getting the sense Link (Rick’s name for this works for me, also, hello Rick) is asking this in earnest, town read for him.In post 100, Gentleman 3 wrote:L5, what made you think that the smiley faces might bother someone?
I may be keeping a serious tone to maintain the roleplay I’m somewhat doing but I see no problem with joking around at this point.In post 102, Lady 9 wrote:
The question isn't directed at me, but I want to point out that it seems to me like Lady 5 is specifically avoiding making non-joke posts. She's ignored my more serious posts twice now. Joking is fine but she doesn't have any non-jokey content yet.In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.
I assume Madeline is Lady 8? Could you talk about that name?In post 108, Lady 4 wrote:I am already getting the impression Madeline is a more accomplished scumhunter than I.
As opposed to what came before why?In post 112, Lady 7 wrote:In post 106, Lady 5 wrote:
Do you actually think I’m that stupid to believe a Neutral exists in this setup?In post 99, Lady 8 wrote:
That assumes it is a joke.In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.
Hey! This feels like your real tone.
It made me think of this clip.In post 119, Lady 5 wrote:
“69”In post 115, Lady 9 wrote:
I think the jokey/blending-in playstyle can be a strategy to get widely town read in itself though.In post 109, Gentleman 6 wrote:I interpret that apathy as townie. I think that scum care a lot more about getting town read than town do right now.
:3
I still can’t get over that funny theory.
I had figured as much.In post 121, Lady 7 wrote:
That is not a main guess.In post 117, Lady 5 wrote:
Now now. We don’t talk about our mains here!In post 116, Gentleman 3 wrote:
That it does. Good call.In post 112, Lady 7 wrote:Hey! This feels like your real tone.
We are here to dance and have fun!
I agree with this impression. Dawn is technically my second town read. Not sure I should town read Harry just off of this.In post 124, Gentleman 6 wrote:I agree that town carry playstyles will also want to show themselves to be town quickly.
But I don't think that avoiding serious talk in the early game when prompted to is a scumtell and I would lean it and Lady 5 the other way.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Is there a reason you didn’t want that question asked?In post 128, Lady 7 wrote:But l8 is there a reason you opted for a mechanical discussion rather than what’s gone on yet?
Sure but I see two problems, the fact that we essentially need 2 T-T pairings going into Intermission, and the fact that lack of meta reads will likely make this a lot harder to do effectively.In post 144, Lady 8 wrote:
Let me cut to the chase, we only need ONE solid T-T pairing at late game to win after intermission.In post 142, Lady 9 wrote:In post 134, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean the key is to make T/T pairings. If flips make a difference in how likely a pairing is to be T/T, then sure, but I'm wary of that because scum have pretty much no incentive to avoid bussing, so associatives will probably not be helpful.
I don't think that's necessarily true? Especially if town manages to play well enough to force an S/S pairing, bussing isn't necessarily an optimal strategy for scum.In post 137, Lady 4 wrote:
The possibility you may be correct about this has me shook.In post 134, Gentleman 3 wrote:I'm wary of that because scum have pretty much no incentive to avoid bussing, so associatives will probably not be helpful.
Why is it bad? If the Confirmed Town is paired with another townread slot that pairing likely dies during Intermission.In post 149, Lady 8 wrote:
No. This is extremely bad. Burn this post.In post 147, Lady 5 wrote:Looking at the setup.
Isn’t it ideal for Gentleman 2 to choose a Lady that could be a Wolf.
That way they can’t kill him if they are a wolf or their lady partner dies.
On the other hand if they aren’t a wolf they just got rid of a miss Lynch target.
If I was Gentleman 2, my ideal play would be to do this. ^_^
Saladfor me Lady 9 is Celeste because I know the character. I’ll keep that in mind, and I don’t recall any issue with your thoughts on that player.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yeah I definitely don’t think this idea is that good.In post 152, Lady 8 wrote:We want Gentleman 2 ideally to be the NK bait.
How are you so certain Orange (my place holder name for L8) was going to say this? If not why cut her off?In post 158, Lady 9 wrote:
It's so that the other T/T pair that we can hopefully confidently create survives until end game.In post 156, Lady 5 wrote:
Why would we want the confirmed Town to die?In post 152, Lady 8 wrote:We want Gentleman 2 ideally to be the NK bait.In post 164, Gentleman 2 wrote:@FakeMod: Can I request for someone to shoot me an avatar sized image of something?
Also down for nicknaming people once everyone has settled on avatars.
Gentleman 6 is trying too hard with their avvie. Like Gentleman 3. Lady 6 is looking p good too.
AND How dare Lady 8!
If the correction is of Lady 6 then I feel like our reads gel pretty well, which makes it a shame we are on the same side gender wise.In post 166, Gentleman 2 wrote:Lady 5*
By the way what sort of avatar are you in the market for?
I like this for what I am pretty sure is the second post by Masque.In post 169, Lady 2 wrote:I'm feeling just a littttle regret here. For a moment just now I thought I should have joined this game as Gentleman, you know, I'm in touch with my masculine side. Because if I were I could yolo an invitation to dance with someone? I'll be honest. The usernames we were given are bland, which, fine. There are no votes, no traditional RVS-like stage with, you know, votes. And I'm stuck as a lovely Lady with no concrete game-related, like,offersI can make for people to respond to the way I could do with a vote in a game where everyone has a vote. Like sure I like L9 well enough Town. She seems to have her head in the game. Though to be honest even though their avatars aren't different she and L7 are kind of occupying the same spot in my brain, so. Great. Wonderful. The rest is a mush of people toying with yes admittedly a mostly NAI thing from L5. Oh okay G6 for your last two posts you seem chill as well.
And actually Lady 5, if you're asking, Idofind the cutesy smileys, punctuating nearly your every sentance, irritating. Saccharine. I'm interested to see if you toning it down a bit can help me read you and other people. Offer accepted.
Very bold and interesting idea. Think it might be good.In post 174, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Actually, it might be smart for you to do that, and then keep your read on your partner completely secret.In post 170, Gentleman 2 wrote:Can we ask people to dance yet. bc like I am keen to do it early and do most of my reading under an assumed masons idea.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
That is a shame.In post 187, FakeGod wrote:In post 164, Gentleman 2 wrote:@FakeMod: Can I request for someone to shoot me an avatar sized image of something?Please come up with an avatar of your own.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Look up “image resizer” on Google, the first hit should be a rather easy one to use. What I would suggest is try your desired image, see what the pixel size is, then try to keep the same proportions (so a square one should remain square), that’s what I do.In post 190, Gentleman 2 wrote:Hey can someone walk me through how to make an image avatar size?- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Oh? What sort of plan did you have in mind?In post 201, Gentleman 2 wrote:
You ruined my plan. Thanks.In post 199, Lady 9 wrote:
It'll happen naturally enough through pairing. I think even if there's an unofficial vote there's probably gonna be some rogue gentleman who will extend a dance invitation to the voted lady.In post 196, Gentleman 2 wrote:Ok so, thoughts on holding a vote for which Lady to kill? An unofficial one.
Why is this?In post 217, Lady 9 wrote:I do not like Lady 2.I might start calling you Dewey instead.
I’d like Italian sausage. Also anyone who asks for artichokes is dead to me, if these are to be shared.In post 224, Gentleman 4 wrote:First order of business:
I am buying this town a pizza!!!!
What you want on your pizza?
If any of you say anchovies you might as well claim scum now- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Is it just me, or has Masque put forth a large amount of the solving effort up to here despite a lack of posts? I definitely like that.In post 244, Lady 2 wrote:
Could have fooled me. I think you might make a fine one. Maybe at an ordinary dance you wouldn't. But tonight you're wearing the mask. Why not go for it?In post 211, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm not a town leader type.
Fair. I probably wouldn't like me either, and I know it, and it's really gnawing at me. Something isn't gelling. I want to be engaging here. Like genuinely I do. But it's not working, apparently. Like it's apparent even to me that I'm trying to say something but I get passed right by, like a ghost. Maybe it's posting while working, here and there, while other people are managing to have actual back-and-forth conversations.In post 217, Lady 9 wrote:I do not like Lady 2.
Like L9, G3, L7, G6 are all sensible. L5 is ... fine. Can stay. L4 ... feels kind of like I do? I mean at the very least I'm sympathetic to her early frustration due to distraction and/or generic names. I'm not sure about her backing down immediately and completely after tbh a mild riposte from G3 early (I'm rereading, because yeah, I need to find some kind of foothold). Like, whatever it is, it's a firmer backing up than necessary but probably NAI. L8, kind of a low-key entrance as well? I'm not really getting much there. I do feel like trending Townread on L5 is a fake unpopular opinion? Like I don't think it was every truly going against the grain?
Mostly I want to know how L4 reads G6.
Oh, G4 also kind of lower bracket. Actually scratch that, I like him taking the offered mantle as Town leader. That's actually quite fine. Same with early offer. Actually even better. I saw the jokey pizza post and was wondering how long that shtick would take to play out. Moving fast on an offer was a strong Town move, like he stepped up to the plate and then actually delivered. Good choice of initial offer, too. L3 was in early but did and said little. G4's offer will offer some focus in a new direction.
I do actually like the broad strokes of the treanding-towards-consensus reads I'm seeing. I actually like all the active gentlemen fairly well, G3, G4, and G6 all Townleaning for me.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What irks me about this is someone’s continuity of opinion has been cut off without any clear indication of whose it was. So you might ask someone a question about what they posted earlier, only to find out it was not them.
G2I would accept if FakeGod were cool enough to allow same-sex pairings, but he is not unfortunately.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I thought your avatar was supposed to be Spike from Cowboy Bebop. Do you mind if I call you Spike?In post 270, Gentleman 5 wrote:Yeah I need a better Kougami avi- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yes, it being announced is helpful to know someone’s continuity was interrupted, but I still am not aware of whose it was until I find out the hard way. A note on which slot the replaced person was in would be nice, since if you find out the hard way you get any information you would be getting from that anyway.In post 451, Gentleman 6 wrote:I actually vastly prefer having known that Chennis was replaced so I can play around it rather than having no idea what slot Dannflor was representing that then shifted.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Indeed it was, I’m pretty sure he was one of the players who had not posted yet based on that.In post 285, Gentleman 5 wrote:That was quick.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I am forming a good impression of Malala (L1) already. I also like the idea of pairing off the townreads first.In post 299, Lady 1 wrote:Oh god two slips already :/
Am I the last one to arrive? My thoughts so far are that consensus townreads are probably the way to go, then ideally we can form pairs from within that group first. That way we have a better chance of crowding out scum into non optimal pairings with each other and with town who are harder to identify. Better than if we tried to just pick scum out individually, or all decide on pairings individually.
I've skimmed the game on mobile but the text is too small for me to actually read people's usernames easily which is a bit of a problem. So while I reread can everyone please give a list of your strongest townreads? It helps to have them in a list instead of scattered across pages.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What does wood mean, in this scenario?In post 306, Lady 7 wrote:Add lady 1 to the list of wood.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This was what I was anticipating as well.In post 313, Gentleman 6 wrote:Oh. Lady 9 wasn't Dannflor.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Who is this directed towards?In post 324, Gentleman 2 wrote:Why are people listening to you and not me?
I am town reading G3 and L9.
That's it.
However I am thinking I should match with scum.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I will wait for Dawn to return before passing further judgment but as it stands I feel sympathetic to Harry’s position on her.In post 465, Lady 9 wrote:
Sure, but they seemed to be going out of their way to avoid the more serious posts, which is the real issue here. And they didn't acknowledge 102 either.In post 427, Gentleman 1 wrote:
I may be keeping a serious tone to maintain the roleplay I’m somewhat doing but I see no problem with joking around at this point.In post 102, Lady 9 wrote:
The question isn't directed at me, but I want to point out that it seems to me like Lady 5 is specifically avoiding making non-joke posts. She's ignored my more serious posts twice now. Joking is fine but she doesn't have any non-jokey content yet.In post 96, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.
It's certainly possible to play mafia effectively without using meta. It's probably the case that meta doesn't change winrate too drastically due to poor applications.In post 433, Gentleman 1 wrote:Sure but I see two problems, the fact that we essentially need 2 T-T pairings going into Intermission, and the fact that lack of meta reads will likely make this a lot harder to do effectively.
I don't think I cut her off, I think the question was open ended discussion on what we should be doing.In post 442, Gentleman 1 wrote:
How are you so certain Orange (my place holder name for L8) was going to say this? If not why cut her off?In post 158, Lady 9 wrote:
It's so that the other T/T pair that we can hopefully confidently create survives until end game.In post 156, Lady 5 wrote:
Why would we want the confirmed Town to die?In post 152, Lady 8 wrote:We want Gentleman 2 ideally to be the NK bait.
At the time I wrote that I'd have considered them to be active lurking - not really getting into the game, talking about use of smilies, not really offering anything. They've since turned that around, I actually liked their responses that came out after a bit of prodding in 244 and 343.
I agree playing the game that way is possible with no meta. I just believe it will be harder.
If a question directed at someone else seems open to discussion and you want to add your input, doing so is fine but wait until the intended responder answers first, so as to not taint their own response. That is the habit I practice.
Acknowledged on your Masque read, and good to see it seems you now agree with me there.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Why did you feel that way about Malala?In post 467, Gentleman 2 wrote:
L1In post 466, Gentleman 1 wrote:
Who is this directed towards?In post 324, Gentleman 2 wrote:Why are people listening to you and not me?
I am town reading G3 and L9.
That's it.
However I am thinking I should match with scum.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I assume when you say Cassandra you are referring the the Greek mythology story?In post 345, Lady 1 wrote:@L2: Because this strategy requires cooperation, it can't be left until later since people will probably start pairing badly which will lead to suicides. I appreciate you repeating them for me. I'm also getting distracted by interacting with people currently instead of rereading on a bigger screen.
@G2: yeah let's avoid suiciding. If you're a cassandra, show that off now with sorting out good pairings
I scoped out all of the players because I was interested in what people were doing. You can still find profiles even if someone hasn't posted, using the member list. Lady 6 does not have an avatar.In post 339, Lady 9 wrote:Can you elaborate on this, how do you know that they had avatars early?
This seems like a nothing question. I mean if you're interested in how to view their profiles sure, but sounded like you were trying to get a read off my method somehow.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I see this was already answered.In post 469, Gentleman 1 wrote:
Why did you feel that way about Malala?In post 467, Gentleman 2 wrote:
L1In post 466, Gentleman 1 wrote:
Who is this directed towards?In post 324, Gentleman 2 wrote:Why are people listening to you and not me?
I am town reading G3 and L9.
That's it.
However I am thinking I should match with scum.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I mean it probably yields nothing but I recall a game a couple years back where something came if this sort of event. I think Jackpot also pointed it out. I myself tried checking a couple profiles when I got the day start message, to see what others had chosen for their avatars, so Malala’s course of action makes sense.In post 347, Lady 9 wrote:
Am I wrong to be thinking like this?In post 345, Lady 1 wrote:This seems like a nothing question. I mean if you're interested in how to view their profiles sure, but sounded like you were trying to get a read off my method somehow.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
As I suspected, it was Jackpot who noted it. Gives me an idea of who she is, but I will not try to act on that lead. It will probably impact how I interact with her, though.In post 351, Lady 7 wrote:
Many many moons ago in a galaxy far far away, scum outed themselves in the first few pages of the game by discussing the avatar of someone who hadn't posted yet in thread.In post 347, Lady 9 wrote:
Am I wrong to be thinking like this?In post 345, Lady 1 wrote:This seems like a nothing question. I mean if you're interested in how to view their profiles sure, but sounded like you were trying to get a read off my method somehow.
While anyone can make a mistake like that, there's something about Lady 1's measured tone that feels too systematic to make that mistake. Though the response to the question feels a bit eh.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This is just too good. Well played, both of you.
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Spoiler: My own list- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
From now on you shall be dubbed Doggo by me.In post 425, Gentleman 2 wrote:I will be having a cute puppy. You can call me Bestest Boi.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Oh my, don’t tell me you still feel this way about me?In post 430, Lady 8 wrote:The only Gentleman I'd accept at this point is the Doctor aka Gentleman 6. All the other gentlemen have been lack luster, even Gentleman 2, the IC.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Very clever as well.In post 482, Lady 6 wrote:I'm afraid not. Older Harry is a Joule of my eye.
This joke is starting to get old. I noticed you barely posted anything of relevance and checked out rather quickly, cannot say I am a fan of that.In post 483, Lady 5 wrote:
“69”In post 454, Gentleman 6 wrote:
May I ask why you're asking this question?In post 452, Lady 3 wrote:Gent 6 are you thinking of pairing with Lady 8?- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I had a small feeling some of what Celeste was expressing didn’t feel genuine, I believe.In post 494, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Interesting. Want to talk about this?In post 480, Gentleman 1 wrote:Outside of some small concerns about Celeste I have practically no solid suspicions at this moment.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In post 498, Gentleman 3 wrote:362 was me being annoyed about G6 getting on my case for asking for clarification. Had nothing to do with the actual thing I asked clarification on.
I’m inclined to agree with this perspective.In post 499, Gentleman 3 wrote:If any part of that exchange was an attack, it was 356. That's pretty pointedly implying that there's something bad about my question.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Why are you so eager to see that pairing, is it only because of the dirty number? I do like that you are trying to provide some content here, though.In post 511, Lady 5 wrote:Also just saying.
If “69” doesn’t become a couple, I’ll be disappointed and I’ll question both of them with everything I got.
They better be ready to defend themselves.
You haven’t seen anything yet.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What are you getting at with this comment. Also, I see your point about possible lack of randomization, but I think FakeGod is not juvenile enough to deliberately make that reference. My impression of him is actually that he is rather uptight, if I may be blunt.In post 524, Lady 5 wrote:
Anyone can make Town reads.In post 516, Gentleman 6 wrote:Lady 3 was my other tentative townread, given that I'm also tentatively townreading G4 I think that I'm fine with that pairing in general.
Still townreading L9. Not going to bother saying more?
Would greatly appreciate it if new G5, L6, etc., came in and played since I am starting to feel like we'll win with just a few more townreads.
Also I believe I am experiencing the same issues with our communications hub as many others have noted, as delays in my ability to post have resulted in mild interruptions twice in a row now.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What is your opinion now that Celeste has chosen to pair with G2?In post 526, Lady 5 wrote:
Personally I don’t trust Gentleman 6.In post 503, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean I think it's pretty clear-cut?
I ask for clarification in 350
G6 calls my questioning bad and heavily implies that it's scummy in 354 and 356
I defend my question by telling G6 that he shouldn't be ambiguous in 362
I later explain that I only wanted a clarification (372)
If he doesn’t make himself “69” then I’ll tell Piplup to use bubble beam on him!
I seem to have catching up to do if I want to continue doing nicknames. I recall multiple changes to G2's profile picture, so that needs to be updated. I'll start calling G4 Leo and G8 Michael for now, I'll post my full up-to-date list when I'm certain I have everything properly set.In post 530, Gentleman 4 wrote:
Hi MichaelIn post 529, Gentleman 8 wrote:Fashionably late of course, friends. I do say, this shall be a splendid affair. Absolutely spiffing!
I was leaning towards asking out Masque around this time.In post 539, Lady 5 wrote:
So which lady would you ask out?In post 537, Gentleman 1 wrote:
I had a small feeling some of what Celeste was expressing didn’t feel genuine, I believe.In post 494, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Interesting. Want to talk about this?In post 480, Gentleman 1 wrote:Outside of some small concerns about Celeste I have practically no solid suspicions at this moment.
I am confused by this post. Where does it looks like I was responding to one of Harry's posts?In post 540, Lady 5 wrote:Also @Gent 1
What made you want to respond to Gent 6’s Post?
Did you just want to point out you are getting sick of my joke? :l
I really just do not get good vibes from this post.In post 546, Lady 5 wrote:It also makes it easy late game if “69” is both mafia, we take out 2 mafia without having to worry about losing a Town Member.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I am really liking Jackpot's approach to solving at this point. I'd call her a solid town read.In post 567, Lady 7 wrote:
Not necessarily. Could just be a personality quirk, but the discussion over "sure" felt a bit pedantic, and I really don't want to get that discussion started again at all. If you had scum read him while having that discussion I'd be looking at you with a lot more squinty faces because that could be scum indicative. The fact that you town read him and said it was for clarification means that it could just be communication/personality clash. It stood out to me as a "not quite sure what to do with this" though.In post 564, Gentleman 3 wrote:
What can I say, semantics are important. Do you think my wanting people to say exactly what they mean reflects badly on me?In post 560, Lady 7 wrote:Tonally G3 feels fine most of the time, but his discussion with G6 felt a bit too much based on semantics.
My goal right now is to have a functional read list by the time I am caught up, and be ready to send a missive to my Lady of choice at that time as well.
I am interested in how you plan to implement your suggested approach. You say you plan to base your conclusions of of the flip of the person you pair with. How do you intend to have that work out? I feel like logistically there is something amiss.In post 569, Gentleman 2 wrote:Also if I am reading everything correctly, I get two 'lynches' worth of time / another 8 days before mafia get a 'kill' if I have matched a townie lady. So I think that is ample time to get some serious game solve happening.
I think an important question is to the ladies, given what I have said of my approach, who among you feels they are a strong hydra player / feels comfortable with me probably posting close to exclusively in the PT? I intend to lean heavily on my partner to help me parse the game and then form conclusions based on both an inevitable flip of either town or scum from my partner.
How many of these games have you played before? This has been suggested often, but no solid method of executing this idea has ever been suggested.In post 572, Gentleman 7 wrote:Actually, am I missing something?
When I think about it, isn't this just a case of finding one town lady to pair with the IC, and then...just no one else pairs up at all (Ideally we'd come up with backup pairs to organize at the last second in case scum tries to make a S/S pairing in the last minute). Although this sounds like it's starting to get really unfun.
Could it have been for what Dawn is proposing in some way?In post 574, Gentleman 6 wrote:To be honest I want to pair with L9 for reasons that aren't really related to mathematically optimizing the setup. I think it's probably a suboptimal pairing, but I don't really care.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This is your second time saying this, which I don't object to much but I am curious what gave you the impression Orange is a town powerhouse at this time. I would say Jackpot is a better pick for a town powerhouseIn post 581, Lady 5 wrote:If both Gent 1 and Lady 8 are town.
They will by far be the power house town needs to win.
The reason Gent 2 should go with Lady 7 is because Lady 7 is feel could be the most possible Deep Wolf so making the confirmed Town partners with them could help in the long run.
As for Gent 5 with Gent 2 I also feel another power house town can be made.
With both their play style’s together it can make with some good late game solving
I’ll now be gone for the day.
Cya.
I would have asked about this but I read the mod's posts and it seems like it would not do much. Also, I don't know who the person in G2's current avatar is, but he looks like Adam from the show Adam Ruins Everything so that's what I am going to call him now.In post 586, Gentleman 2 wrote:F - But tbh I am actually kinda ok with this one.
I have been maintaining my stability by writing my posts here in a way that I feel is contrary to my standard posting style, as well as avoiding mixing up which account I am using to check on the game. I am using my main account to just make cursory checks and using this one when I actually am trying to be involved.In post 596, Gentleman 2 wrote:There's a solution G7. Which is for people to not fuck up.
Like I am only playing this game in an incognito tab and not opening it or tracking it on any other account.
Spike, I do not see why I should drop the nicknames currently.
Also, going to leave in a bit, please don't make things harder to handle.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I would really like it if no one left at this point, we have plenty of time currently, so we should maybe try using the vote first.
Also, going to be a bit before I do it, but I should be working at getting current again today. Problem is it seems like the volume of content I need to get through has only gotten worse.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
In that case, how would you opt to refer to those types of players?In post 617, Lady 7 wrote:
No, and I know how frustrating playing with antitown people are, but it does hurt people’s feelings and I’m a big ole softie and feel bad for them.In post 616, Gentleman 2 wrote:
Sorry. Should I use "unporposefully/unknowingly severely anti-town but likely town" instead?In post 613, Lady 7 wrote:I hate when people refer to others as VIs
My honest feeling is that I did not miss much at this point. Still have more to read though.In post 659, Gentleman 1 wrote:I am not quite in the mood to deal with this game just now but I will be giving input on some things soon.
Also sadly I will be dropping nicknames at this point. The amount of catching up I have to do, along with the situation with having to track who has been changing appearances, just makes it seem like something I do not want to put up with, and I don’t want to put you through it either.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
L7 continues to post things that I find towny.In post 674, Lady 7 wrote:
Not really no. I don’t want to be townread because I whined about not being interacted with. I’m a crazy person don’t mind me.In post 667, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm actually townreading your posts now if it helps.
Did you just seriously ask me who the FakeGod is? He is the person running this game. How clueless can you be? My instinct is that this is an act, no one can be as dense as you.In post 699, Lady 5 wrote:
Who’s FakeGod?In post 550, Gentleman 1 wrote:
What are you getting at with this comment. Also, I see your point about possible lack of randomization, but I think FakeGod is not juvenile enough to deliberately make that reference. My impression of him is actually that he is rather uptight, if I may be blunt.In post 524, Lady 5 wrote:
Anyone can make Town reads.In post 516, Gentleman 6 wrote:Lady 3 was my other tentative townread, given that I'm also tentatively townreading G4 I think that I'm fine with that pairing in general.
Still townreading L9. Not going to bother saying more?
Would greatly appreciate it if new G5, L6, etc., came in and played since I am starting to feel like we'll win with just a few more townreads.
Also I believe I am experiencing the same issues with our communications hub as many others have noted, as delays in my ability to post have resulted in mild interruptions twice in a row now.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I have been preoccupied, but I have not been replaced at all.In post 703, Lady 5 wrote:
Hopefully you weren’t the slot that replaced out.In post 659, Gentleman 1 wrote:I am not quite in the mood to deal with this game just now but I will be giving input on some things soon.
Gent 1 Slot was strong town.
I guess it might be interesting to see how sentiment towards me has shifted as I have been absent.
I assume these questions are asking about G6’s reads on those slots?In post 718, Lady 3 wrote:
6? 1? Me?In post 675, Gentleman 6 wrote:I mean that's very little of the reason that I townread you.
I'm still happy with 5 being removed, even if she's town her contributions are... limited.
What do you make of my pairing currently? It is the gentleman from one of your powerhouse pairing with the lady from the other. So I wonder what you’re thinking as of now.In post 731, Lady 5 wrote:Gent 5 should always be with Lady 2 IMO.
Why did you think L5 was a match for me? How do you feel they are similar to you, and how did that factor in to your preference?In post 744, Gentleman 2 wrote:I strongly think L2 and T6 is an incredibly useful pairing as I have already mentioned.
I am warming to G1/L5 as a pairing as I think L5, if town, is going to be somewhat similar to me come actual game days.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I am pretty sure this should get discussed down the line but if it did not, please explain this read. I’ll most likely be reacting to posts without any expectation for my questions to already be answered, so don’t get frustrated because of that, I’m aware of it.In post 758, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Sort of. G5 was pretty dang towny.In post 627, Lady 4 wrote:G5 being turbotown is definitely a hot take.
If you have not yet, here is your reminder to go over this.In post 771, Gentleman 3 wrote:
Remind me to answer this after pre-dance.In post 708, Lady 7 wrote:How likely is it that scum will want to pair with their partners? Ive been part of a mafia/mafia lover pair in a lovers game and it was even more stressful and miserable than playing scum usually is. So my thought is they wouldn’t want it, but then someone made a post about pairing off before scum had a chance to pair off together, and now I’m wondering icky original thought makes sense. Is there some reason scum would want to pair with each other here?
I like this post a little, seems like the desire to solve is genuine.In post 774, Lady 9 wrote:
Yeah we can dance if you want, let me know if you want me to accept this for real and i will. Only reservation here is knowing that I'm set to die if dancing with you, but if we can set up a few pairings that I feel good about then there isn't a problem, and maybe people will be more inclined to follow through with them that wayIn post 705, Gentleman 2 wrote:Lady 9, may I have this dance?
I will not hold it against you if you decline.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I am definitely feeling good about the effort L9 is showing here.In post 777, Lady 9 wrote:
I do, but I see that paranoia is starting to blossom. I'm thinking my biggest contribution to this game now would be to set up T-T pairings and then die. I'm at a point in the game where I'm able to pick and choose with Ladies I'd like to see live to the end. I'm going to be focusing on Gents now.In post 776, Gentleman 3 wrote:You don't want to try and live to endgame?
Can you explain why you don't think L5/G5 are scum? I'm not sure that you've talked about this beforeIn post 773, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean, yeah, that's absolutely something scum might do to try to avoid giving away inside knowledge. I don't think L5 or G5 are scum but I don't think this specifically rules them out.
L5 is posting quite a few things, yes, but I don’t get the sense that there is a lot of rhyme or reason to it. Seems like posting for the sake of it. Which I do know people have brought against me, but I am trying to use my posting as footholds here.In post 780, Gentleman 3 wrote:G5 I just explained.
L5, I guess it's just that she's spitting out a lot of information in a way that doesn't really seem planned or controlled. It's not that there aren't people who do this as scum but most of the time that carefree, say-what-you-feel attitude is town.
Could you expand on this post? How have your opinions expressed here evolved?In post 783, Gentleman 5 wrote:Ok fuck it.
Without stating reasons at this time, I think either L8 or L5 shouldnt be dancing. I may sheep L9 until I get bored. Im thinking the setup is 2L/1G right now, but guessing the scumteam at this time would be detrimental until we get pairings. I Already stated my opinion on who should get left out.
With ICs permission I will be moving towards asking someone to dance.
I hope yall are ready, Im taking the reigns of the most active gentleman in the game; ladies I hope you can handle me.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Please tell me you do not keep this schtick up. It would be quite annoying.In post 823, Gentleman 2 wrote:OH MY GOD!
This avi just will not do. I do declare that my first action will not be to make the women (and men for that matter) swoon with the absolute machismo emanating from places others have only dreamed of, but to fix this horrible avi situation.
Someone catch me up while I look. Thanks dears.
I felt like you had a good awareness of the current situation earlier, so why are you making suggestions for G2 after he paired already?In post 841, Lady 6 wrote:I think G2 should aim for talkative scum. He's conftown. If he gets paired with a scum, he forces a 1 v 1 trade. If he hits a vocal player, the hood gives information.
I do like this from L6. I feel like town tend to notice these sorts of errata more frequently. This is specifically about asking why L4 think she should dance.In post 843, Lady 6 wrote:
Odd, why are you saying I should dance?In post 840, Lady 4 wrote:I'm currently fine with any of 1, 3, 5, 7 sitting out.
If this were a Sadie Hawkins dance, I'd have asked G6 out a while ago. The rest just don't impress.
Why can't you find a good man here? I think G5 is definitely worth linking to.
Why do you find the things I comment on strange L4?In post 846, Lady 4 wrote:As for why few men appeal to me,
1 focuses on strange things, I don't think I understand him.
3 is a suspect of mine.
4 was recently replaced and hasn't done much besides roleplay.
5 might not be awful, but I don't think he's interested in me and I don't get what he's doing recently.
7 is too mechanically focused. I cannot read him.
8 is not even here.
Truth is, I felt mildly attacked when L4 initially expressed this sentiment, I was just starting to get into things then, and it felt like she was having a problem with that. At this point, though, it burns me less.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Oh my. Might this be a Game of Thrones reference? Your verbiage gives me that impression.In post 856, Lady 7 wrote:In post 855, Gentleman 2 wrote:I would please ask the lovely Lady 7 to not flirt with me when I have already given my heart to another.
Here is my room key, meet me up there in 15 minutes and make sure no one sees you leave. Did you bring your dental dams?Spoiler:
Why did you not intend to pair with L2?In post 861, Gentleman 5 wrote:Why THE FUCK did I read 9 ladies and 8 gentlemen last night? Lol
That means we have to atleast scumhunt in gentlemen, and oh boy thats going to be interesting.
Lady 5, while looking back, I think youre posting has been suspect, but I admit im not entirely confident youre flipping mafia. Im willing to take a chance. Ive seen some associations that make me think youre townie.
As for why you over L2, I was never intending on dancing with L2, that was a joke post.
I’ll ask you this because of the sentiment expressed here: what do you think of me pairing with L2, rather than L1?In post 864, Lady 4 wrote:Fixing:
I just don't get it. It's like everyone else is reading different, secret L3 posts. They don't do anything for me.In post 847, Lady 9 wrote:
Hmm, I remember liking Misty's early posts, and she had more content than a lot of people at the timeIn post 844, Lady 4 wrote:
What's right with 3? For real, please tell me why everyone likes her, I don't get it.In post 842, Lady 9 wrote:What's wrong with lady 3 and lady 7?
7 has had a few posts that made me think she might be town, but a lot more neutral unmemorable ones. I don't trust her.
If the only posts from 7 are neutral or towny, shouldn't you want them to get a dance partner? It doesn't sound like you scumread her
My experience tells me that players with a large volume of posts that read neutral to me often turn out to be scum. The same applies to G3. In the absence of many players who feel outright scummy, this is something I'm turning to.
Someone who's trying is easier to read. I have no illusions that I'm, for example, going to be able to get my sick pocket L7 concerns lynched today. Not even sure I want to, as more time might help. If L1 is going to continue to be useless, that's a low risk predance kill.In post 847, Lady 9 wrote:
Hold on, are you leaving people out based on whether they will try, or whether you think they will flip scum? You're changing your method between posts hereIn post 845, Lady 4 wrote:I haven't formed a strong opinion of you yet, but as you probably already have more posts than L1, it seems like you will at least try.
I feel like each has their own problems. G5 feels artificially aggressive, like he’s forcing himself to provide. L5, however, seems to be taking the reverse approach, barely providing anything that really seems of worth, mostly providing drivel.In post 870, Lady 4 wrote:If there's an S-S pair in the process of happening here it is G5-L5. Neither of them is making any sense on the subject.
I had already been feeling decent about G7, and this post I think makes that improve. Seems to be a major team player here.In post 873, Gentleman 7 wrote:
I don't feel like I'm too town read and what we need to win is to create as many strong T/T pairs as possible. If I'm scumread, it will potentially get someone who's well townread to die from being lynched or them leaving. I still want to pair with someone I consider town, to potentially help in solving, bit nit someone whow iso a consensus TR unless I am as well.In post 862, Lady 7 wrote:I retract my earlier wooden feel on g7.
He’s cool.
G7 - why don’t you want to partner with someone too towny?
If they're both town read, I think it's reasonable. But at that point we're already in trouble.In post 872, Gentleman 5 wrote:Why do people honestly think scum would ever pair up with scum?
Other than being a stupidly ballsy gambit, its against scum wincon, no?- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What made you feel this way about L3?In post 891, Gentleman 4 wrote:I think it would be good for me to have a partner early, and I think of the ladies, three is best for me.
So, my dear, I'd like to re-extend my offer.
Lady 3, dance with me?
I see. Thank you for the moment of levity. It kind of made my day.In post 904, Lady 7 wrote:
Heh I am a very big fan of the books! The first one amused me when I thought of it. The second must have just flowed subconsciously.In post 902, Gentleman 2 wrote:In post 856, Lady 7 wrote:In post 855, Gentleman 2 wrote:I would please ask the lovely Lady 7 to not flirt with me when I have already given my heart to another.
Here is my room key, meet me up there in 15 minutes and make sure no one sees you leave. Did you bring your dental dams?Spoiler:
Wonder why you used multiple allusions to GoT...
You should probably be less antagonistic.In post 921, Gentleman 5 wrote:
Hun, dont be so thin skinnedIn post 919, Lady 4 wrote:Please do not make me hate this game.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This is the post I feel looks the worst out of L5’s outburst. The attitude around G8 just feels wrong, specifically saying him being town loses the game, and the mention of the possibility of G8 leaving gives me the sense this outburst is a political move to make herself look helpful.In post 3016, Lady 5 wrote:
It’s better to lynch a G1/L2.In post 3007, Gentleman 4 wrote:@ModeratorDoes day end when a couple dies?
If not, I'm very much fine with getting rid of Gentleman 8 and Lady 5 immediately and then working through the second pair immediately after, as I don't see the status of that pair changing.
Because if G8 is Town we could lose this game.
G1 and L2 I feel have a high chance of containing 1 scum in it.
This game would be allot better if I could actually fully trust my partner and my partner actually posted something, I’m kinda sad G3 didn’t pick me.
It’s also kinda sad that G8 said in our dance chat that I’m prob scum and he may leave the dance.
LMAO.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This is the correct practice when it comes to talking about posts in private threads. Direct quoting is very often considered against the rules.
That’s nice to hear G6, but it’s jarring when I am the only one to have one.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
It seems that you are trying to push something to look like you are actively involved. I don’t recall you holding the stance you are currently expressing on my pair ever.In post 3061, Lady 5 wrote:
Look Helpful how?In post 3042, Gentleman 1 wrote:
This is the post I feel looks the worst out of L5’s outburst. The attitude around G8 just feels wrong, specifically saying him being town loses the game, and the mention of the possibility of G8 leaving gives me the sense this outburst is a political move to make herself look helpful.In post 3016, Lady 5 wrote:
It’s better to lynch a G1/L2.In post 3007, Gentleman 4 wrote:@ModeratorDoes day end when a couple dies?
If not, I'm very much fine with getting rid of Gentleman 8 and Lady 5 immediately and then working through the second pair immediately after, as I don't see the status of that pair changing.
Because if G8 is Town we could lose this game.
G1 and L2 I feel have a high chance of containing 1 scum in it.
This game would be allot better if I could actually fully trust my partner and my partner actually posted something, I’m kinda sad G3 didn’t pick me.
It’s also kinda sad that G8 said in our dance chat that I’m prob scum and he may leave the dance.
LMAO.
And Yes him being Town loses the game as scum can manipulate Town after our lynch and pull off an easy win.
If you feel that way, what do you think scum’s game plan is when your pair gets lynched?
As I side note, I had hoped to take a break for about an hour, but that looks like something that will not be happening soon.- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This is quite obnoxious. This game feels more polluted than Zoness currently. Good job people, you have managed to be worse than Andross.
I do note this, however. I will keep that in mind when I get back to going through this bog of a game.In post 3112, Gentleman 4 wrote:
This is why several players have decided to push Lady 5 and Gentleman 8 at the moment.In post 3100, Gentleman 1 wrote:I think I understand why this game has been swelling, there seems to be some severe issues of people having problems with others. I feel like my vote will end up being on the pair I find most problematic if this proves true.
This isn't the reason why I'm pushing this pair (although it's not a reason to not push it, in my opinion).In post 3102, Lady 8 wrote:No we're not lynching L6.
That's at least part of the argument.In post 3103, Lady 8 wrote:Ok actually G3 hasn't been doing shit lately so maybe...
Why not?In post 3106, Gentleman 6 wrote:G3 L6 isn't scum m8s- Gentleman 1
-
Gentleman 1 Goon
- Gentleman 1
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1
- Gentleman 1