Coming from a literal numeral...In post 17, Lady 7 wrote:Dude 3 probably scum. Too many birds in his avatar, trying to present himself as something he’s not.
Perfect Masquerade [Game Over]
Forum rules
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
That's such a loaded question, how could I ever decideIn post 46, Lady 5 wrote:Have you decided which Lady you think is the cutest?- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?In post 50, Lady 7 wrote:Me. It hit me wrong.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Eh, I think it was reasonable. It's best practice to not suggest a possible answer when you ask for an explanation of something, because you could be signaling to scum exactly how to tell you what you want to hear.In post 59, Lady 7 wrote:I mean posts do bug me sometimes and I don’t know why, but still this reaction feels weird.
I was aware of this, but I figured the risk was minimal because it's only page 3 anyway, and trying to jump-start discussion was more important.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I see your owo and raise you an uwu.In post 66, Lady 8 wrote:Hi everyone! owo
Also yet another lady pops in. Where are my bros at??- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Why does a joke suggest that she's afraid of making a read?In post 92, Lady 8 wrote:It seems initially scummy and lessens your chances of getting asked to the dance because it seems like you're afraid of engaging in a read of a player.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
She literally just said it was...In post 99, Lady 8 wrote:That assumes it is a joke.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
This conversation is for the birds.In post 101, Lady 7 wrote:If you’re referring to my scumread on g3 because he had too many birds in his avatar, that was a joke.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
That it does. Good call.In post 112, Lady 7 wrote:Hey! This feels like your real tone.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Gentleman 9 isn't even in the game lol.
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I don't think anyone was suggesting this.In post 130, Gentleman 6 wrote:I want no part of a version of the game where certain player types dictate pairings and no one else actually plays mafia.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I mean I think she made it pretty clear why...In post 141, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm confused as to why you townread Lady 4 because I think she's been the only person I outright scumread so far.
Do you expect that everyone else ought to be reading people's posts the same way you do?- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I didn't say it was, but scum may well be indifferent about whether their partners die (particularly if they have one member who's clearly their best shot at endgame).In post 142, Lady 9 wrote:bussing isn't necessarily an optimal strategy for scum.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Don't think so, because if he pairs with someone who has to die before LYLO anyway, the advantage of the IC is nullified.In post 147, Lady 5 wrote:Isn’t it ideal for Gentleman 2 to choose a Lady that could be a Wolf.
You're on the right track though. He should probably pair with someone who isn't incredibly townread but could possibly get to that point.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Our wincon isn't keeping individual townies alive, it's keeping town/town pairs alive. IC living to endgame is devastating if their partner is scum.
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
You're fine, you just phrased it obtusely. A more specific question would have probably better served your purpose.In post 153, Gentleman 6 wrote:The reasoning she gave was pretty vague and I think I'm justified in asking her to follow up on it. Do you think that I'm not?- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Actually, it might be smart for you to do that, and then keep your read on your partner completely secret.In post 170, Gentleman 2 wrote:Can we ask people to dance yet. bc like I am keen to do it early and do most of my reading under an assumed masons idea.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Nothing's falsifiable except by flips...?In post 168, Gentleman 6 wrote:Both claims are essentially unfalsifiable, essentially meaningless- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
If on Windows, download & open in Paint, Image -> Resize, keep aspect ratio and make it so width is <= 120 and height is <= 100.In post 190, Gentleman 2 wrote:Hey can someone walk me through how to make an image avatar size?
If not Windows, no clue.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Not quite, we're still waiting on Lady 6 and Gents 1 and 8.In post 299, Lady 1 wrote:Am I the last one to arrive?- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
LOLIn post 302, Lady 4 wrote:Would you believe that I went to the first post for a playerlist to think about who my strongest townreads are? It wasn't very helpful.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What are you talking about? Buchanan was a bachelor.In post 309, Gentleman 4 wrote:No single man has ever been voted president- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yup.In post 314, Gentleman 6 wrote:I suppose I shouldn't really be discussing that.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I did it too ftr. Was curious and antsy for the game to start.In post 346, Lady 9 wrote:I was more trying to figure out why you would do that?- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
...was there a time when you were sure she was scum?In post 344, Gentleman 6 wrote:Please don't read L4 off of my read on them, I'm not actually sure they're scum anymore.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Because using imprecise language is bad? If you weren't sure she was scum, don't say you were sure, I don't really see what's hard about this.In post 356, Gentleman 6 wrote:No, I was never 100% sure they were scum. There was a time that I was rather confidently scumreading them. I am no longer sure what my read on them is. Does that post really need to be asked?
Why are you repeatedly going after me forcing me to clarify things that really don't need any sort of clarification?- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Well, chalk it up to differing experiences I guess, because I rarely see this (unless you're talking about people tunneling when they really aren't as confident as they claim).In post 365, Gentleman 6 wrote:You act like I'm the first person on MafiaScum to say that I'm no longer sure if someone is scum or not without an investigative result. It's not uncommon to use this phrasing without literally thinking someone is for sure, beyond reconsideration, scum.
Regardless, I asked for clarification because I was unsure, and clarification I got. We don't really need to dwell on it anymore.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
I mean, that post was in reference to me saying that "I'm no longer sure" isn't a common phrasing, so unless you think I knowingly lied about that to make G6 look bad and thought nobody would call me on it, then that interaction would go exactly the same way regardless of my alignment.In post 395, Lady 4 wrote:I can easily think of a way G3 could be coming from a scum mindset here.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Yeah, it really ought to be revealed which slot was replaced.In post 450, Gentleman 1 wrote:What irks me about this is someone’s continuity of opinion has been cut off without any clear indication of whose it was.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
Interesting. Want to talk about this?In post 480, Gentleman 1 wrote:Outside of some small concerns about Celeste I have practically no solid suspicions at this moment.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
What can I say, semantics are important. Do you think my wanting people to say exactly what they mean reflects badly on me?In post 560, Lady 7 wrote:Tonally G3 feels fine most of the time, but his discussion with G6 felt a bit too much based on semantics.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
We don't have to talk about it anymore, but I can assure you this is what it isIn post 567, Lady 7 wrote:Could just be a personality quirk
That should become clear enough eventually.- Gentleman 3
-
Gentleman 3 Goon
- Gentleman 3
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 452
- Joined: October 29, 2019
You would need three T/T pairs to make that work, because otherwise scum makes a S/S pair and then NK's a T/T pair.In post 572, Gentleman 7 wrote:Actually, am I missing something?
When I think about it, isn't this just a case of finding one town lady to pair with the IC, and then...just no one else pairs up at all (Ideally we'd come up with backup pairs to organize at the last second in case scum tries to make a S/S pairing in the last minute). Although this sounds like it's starting to get really unfun. - Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3
- Gentleman 3